\f
;;;; special forms for control
-(def-ir1-translator progn ((&rest forms) start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator progn ((&rest forms) start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"Progn Form*
Evaluates each Form in order, returning the values of the last form. With no
forms, returns NIL."
- (ir1-convert-progn-body start cont forms))
+ (ir1-convert-progn-body start next result forms))
-(def-ir1-translator if ((test then &optional else) start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator if ((test then &optional else) start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"If Predicate Then [Else]
If Predicate evaluates to non-null, evaluate Then and returns its values,
otherwise evaluate Else and return its values. Else defaults to NIL."
- (let* ((pred (make-continuation))
- (then-cont (make-continuation))
- (then-block (continuation-starts-block then-cont))
- (else-cont (make-continuation))
- (else-block (continuation-starts-block else-cont))
- (dummy-cont (make-continuation))
- (node (make-if :test pred
+ (let* ((pred-ctran (make-ctran))
+ (pred-lvar (make-lvar))
+ (then-ctran (make-ctran))
+ (then-block (ctran-starts-block then-ctran))
+ (else-ctran (make-ctran))
+ (else-block (ctran-starts-block else-ctran))
+ (node (make-if :test pred-lvar
:consequent then-block
:alternative else-block)))
- (setf (continuation-dest pred) node)
- (ir1-convert start pred test)
- (link-node-to-previous-continuation node pred)
- (use-continuation node dummy-cont)
+ ;; IR1-CONVERT-MAYBE-PREDICATE requires DEST to be CIF, so the
+ ;; order of the following two forms is important
+ (setf (lvar-dest pred-lvar) node)
+ (ir1-convert start pred-ctran pred-lvar test)
+ (link-node-to-previous-ctran node pred-ctran)
- (let ((start-block (continuation-block pred)))
+ (let ((start-block (ctran-block pred-ctran)))
(setf (block-last start-block) node)
- (continuation-starts-block cont)
+ (ctran-starts-block next)
(link-blocks start-block then-block)
(link-blocks start-block else-block))
- (ir1-convert then-cont cont then)
- (ir1-convert else-cont cont else)))
+ (ir1-convert then-ctran next result then)
+ (ir1-convert else-ctran next result else)))
\f
;;;; BLOCK and TAGBODY
;;;; node.
;;; Make a :ENTRY cleanup and emit an ENTRY node, then convert the
-;;; body in the modified environment. We make CONT start a block now,
+;;; body in the modified environment. We make NEXT start a block now,
;;; since if it was done later, the block would be in the wrong
;;; environment.
-(def-ir1-translator block ((name &rest forms) start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator block ((name &rest forms) start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"Block Name Form*
Evaluate the Forms as a PROGN. Within the lexical scope of the body,
result of Value-Form."
(unless (symbolp name)
(compiler-error "The block name ~S is not a symbol." name))
- (continuation-starts-block cont)
- (let* ((dummy (make-continuation))
+ (start-block start)
+ (ctran-starts-block next)
+ (let* ((dummy (make-ctran))
(entry (make-entry))
(cleanup (make-cleanup :kind :block
:mess-up entry)))
(push entry (lambda-entries (lexenv-lambda *lexenv*)))
(setf (entry-cleanup entry) cleanup)
- (link-node-to-previous-continuation entry start)
- (use-continuation entry dummy)
+ (link-node-to-previous-ctran entry start)
+ (use-ctran entry dummy)
- (let* ((env-entry (list entry cont))
+ (let* ((env-entry (list entry next result))
(*lexenv* (make-lexenv :blocks (list (cons name env-entry))
:cleanup cleanup)))
- (push env-entry (continuation-lexenv-uses cont))
- (ir1-convert-progn-body dummy cont forms))))
+ (ir1-convert-progn-body dummy next result forms))))
-(def-ir1-translator return-from ((name &optional value) start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator return-from ((name &optional value) start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"Return-From Block-Name Value-Form
Evaluate the Value-Form, returning its values from the lexically enclosing
BLOCK Block-Name. This is constrained to be used only within the dynamic
extent of the BLOCK."
- ;; CMU CL comment:
- ;; We make CONT start a block just so that it will have a block
- ;; assigned. People assume that when they pass a continuation into
- ;; IR1-CONVERT as CONT, it will have a block when it is done.
+ ;; old comment:
+ ;; We make NEXT start a block just so that it will have a block
+ ;; assigned. People assume that when they pass a ctran into
+ ;; IR1-CONVERT as NEXT, it will have a block when it is done.
;; KLUDGE: Note that this block is basically fictitious. In the code
;; (BLOCK B (RETURN-FROM B) (SETQ X 3))
;; it's the block which answers the question "which block is
;; BLOCK-HOME-LAMBDA-OR-NULL) more obscure, and it might be better
;; to get rid of it, perhaps using a special placeholder value
;; to indicate the orphanedness of the code.
- (continuation-starts-block cont)
+ (declare (ignore result))
+ (ctran-starts-block next)
(let* ((found (or (lexenv-find name blocks)
(compiler-error "return for unknown block: ~S" name)))
- (value-cont (make-continuation))
+ (value-ctran (make-ctran))
+ (value-lvar (make-lvar))
(entry (first found))
(exit (make-exit :entry entry
- :value value-cont)))
+ :value value-lvar)))
(push exit (entry-exits entry))
- (setf (continuation-dest value-cont) exit)
- (ir1-convert start value-cont value)
- (link-node-to-previous-continuation exit value-cont)
- (let ((home-lambda (continuation-home-lambda-or-null start)))
+ (setf (lvar-dest value-lvar) exit)
+ (ir1-convert start value-ctran value-lvar value)
+ (link-node-to-previous-ctran exit value-ctran)
+ (let ((home-lambda (ctran-home-lambda-or-null start)))
(when home-lambda
(push entry (lambda-calls-or-closes home-lambda))))
- (use-continuation exit (second found))))
+ (use-continuation exit (second found) (third found))))
;;; Return a list of the segments of a TAGBODY. Each segment looks
;;; like (<tag> <form>* (go <next tag>)). That is, we break up the
;;; each tag, building up the tag list for LEXENV-TAGS as we go.
;;; Finally, convert each segment with the precomputed Start and Cont
;;; values.
-(def-ir1-translator tagbody ((&rest statements) start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator tagbody ((&rest statements) start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"Tagbody {Tag | Statement}*
Define tags for used with GO. The Statements are evaluated in order
to the next statement following that tag. A Tag must an integer or a
symbol. A statement must be a list. Other objects are illegal within the
body."
