(macrolet ((define-fasl-format-features ()
(let (;; master value for *F-P-A-F-F*
- (fpaff '(:sb-thread :sb-package-locks :sb-unicode :gencgc)))
+ (fpaff '(:sb-thread :sb-package-locks :sb-unicode :gencgc :ud2-breakpoints)))
`(progn
;; a list of *(SHEBANG-)FEATURES* flags which affect
;; binary compatibility, i.e. which must be the same
;;; versions which break binary compatibility. But it certainly should
;;; be incremented for release versions which break binary
;;; compatibility.
-(def!constant +fasl-file-version+ 77)
+(def!constant +fasl-file-version+ 78)
;;; (description of versions before 0.9.0.1 deleted in 0.9.17)
;;; 56: (2005-05-22) Something between 0.9.0.1 and 0.9.0.14. My money is
;;; on 0.9.0.6 (MORE CASE CONSISTENCY).
;;; Further fasl-file-version bumps should only be done for real changes
;;; in the fasl format, not for changes in function/macro signatures or
;;; lisp data structures.
+;;; 78: (2010-04-02) Add FOP-{SMALL-,}NAMED-PACKAGE, remove FOP-NORMAL-LOAD
+;;; and FOP-MAYBE-COLD-LOAD.
;;; the conventional file extension for our fasl files
(declaim (type simple-string *fasl-file-type*))