;;;; This file implements the constraint propagation phase of the ;;;; compiler, which uses global flow analysis to obtain dynamic type ;;;; information. ;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for ;;;; more information. ;;;; ;;;; This software is derived from the CMU CL system, which was ;;;; written at Carnegie Mellon University and released into the ;;;; public domain. The software is in the public domain and is ;;;; provided with absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS ;;;; files for more information. ;;; TODO: ;;; ;;; -- documentation ;;; ;;; -- MV-BIND, :ASSIGNMENT ;;; Problems: ;;; ;;; -- Constraint propagation badly interacts with bottom-up type ;;; inference. Consider ;;; ;;; (defun foo (n &aux (i 42)) ;;; (declare (optimize speed)) ;;; (declare (fixnum n) ;;; #+nil (type (integer 0) i)) ;;; (tagbody ;;; (setq i 0) ;;; :loop ;;; (when (>= i n) (go :exit)) ;;; (setq i (1+ i)) ;;; (go :loop) ;;; :exit)) ;;; ;;; In this case CP cannot even infer that I is of class INTEGER. ;;; ;;; -- In the above example if we place the check after SETQ, CP will ;;; fail to infer (< I FIXNUM): is does not understand that this ;;; constraint follows from (TYPEP I (INTEGER 0 0)). ;;; BUGS: ;;; ;;; -- this code does not check whether SET appears between REF and a ;;; test (bug 233b) (in-package "SB!C") (deftype constraint-y () '(or ctype lvar lambda-var constant)) (defstruct (constraint (:include sset-element) (:constructor make-constraint (number kind x y not-p)) (:copier nil)) ;; the kind of constraint we have: ;; ;; TYPEP ;; X is a LAMBDA-VAR and Y is a CTYPE. The value of X is ;; constrained to be of type Y. ;; ;; > or < ;; X is a lambda-var and Y is a CTYPE. The relation holds ;; between X and some object of type Y. ;; ;; EQL ;; X is a LAMBDA-VAR and Y is a LVAR, a LAMBDA-VAR or a CONSTANT. ;; The relation is asserted to hold. (kind nil :type (member typep < > eql)) ;; The operands to the relation. (x nil :type lambda-var) (y nil :type constraint-y) ;; If true, negates the sense of the constraint, so the relation ;; does *not* hold. (not-p nil :type boolean)) (defvar *constraint-number*) (defun find-constraint (kind x y not-p) (declare (type lambda-var x) (type constraint-y y) (type boolean not-p)) (etypecase y (ctype (do-sset-elements (con (lambda-var-constraints x) nil) (when (and (eq (constraint-kind con) kind) (eq (constraint-not-p con) not-p) (type= (constraint-y con) y)) (return con)))) ((or lvar constant) (do-sset-elements (con (lambda-var-constraints x) nil) (when (and (eq (constraint-kind con) kind) (eq (constraint-not-p con) not-p) (eq (constraint-y con) y)) (return con)))) (lambda-var (do-sset-elements (con (lambda-var-constraints x) nil) (when (and (eq (constraint-kind con) kind) (eq (constraint-not-p con) not-p) (let ((cx (constraint-x con))) (eq (if (eq cx x) (constraint-y con) cx) y))) (return con)))))) ;;; Return a constraint for the specified arguments. We only create a ;;; new constraint if there isn't already an equivalent old one, ;;; guaranteeing that all equivalent constraints are EQ. This ;;; shouldn't be called on LAMBDA-VARs with no CONSTRAINTS set. (defun find-or-create-constraint (kind x y not-p) (declare (type lambda-var x) (type constraint-y y) (type boolean not-p)) (or (find-constraint kind x y not-p) (let ((new (make-constraint (incf *constraint-number*) kind x y not-p))) (sset-adjoin new (lambda-var-constraints x)) (when (lambda-var-p y) (sset-adjoin new (lambda-var-constraints y))) new))) ;;; If REF is to a LAMBDA-VAR with CONSTRAINTs (i.e. we can do flow ;;; analysis on it), then return the LAMBDA-VAR, otherwise NIL. #!