- (continuation-starts-block cont)
- (let* ((dummy (make-continuation))
+ (start-block start)
+ (ctran-starts-block next)
+ (let* ((dummy (make-ctran))
(entry (make-entry))
(segments (parse-tagbody statements))
(cleanup (make-cleanup :kind :tagbody
:mess-up entry)))
(push entry (lambda-entries (lexenv-lambda *lexenv*)))
(setf (entry-cleanup entry) cleanup)
- (link-node-to-previous-continuation entry start)
- (use-continuation entry dummy)
+ (link-node-to-previous-ctran entry start)
+ (use-ctran entry dummy)
(collect ((tags)
(starts)
- (conts))
+ (ctrans))
(starts dummy)
(dolist (segment (rest segments))
- (let* ((tag-cont (make-continuation))
- (tag (list (car segment) entry tag-cont)))
- (conts tag-cont)
- (starts tag-cont)
- (continuation-starts-block tag-cont)
- (tags tag)
- (push (cdr tag) (continuation-lexenv-uses tag-cont))))
- (conts cont)
+ (let* ((tag-ctran (make-ctran))
+ (tag (list (car segment) entry tag-ctran)))
+ (ctrans tag-ctran)
+ (starts tag-ctran)
+ (ctran-starts-block tag-ctran)
+ (tags tag)))
+ (ctrans next)
(let ((*lexenv* (make-lexenv :cleanup cleanup :tags (tags))))
- (mapc (lambda (segment start cont)
- (ir1-convert-progn-body start cont (rest segment)))
- segments (starts) (conts))))))
+ (mapc (lambda (segment start end)
+ (ir1-convert-progn-body start end
+ (when (eq end next) result)
+ (rest segment)))
+ segments (starts) (ctrans))))))
;;; Emit an EXIT node without any value.
-(def-ir1-translator go ((tag) start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator go ((tag) start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"Go Tag
Transfer control to the named Tag in the lexically enclosing TAGBODY. This
is constrained to be used only within the dynamic extent of the TAGBODY."
- (continuation-starts-block cont)
+ (ctran-starts-block next)
(let* ((found (or (lexenv-find tag tags :test #'eql)
(compiler-error "attempt to GO to nonexistent tag: ~S"
tag)))
(entry (first found))
(exit (make-exit :entry entry)))
(push exit (entry-exits entry))
- (link-node-to-previous-continuation exit start)
- (let ((home-lambda (continuation-home-lambda-or-null start)))
+ (link-node-to-previous-ctran exit start)
+ (let ((home-lambda (ctran-home-lambda-or-null start)))
(when home-lambda
(push entry (lambda-calls-or-closes home-lambda))))
- (use-continuation exit (second found))))
+ (use-ctran exit (second found))))
\f
;;;; translators for compiler-magic special forms
;;; eval-when specifying the :EXECUTE situation is treated as an
;;; implicit PROGN including the forms in the body of the EVAL-WHEN
;;; form; otherwise, the forms in the body are ignored.
-(def-ir1-translator eval-when ((situations &rest forms) start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator eval-when ((situations &rest forms) start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"EVAL-WHEN (Situation*) Form*
Evaluate the Forms in the specified Situations (any of :COMPILE-TOPLEVEL,
:LOAD-TOPLEVEL, or :EXECUTE, or (deprecated) COMPILE, LOAD, or EVAL)."
(multiple-value-bind (ct lt e) (parse-eval-when-situations situations)
(declare (ignore ct lt))
- (ir1-convert-progn-body start cont (and e forms)))
+ (ir1-convert-progn-body start next result (and e forms)))
(values))
;;; common logic for MACROLET and SYMBOL-MACROLET
(compiler-style-warn "duplicate definitions in ~S" definitions))
(let* ((processed-definitions (mapcar definitionize-fun definitions))
(*lexenv* (make-lexenv definitionize-keyword processed-definitions)))
+ ;; I wonder how much of an compiler performance penalty this
+ ;; non-constant keyword is.
(funcall fun definitionize-keyword processed-definitions)))
;;; Tweak LEXENV to include the DEFINITIONS from a MACROLET, then
;;; shared by the special-case top level MACROLET processing code, and
;;; further split so that the special-case MACROLET processing code in
;;; EVAL can likewise make use of it.
-(defmacro macrolet-definitionize-fun (context lexenv)
- (flet ((make-error-form (control &rest args)
+(defun macrolet-definitionize-fun (context lexenv)
+ (flet ((fail (control &rest args)
(ecase context
- (:compile `(compiler-error ,control ,@args))
- (:eval `(error 'simple-program-error
- :format-control ,control
- :format-arguments (list ,@args))))))
- `(lambda (definition)
+ (:compile (apply #'compiler-error control args))
+ (:eval (error 'simple-program-error
+ :format-control control
+ :format-arguments args)))))
+ (lambda (definition)
(unless (list-of-length-at-least-p definition 2)
- ,(make-error-form "The list ~S is too short to be a legal local macro definition." 'definition))
+ (fail "The list ~S is too short to be a legal local macro definition."
+ definition))
(destructuring-bind (name arglist &body body) definition
- (unless (symbolp name)
- ,(make-error-form "The local macro name ~S is not a symbol." 'name))
- (unless (listp arglist)
- ,(make-error-form "The local macro argument list ~S is not a list." 'arglist))
- (let ((whole (gensym "WHOLE"))
- (environment (gensym "ENVIRONMENT")))
- (multiple-value-bind (body local-decls)
- (parse-defmacro arglist whole body name 'macrolet
- :environment environment)
- `(,name macro .
- ,(compile-in-lexenv
- nil
- `(lambda (,whole ,environment)
- ,@local-decls
- (block ,name ,body))
- ,lexenv))))))))
-
-(defun funcall-in-macrolet-lexenv (definitions fun)
+ (unless (symbolp name)
+ (fail "The local macro name ~S is not a symbol." name))
+ (when (fboundp name)
+ (compiler-assert-symbol-home-package-unlocked
+ name "binding ~A as a local macro"))
+ (unless (listp arglist)
+ (fail "The local macro argument list ~S is not a list."
+ arglist))
+ (with-unique-names (whole environment)
+ (multiple-value-bind (body local-decls)
+ (parse-defmacro arglist whole body name 'macrolet
+ :environment environment)
+ `(,name macro .
