;;;; This file is for testing debugging functionality, using ;;;; test machinery which might have side effects (e.g. ;;;; executing DEFUN). ;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for ;;;; more information. ;;;; ;;;; While most of SBCL is derived from the CMU CL system, the test ;;;; files (like this one) were written from scratch after the fork ;;;; from CMU CL. ;;;; ;;;; This software is in the public domain and is provided with ;;;; absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS files for ;;;; more information. (cl:in-package :cl-user) ;;; The debugger doesn't have any native knowledge of the interpreter (when (eq sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :interpret) (sb-ext:exit :code 104)) ;;;; Check that we get debug arglists right. (defvar *p* (namestring *load-truename*)) ;;; FIXME: This should use some get-argslist like functionality that ;;; we actually export. ;;; ;;; Return the debug arglist of the function object FUN as a list, or ;;; punt with :UNKNOWN. (defun get-arglist (fun) (declare (type function fun)) ;; The Lisp-level type FUNCTION can conceal a multitude of sins.. (case (sb-kernel:widetag-of fun) (#.sb-vm:simple-fun-header-widetag (sb-kernel:%simple-fun-arglist fun)) (#.sb-vm:closure-header-widetag (get-arglist (sb-kernel:%closure-fun fun))) ;; In code/describe.lisp, ll. 227 (%describe-fun), we use a scheme ;; like above, and it seems to work. -- MNA 2001-06-12 ;; ;; (There might be other cases with arglist info also. ;; SIMPLE-FUN-HEADER-WIDETAG and CLOSURE-HEADER-WIDETAG just ;; happen to be the two case that I had my nose rubbed in when ;; debugging a GC problem caused by applying %SIMPLE-FUN-ARGLIST to ;; a closure. -- WHN 2001-06-05) (t #+sb-eval (if (typep fun 'sb-eval::interpreted-function) (sb-eval::interpreted-function-lambda-list fun) :unknown) #-sb-eval :unknown))) (defun zoop (zeep &key beep) blurp) (assert (equal (get-arglist #'zoop) '(zeep &key beep))) ;;; Check some predefined functions too. ;;; ;;; (We don't know exactly what the arguments are, e.g. the first ;;; argument of PRINT might be SB-IMPL::OBJECT or SB-KERNEL::OBJ or ;;; whatever. But we do know the general structure that a correct ;;; answer should have, so we can safely do a lot of checks.) (with-test (:name :predefined-functions-1) (destructuring-bind (object-sym &optional-sym stream-sym) (get-arglist #'print) (assert (symbolp object-sym)) (assert (eql &optional-sym '&optional)) (assert (symbolp stream-sym)))) (with-test (:name :predefined-functions-2) (destructuring-bind (dest-sym control-sym &rest-sym format-args-sym) (get-arglist #'format) (assert (symbolp dest-sym)) (assert (symbolp control-sym)) (assert (eql &rest-sym '&rest)) (assert (symbolp format-args-sym)))) ;;; Check for backtraces generally being correct. Ensure that the ;;; actual backtrace finishes (doesn't signal any errors on its own), ;;; and that it contains the frames we expect, doesn't contain any ;;; "bogus stack frame"s, and contains the appropriate toplevel call ;;; and hasn't been cut off anywhere. (defun verify-backtrace (test-function frame-specs &key (allow-stunted nil) details) (labels ((args-equal (want real) (cond ((eq '&rest (car want)) t) ((endp want) (endp real)) ((or (eq '? (car want)) (equal (car want) (car real))) (args-equal (cdr want) (cdr real))) (t nil)))) (let ((result nil)) (block outer-handler (handler-bind ((error (lambda (condition) ;; find the part of the backtrace we're interested in (let (full-backtrace) (sb-debug::map-backtrace (lambda (frame) (multiple-value-bind (name args info) (sb-debug::frame-call frame #+nil #+nil :replace-dynamic-extent-objects t) (if details (push (list (cons name args) info) full-backtrace) (push (cons name args) full-backtrace))))) (setf full-backtrace (nreverse full-backtrace)) (let ((backtrace (if details (member (caaar frame-specs) full-backtrace :key #'caar :test #'equal) (member (caar frame-specs) full-backtrace :key #'car :test #'equal)))) (setf result condition) (unless backtrace (format t "~&//~S not in backtrace:~% ~S~%" (caar frame-specs) full-backtrace) (setf result nil)) ;; check that we have all the frames we wanted (mapcar (lambda (spec frame) (unless (or (not spec) (if details (handler-case (and (args-equal (car spec) (car frame)) (equal (cdr spec) (cdr frame))) (error (e) (print (list :spec spec :frame frame)) (error e))) (and (equal (car spec) (car frame)) (args-equal (cdr spec) (cdr frame))))) (print (list :wanted spec :got frame)) (setf result nil))) frame-specs backtrace) ;; Make sure the backtrace isn't stunted in ;; any way. (Depends on running in the main ;; thread.) FIXME: On Windows we get two ;; extra foreign frames below regular frames. (unless (find (if details '((sb-impl::toplevel-init) ()) '(sb-impl::toplevel-init)) backtrace :test #'equal) (print (list :backtrace-stunted backtrace)) (setf result nil)) (return-from outer-handler)))))) (funcall test-function))) result))) (defvar *undefined-function-frame* ;; bug 353 '("undefined function")) ;;; Test for "undefined function" (undefined_tramp) working properly. ;;; Try it with and without tail call elimination, since they can have ;;; different effects. (Specifically, if undefined_tramp is incorrect ;;; a stunted stack can result from the tail call variant.) (flet ((optimized () (declare (optimize (speed 2) (debug 1))) ; tail call elimination (#:undefined-function 42)) (not-optimized () (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination (#:undefined-function 42)) (test (fun) (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination (funcall fun))) (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-346) ;; Failures on ALPHA, SPARC, MIPS, and probably ;; HPPA are due to not having a full and valid ;; stack frame for the undefined function frame. ;; See PPC undefined_tramp for details. :fails-on '(or :alpha :sparc :mips (and :x86-64 :freebsd))) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'optimized)) (list *undefined-function-frame* (list `(flet test :in ,*p*) #'optimized))))) ;; bug 353: This test fails at least most of the time for x86/linux ;; ca. 0.8.20.16. -- WHN (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-353)) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'not-optimized)) (list *undefined-function-frame* (list `(flet not-optimized :in ,*p*)) (list `(flet test :in ,*p*) #'not-optimized)))))) (with-test (:name :backtrace-interrupted-condition-wait :skipped-on '(not :sb-thread) ;; For some unfathomable reason the backtrace becomes ;; stunted, ending at _sigtramp, when we add :TIMEOUT NIL to ;; the frame we expect. If we leave it out, the backtrace is ;; fine -- but the test fails. I can only boggle right now. :fails-on `(or (and :x86 :linux) :win32)) (let ((m (sb-thread:make-mutex)) (q (sb-thread:make-waitqueue))) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (sb-thread:with-mutex (m) (handler-bind ((timeout (lambda (c) (error "foo")))) (with-timeout 0.1 (sb-thread:condition-wait q m))))) `((sb-thread:condition-wait ,q ,m :timeout nil)))))) ;;; Division by zero was a common error on PPC. It depended on the ;;; return function either being before INTEGER-/-INTEGER in memory, ;;; or more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM bytes ahead. It also depends on ;;; INTEGER-/-INTEGER calling SIGNED-TRUNCATE. I believe Raymond Toy ;;; says that the Sparc backend (at least for CMUCL) inlines this, so ;;; if SBCL does the same this test is probably not good for the ;;; Sparc. ;;; ;;; Disabling tail call elimination on this will probably ensure that ;;; the return value (to the flet or the enclosing top level form) is ;;; more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM with the current spaces on OS X. ;;; Enabling it might catch other problems, so do it anyway. (flet ((optimized () (declare (optimize (speed 2) (debug 1))) ; tail call elimination (/ 42 0)) (not-optimized () (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination (/ 42 0)) (test (fun) (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination (funcall fun))) (with-test (:name (:divide-by-zero :bug-346) :fails-on :alpha) ; bug 346 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'optimized)) (list '(/ 42 &rest) (list `(flet test :in ,*p*) #'optimized))))) (with-test (:name (:divide-by-zero :bug-356) :fails-on :alpha) ; bug 356 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'not-optimized)) (list '(/ 42 &rest) `((flet not-optimized :in ,*p*)) (list `(flet test :in ,*p*) #'not-optimized)))))) (with-test (:name (:throw :no-such-tag) :fails-on '(or (and :sparc :linux) :alpha :mips)) (progn (defun