-sb-fluid (declaim (inline ok-ref-lambda-var)) (defun ok-ref-lambda-var (ref) (declare (type ref ref)) (let ((leaf (ref-leaf ref))) (when (and (lambda-var-p leaf) (lambda-var-constraints leaf)) leaf))) ;;; See if LVAR's single USE is a REF to a LAMBDA-VAR and they are EQL ;;; according to CONSTRAINTS. Return LAMBDA-VAR if so. (defun ok-lvar-lambda-var (lvar constraints) (declare (type lvar lvar)) (let ((use (lvar-uses lvar))) (when (ref-p use) (let ((lambda-var (ok-ref-lambda-var use))) (when lambda-var (let ((constraint (find-constraint 'eql lambda-var lvar nil))) (when (and constraint (sset-member constraint constraints)) lambda-var))))))) ;;;; Searching constraints ;;; Add the indicated test constraint to BLOCK, marking the block as ;;; having a new assertion when the constriant was not already ;;; present. We don't add the constraint if the block has multiple ;;; predecessors, since it only holds on this particular path. (defun add-test-constraint (block fun x y not-p) (unless (rest (block-pred block)) (let ((con (find-or-create-constraint fun x y not-p)) (old (or (block-test-constraint block) (setf (block-test-constraint block) (make-sset))))) (when (sset-adjoin con old) (setf (block-type-asserted block) t)))) (values)) ;;; Add complementary constraints to the consequent and alternative ;;; blocks of IF. We do nothing if X is NIL. (defun add-complement-constraints (if fun x y not-p) (when (and x ;; Note: Even if we do (IF test exp exp) => (PROGN test exp) ;; optimization, the *MAX-OPTIMIZE-ITERATIONS* cutoff means ;; that we can't guarantee that the optimization will be ;; done, so we still need to avoid barfing on this case. (not (eq (if-consequent if) (if-alternative if)))) (add-test-constraint (if-consequent if) fun x y not-p) (add-test-constraint (if-alternative if) fun x y (not not-p))) (values)) ;;; Add test constraints to the consequent and alternative blocks of ;;; the test represented by USE. (defun add-test-constraints (use if constraints) (declare (type node use) (type cif if)) (typecase use (ref (add-complement-constraints if 'typep (ok-lvar-lambda-var (ref-lvar use) constraints) (specifier-type 'null) t)) (combination (unless (eq (combination-kind use) :error) (let ((name (lvar-fun-name (basic-combination-fun use))) (args (basic-combination-args use))) (case name ((%typep %instance-typep) (let ((type (second args))) (when (constant-lvar-p type) (let ((val (lvar-value type))) (add-complement-constraints if 'typep (ok-lvar-lambda-var (first args) constraints) (if (ctype-p val) val (specifier-type val)) nil))))) ((eq eql) (let* ((var1 (ok-lvar-lambda-var (first args) constraints)) (arg2 (second args)) (var2 (ok-lvar-lambda-var arg2 constraints))) (cond ((not var1)) (var2 (add-complement-constraints if 'eql var1 var2 nil)) ((constant-lvar-p arg2) (add-complement-constraints if 'eql var1 (ref-leaf (principal-lvar-use arg2)) nil))))) ((< >) (let* ((arg1 (first args)) (var1 (ok-lvar-lambda-var arg1 constraints)) (arg2 (second args)) (var2 (ok-lvar-lambda-var arg2 constraints))) (when var1 (add-complement-constraints if name var1 (lvar-type arg2) nil)) (when var2 (add-complement-constraints if (if (eq name '<) '> '<) var2 (lvar-type arg1) nil)))) (t (let ((ptype (gethash name *backend-predicate-types*))) (when ptype (add-complement-constraints if 'typep (ok-lvar-lambda-var (first args) constraints) ptype nil))))))))) (values)) ;;; Set the TEST-CONSTRAINT in the successors of BLOCK according to ;;; the condition it tests. (defun find-test-constraints (block) (declare (type cblock block)) (let ((last (block-last block))) (when (if-p last) (let ((use (lvar-uses (if-test last)))) (when (node-p use) ;; BLOCK-OUT contains the (EQL LAMBDA-VAR LVAR) ;; constraints valid at the end of the block. Since the ;; IF node is last node in its block, it can be used to ;; check LVAR LAMBDA-VAR equality. (add-test-constraints use last (block-out block)))))) (values)) ;;;; Applying constraints ;;; Return true if X is an integer NUMERIC-TYPE. (defun integer-type-p (x) (declare (type ctype x)) (and (numeric-type-p x) (eq (numeric-type-class x) 'integer) (eq (numeric-type-complexp x) :real))) ;;; Given that an inequality holds on values of type X and Y, return a ;;; new