+ ,(compile-in-lexenv
+ nil
+ `(lambda (,whole ,environment)
+ ,@local-decls
+ ,body)
+ lexenv))))))))
+
+(defun funcall-in-macrolet-lexenv (definitions fun context)
(%funcall-in-foomacrolet-lexenv
- (macrolet-definitionize-fun :compile (make-restricted-lexenv *lexenv*))
+ (macrolet-definitionize-fun context (make-restricted-lexenv *lexenv*))
:funs
definitions
fun))
-(def-ir1-translator macrolet ((definitions &rest body) start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator macrolet ((definitions &rest body) start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"MACROLET ({(Name Lambda-List Form*)}*) Body-Form*
Evaluate the Body-Forms in an environment with the specified local macros
definitions
(lambda (&key funs)
(declare (ignore funs))
- (ir1-translate-locally body start cont))))
+ (ir1-translate-locally body start next result))
+ :compile))
-(defmacro symbol-macrolet-definitionize-fun (context)
- (flet ((make-error-form (control &rest args)
+(defun symbol-macrolet-definitionize-fun (context)
+ (flet ((fail (control &rest args)
(ecase context
- (:compile `(compiler-error ,control ,@args))
- (:eval `(error 'simple-program-error
- :format-control ,control
- :format-arguments (list ,@args))))))
- `(lambda (definition)
+ (:compile (apply #'compiler-error control args))
+ (:eval (error 'simple-program-error
+ :format-control control
+ :format-arguments args)))))
+ (lambda (definition)
(unless (proper-list-of-length-p definition 2)
- ,(make-error-form "malformed symbol/expansion pair: ~S" 'definition))
- (destructuring-bind (name expansion) definition
- (unless (symbolp name)
- ,(make-error-form
- "The local symbol macro name ~S is not a symbol."
- 'name))
- (let ((kind (info :variable :kind name)))
- (when (member kind '(:special :constant))
- ,(make-error-form
- "Attempt to bind a ~(~A~) variable with SYMBOL-MACROLET: ~S"
- 'kind 'name)))
- `(,name . (MACRO . ,expansion))))))1
-
-(defun funcall-in-symbol-macrolet-lexenv (definitions fun)
+ (fail "malformed symbol/expansion pair: ~S" definition))
+ (destructuring-bind (name expansion) definition
+ (unless (symbolp name)
+ (fail "The local symbol macro name ~S is not a symbol." name))
+ (when (or (boundp name) (eq (info :variable :kind name) :macro))
+ (compiler-assert-symbol-home-package-unlocked
+ name "binding ~A as a local symbol-macro"))
+ (let ((kind (info :variable :kind name)))
+ (when (member kind '(:special :constant))
+ (fail "Attempt to bind a ~(~A~) variable with SYMBOL-MACROLET: ~S"
+ kind name)))
+ ;; A magical cons that MACROEXPAND-1 understands.
+ `(,name . (MACRO . ,expansion))))))
+
+(defun funcall-in-symbol-macrolet-lexenv (definitions fun context)
(%funcall-in-foomacrolet-lexenv
- (symbol-macrolet-definitionize-fun :compile)
+ (symbol-macrolet-definitionize-fun context)
:vars
definitions
fun))
-(def-ir1-translator symbol-macrolet ((macrobindings &body body) start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator symbol-macrolet
+ ((macrobindings &body body) start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"SYMBOL-MACROLET ({(Name Expansion)}*) Decl* Form*
Define the Names as symbol macros with the given Expansions. Within the
(funcall-in-symbol-macrolet-lexenv
macrobindings
(lambda (&key vars)
- (ir1-translate-locally body start cont :vars vars))))
-
-;;; not really a special form, but..
-(def-ir1-translator declare ((&rest stuff) start cont)
- (declare (ignore stuff))
- ;; We ignore START and CONT too, but we can't use DECLARE IGNORE to
- ;; tell the compiler about it here, because the DEF-IR1-TRANSLATOR
- ;; macro would put the DECLARE in the wrong place, so..
- start cont
- (compiler-error "misplaced declaration"))
+ (ir1-translate-locally body start next result :vars vars))
+ :compile))
\f
;;;; %PRIMITIVE
;;;;
;;; BACKEND-TEMPLATE-NAMES to BACKEND-VOPS, and rename %PRIMITIVE to
;;; VOP or %VOP.. -- WHN 2001-06-11
;;; FIXME: Look at doing this ^, it doesn't look too hard actually.
-(def-ir1-translator %primitive ((name &rest args) start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator %primitive ((name &rest args) start next result)
(declare (type symbol name))
(let* ((template (or (gethash name *backend-template-names*)
(bug "undefined primitive ~A" name)))
(if (template-more-args-type template)
(when (< nargs min)
(bug "Primitive ~A was called with ~R argument~:P, ~
- but wants at least ~R."
+ but wants at least ~R."
name
nargs
min))
(when (template-more-results-type template)
(bug "%PRIMITIVE was used with an unknown values template."))
- (ir1-convert start
- cont
+ (ir1-convert start next result
`(%%primitive ',template
',(eval-info-args
(subseq args required min))
\f
;;;; QUOTE
-(def-ir1-translator quote ((thing) start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator quote ((thing) start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"QUOTE Value
Return Value without evaluating it."
- (reference-constant start cont thing))
+ (reference-constant start next result thing))
\f
;;;; FUNCTION and NAMED-LAMBDA
+(defun fun-name-leaf (thing)
+ (if (consp thing)
+ (cond
+ ((member (car thing)
+ '(lambda named-lambda instance-lambda lambda-with-lexenv))
+ (ir1-convert-lambdalike
+ thing
+ :debug-name (debug-namify "#'" thing)))
+ ((legal-fun-name-p thing)
+ (find-lexically-apparent-fun
+ thing "as the argument to FUNCTION"))
+ (t
+ (compiler-error "~S is not a legal function name." thing)))
+ (find-lexically-apparent-fun
+ thing "as the argument to FUNCTION")))
-(def-ir1-translator function ((thing) start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator function ((thing) start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"FUNCTION Name
Return the lexically apparent definition of the function Name. Name may also
be a lambda expression."
- (if (consp thing)
- (case (car thing)
- ((lambda)
- (reference-leaf start
- cont
- (ir1-convert-lambda thing
- :debug-name (debug-namify
- "#'~S" thing))))
- ((setf)
- (let ((var (find-lexically-apparent-fun
- thing "as the argument to FUNCTION")))
- (reference-leaf start cont var)))
- ((instance-lambda)
- (let ((res (ir1-convert-lambda `(lambda ,@(cdr thing))
- :debug-name (debug-namify "#'~S"
- thing))))
- (setf (getf (functional-plist res) :fin-function) t)
- (reference-leaf start cont res)))
- (t
- (compiler-error "~S is not a legal function name." thing)))
- (let ((var (find-lexically-apparent-fun
- thing "as the argument to FUNCTION")))
- (reference-leaf start cont var))))
-
-;;; `(NAMED-LAMBDA ,NAME ,@REST) is like `(FUNCTION (LAMBDA ,@REST)),
-;;; except that the value of NAME is passed to the compiler for use in
-;;; creation of debug information for the resulting function.
