(defclass ccc () ())
(setf (find-class 'ccc1) (find-class 'ccc))
(defmethod zut ((c ccc1)) 123)
+ In sbcl-0.7.1.13, this gives an error,
+ There is no class named CCC1.
DTC's recommended workaround from the mailing list 3 Mar 2000:
(setf (pcl::find-class 'ccc1) (pcl::find-class 'ccc))
Process inferior-lisp exited abnormally with code 1
I haven't noticed a repeatable case of this yet.
-31:
- In some cases the compiler believes type declarations on array
- elements without checking them, e.g.
- (DECLAIM (OPTIMIZE (SAFETY 3) (SPEED 1) (SPACE 1)))
- (DEFSTRUCT FOO A B)
- (DEFUN BAR (X)
- (DECLARE (TYPE (SIMPLE-ARRAY CONS 1) X))
- (WHEN (CONSP (AREF X 0))
- (PRINT (AREF X 0))))
- (BAR (VECTOR (MAKE-FOO :A 11 :B 12)))
- prints
- #S(FOO :A 11 :B 12)
- in SBCL 0.6.5 (and also in CMU CL 18b). This does not happen for
- all cases, e.g. the type assumption *is* checked if the array
- elements are declared to be of some structure type instead of CONS.
-
32:
The printer doesn't report closures very well. This is true in
CMU CL 18b as well:
ANSI spec, bare 'MEMBER, 'AND, and 'OR are not legal types, CMUCL
(and now SBCL) interpret them as legal types.
-44:
- ANSI specifies DEFINE-SYMBOL-MACRO, but it's not defined in SBCL.
- CMU CL added it ca. Aug 13, 2000, after some discussion on the mailing
- list, and it is probably possible to use substantially the same
- patches to add it to SBCL.
-
45:
a slew of floating-point-related errors reported by Peter Van Eynde
on July 25, 2000:
c: SYMBOL-MACROLET should signal PROGRAM-ERROR if something
it binds is declared SPECIAL inside.
-50:
- type system errors reported by Peter Van Eynde July 25, 2000:
- c: (SUBTYPEP '(INTEGER (0) (0)) 'NIL) dies with nested errors.
- d: In general, the system doesn't like '(INTEGER (0) (0)) -- it
- blows up at the level of SPECIFIER-TYPE with
- "Lower bound (0) is greater than upper bound (0)." Probably
- SPECIFIER-TYPE should return the NIL type instead.
- g: The type system isn't all that smart about relationships
- between hairy types, as shown in the type.erg test results,
- e.g. (SUBTYPEP 'CONS '(NOT ATOM)) => NIL, NIL.
-
51:
miscellaneous errors reported by Peter Van Eynde July 25, 2000:
a: (PROGN
The implementation of #'+ returns its single argument without
type checking, e.g. (+ "illegal") => "illegal".
-58:
- (SUBTYPEP '(AND ZILCH INTEGER) 'ZILCH) => NIL, NIL
- Note: I looked into fixing this in 0.6.11.15, but gave up. The
- problem seems to be that there are two relevant type methods for
- the subtypep operation, HAIRY :COMPLEX-SUBTYPEP-ARG2 and
- INTERSECTION :COMPLEX-SUBTYPEP-ARG1, and only the first is
- called. This could be fixed, but type dispatch is messy and
- confusing enough already, I don't want to complicate it further.
- Perhaps someday we can make CLOS cross-compiled (instead of compiled
- after bootstrapping) so that we don't need to have the type system
- available before CLOS, and then we can rewrite the type methods to
- CLOS methods, and then expressing the solutions to stuff like this
- should become much more straightforward. -- WHN 2001-03-14
-
60:
The debugger LIST-LOCATIONS command doesn't work properly.
it should probably look at the class name, the way that it does
for STRUCTURE-OBJECTs.
-69:
- As reported by Martin Atzmueller on the sbcl-devel list 2000-11-22,
- > There remains one issue, that is a bug in SBCL:
- > According to my interpretation of the spec, the ":" and "@" modifiers
- > should appear _after_ the comma-seperated arguments.
- > Well, SBCL (and CMUCL for that matter) accept
- > (ASSERT (STRING= (FORMAT NIL "~:8D" 1) " 1"))
- > where the correct way (IMHO) should be
- > (ASSERT (STRING= (FORMAT NIL "~8:D" 1) " 1"))
- Probably SBCL should stop accepting the "~:8D"-style format arguments,
- or at least issue a warning.