type for X. If GREATER is true, then X was greater than Y, ;;; otherwise less. If OR-EQUAL is true, then the inequality was ;;; inclusive, i.e. >=. ;;; ;;; If GREATER (or not), then we max (or min) in Y's lower (or upper) ;;; bound into X and return that result. If not OR-EQUAL, we can go ;;; one greater (less) than Y's bound. (defun constrain-integer-type (x y greater or-equal) (declare (type numeric-type x y)) (flet ((exclude (x) (cond ((not x) nil) (or-equal x) (greater (1+ x)) (t (1- x)))) (bound (x) (if greater (numeric-type-low x) (numeric-type-high x)))) (let* ((x-bound (bound x)) (y-bound (exclude (bound y))) (new-bound (cond ((not x-bound) y-bound) ((not y-bound) x-bound) (greater (max x-bound y-bound)) (t (min x-bound y-bound))))) (if greater (modified-numeric-type x :low new-bound) (modified-numeric-type x :high new-bound))))) ;;; Return true if X is a float NUMERIC-TYPE. (defun float-type-p (x) (declare (type ctype x)) (and (numeric-type-p x) (eq (numeric-type-class x) 'float) (eq (numeric-type-complexp x) :real))) ;;; Exactly the same as CONSTRAIN-INTEGER-TYPE, but for float numbers. (defun constrain-float-type (x y greater or-equal) (declare (type numeric-type x y)) (declare (ignorable x y greater or-equal)) ; for CROSS-FLOAT-INFINITY-KLUDGE (aver (eql (numeric-type-class x) 'float)) (aver (eql (numeric-type-class y) 'float)) #+sb-xc-host ; (See CROSS-FLOAT-INFINITY-KLUDGE.) x #-sb-xc-host ; (See CROSS-FLOAT-INFINITY-KLUDGE.) (labels ((exclude (x) (cond ((not x) nil) (or-equal x) (greater (if (consp x) (car x) x)) (t (if (consp x) x (list x))))) (bound (x) (if greater (numeric-type-low x) (numeric-type-high x))) (max-lower-bound (x y) ;; Both X and Y are not null. Find the max. (let ((res (max (type-bound-number x) (type-bound-number y)))) ;; An open lower bound is greater than a close ;; lower bound because the open bound doesn't ;; contain the bound, so choose an open lower ;; bound. (set-bound res (or (consp x) (consp y))))) (min-upper-bound (x y) ;; Same as above, but for the min of upper bounds ;; Both X and Y are not null. Find the min. (let ((res (min (type-bound-number x) (type-bound-number y)))) ;; An open upper bound is less than a closed ;; upper bound because the open bound doesn't ;; contain the bound, so choose an open lower ;; bound. (set-bound res (or (consp x) (consp y)))))) (let* ((x-bound (bound x)) (y-bound (exclude (bound y))) (new-bound (cond ((not x-bound) y-bound) ((not y-bound) x-bound) (greater (max-lower-bound x-bound y-bound)) (t (min-upper-bound x-bound y-bound))))) (if greater (modified-numeric-type x :low new-bound) (modified-numeric-type x :high new-bound))))) ;;; Given the set of CONSTRAINTS for a variable and the current set of ;;; restrictions from flow analysis IN, set the type for REF ;;; accordingly. (defun constrain-ref-type (ref constraints in) (declare (type ref ref) (type sset constraints in)) (let ((var-cons (copy-sset constraints))) (sset-intersection var-cons in) (let ((res (single-value-type (node-derived-type ref))) (not-res *empty-type*) (leaf (ref-leaf ref))) (do-sset-elements (con var-cons) (let* ((x (constraint-x con)) (y (constraint-y con)) (not-p (constraint-not-p con)) (other (if (eq x leaf) y x)) (kind (constraint-kind con))) (case kind (typep (if not-p (setq not-res (type-union not-res other)) (setq res (type-approx-intersection2 res other)))) (eql (unless (lvar-p other) (let ((other-type (leaf-type other))) (if not-p (when (and (constant-p other) (member-type-p other-type)) (setq not-res (type-union not-res other-type))) (let ((leaf-type (leaf-type leaf))) (when (or (constant-p other) (and (leaf-refs other) ; protect from ; deleted vars (csubtypep other-type leaf-type) (not (type= other-type leaf-type)))) (change-ref-leaf ref other) (when (constant-p other) (return)))))))) ((< >) (cond ((and (integer-type-p res) (integer-type-p y)) (let ((greater (eq kind '>))) (let ((greater (if not-p (not