-;;;
-;;; NAME can be a legal function name or some arbitrary other thing.
-;;;
-;;; If NAME is a legal function name, then the caller should be
-;;; planning to set (FDEFINITION NAME) to the created function.
-;;; (Otherwise the debug names will be inconsistent and thus
-;;; unnecessarily confusing.)
-;;;
-;;; Arbitrary other things are appropriate for naming things which are
-;;; not the FDEFINITION of NAME. E.g.
-;;; NAME = (:FLET FOO BAR)
-;;; for the FLET function in
-;;; (DEFUN BAR (X)
-;;; (FLET ((FOO (Y) (+ X Y)))
-;;; FOO))
-;;; or
-;;; NAME = (:METHOD PRINT-OBJECT :AROUND (STARSHIP T))
-;;; for the function used to implement
-;;; (DEFMETHOD PRINT-OBJECT :AROUND ((SS STARSHIP) STREAM) ...).
-(def-ir1-translator named-lambda ((name &rest rest) start cont)
- (let* ((fun (if (legal-fun-name-p name)
- (ir1-convert-lambda `(lambda ,@rest)
- :source-name name)
- (ir1-convert-lambda `(lambda ,@rest)
- :debug-name name)))
- (leaf (reference-leaf start cont fun)))
- (when (legal-fun-name-p name)
- (assert-global-function-definition-type name fun))
- leaf))
+ (reference-leaf start next result (fun-name-leaf thing)))
\f
;;;; FUNCALL
(deftransform funcall ((function &rest args) * *)
(let ((arg-names (make-gensym-list (length args))))
`(lambda (function ,@arg-names)
- (%funcall ,(if (csubtypep (continuation-type function)
+ (%funcall ,(if (csubtypep (lvar-type function)
(specifier-type 'function))
'function
'(%coerce-callable-to-fun function))
,@arg-names))))
-(def-ir1-translator %funcall ((function &rest args) start cont)
- (let ((fun-cont (make-continuation)))
- (ir1-convert start fun-cont function)
- (assert-continuation-type fun-cont (specifier-type 'function)
- (lexenv-policy *lexenv*))
- (ir1-convert-combination-args fun-cont cont args)))
+(def-ir1-translator %funcall ((function &rest args) start next result)
+ (if (and (consp function) (eq (car function) 'function))
+ (ir1-convert start next result
+ `(,(fun-name-leaf (second function)) ,@args))
+ (let ((ctran (make-ctran))
+ (fun-lvar (make-lvar)))
+ (ir1-convert start ctran fun-lvar `(the function ,function))
+ (ir1-convert-combination-args fun-lvar ctran next result args))))
;;; This source transform exists to reduce the amount of work for the
;;; compiler. If the called function is a FUNCTION form, then convert
`(%funcall ,function ,@args)
(values nil t)))
-(deftransform %coerce-callable-to-fun ((thing) (function) *
- :important t)
+(deftransform %coerce-callable-to-fun ((thing) (function) *)
"optimize away possible call to FDEFINITION at runtime"
'thing)
\f
(vars var)
(names name)
(vals (second spec)))))))
-
+ (dolist (name (names))
+ (when (eq (info :variable :kind name) :macro)
+ (compiler-assert-symbol-home-package-unlocked
+ name "lexically binding symbol-macro ~A")))
(values (vars) (vals))))
-(def-ir1-translator let ((bindings &body body)
- start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator let ((bindings &body body) start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"LET ({(Var [Value]) | Var}*) Declaration* Form*
During evaluation of the Forms, bind the Vars to the result of evaluating the
Value forms. The variables are bound in parallel after all of the Values are
evaluated."
- (multiple-value-bind (forms decls) (parse-body body nil)
- (multiple-value-bind (vars values) (extract-let-vars bindings 'let)
- (let ((fun-cont (make-continuation)))
- (let* ((*lexenv* (process-decls decls vars nil cont))
- (fun (ir1-convert-lambda-body
- forms vars
- :debug-name (debug-namify "LET ~S" bindings))))
- (reference-leaf start fun-cont fun))
- (ir1-convert-combination-args fun-cont cont values)))))
+ (if (null bindings)
+ (ir1-translate-locally body start next result)
+ (multiple-value-bind (forms decls)
+ (parse-body body :doc-string-allowed nil)
+ (multiple-value-bind (vars values) (extract-let-vars bindings 'let)
+ (binding* ((ctran (make-ctran))
+ (fun-lvar (make-lvar))
+ ((next result)
+ (processing-decls (decls vars nil next result)
+ (let ((fun (ir1-convert-lambda-body
+ forms
+ vars
+ :debug-name (debug-namify "LET S"
+ bindings))))
+ (reference-leaf start ctran fun-lvar fun))
+ (values next result))))
+ (ir1-convert-combination-args fun-lvar ctran next result values))))))
(def-ir1-translator let* ((bindings &body body)
- start cont)
+ start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"LET* ({(Var [Value]) | Var}*) Declaration* Form*
Similar to LET, but the variables are bound sequentially, allowing each Value
form to reference any of the previous Vars."
- (multiple-value-bind (forms decls) (parse-body body nil)
+ (multiple-value-bind (forms decls)
+ (parse-body body :doc-string-allowed nil)
(multiple-value-bind (vars values) (extract-let-vars bindings 'let*)
- (let ((*lexenv* (process-decls decls vars nil cont)))
- (ir1-convert-aux-bindings start cont forms vars values)))))
+ (processing-decls (decls vars nil start next)
+ (ir1-convert-aux-bindings start
+ next
+ result
+ forms
+ vars
+ values)))))
;;; logic shared between IR1 translators for LOCALLY, MACROLET,
;;; and SYMBOL-MACROLET
;;; but we don't need to worry about that within an IR1 translator,
;;; since toplevel-formness is picked off by PROCESS-TOPLEVEL-FOO
;;; forms before we hit the IR1 transform level.
-(defun ir1-translate-locally (body start cont &key vars funs)
- (declare (type list body) (type continuation start cont))
- (multiple-value-bind (forms decls) (parse-body body nil)
- (let ((*lexenv* (process-decls decls vars funs cont)))
- (ir1-convert-aux-bindings start cont forms nil nil))))
-
-(def-ir1-translator locally ((&body body) start cont)
+(defun ir1-translate-locally (body start next result &key vars funs)
+ (declare (type ctran start next) (type (or lvar null) result)
+ (type list body))
+ (multiple-value-bind (forms decls) (parse-body body :doc-string-allowed nil)
+ (processing-decls (decls vars funs next result)
+ (ir1-convert-progn-body start next result forms))))
+
+(def-ir1-translator locally ((&body body) start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"LOCALLY Declaration* Form*
Sequentially evaluate the Forms in a lexical environment where the
the Declarations have effect. If LOCALLY is a top level form, then
the Forms are also processed as top level forms."