throw-test () (throw 'no-such-tag t)) (assert (verify-backtrace #'throw-test '((throw-test)))))) (defun bug-308926 (x) (let ((v "foo")) (flet ((bar (z) (oops v z) (oops z v))) (bar x) (bar v)))) (with-test (:name :bug-308926) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-308926 13)) '(((flet bar :in bug-308926) 13) (bug-308926 &rest t))))) ;;; Test backtrace through assembly routines ;;; :bug-800343 (macrolet ((test (predicate fun &optional (two-arg (find-symbol (format nil "TWO-ARG-~A" fun) "SB-KERNEL"))) (let ((test-name (make-symbol (format nil "TEST-~A" fun)))) `(flet ((,test-name (x y) ;; make sure it's not in tail position (list (,fun x y)))) (with-test (:name (:bug-800343 ,fun)) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (eval `(funcall ,#',test-name 42 t))) '((,two-arg 42 t) #+(or x86 x86-64) ,@(and predicate '(("no debug information for frame"))) ((flet ,test-name :in ,*p*) 42 t)))))))) (test-predicates (&rest functions) `(progn ,@(mapcar (lambda (function) (if (consp function) `(test t ,@function) `(test t ,function))) functions))) (test-functions (&rest functions) `(progn ,@(mapcar (lambda (function) (if (consp function) `(test nil ,@function) `(test nil ,function))) functions)))) (test-predicates = < >) (test-functions + - * / gcd lcm (logand sb-kernel:two-arg-and) (logior sb-kernel:two-arg-ior) (logxor sb-kernel:two-arg-xor))) ;;; test entry point handling in backtraces (defun oops () (error "oops")) (with-test (:name :xep-too-many-arguments) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (oops 1 2 3 4 5 6)) '((oops ? ? ? ? ? ?))))) (defmacro defbt (n ll &body body) ;; WTF is this? This is a way to make these tests not depend so much on the ;; details of LOAD/EVAL. Around 1.0.57 we changed %SIMPLE-EVAL to be ;; slightly smarter, which meant that things which used to have xeps ;; suddently had tl-xeps, etc. This takes care of that. `(funcall (compile nil '(lambda () (progn ;; normal debug info (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.1" n)) ,ll ,@body) ;; no arguments saved (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.2" n)) ,ll (declare (optimize (debug 1) (speed 3))) ,@body) ;; no lambda-list saved (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.3" n)) ,ll (declare (optimize (debug 0))) ,@body)))))) (defbt 1 (&key key) (list key)) (defbt 2 (x) (list x)) (defbt 3 (&key (key (oops))) (list key)) ;;; ERROR instead of OOPS so that tail call elimination doesn't happen (defbt 4 (&optional opt) (list (error "error"))) (defbt 5 (&optional (opt (oops))) (list opt)) (defun bug-354 (x) (error "XEPs in backtraces: ~S" x)) (with-test (:name :bug-354) (assert (not (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-354 354)) '((bug-354 354) (((bug-354 &rest) (:tl :external)) 354))))) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-354 354)) '((bug-354 354))))) ;;; FIXME: This test really should be broken into smaller pieces (with-test (:name (:backtrace :tl-xep)) (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring '(((namestring) (:tl :external))) :details t)) (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring '((namestring))))) (with-test (:name (:backtrace :more-processor)) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key)) '(((bt.1.1 :key) (:more :optional))) :details t)) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key)) '(((bt.1.2 ?) (:more :optional))) :details t)) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key)) '(((bt.1.3 &rest) (:more :optional))) :details t)) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key)) '((bt.1.1 :key)))) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key)) '((bt.1.2 &rest)))) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key)) '((bt.1.3 &rest))))) (with-test (:name (:backtrace :xep)) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1 '(((bt.2.1) (:external))) :details t)) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2 '(((bt.2.2 &rest) (:external))) :details t)) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3 '(((bt.2.3 &rest) (:external))) :details t)) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1 '((bt.2.1)))) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2 '((bt.2.2 &rest)))) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3 '((bt.2.3 &rest))))) ;;; This test is somewhat deceptively named. Due to confusion in debug naming ;;; these functions used to have sb-c::varargs-entry debug names for their ;;; main lambda. (with-test (:name (:backtrace :varargs-entry)) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1 '((bt.3.1 :key nil)))) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2 '((bt.3.2 :key ?)))) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3 '((bt.3.3 &rest)))) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1 '((bt.3.1 :key nil)))) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2 '((bt.3.2 :key ?)))) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3 '((bt.3.3 &rest))))) ;;; This test is somewhat deceptively named. Due to confusion in debug naming ;;; these functions used to have sb-c::hairy-args-processor debug names for ;;; their main lambda. (with-test (:name (:backtrace :hairy-args-processor)) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1 '((bt.4.1 ?)))) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2 '((bt.4.2 ?)))) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3 '((bt.4.3 &rest)))) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1 '((bt.4.1 ?)))) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2 '((bt.4.2 ?)))) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3 '((bt.4.3 &rest))))) (with-test (:name (:backtrace :optional-processor)) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1 '(((bt.5.1) (:optional))) :details t)) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2 '(((bt.5.2 &rest) (:optional))) :details t)) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3 '(((bt.5.3 &rest) (:optional))) :details t)) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1 '((bt.5.1)))) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2 '((bt.5.2 &rest)))) (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3 '((bt.5.3 &rest))))) (write-line "//compile nil") (defvar *compile-nil-error* (compile nil '(lambda (x) (cons (when x (error "oops")) nil)))) (defvar *compile-nil-non-tc* (compile nil '(lambda (y) (cons (funcall *compile-nil-error* y) nil)))) (with-test (:name (:compile nil)) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (funcall *compile-nil-non-tc* 13)) `(((lambda (x) :in ,*p*) 13) ((lambda (y) :in ,*p*) 13))))) (with-test (:name :clos-slot-typecheckfun-named) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (eval `(locally (declare (optimize safety)) (defclass clos-typecheck-test () ((slot :type fixnum))) (setf (slot-value (make-instance 'clos-typecheck-test) 'slot) t)))) '(((sb-pcl::slot-typecheck fixnum) t))))) (with-test (:name :clos-emf-named) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (eval `(progn (defmethod clos-emf-named-test ((x symbol)) x) (defmethod clos-emf-named-test :before (x) (assert x)) (clos-emf-named-test nil)))) '(((sb-pcl::emf clos-emf-named-test) ? ? nil))))) (with-test (:name :bug-310173) (flet ((make-fun (n) (let* ((names '(a b)) (req (loop repeat n collect (pop names)))) (compile nil `(lambda (,@req &rest rest) (let ((* *)) ; no tail-call (apply '/ ,@req rest))))))) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (funcall (make-fun 0) 10 11 0)) `((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0) (/ 10 11 0) ((lambda (&rest rest) :in ,*p*) 10 11 0)))) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (funcall (make-fun 1) 10 11 0)) `((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0) (/ 10 11 0) ((lambda (a &rest rest) :in ,*p*) 10 11 0)))) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (funcall (make-fun 2) 10 11 0)) `((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0) (/ 10 11 0) ((lambda (a b &rest rest) :in ,*p*) 10 11 0)))))) ;;;; test TRACE (defun trace-this () 'ok) (defun trace-fact (n) (if (zerop n) 1 (* n (trace-fact (1- n))))) (with-test (:name (trace :simple)) (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*) (trace trace-this) (assert (eq 'ok (trace-this))) (untrace)))) (assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out)) (assert (search "returned OK" out)))) ;;; bug 379 ;;; This is not a WITH-TEST :FAILS-ON PPC DARWIN since there are ;;; suspicions that the breakpoint trace might corrupt the whole image ;;; on that platform. (with-test (:name (trace :encapsulate nil) :fails-on '(or (and :ppc (not :linux)) :sparc :mips) :broken-on '(or :darwin :sunos)) (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*) (trace trace-this :encapsulate nil) (assert (eq 'ok (trace-this))) (untrace)))) (assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out)) (assert (search "returned OK" out)))) (with-test (:name (trace-recursive :encapsulate nil) :fails-on '(or (and :ppc (not :linux)) :sparc :mips :sunos) :broken-on '(or :darwin (and :x86 :sunos))) (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*) (trace trace-fact :encapsulate nil) (assert (= 120 (trace-fact 5))) (untrace)))) (assert (search "TRACE-FACT" out)) (assert (search "returned 1" out)) (assert (search "returned 120" out)))) (defun trace-and-fmakunbound-this (x) x) (with-test (:name :bug-667657) (trace trace-and-fmakunbound-this) (fmakunbound 'trace-and-fmakunbound-this) (untrace) (assert (not (trace)))) (with-test (:name :bug-414) (handler-bind ((warning #'error)) (load (compile-file "bug-414.lisp")) (disassemble 'bug-414))) (with-test (:name :bug-310175 :fails-on '(not :stack-allocatable-lists)) ;; KLUDGE: Not all DX-enabled platforms DX CONS, and the compiler ;; transforms two-arg-LIST* (and one-arg-LIST) to CONS. Therefore, ;; use two-arg-LIST, which should get through to VOP LIST, and thus ;; stack-allocate on a predictable set of machines. (let ((dx-arg (list t t))) (declare (dynamic-extent dx-arg)) (flet ((dx-arg-backtrace (x) (declare (optimize (debug 2))) (prog1 (sb-debug:list-backtrace :count 10) (assert (sb-debug::stack-allocated-p x))))) (declare (notinline dx-arg-backtrace)) (assert (member-if (lambda (frame) (and (consp frame) (consp (car frame)) (equal '(flet dx-arg-backtrace :in) (butlast (car frame))) (notany #'sb-debug::stack-allocated-p (cdr frame)))) (dx-arg-backtrace dx-arg)))))) (with-test (:name :bug-795245) (assert (eq :ok (catch 'done (handler-bind ((error (lambda (e) (declare (ignore e)) (handler-case (sb-debug:print-backtrace :count 100 :stream (make-broadcast-stream)) (error () (throw 'done :error)) (:no-error () (throw 'done :ok)))))) (apply '/= nil 1 2 nil)))))) ;;;; test infinite error protection (defmacro nest-errors (n-levels error-form) (if (< 0 n-levels) `(handler-bind ((error (lambda (condition) (declare (ignore condition)) ,error-form))) (nest-errors ,(1- n-levels) ,error-form)) error-form)) (defun erroring-debugger-hook (condition old-debugger-hook) (let ((*debugger-hook* old-debugger-hook)) (format t "recursive condition: ~A~%" condition) (force-output) (error "recursive condition: ~A" condition))) (defun test-inifinite-error-protection () ;; after 50 successful throws to SB-IMPL::TOPLEVEL-CATCHER sbcl used ;; to halt, it produces so much garbage that's hard to suppress that ;; it is tested only once (write-line "--HARMLESS BUT ALARMING BACKTRACE COMING UP--") (let ((*debugger-hook* #'erroring-debugger-hook)) (loop repeat 1 do (let ((error-counter 0) (*terminal-io* (make-broadcast-stream))) (assert (not (eq :normal-exit (catch 'sb-impl::toplevel-catcher (nest-errors 20 (error "infinite error ~s" (incf error-counter))) :normal-exit))))))) (write-line "--END OF H-B-A-B--")) (with-test (:name infinite-error-protection) (enable-debugger) (test-inifinite-error-protection)) (with-test (:name (infinite-error-protection :thread) :skipped-on '(not :sb-thread)) (enable-debugger) (let ((thread (sb-thread:make-thread #'test-inifinite-error-protection))) (loop while (sb-thread:thread-alive-p thread)))) ;; unconditional, in case either previous left it enabled (disable-debugger) ;;;; test some limitations of MAKE-LISP-OBJ ;;; Older GENCGC systems had a bug in the pointer validation used by ;;; MAKE-LISP-OBJ that made SIMPLE-FUN objects always fail to ;;; validate. (with-test (:name (make-lisp-obj :simple-funs)) (sb-sys:without-gcing (assert (eq #'identity (sb-kernel:make-lisp-obj (sb-kernel:get-lisp-obj-address #'identity)))))) ;;; Older CHENEYGC systems didn't perform any real pointer validity ;;; checks beyond "is this pointer to somewhere in heap space". (with-test (:name (make-lisp-obj :pointer-validation)) ;; Fun and games: We need to test MAKE-LISP-OBJ with a known-bogus ;; address, but we also need the GC to not pitch a fit if it sees an ;; object with said bogus address. Thus, construct our known-bogus ;; object within an area of unboxed storage (a vector) in static ;; space. We'll make it a simple object, (CONS 0 0), which has an ;; in-memory representation of two consecutive zero words. We ;; allocate a three-word vector so that we can guarantee a ;; double-word aligned double-word of zeros no matter what happens ;; with the vector-data-offset (currently double-word aligned). (let* ((memory (sb-int:make-static-vector 3 :element-type `(unsigned-byte ,sb-vm:n-word-bits) :initial-element 0)) (vector-data-address (sb-sys:sap-int (sb-kernel::vector-sap memory))) (object-base-address (logandc2 (+ vector-data-address sb-vm:lowtag-mask) sb-vm:lowtag-mask)) (object-tagged-address (+ object-base-address sb-vm:list-pointer-lowtag))) (multiple-value-bind (object valid-p) (sb-kernel:make-lisp-obj object-tagged-address nil) (declare (ignore object)) (assert (not valid-p))))) (defun test-debugger (control form &rest targets) (let ((out (make-string-output-stream)) (oops t)) (unwind-protect (progn (with-simple-restart (debugger-test-done! "Debugger Test Done!") (let* ((*debug-io* (make-two-way-stream (make-string-input-stream control) (make-broadcast-stream out #+nil *standard-output*))) ;; Initial announcement goes to *ERROR-OUTPUT* (*error-output* *debug-io*) (*invoke-debugger-hook* nil)) (handler-bind ((error #'invoke-debugger)) (eval form)))) (setf oops nil)) (when oops (error "Uncontrolled unwind from debugger test."))) ;; For sanity's sake this is outside the *debug-io* rebinding -- otherwise ;; it could swallow our asserts! (with-input-from-string (s (get-output-stream-string out)) (loop for line = (read-line s nil) while line do (assert targets) #+nil (format *error-output* "Got: ~A~%" line) (let ((match (pop targets))) (if (eq '* match) ;; Whatever, till the next line matches. (let ((text (pop targets))) #+nil (format *error-output* "Looking for: ~A~%" text) (unless (search text line) (push text targets) (push match targets))) (unless (search match line) (format *error-output* "~&Wanted: ~S~% Got: ~S~%" match line) (setf oops t)))))) ;; Check that we saw everything we wanted (when targets (error "Missed: ~S" targets)) (assert (not oops)))) (with-test (:name (:debugger :source 1)) (test-debugger "d source 0 debugger-test-done!" `(progn (defun this-will-break (x) (declare (optimize debug)) (let* ((y (- x x)) (z (/ x y))) (+ x z))) (this-will-break 1)) '* "debugger invoked" '* "DIVISION-BY-ZERO" "operands (1 0)" '* "INTEGER-/-INTEGER" "(THIS-WILL-BREAK 1)" "1]" "(/ X Y)" "1]")) (with-test (:name (:debugger :source 2)) (test-debugger "d source 0 debugger-test-done!" `(locally (declare (optimize (speed 0) (safety 3) (debug 3))) (let ((f #'(lambda (x cont) (print x (make-broadcast-stream)) (if (zerop x) (error "~%foo") (funcall cont (1- x) cont))))) (funcall f 10 f))) '* "debugger" '* "foo" '* "source: (ERROR \"~%foo\")" '* "(LAMBDA (X CONT)" '* "(FUNCALL CONT (1- X) CONT)" "1]")) (with-test (:name (disassemble :high-debug-eval)) (eval `(defun this-will-be-disassembled (x) (declare (optimize debug)) (+ x x))) (let* ((oopses (make-string-output-stream)) (disassembly (let ((*error-output* oopses)) (with-output-to-string (*standard-output*) (disassemble 'this-will-be-disassembled))))) (with-input-from-string (s disassembly) (assert (search "; disassembly for THIS-WILL-BE-DISASSEMBLED" (read-line s)))) (let ((problems (get-output-stream-string oopses))) (unless (zerop (length problems)) (error problems))))) (defun this-too-will-be-disasssembled (x) (declare (optimize debug)) (+ x x)) (with-test (:name (disassemble :high-debug-load)) (let* ((oopses (make-string-output-stream)) (disassembly (let ((*error-output* oopses)) (with-output-to-string (*standard-output*) (disassemble 'this-too-will-be-disasssembled))))) (with-input-from-string (s disassembly) (assert (equal "; disassembly for THIS-TOO-WILL-BE-DISASSSEMBLED" (read-line s)))) (let ((problems (get-output-stream-string oopses))) (unless (zerop (length problems)) (error problems))))) (defgeneric gf-dispatch-test/gf (x y) (:method (x y) (+ x y))) (defun gf-dispatch-test/f (z) (gf-dispatch-test/gf z)) (with-test (:name :gf-dispatch-backtrace) ;; Fill the cache (gf-dispatch-test/gf 1 1) ;; Wrong argument count (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (gf-dispatch-test/f 42)) '(((sb-pcl::gf-dispatch gf-dispatch-test/gf) 42))))) (write-line "/debug.impure.lisp done")