greater) greater))) (setq res (constrain-integer-type res y greater not-p))))) ((and (float-type-p res) (float-type-p y)) (let ((greater (eq kind '>))) (let ((greater (if not-p (not greater) greater))) (setq res (constrain-float-type res y greater not-p))))) ))))) (cond ((and (if-p (node-dest ref)) (csubtypep (specifier-type 'null) not-res)) (setf (node-derived-type ref) *wild-type*) (change-ref-leaf ref (find-constant t))) (t (derive-node-type ref (make-single-value-type (or (type-difference res not-res) res))) (maybe-terminate-block ref nil))))) (values)) ;;;; Flow analysis ;;; Local propagation ;;; -- [TODO: For any LAMBDA-VAR ref with a type check, add that ;;; constraint.] ;;; -- For any LAMBDA-VAR set, delete all constraints on that var; add ;;; a type constraint based on the new value type. (declaim (ftype (function (cblock sset &key (:ref-preprocessor function) (:set-preprocessor function)) sset) constraint-propagate-in-block)) (defun constraint-propagate-in-block (block gen &key ref-preprocessor set-preprocessor) (let ((test (block-test-constraint block))) (when test (sset-union gen test))) (do-nodes (node lvar block) (typecase node (bind (let ((fun (bind-lambda node))) (when (eq (functional-kind fun) :let) (loop with call = (lvar-dest (node-lvar (first (lambda-refs fun)))) for var in (lambda-vars fun) and val in (combination-args call) when (and val (lambda-var-constraints var) ;; if VAR has no SETs, type inference is ;; fully performed by IR1 optimizer (lambda-var-sets var)) do (let* ((type (lvar-type val)) (con (find-or-create-constraint 'typep var type nil))) (sset-adjoin con gen)))))) (ref (when (ok-ref-lambda-var node) (maybe-add-eql-constraint-for-lvar node gen) (when ref-preprocessor (funcall ref-preprocessor node gen)))) (cast (let ((lvar (cast-value node))) (let ((var (ok-lvar-lambda-var lvar gen))) (when var (let* ((atype (single-value-type (cast-derived-type node))) ; FIXME (con (find-or-create-constraint 'typep var atype nil))) (sset-adjoin con gen)))))) (cset (binding* ((var (set-var node)) (nil (lambda-var-p var) :exit-if-null) (cons (lambda-var-constraints var) :exit-if-null)) (when set-preprocessor (funcall set-preprocessor var)) (sset-difference gen cons) (let* ((type (single-value-type (node-derived-type node))) (con (find-or-create-constraint 'typep var type nil))) (sset-adjoin con gen)))))) gen) ;;; BLOCK-KILL is just a list of the LAMBDA-VARs killed, so we must ;;; compute the kill set when there are any vars killed. We bum this a ;;; bit by special-casing when only one var is killed, and just using ;;; that var's constraints as the kill set. This set could possibly be ;;; precomputed, but it would have to be invalidated whenever any ;;; constraint is added, which would be a pain. (defun compute-block-out (block) (declare (type cblock block)) (let ((in (block-in block)) (kill (block-kill block)) (out (copy-sset (block-gen block)))) (cond ((null kill) (sset-union out in)) ((null (rest kill)) (let ((con (lambda-var-constraints (first kill)))) (if con (sset-union-of-difference out in con) (sset-union out in)))) (t (let ((kill-set (make-sset))) (dolist (var kill) (let ((con (lambda-var-constraints var))) (when con (sset-union kill-set con)))) (sset-union-of-difference out in kill-set)))) out)) ;; Add a (EQL LAMBDA-VAR LVAR) constraint, but only for LVAR's with a ;; DEST that's an IF or a test for an IF. (defun maybe-add-eql-constraint-for-lvar (ref gen) (let ((lvar (ref-lvar ref)) (leaf (ref-leaf ref))) (when (and (lambda-var-p leaf) lvar ;; This test avoids generating constraints for an LVAR ;; for which EQLness to its referenced LAMBDA-VAR is ;; not important because OK-LVAR-LAMBDA-VAR won't need ;; it. (or (cast-p (lvar-dest lvar)) (if-p (lvar-dest lvar)) (and (valued-node-p (lvar-dest lvar)) (let ((lvar2 (node-lvar (lvar-dest lvar)))) (when lvar2 (if-p (lvar-dest lvar2))))))) (sset-adjoin (find-or-create-constraint 'eql leaf lvar nil) gen)))) ;;; Compute