- (ir1-translate-locally body start cont))
+ (ir1-translate-locally body start next result))
\f
;;;; FLET and LABELS
(let ((name (first def)))
(check-fun-name name)
+ (when (fboundp name)
+ (compiler-assert-symbol-home-package-unlocked
+ name "binding ~A as a local function"))
(names name)
(multiple-value-bind (forms decls) (parse-body (cddr def))
(defs `(lambda ,(second def)
(values (names) (defs))))
(def-ir1-translator flet ((definitions &body body)
- start cont)
+ start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"FLET ({(Name Lambda-List Declaration* Form*)}*) Declaration* Body-Form*
Evaluate the Body-Forms with some local function definitions. The bindings
do not enclose the definitions; any use of Name in the Forms will refer to
the lexically apparent function definition in the enclosing environment."
- (multiple-value-bind (forms decls) (parse-body body nil)
+ (multiple-value-bind (forms decls)
+ (parse-body body :doc-string-allowed nil)
(multiple-value-bind (names defs)
- (extract-flet-vars definitions 'flet)
- (let* ((fvars (mapcar (lambda (n d)
- (ir1-convert-lambda d
- :source-name n
- :debug-name (debug-namify
- "FLET ~S" n)))
- names defs))
- (*lexenv* (make-lexenv
- :default (process-decls decls nil fvars cont)
- :funs (pairlis names fvars))))
- (ir1-convert-progn-body start cont forms)))))
-
-(def-ir1-translator labels ((definitions &body body) start cont)
+ (extract-flet-vars definitions 'flet)
+ (let ((fvars (mapcar (lambda (n d)
+ (ir1-convert-lambda d
+ :source-name n
+ :debug-name (debug-namify
+ "FLET " n)))
+ names defs)))
+ (processing-decls (decls nil fvars next result)
+ (let ((*lexenv* (make-lexenv :funs (pairlis names fvars))))
+ (ir1-convert-progn-body start
+ next
+ result
+ forms)))))))
+
+(def-ir1-translator labels ((definitions &body body) start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"LABELS ({(Name Lambda-List Declaration* Form*)}*) Declaration* Body-Form*
Evaluate the Body-Forms with some local function definitions. The bindings
enclose the new definitions, so the defined functions can call themselves or
each other."
- (multiple-value-bind (forms decls) (parse-body body nil)
+ (multiple-value-bind (forms decls) (parse-body body :doc-string-allowed nil)
(multiple-value-bind (names defs)
- (extract-flet-vars definitions 'labels)
+ (extract-flet-vars definitions 'labels)
(let* (;; dummy LABELS functions, to be used as placeholders
;; during construction of real LABELS functions
- (placeholder-funs (mapcar (lambda (name)
- (make-functional
- :%source-name name
- :%debug-name (debug-namify
- "LABELS placeholder ~S"
- name)))
- names))
- ;; (like PAIRLIS but guaranteed to preserve ordering:)
- (placeholder-fenv (mapcar #'cons names placeholder-funs))
+ (placeholder-funs (mapcar (lambda (name)
+ (make-functional
+ :%source-name name
+ :%debug-name (debug-namify
+ "LABELS placeholder "
+ name)))
+ names))
+ ;; (like PAIRLIS but guaranteed to preserve ordering:)
+ (placeholder-fenv (mapcar #'cons names placeholder-funs))
;; the real LABELS functions, compiled in a LEXENV which
;; includes the dummy LABELS functions
- (real-funs
- (let ((*lexenv* (make-lexenv :funs placeholder-fenv)))
- (mapcar (lambda (name def)
- (ir1-convert-lambda def
- :source-name name
- :debug-name (debug-namify
- "LABELS ~S" name)))
- names defs))))
-
+ (real-funs
+ (let ((*lexenv* (make-lexenv :funs placeholder-fenv)))
+ (mapcar (lambda (name def)
+ (ir1-convert-lambda def
+ :source-name name
+ :debug-name (debug-namify
+ "LABELS " name)))
+ names defs))))
+
;; Modify all the references to the dummy function leaves so
;; that they point to the real function leaves.
- (loop for real-fun in real-funs and
- placeholder-cons in placeholder-fenv do
- (substitute-leaf real-fun (cdr placeholder-cons))
- (setf (cdr placeholder-cons) real-fun))
-
+ (loop for real-fun in real-funs and
+ placeholder-cons in placeholder-fenv do
+ (substitute-leaf real-fun (cdr placeholder-cons))
+ (setf (cdr placeholder-cons) real-fun))
+
;; Voila.
- (let ((*lexenv* (make-lexenv
- :default (process-decls decls nil real-funs cont)
- ;; Use a proper FENV here (not the
- ;; placeholder used earlier) so that if the
- ;; lexical environment is used for inline
- ;; expansion we'll get the right functions.
- :funs (pairlis names real-funs))))
- (ir1-convert-progn-body start cont forms))))))
+ (processing-decls (decls nil real-funs next result)
+ (let ((*lexenv* (make-lexenv
+ ;; Use a proper FENV here (not the
+ ;; placeholder used earlier) so that if the
+ ;; lexical environment is used for inline
+ ;; expansion we'll get the right functions.
+ :funs (pairlis names real-funs))))
+ (ir1-convert-progn-body start
+ next
+ result
+ forms)))))))
+
\f
;;;; the THE special operator, and friends
-;;; Do stuff to recognize a THE or VALUES declaration. CONT is the
-;;; continuation that the assertion applies to, TYPE is the type
-;;; specifier and LEXENV is the current lexical environment. NAME is
-;;; the name of the declaration we are doing, for use in error
-;;; messages.
-;;;
-;;; This is somewhat involved, since a type assertion may only be made
-;;; on a continuation, not on a node. We can't just set the
-;;; continuation asserted type and let it go at that, since there may
-;;; be parallel THE's for the same continuation, i.e.
-;;; (if ...
-;;; (the foo ...)
-;;; (the bar ...))
-;;;
-;;; In this case, our representation can do no better than the union
-;;; of these assertions. And if there is a branch with no assertion,
-;;; we have nothing at all. We really need to recognize scoping, since
-;;; we need to be able to discern between parallel assertions (which
-;;; we union) and nested ones (which we intersect).
