;;; anything whose name matches a magic character pattern is
;;; uninterned.
;;;
-;;; FIXME: should also go through globaldb (and perhaps other tables)
-;;; blowing away associated entries
+;;; FIXME: Are there other tables that need to have entries removed?
+;;; What about symbols of the form DEF!FOO?
(defun !unintern-init-only-stuff ()
(do ((any-changes? nil nil))
(nil)
(string= name "*!" :end1 2 :end2 2)))
(/show0 "uninterning cold-init-only symbol..")
(/primitive-print name)
+ ;; FIXME: Is this (FIRST (LAST *INFO-ENVIRONMENT*)) really
+ ;; meant to be an idiom to use? Is there a more obvious
+ ;; name for this? [e.g. (GLOBAL-ENVIRONMENT)?]
+ (do-info ((first (last *info-environment*))
+ :name entry :class class :type type)
+ (when (eq entry symbol)
+ (clear-info class type entry)))
(unintern symbol package)
(setf any-changes? t)))))
(unless any-changes?
(setf *gc-notify-stream* nil
*before-gc-hooks* nil
*after-gc-hooks* nil
- *already-maybe-gcing* t
- *gc-inhibit* t
+ *gc-inhibit* 1
*need-to-collect-garbage* nil
sb!unix::*interrupts-enabled* t
sb!unix::*interrupt-pending* nil
(svref *!load-time-values* (third toplevel-thing)))))
#!+(and x86 gencgc)
(:load-time-code-fixup
- (sb!vm::!do-load-time-code-fixup (second toplevel-thing)
- (third toplevel-thing)
- (fourth toplevel-thing)
- (fifth toplevel-thing)))
+ (sb!vm::!envector-load-time-code-fixup (second toplevel-thing)
+ (third toplevel-thing)
+ (fourth toplevel-thing)
+ (fifth toplevel-thing)))
(t
(!cold-lose "bogus fixup code in *!REVERSED-COLD-TOPLEVELS*"))))
(t (!cold-lose "bogus function in *!REVERSED-COLD-TOPLEVELS*")))))
;; FIXME: This list of modes should be defined in one place and
;; explicitly shared between here and REINIT.
- ;;
- ;; FIXME: In CMU CL, this is done "here" (i.e. in the analogous
- ;; lispinit.lisp code) for every processor architecture. But Daniel
- ;; Barlow's Alpha patches suppress it for Alpha. Why the difference?
- #!+alpha
- (set-floating-point-modes :traps '(:overflow
- #!-x86 :underflow
- :invalid
- :divide-by-zero))
+
+ ;; Why was this marked #!+alpha? CMUCL does it here on all architectures
+ (set-floating-point-modes :traps '(:overflow :invalid :divide-by-zero))
(show-and-call !class-finalize)
(setf *cold-init-complete-p* t)
;; The system is finally ready for GC.
- (setf *already-maybe-gcing* nil)
(/show0 "enabling GC")
(gc-on)
(/show0 "doing first GC")
(os-cold-init-or-reinit)
(stream-reinit)
(signal-cold-init-or-reinit)
- (gc-reinit)
(setf (sb!alien:extern-alien "internal_errors_enabled" boolean) t)
- (set-floating-point-modes :traps
- '(:overflow
- :invalid
- :divide-by-zero
- ;; PRINT seems not to like x86 NPX
- ;; denormal floats like
- ;; LEAST-NEGATIVE-SINGLE-FLOAT, so
- ;; the :UNDERFLOW exceptions are
- ;; disabled by default. Joe User can
- ;; explicitly enable them if
- ;; desired.
- #!-x86 :underflow))
+ ;; PRINT seems not to like x86 NPX denormal floats like
+ ;; LEAST-NEGATIVE-SINGLE-FLOAT, so the :UNDERFLOW exceptions are
+ ;; disabled by default. Joe User can explicitly enable them if
+ ;; desired.
+ (set-floating-point-modes :traps '(:overflow :invalid :divide-by-zero))
+
;; Clear pseudo atomic in case this core wasn't compiled with
;; support.
;;
;; reason.. (Perhaps we should do it anyway in case someone
;; manages to save an image from within a pseudo-atomic-atomic
;; operation?)
- #!+x86 (setf *pseudo-atomic-atomic* 0))
- (gc-on)))
+ #!+x86 (setf *pseudo-atomic-atomic* 0)))
+ (gc-on)
+ (gc))
\f
;;;; some support for any hapless wretches who end up debugging cold
;;;; init code
#!+sb-show
(defun hexstr (thing)
(/noshow0 "entering HEXSTR")
- (let ((addr (sb!kernel:get-lisp-obj-address thing))
+ (let ((addr (get-lisp-obj-address thing))
(str (make-string 10)))
(/noshow0 "ADDR and STR calculated")
(setf (char str 0) #\0