;;;; EVAL and friends ;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for ;;;; more information. ;;;; ;;;; This software is derived from the CMU CL system, which was ;;;; written at Carnegie Mellon University and released into the ;;;; public domain. The software is in the public domain and is ;;;; provided with absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS ;;;; files for more information. (in-package "SB!IMPL") ;;; general case of EVAL (except in that it can't handle toplevel ;;; EVAL-WHEN magic properly): Delegate to #'COMPILE. (defun %eval (expr lexenv) (funcall (sb!c:compile-in-lexenv (gensym "EVAL-TMPFUN-") `(lambda () ,expr) lexenv))) ;;; Handle PROGN and implicit PROGN. (defun eval-progn-body (progn-body lexenv) (unless (list-with-length-p progn-body) (let ((*print-circle* t)) (error 'simple-program-error :format-control "~@" :format-arguments (list progn-body)))) ;; Note: ;; * We can't just use (MAP NIL #'EVAL PROGN-BODY) here, because we ;; need to take care to return all the values of the final EVAL. ;; * It's left as an exercise to the reader to verify that this ;; gives the right result when PROGN-BODY is NIL, because ;; (FIRST NIL) = (REST NIL) = NIL. (do* ((i progn-body rest-i) (rest-i (rest i) (rest i))) (nil) (if rest-i ; if not last element of list (eval-in-lexenv (first i) lexenv) (return (eval-in-lexenv (first i) lexenv))))) (defun eval (original-exp) #!+sb-doc "Evaluate the argument in a null lexical environment, returning the result or results." (eval-in-lexenv original-exp (make-null-lexenv))) ;;; Pick off a few easy cases, and the various top level EVAL-WHEN ;;; magical cases, and call %EVAL for the rest. (defun eval-in-lexenv (original-exp lexenv) (declare (optimize (safety 1))) ;; (aver (lexenv-simple-p lexenv)) (let ((exp (macroexpand original-exp lexenv))) (typecase exp (symbol (ecase (info :variable :kind exp) (:constant (values (info :variable :constant-value exp))) ((:special :global) (symbol-value exp)) ;; FIXME: This special case here is a symptom of non-ANSI ;; weirdness in SBCL's ALIEN implementation, which could ;; cause problems for e.g. code walkers. It'd probably be ;; good to ANSIfy it by making alien variable accessors into ;; ordinary forms, e.g. (SB-UNIX:ENV) and (SETF SB-UNIX:ENV), ;; instead of magical symbols, e.g. plain SB-UNIX:ENV. Then ;; if the old magical-symbol syntax is to be retained for ;; compatibility, it can be implemented with ;; DEFINE-SYMBOL-MACRO, keeping the code walkers happy. (:alien (%eval original-exp lexenv)))) (list (let ((name (first exp)) (n-args (1- (length exp)))) (case name ((function) (unless (= n-args 1) (error "wrong number of args to FUNCTION:~% ~S" exp)) (let ((name (second exp))) (if (and (or (atom name) (and (consp name) (eq (car name) 'setf))) (not (consp (let ((sb!c:*lexenv* lexenv)) (sb!c:lexenv-find name funs))))) (fdefinition name) (%eval original-exp lexenv)))) ((quote) (unless (= n-args 1) (error "wrong number of args to QUOTE:~% ~S" exp)) (second exp)) (setq (unless (evenp n-args) (error "odd number of args to SETQ:~% ~S" exp)) (unless (zerop n-args) (do ((name (cdr exp) (cddr name))) ((null name) (do ((args (cdr exp) (cddr args))) ((null (cddr args)) ;; We duplicate the call to SET so that the ;; correct value gets returned. (set (first args) (eval (second args)))) (set (first args) (eval (second args))))) (let ((symbol (first name))) (case (info :variable :kind symbol) ;; FIXME: I took out the *TOPLEVEL-AUTO-DECLARE* ;; test here, and removed the *TOPLEVEL-AUTO-DECLARE* ;; variable; the code should now act as though that ;; variable is NIL. This should be tested.. (:special) (t (return (%eval original-exp lexenv)))))))) ((progn) (eval-progn-body (rest exp) lexenv)) ((eval-when) ;; FIXME: DESTRUCTURING-BIND returns ARG-COUNT-ERROR ;; instead of PROGRAM-ERROR when there's something wrong ;; with the syntax here (e.g. missing SITUATIONS). This ;; could be fixed by hand-crafting clauses to catch and ;; report each possibility, but it