-;;;
-;;; We represent the scoping by throwing our innermost (intersected)
-;;; assertion on CONT into the TYPE-RESTRICTIONS. As we go down, we
-;;; intersect our assertions together. If CONT has no uses yet, we
-;;; have not yet bottomed out on the first COND branch; in this case
-;;; we optimistically assume that this type will be the one we end up
-;;; with, and set the ASSERTED-TYPE to it. We can never get better
-;;; than the type that we have the first time we bottom out. Later
-;;; THE's (or the absence thereof) can only weaken this result.
-;;;
-;;; We make this work by getting USE-CONTINUATION to do the unioning
-;;; across COND branches. We can't do it here, since we don't know how
-;;; many branches there are going to be.
-(defun ir1ize-the-or-values (type cont lexenv place)
- (declare (type continuation cont) (type lexenv lexenv))
- (let* ((atype (if (typep type 'ctype) type (compiler-values-specifier-type type)))
- (old-atype (or (lexenv-find cont type-restrictions)
- *wild-type*))
- (old-ctype (or (lexenv-find cont weakend-type-restrictions)
- *wild-type*))
- (intersects (values-types-equal-or-intersect old-atype atype))
- (new-atype (values-type-intersection old-atype atype))
- (new-ctype (values-type-intersection
- old-ctype (maybe-weaken-check atype (lexenv-policy lexenv)))))
- (when (null (find-uses cont))
- (setf (continuation-asserted-type cont) new-atype)
- (setf (continuation-type-to-check cont) new-ctype))
- (when (and (not intersects)
- ;; FIXME: Is it really right to look at *LEXENV* here,
- ;; instead of looking at the LEXENV argument? Why?
- (not (policy *lexenv*
- (= inhibit-warnings 3)))) ;FIXME: really OK to suppress?
- (compiler-warn
- "The type ~S ~A conflicts with an enclosing assertion:~% ~S"
- (type-specifier atype)
- place
- (type-specifier old-atype)))
- (make-lexenv :type-restrictions `((,cont . ,new-atype))
- :weakend-type-restrictions `((,cont . ,new-ctype))
- :default lexenv)))
+;;; A logic shared among THE and TRULY-THE.
+(defun the-in-policy (type value policy start next result)
+ (let ((type (if (ctype-p type) type
+ (compiler-values-specifier-type type))))
+ (cond ((or (eq type *wild-type*)
+ (eq type *universal-type*)
+ (and (leaf-p value)
+ (values-subtypep (make-single-value-type (leaf-type value))
+ type))
+ (and (sb!xc:constantp value)
+ (ctypep (constant-form-value value)
+ (single-value-type type))))
+ (ir1-convert start next result value))
+ (t (let ((value-ctran (make-ctran))
+ (value-lvar (make-lvar)))
+ (ir1-convert start value-ctran value-lvar value)
+ (let ((cast (make-cast value-lvar type policy)))
+ (link-node-to-previous-ctran cast value-ctran)
+ (setf (lvar-dest value-lvar) cast)
+ (use-continuation cast next result)))))))
;;; Assert that FORM evaluates to the specified type (which may be a
-;;; VALUES type).
-;;;
-;;; FIXME: In a version of CMU CL that I used at Cadabra ca. 20000101,
-;;; this didn't seem to expand into an assertion, at least for ALIEN
-;;; values. Check that SBCL doesn't have this problem.
-(def-ir1-translator the ((type value) start cont)
- (with-continuation-type-assertion (cont (compiler-values-specifier-type type)
- "in THE declaration")
- (ir1-convert start cont value)))
+;;; VALUES type). TYPE may be a type specifier or (as a hack) a CTYPE.
+(def-ir1-translator the ((type value) start next result)
+ (the-in-policy type value (lexenv-policy *lexenv*) start next result))
;;; This is like the THE special form, except that it believes
;;; whatever you tell it. It will never generate a type check, but
;;; will cause a warning if the compiler can prove the assertion is
;;; wrong.
-;;;
-;;; Since the CONTINUATION-DERIVED-TYPE is computed as the union of
-;;; its uses's types, setting it won't work. Instead we must intersect
-;;; the type with the uses's DERIVED-TYPE.
-(def-ir1-translator truly-the ((type value) start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator truly-the ((type value) start next result)
#!+sb-doc
- (declare (inline member))
- (let ((type (compiler-values-specifier-type type))
- (old (find-uses cont)))
- (ir1-convert start cont value)
- (do-uses (use cont)
- (unless (member use old :test #'eq)
- (derive-node-type use type)))))
+ ""
+ #-nil
+ (let ((type (coerce-to-values (compiler-values-specifier-type type)))
+ (old (when result (find-uses result))))
+ (ir1-convert start next result value)
+ (when result
+ (do-uses (use result)
+ (unless (memq use old)
+ (derive-node-type use type)))))
+ #+nil
+ (the-in-policy type value '((type-check . 0)) start cont))
\f
;;;; SETQ
;;; If there is a definition in LEXENV-VARS, just set that, otherwise
;;; look at the global information. If the name is for a constant,
;;; then error out.
-(def-ir1-translator setq ((&whole source &rest things) start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator setq ((&whole source &rest things) start next result)
(let ((len (length things)))
(when (oddp len)
(compiler-error "odd number of args to SETQ: ~S" source))
(when (constant-p leaf)
(compiler-error "~S is a constant and thus can't be set." name))
(when (lambda-var-p leaf)
- (let ((home-lambda (continuation-home-lambda-or-null start)))
+ (let ((home-lambda (ctran-home-lambda-or-null start)))
(when home-lambda
(pushnew leaf (lambda-calls-or-closes home-lambda))))
(when (lambda-var-ignorep leaf)
(compiler-style-warn
"~S is being set even though it was declared to be ignored."
name)))
- (setq-var start cont leaf (second things)))
+ (setq-var start next result leaf (second things)))
(cons
(aver (eq (car leaf) 'MACRO))
- (ir1-convert start cont `(setf ,(cdr leaf) ,(second things))))
+ ;; FIXME: [Free] type declaration. -- APD, 2002-01-26
+ (ir1-convert start next result
+ `(setf ,(cdr leaf) ,(second things))))
(heap-alien-info
- (ir1-convert start cont
+ (ir1-convert start next result
`(%set-heap-alien ',leaf ,(second things))))))
(collect ((sets))
(do ((thing things (cddr thing)))
((endp thing)
- (ir1-convert-progn-body start cont (sets)))
+ (ir1-convert-progn-body start next result (sets)))
(sets `(setq ,(first thing) ,(second thing))))))))
;;; This is kind of like REFERENCE-LEAF, but we generate a SET node.
;;; This should only need to be called in SETQ.