-
70:
(probably related to bug #65; maybe related to bug #109)
The compiler doesn't like &OPTIONAL arguments in LABELS and FLET
it would decrease efficiency more than is probably necessary. Perhaps
using some sort of accept/reject method would be better.
-84:
- (SUBTYPEP '(SATISFIES SOME-UNDEFINED-FUN) NIL)=>NIL,T (should be NIL,NIL)
-
85:
Internally the compiler sometimes evaluates
(sb-kernel:type/= (specifier-type '*) (specifier-type t))
bootstrap on a system which uses a different value of CHAR-CODE-LIMIT
than SBCL does.
-91:
- (subtypep '(or (integer -1 1)
- unsigned-byte)
- '(or (rational -1 7)
- unsigned-byte
- (integer -1 1))) => NIL,T
- An analogous problem with SINGLE-FLOAT and REAL types was fixed in
- sbcl-0.6.11.22, but some peculiarites of the RATIO type make it
- awkward to generalize the fix to INTEGER and RATIONAL. It's not
- clear what's the best fix. (See the "bug in type handling" discussion
- on cmucl-imp ca. 2001-03-22 and ca. 2001-02-12.)
-
94a:
Inconsistencies between derived and declared VALUES return types for
DEFUN aren't checked very well. E.g. the logic which successfully
arguments in FLET/LABELS: it might be an old Python bug which is
only exercised by the new arrangement of the SBCL compiler.)
-132:
- Trying to compile
- (DEFUN FOO () (CATCH 0 (PRINT 1331)))
- gives an error
- #<SB-C:TN '0!1> is not valid as the second argument to VOP:
- SB-C:MAKE-CATCH-BLOCK,
- since the TN's primitive type SB-VM::POSITIVE-FIXNUM doesn't allow
- any of the SCs allowed by the operand restriction:
- (SB-VM::DESCRIPTOR-REG)
- The (CATCH 0 ...) construct is bad style (because of unportability
- of EQ testing of numbers) but it is legal, and shouldn't cause an
- internal compiler error. (This error occurs in sbcl-0.6.13 and in
- 0.pre7.86.flaky7.14.)
-
135:
Ideally, uninterning a symbol would allow it, and its associated
FDEFINITION and PROCLAIM data, to be reclaimed by the GC. However,
T
T
+ This is probably due to underzealous clearing of the type caches; a
+ brute-force solution in that case would be to make a defclass expand
+ into something that included a call to SB-KERNEL::CLEAR-TYPE-CACHES,
+ but there may be a better solution.
+
141:
Pretty-printing nested backquotes doesn't work right, as
reported by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2002-01-13:
upgraded to do so. (This doesn't seem to be a high priority
conformance problem, since seems hard to construct useful code
where it matters.)
-
+
+146:
+ Floating point errors are reported poorly. E.g. on x86 OpenBSD
+ with sbcl-0.7.1,
+ * (expt 2.0 12777)
+ debugger invoked on condition of type SB-KERNEL:FLOATING-POINT-EXCEPTION:
+ An arithmetic error SB-KERNEL:FLOATING-POINT-EXCEPTION was signalled.
+ No traps are enabled? How can this be?
+ It should be possible to be much more specific (overflow, division
+ by zero, etc.) and of course the "How can this be?" should be fixable.
+
+148:
+ In sbcl-0.7.1.3 on x86, COMPILE-FILE on the file
+ (in-package :cl-user)
+ (defvar *thing*)
+ (defvar *zoom*)
+ (defstruct foo bar bletch)
+ (defun %zeep ()
+ (labels ((kidify1 (kid)
+ )
+ (kid-frob (kid)
+ (if *thing*
+ (setf sweptm
+ (m+ (frobnicate kid)
+ sweptm))
+ (kidify1 kid))))
+ (declare (inline kid-frob))
+ (map nil
+ #'kid-frob
+ (the simple-vector (foo-bar perd)))))
+ fails with
+ debugger invoked on condition of type TYPE-ERROR:
+ The value NIL is not of type SB-C::NODE.
+ The location of this failure has moved around as various related
+ issues were cleaned up. As of sbcl-0.7.1.9, it occurs in
+ NODE-BLOCK called by LAMBDA-COMPONENT called by IR2-CONVERT-CLOSURE.
+
+153:
+ (essentially the same problem as a CMU CL bug reported by Martin
+ Cracauer on cmucl-imp 2002-02-19)
+ There is a hole in structure slot type checking. Compiling and LOADing
+ (declaim (optimize safety))
+ (defstruct foo
+ (bla 0 :type fixnum))
+ (defun f ()
+ (let ((foo (make-foo)))
+ (setf (foo-bla foo) '(1 . 1))
+ (format t "Is ~a of type ~a a cons? => ~a~%"
+ (foo-bla foo)
+ (type-of (foo-bla foo))
+ (consp (foo-bla foo)))))
+ (f)
+ should signal an error, but in sbcl-0.7.1.21 instead gives the output
+ Is (1 . 1) of type CONS a cons? => NIL
+ without signalling an error.