would probably be ;; cleaner to write a new macro ;; DESTRUCTURING-BIND-PROGRAM-SYNTAX which does ;; DESTRUCTURING-BIND and promotes any mismatch to ;; PROGRAM-ERROR, then to use it here and in (probably ;; dozens of) other places where the same problem arises. (destructuring-bind (eval-when situations &rest body) exp (declare (ignore eval-when)) (multiple-value-bind (ct lt e) (sb!c:parse-eval-when-situations situations) ;; CLHS 3.8 - Special Operator EVAL-WHEN: The use of ;; the situation :EXECUTE (or EVAL) controls whether ;; evaluation occurs for other EVAL-WHEN forms; that ;; is, those that are not top level forms, or those in ;; code processed by EVAL or COMPILE. If the :EXECUTE ;; situation is specified in such a form, then the ;; body forms are processed as an implicit PROGN; ;; otherwise, the EVAL-WHEN form returns NIL. (declare (ignore ct lt)) (when e (eval-progn-body body lexenv))))) ((locally) (multiple-value-bind (body decls) (parse-body (rest exp) nil) (let ((lexenv ;; KLUDGE: Uh, yeah. I'm not anticipating ;; winning any prizes for this code, which was ;; written on a "let's get it to work" basis. ;; These seem to be the variables that need ;; bindings for PROCESS-DECLS to work ;; (*FREE-FUNS* and *FREE-VARS* so that ;; references to free functions and variables in ;; the declarations can be noted; ;; *UNDEFINED-WARNINGS* so that warnings about ;; undefined things can be accumulated [and then ;; thrown away, as it happens]). -- CSR, 2002-10-24 (let ((sb!c:*lexenv* lexenv) (sb!c::*free-funs* (make-hash-table :test 'equal)) (sb!c::*free-vars* (make-hash-table :test 'eq)) (sb!c::*undefined-warnings* nil)) (sb!c::process-decls decls nil nil (sb!c::make-continuation) lexenv)))) (eval-progn-body body lexenv)))) ((macrolet) (destructuring-bind (definitions &rest body) (rest exp) ;; FIXME: shared code with FUNCALL-IN-FOOMACROLET-LEXENV (declare (type list definitions)) (unless (= (length definitions) (length (remove-duplicates definitions :key #'first))) (style-warn "duplicate definitions in ~S" definitions)) (let ((lexenv (sb!c::make-lexenv :default lexenv :funs (mapcar (sb!c::macrolet-definitionize-fun :eval ;; I'm not sure that this is the correct ;; LEXENV to be compiling local macros ;; in... lexenv) definitions)))) (eval-in-lexenv `(locally ,@body) lexenv)))) ((symbol-macrolet) (destructuring-bind (definitions &rest body) (rest exp) ;; FIXME: shared code with FUNCALL-IN-FOOMACROLET-LEXENV (declare (type list definitions)) (unless (= (length definitions) (length (remove-duplicates definitions :key #'first))) (style-warn "duplicate definitions in ~S" definitions)) (let ((lexenv (sb!c::make-lexenv :default lexenv :vars (mapcar (sb!c::symbol-macrolet-definitionize-fun :eval) definitions)))) (eval-in-lexenv `(locally ,@body) lexenv)))) (t (if (and (symbolp name) (eq (info :function :kind name) :function)) (collect ((args)) (dolist (arg (rest exp)) (args (eval-in-lexenv arg lexenv))) (apply (symbol-function name) (args))) (%eval exp lexenv)))))) (t exp)))) ;;; miscellaneous full function definitions of things which are ;;; ordinarily handled magically by the compiler (defun apply (function arg &rest arguments) #!+sb-doc "Apply FUNCTION to a list of arguments produced by evaluating ARGUMENTS in the manner of LIST*. That is, a list is made of the values of all but the last argument, appended to the value of the last argument, which must be a list." (cond ((atom arguments) (apply function arg)) ((atom (cdr arguments)) (apply function (cons arg (car arguments)))) (t (do* ((a1 arguments a2) (a2 (cdr arguments) (cdr a2))) ((atom (cdr a2)) (rplacd a1 (car a2)) (apply function (cons arg arguments))))))) (defun funcall (function &rest arguments) #!+sb-doc "Call FUNCTION with the given ARGUMENTS." (apply function arguments)) (defun values (&rest values) #!+sb-doc "Return all arguments, in order, as values." (values-list values)) (defun values-list (list) #!+sb-doc "Return all of the elements of LIST, in order, as values." (values-list list))