-(defun setq-var (start cont var value)
- (declare (type continuation start cont) (type basic-var var))
- (let ((dest (make-continuation)))
- (ir1-convert start dest value)
- (assert-continuation-type dest (leaf-type var) (lexenv-policy *lexenv*))
- (let ((res (make-set :var var :value dest)))
- (setf (continuation-dest dest) res)
+(defun setq-var (start next result var value)
+ (declare (type ctran start next) (type (or lvar null) result)
+ (type basic-var var))
+ (let ((dest-ctran (make-ctran))
+ (dest-lvar (make-lvar))
+ (type (or (lexenv-find var type-restrictions)
+ (leaf-type var))))
+ (ir1-convert start dest-ctran dest-lvar `(the ,type ,value))
+ (let ((res (make-set :var var :value dest-lvar)))
+ (setf (lvar-dest dest-lvar) res)
(setf (leaf-ever-used var) t)
(push res (basic-var-sets var))
- (link-node-to-previous-continuation res dest)
- (use-continuation res cont))))
+ (link-node-to-previous-ctran res dest-ctran)
+ (use-continuation res next result))))
\f
;;;; CATCH, THROW and UNWIND-PROTECT
;;; We turn THROW into a MULTIPLE-VALUE-CALL of a magical function,
;;; since as as far as IR1 is concerned, it has no interesting
;;; properties other than receiving multiple-values.
-(def-ir1-translator throw ((tag result) start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator throw ((tag result) start next result-lvar)
#!+sb-doc
"Throw Tag Form
Do a non-local exit, return the values of Form from the CATCH whose tag
evaluates to the same thing as Tag."
- (ir1-convert start cont
+ (ir1-convert start next result-lvar
`(multiple-value-call #'%throw ,tag ,result)))
;;; This is a special special form used to instantiate a cleanup as
;;; and introduce the cleanup into the lexical environment. We
;;; back-patch the ENTRY-CLEANUP for the current cleanup to be the new
;;; cleanup, since this inner cleanup is the interesting one.
-(def-ir1-translator %within-cleanup ((kind mess-up &body body) start cont)
- (let ((dummy (make-continuation))
- (dummy2 (make-continuation)))
- (ir1-convert start dummy mess-up)
- (let* ((mess-node (continuation-use dummy))
+(def-ir1-translator %within-cleanup
+ ((kind mess-up &body body) start next result)
+ (let ((dummy (make-ctran))
+ (dummy2 (make-ctran)))
+ (ir1-convert start dummy nil mess-up)
+ (let* ((mess-node (ctran-use dummy))
(cleanup (make-cleanup :kind kind
:mess-up mess-node))
(old-cup (lexenv-cleanup *lexenv*))
(*lexenv* (make-lexenv :cleanup cleanup)))
(setf (entry-cleanup (cleanup-mess-up old-cup)) cleanup)
- (ir1-convert dummy dummy2 '(%cleanup-point))
- (ir1-convert-progn-body dummy2 cont body))))
+ (ir1-convert dummy dummy2 nil '(%cleanup-point))
+ (ir1-convert-progn-body dummy2 next result body))))
;;; This is a special special form that makes an "escape function"
;;; which returns unknown values from named block. We convert the
;;;
;;; Note that environment analysis replaces references to escape
;;; functions with references to the corresponding NLX-INFO structure.
-(def-ir1-translator %escape-fun ((tag) start cont)
- (let ((fun (ir1-convert-lambda
- `(lambda ()
- (return-from ,tag (%unknown-values)))
- :debug-name (debug-namify "escape function for ~S" tag))))
+(def-ir1-translator %escape-fun ((tag) start next result)
+ (let ((fun (let ((*allow-instrumenting* nil))
+ (ir1-convert-lambda
+ `(lambda ()
+ (return-from ,tag (%unknown-values)))
+ :debug-name (debug-namify "escape function for " tag)))))
(setf (functional-kind fun) :escape)
- (reference-leaf start cont fun)))
+ (reference-leaf start next result fun)))
;;; Yet another special special form. This one looks up a local
;;; function and smashes it to a :CLEANUP function, as well as
;;; referencing it.
-(def-ir1-translator %cleanup-fun ((name) start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator %cleanup-fun ((name) start next result)
(let ((fun (lexenv-find name funs)))
(aver (lambda-p fun))
(setf (functional-kind fun) :cleanup)
- (reference-leaf start cont fun)))
+ (reference-leaf start next result fun)))
-;;; We represent the possibility of the control transfer by making an
-;;; "escape function" that does a lexical exit, and instantiate the
-;;; cleanup using %WITHIN-CLEANUP.
-(def-ir1-translator catch ((tag &body body) start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator catch ((tag &body body) start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"Catch Tag Form*
- Evaluates Tag and instantiates it as a catcher while the body forms are
- evaluated in an implicit PROGN. If a THROW is done to Tag within the dynamic
+ Evaluate TAG and instantiate it as a catcher while the body forms are
+ evaluated in an implicit PROGN. If a THROW is done to TAG within the dynamic
scope of the body, then control will be transferred to the end of the body
and the thrown values will be returned."
+ ;; We represent the possibility of the control transfer by making an
+ ;; "escape function" that does a lexical exit, and instantiate the
+ ;; cleanup using %WITHIN-CLEANUP.
(ir1-convert
- start cont
- (let ((exit-block (gensym "EXIT-BLOCK-")))
+ start next result
+ (with-unique-names (exit-block)
`(block ,exit-block
(%within-cleanup
- :catch
- (%catch (%escape-fun ,exit-block) ,tag)
- ,@body)))))
+ :catch (%catch (%escape-fun ,exit-block) ,tag)
+ ,@body)))))
-;;; UNWIND-PROTECT is similar to CATCH, but hairier. We make the
-;;; cleanup forms into a local function so that they can be referenced
-;;; both in the case where we are unwound and in any local exits. We
-;;; use %CLEANUP-FUN on this to indicate that reference by
-;;; %UNWIND-PROTECT isn't "real", and thus doesn't cause creation of
-;;; an XEP.
-(def-ir1-translator unwind-protect ((protected &body cleanup) start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator unwind-protect
+ ((protected &body cleanup) start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"Unwind-Protect Protected Cleanup*
- Evaluate the form Protected, returning its values. The cleanup forms are
- evaluated whenever the dynamic scope of the Protected form is exited (either
+ Evaluate the form PROTECTED, returning its values. The CLEANUP forms are
+ evaluated whenever the dynamic scope of the PROTECTED form is exited (either
due to normal completion or a non-local exit such as THROW)."