the initial flow analysis sets for BLOCK: ;;; -- Compute IN/OUT sets; if OUT of a predecessor is not yet ;;; computed, assume it to be a universal set (this is only ;;; possible in a loop) ;;; ;;; Return T if we have found a loop. (defun find-block-type-constraints (block) (declare (type cblock block)) (collect ((kill nil adjoin)) (let ((gen (constraint-propagate-in-block block (make-sset) :set-preprocessor (lambda (var) (kill var))))) (setf (block-gen block) gen) (setf (block-kill block) (kill)) (setf (block-type-asserted block) nil) (let* ((n (block-number block)) (pred (block-pred block)) (in nil) (loop-p nil)) (dolist (b pred) (cond ((> (block-number b) n) (if in (sset-intersection in (block-out b)) (setq in (copy-sset (block-out b))))) (t (setq loop-p t)))) (unless in (bug "Unreachable code is found or flow graph is not ~ properly depth-first ordered.")) (setf (block-in block) in) (setf (block-out block) (compute-block-out block)) loop-p)))) ;;; BLOCK-IN becomes the intersection of the OUT of the predecessors. ;;; Our OUT is: ;;; gen U (in - kill) ;;; ;;; Return True if we have done something. (defun flow-propagate-constraints (block) (let* ((pred (block-pred block)) (in (progn (aver pred) (let ((res (copy-sset (block-out (first pred))))) (dolist (b (rest pred)) (sset-intersection res (block-out b))) res)))) (setf (block-in block) in) (let ((out (compute-block-out block))) (if (sset= out (block-out block)) nil (setf (block-out block) out))))) ;;; Deliver the results of constraint propagation to REFs in BLOCK. ;;; During this pass, we also do local constraint propagation by ;;; adding in constraints as we seem them during the pass through the ;;; block. (defun use-result-constraints (block) (declare (type cblock block)) (constraint-propagate-in-block block (block-in block) :ref-preprocessor (lambda (node cons) (let* ((var (ref-leaf node)) (con (lambda-var-constraints var))) (constrain-ref-type node con cons))))) ;;; Give an empty constraints set to any var that doesn't have one and ;;; isn't a set closure var. Since a var that we previously rejected ;;; looks identical to one that is new, so we optimistically keep ;;; hoping that vars stop being closed over or lose their sets. (defun init-var-constraints (component) (declare (type component component)) (dolist (fun (component-lambdas component)) (flet ((frob (x) (dolist (var (lambda-vars x)) (unless (lambda-var-constraints var) (when (or (null (lambda-var-sets var)) (not (closure-var-p var))) (setf (lambda-var-constraints var) (make-sset))))))) (frob fun) (dolist (let (lambda-lets fun)) (frob let))))) ;;; How many blocks does COMPONENT have? (defun component-n-blocks (component) (let ((result 0)) (declare (type index result)) (do-blocks (block component :both) (incf result)) result)) (defun find-and-propagate-constraints (component) (let ((loop-p nil)) (do-blocks (block component) (when (find-block-type-constraints block) (setq loop-p t))) (when loop-p ;; If we have to propagate changes more than this many times, ;; something is wrong. (let ((max-n-changes-remaining (component-n-blocks component))) (declare (type fixnum max-n-changes-remaining)) (loop (aver (>= max-n-changes-remaining 0)) (decf max-n-changes-remaining) (let ((did-something nil)) (do-blocks (block component) (when (flow-propagate-constraints block) (setq did-something t))) (unless did-something (return)))))))) (defun constraint-propagate (component) (declare (type component component)) (init-var-constraints component) (unless (block-out (component-head component)) (setf (block-out (component-head component)) (make-sset))) (find-and-propagate-constraints component) (do-blocks (block component) (when (block-test-modified block) (find-test-constraints block) (setf (block-test-modified block) nil))) (find-and-propagate-constraints component) (do-blocks (block component) (unless (block-delete-p block) (use-result-constraints block))) (values))