;;;; the representation of a lexical environment ;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for ;;;; more information. ;;;; ;;;; This software is derived from the CMU CL system, which was ;;;; written at Carnegie Mellon University and released into the ;;;; public domain. The software is in the public domain and is ;;;; provided with absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS ;;;; files for more information. (in-package "SB!C") #!-sb-fluid (declaim (inline internal-make-lexenv)) ; only called in one place ;;; The LEXENV represents the lexical environment used for IR1 conversion. ;;; (This is also what shows up as an ENVIRONMENT value in macroexpansion.) #!-sb-fluid (declaim (inline internal-make-lexenv)) ; only called in one place (def!struct (lexenv (:constructor make-null-lexenv ()) (:constructor internal-make-lexenv (functions variables blocks tags type-restrictions lambda cleanup policy options))) ;; an alist of (NAME . WHAT), where WHAT is either a FUNCTIONAL (a ;; local function), a DEFINED-FUNCTION, representing an ;; INLINE/NOTINLINE declaration, or a list (MACRO . ) (a ;; local macro, with the specifier expander). Note that NAME may be ;; a (SETF ) list, not necessarily a single symbol. (functions nil :type list) ;; an alist translating variable names to LEAF structures. A special ;; binding is indicated by a :SPECIAL GLOBAL-VAR leaf. Each special ;; binding within the code gets a distinct leaf structure, as does ;; the current "global" value on entry to the code compiled. ;; (locally (special ...)) is handled by adding the most recent ;; special binding to the front of the list. ;; ;; If the CDR is (MACRO . ), then is the expansion of a ;; symbol macro. (variables nil :type list) ;; BLOCKS and TAGS are alists from block and go-tag names to 2-lists ;; of the form ( ), where is the ;; continuation to exit to, and is the corresponding ENTRY node. (blocks nil :type list) (tags nil :type list) ;; an alist (THING . CTYPE) which is used to keep track of ;; "pervasive" type declarations. When THING is a leaf, this is for ;; type declarations that pertain to the type in a syntactic extent ;; which does not correspond to a binding of the affected name. When ;; THING is a continuation, this is used to track the innermost THE ;; type declaration. (type-restrictions nil :type list) ;; the lexically enclosing lambda, if any ;; ;; FIXME: This should be :TYPE (OR CLAMBDA NULL), but it was too hard ;; to get CLAMBDA defined in time for the cross-compiler. (lambda nil) ;; the lexically enclosing cleanup, or NIL if none enclosing within Lambda (cleanup nil) ;; the current OPTIMIZE policy (policy *policy* :type policy) ;; an alist of miscellaneous options that are associated with the ;; lexical environment (options nil :type list)) ;;; support for the idiom (in MACROEXPAND and elsewhere) that NIL is ;;; to be taken as a null lexical environment (defun coerce-to-lexenv (x) (etypecase x (null (make-null-lexenv)) (lexenv x))) ;;; Is it safe to just grab the lambda expression LAMBDA in isolation, ;;; ignoring the LEXENV? ;;; ;;; Note: The corresponding CMU CL code did something hairier so that ;;; it could save inline definitions of DEFUNs in nontrivial lexical ;;; environments. If it's ever important to try to do that, take a ;;; look at the old CMU CL #'INLINE-SYNTACTIC-CLOSURE. (defun lambda-independent-of-lexenv-p (lambda lexenv) (declare (type list lambda) (type lexenv lexenv)) (aver (eql (first lambda) 'lambda)) ; basic sanity check ;; This is a trivial implementation that just makes sure that LEXENV ;; doesn't have anything interesting in it. A more sophisticated ;; implementation could skip things in LEXENV which aren't captured ;; by LAMBDA, but this implementation doesn't try. (and (null (lexenv-blocks lexenv)) (null (lexenv-tags lexenv)) (null (lexenv-variables lexenv)) (null (lexenv-functions lexenv))))