+ ;; UNWIND-PROTECT is similar to CATCH, but hairier. We make the
+ ;; cleanup forms into a local function so that they can be referenced
+ ;; both in the case where we are unwound and in any local exits. We
+ ;; use %CLEANUP-FUN on this to indicate that reference by
+ ;; %UNWIND-PROTECT isn't "real", and thus doesn't cause creation of
+ ;; an XEP.
(ir1-convert
- start cont
- (let ((cleanup-fun (gensym "CLEANUP-FUN-"))
- (drop-thru-tag (gensym "DROP-THRU-TAG-"))
- (exit-tag (gensym "EXIT-TAG-"))
- (next (gensym "NEXT"))
- (start (gensym "START"))
- (count (gensym "COUNT")))
+ start next result
+ (with-unique-names (cleanup-fun drop-thru-tag exit-tag next start count)
`(flet ((,cleanup-fun () ,@cleanup nil))
;; FIXME: If we ever get DYNAMIC-EXTENT working, then
;; ,CLEANUP-FUN should probably be declared DYNAMIC-EXTENT,
\f
;;;; multiple-value stuff
-;;; If there are arguments, MULTIPLE-VALUE-CALL turns into an
-;;; MV-COMBINATION.
-;;;
-;;; If there are no arguments, then we convert to a normal
-;;; combination, ensuring that a MV-COMBINATION always has at least
-;;; one argument. This can be regarded as an optimization, but it is
-;;; more important for simplifying compilation of MV-COMBINATIONS.
-(def-ir1-translator multiple-value-call ((fun &rest args) start cont)
+(def-ir1-translator multiple-value-call ((fun &rest args) start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"MULTIPLE-VALUE-CALL Function Values-Form*
- Call Function, passing all the values of each Values-Form as arguments,
- values from the first Values-Form making up the first argument, etc."
- (let* ((fun-cont (make-continuation))
+ Call FUNCTION, passing all the values of each VALUES-FORM as arguments,
+ values from the first VALUES-FORM making up the first argument, etc."
+ (let* ((ctran (make-ctran))
+ (fun-lvar (make-lvar))
(node (if args
- (make-mv-combination fun-cont)
- (make-combination fun-cont))))
- (ir1-convert start fun-cont
+ ;; If there are arguments, MULTIPLE-VALUE-CALL
+ ;; turns into an MV-COMBINATION.
+ (make-mv-combination fun-lvar)
+ ;; If there are no arguments, then we convert to a
+ ;; normal combination, ensuring that a MV-COMBINATION
+ ;; always has at least one argument. This can be
+ ;; regarded as an optimization, but it is more
+ ;; important for simplifying compilation of
+ ;; MV-COMBINATIONS.
+ (make-combination fun-lvar))))
+ (ir1-convert start ctran fun-lvar
(if (and (consp fun) (eq (car fun) 'function))
fun
`(%coerce-callable-to-fun ,fun)))
- (setf (continuation-dest fun-cont) node)
- (assert-continuation-type fun-cont
- (specifier-type '(or function symbol))
- (lexenv-policy *lexenv*))
- (collect ((arg-conts))
- (let ((this-start fun-cont))
+ (setf (lvar-dest fun-lvar) node)
+ (collect ((arg-lvars))
+ (let ((this-start ctran))
(dolist (arg args)
- (let ((this-cont (make-continuation node)))
- (ir1-convert this-start this-cont arg)
- (setq this-start this-cont)
- (arg-conts this-cont)))
- (link-node-to-previous-continuation node this-start)
- (use-continuation node cont)
- (setf (basic-combination-args node) (arg-conts))))))
-
-;;; MULTIPLE-VALUE-PROG1 is represented implicitly in IR1 by having a
-;;; the result code use result continuation (CONT), but transfer
-;;; control to the evaluation of the body. In other words, the result
-;;; continuation isn't IMMEDIATELY-USED-P by the nodes that compute
-;;; the result.
-;;;
-;;; In order to get the control flow right, we convert the result with
-;;; a dummy result continuation, then convert all the uses of the
-;;; dummy to be uses of CONT. If a use is an EXIT, then we also
-;;; substitute CONT for the dummy in the corresponding ENTRY node so
-;;; that they are consistent. Note that this doesn't amount to
-;;; changing the exit target, since the control destination of an exit
-;;; is determined by the block successor; we are just indicating the
-;;; continuation that the result is delivered to.
-;;;
-;;; We then convert the body, using another dummy continuation in its
-;;; own block as the result. After we are done converting the body, we
-;;; move all predecessors of the dummy end block to CONT's block.
-;;;
-;;; Note that we both exploit and maintain the invariant that the CONT
-;;; to an IR1 convert method either has no block or starts the block
-;;; that control should transfer to after completion for the form.
-;;; Nested MV-PROG1's work because during conversion of the result
-;;; form, we use dummy continuation whose block is the true control
-;;; destination.
-(def-ir1-translator multiple-value-prog1 ((result &rest forms) start cont)
+ (let ((this-ctran (make-ctran))
+ (this-lvar (make-lvar node)))
+ (ir1-convert this-start this-ctran this-lvar arg)
+ (setq this-start this-ctran)
+ (arg-lvars this-lvar)))
+ (link-node-to-previous-ctran node this-start)
+ (use-continuation node next result)
+ (setf (basic-combination-args node) (arg-lvars))))))
+
+(def-ir1-translator multiple-value-prog1
+ ((values-form &rest forms) start next result)
#!+sb-doc
"MULTIPLE-VALUE-PROG1 Values-Form Form*
Evaluate Values-Form and then the Forms, but return all the values of
Values-Form."
- (continuation-starts-block cont)
- (let* ((dummy-result (make-continuation))
- (dummy-start (make-continuation))
- (cont-block (continuation-block cont)))
- (continuation-starts-block dummy-start)
- (ir1-convert start dummy-start result)
-
- (with-continuation-type-assertion
- ;; FIXME: policy
- (cont (continuation-asserted-type dummy-start)
- "of the first form")
- (substitute-continuation-uses cont dummy-start))
-
- (continuation-starts-block dummy-result)
- (ir1-convert-progn-body dummy-start dummy-result forms)
- (let ((end-block (continuation-block dummy-result)))
- (dolist (pred (block-pred end-block))
- (unlink-blocks pred end-block)
- (link-blocks pred cont-block))
- (aver (not (continuation-dest dummy-result)))
- (delete-continuation dummy-result)
- (remove-from-dfo end-block))))
+ (let ((dummy (make-ctran)))
+ (ctran-starts-block dummy)
+ (ir1-convert start dummy result values-form)
+ (ir1-convert-progn-body dummy next nil forms)))
\f
;;;; interface to defining macros