+
+154:
+ There's some sort of problem with aborting back out of the debugger
+ after a %DETECT-STACK-EXHAUSTION error in sbcl-0.7.1.38. In some cases
+ telling the debugger to ABORT doesn't get you back to the main REPL,
+ but instead just gives you another stack exhaustion error. The problem
+ doesn't occur in the trivial case
+ * (defun frob () (frob) (frob))
+ FROB
+ * (frob)
+ but it has happened in more complicated cases (which I haven't
+ figured out how to reproduce).
+
+155:
+ (fixed in sbcl-0.7.2.9)
+
+156:
+ FUNCTION-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION doesn't work right in 0.7.0 or 0.7.2.9:
+ * (function-lambda-expression #'(lambda (x) x))
+ debugger invoked on condition of type TYPE-ERROR:
+ The value NIL is not of type SB-C::DEBUG-SOURCE
+ (reported by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2002-04-12)
+
+157:
+ Functions SUBTYPEP, TYPEP, UPGRADED-ARRAY-ELEMENT-TYPE, and
+ UPGRADED-COMPLEX-PART-TYPE should have an optional environment argument.
+ (reported by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2002-04-12)
+
+158:
+ Compiling the following code causes SBCL 0.7.2 to bug. This only
+ happens with optimization enabled, and only when the loop variable is
+ being incremented by more than 1.
+ (defun foo (array)
+ (declare (optimize (safety 0) (space 0) (debug 0) (speed 3)))
+ (loop for i from 0 to 10 by 2
+ do (foo (svref array i))) (svref array (1+ i)))
+ (reported by Eric Marsden sbcl-devel 2002-04-15)
+
+162:
+ (reported by Robert E. Brown 2002-04-16)
+ When a function is called with too few arguments, causing the
+ debugger to be entered, the uninitialized slots in the bad call frame
+ seem to cause GCish problems, being interpreted as tagged data even
+ though they're not. In particular, executing ROOM in the
+ debugger at that point causes AVER failures:
+ * (machine-type)
+ "X86"
+ * (lisp-implementation-version)
+ "0.7.2.12"
+ * (typep 10)
+ ...
+ 0] (room)
+ ...
+ failed AVER: "(SAP= CURRENT END)"
+ (Christophe Rhodes reports that this doesn't occur on the SPARC, which
+ isn't too surprising since there are many differences in stack
+ implementation and GC conservatism between the X86 and other ports.)
+
+163:
+ HOST-NAMESTRING on a Unix pathname returns "Unix", which isn't
+ treated as a valid host by anything else in the system. (Reported by
+ Erik Naggum on comp.lang.lisp 2002-04-18)
+
+164:
+ The type system still can't quite deal with all useful identities;
+ for instance, as of sbcl-0.7.2.18, the type specifier '(and (real -1
+ 7) (real 4 8)) is a HAIRY-TYPE rather than that which would be hoped
+ for, viz: '(real 4 7).
+
+165:
+ Array types with element-types of some unknown type are falsely being
+ assumed to be of type (ARRAY T) by the compiler in some cases. The
+ following code demonstrates the problem:
+
+ (defun foo (x)
+ (declare (type (vector bar) x))
+ (aref x 1))
+ (deftype bar () 'single-float)
+ (foo (make-array 3 :element-type 'bar))
+ -> TYPE-ERROR "The value #(0.0 0.0 0.0) is not of type (VECTOR BAR)."
+ (typep (make-array 3 :element-type 'bar) '(vector bar))
+ -> T
+
+ The easy solution is to make the functions which depend on knowing
+ the upgraded-array-element-type (in compiler/array-tran and
+ compiler/generic/vm-tran as of sbcl-0.7.3.x) be slightly smarter about
+ unknown types; an alternative is to have the
+ specialized-element-type slot in the ARRAY-TYPE structure be
+ *WILD-TYPE* for UNKNOWN-TYPE element types.
+
DEFUNCT CATEGORIES OF BUGS
IR1-#:
- These numbers were used for bugs related to the old IR1
- interpreter. The # values reached 6 before the category
- was closed down.
\ No newline at end of file
+ These labels were used for bugs related to the old IR1 interpreter.
+ The # values reached 6 before the category was closed down.
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff