;;; the remaining args still match up with their vars.
;;;
;;; We also apply the declared variable type assertion to the argument
-;;; continuations.
+;;; lvars.
(defun propagate-to-args (call fun)
(declare (type combination call) (type clambda fun))
- (do ((args (basic-combination-args call) (cdr args))
- (vars (lambda-vars fun) (cdr vars)))
- ((null args))
- (let ((arg (car args))
- (var (car vars)))
- (cond ((leaf-refs var)
- (assert-continuation-type arg (leaf-type var)
- (lexenv-policy (node-lexenv call))))
- (t
- (flush-dest arg)
- (setf (car args) nil)))))
+ (loop with policy = (lexenv-policy (node-lexenv call))
+ for args on (basic-combination-args call)
+ and var in (lambda-vars fun)
+ do (assert-lvar-type (car args) (leaf-type var) policy)
+ do (unless (leaf-refs var)
+ (flush-dest (car args))
+ (setf (car args) nil)))
+ (values))
+(defun recognize-dynamic-extent-lvars (call fun)
+ (declare (type combination call) (type clambda fun))
+ (loop for arg in (basic-combination-args call)
+ and var in (lambda-vars fun)
+ when (and arg
+ (lambda-var-dynamic-extent var)
+ (not (lvar-dynamic-extent arg)))
+ collect arg into dx-lvars
+ and do (let ((use (lvar-uses arg)))
+ ;; Stack analysis wants DX value generators to end
+ ;; their blocks. Uses of mupltiple used LVARs already
+ ;; end their blocks, so we just need to process
+ ;; used-once LVARs.
+ (when (node-p use)
+ (node-ends-block use)))
+ finally (when dx-lvars
+ (binding* ((before-ctran (node-prev call))
+ (nil (ensure-block-start before-ctran))
+ (block (ctran-block before-ctran))
+ (new-call-ctran (make-ctran :kind :inside-block
+ :next call
+ :block block))
+ (entry (with-ir1-environment-from-node call
+ (make-entry :prev before-ctran
+ :next new-call-ctran)))
+ (cleanup (make-cleanup :kind :dynamic-extent
+ :mess-up entry
+ :info dx-lvars)))
+ (setf (node-prev call) new-call-ctran)
+ (setf (ctran-next before-ctran) entry)
+ (setf (ctran-use new-call-ctran) entry)
+ (setf (entry-cleanup entry) cleanup)
+ (setf (node-lexenv call)
+ (make-lexenv :default (node-lexenv call)
+ :cleanup cleanup))
+ (push entry (lambda-entries (node-home-lambda entry)))
+ (dolist (lvar dx-lvars)
+ (setf (lvar-dynamic-extent lvar) cleanup)))))
(values))
;;; This function handles merging the tail sets if CALL is potentially
;;; We destructively modify the set for the calling function to
;;; represent both, and then change all the functions in callee's set
;;; to reference the first. If we do merge, we reoptimize the
-;;; RETURN-RESULT continuation to cause IR1-OPTIMIZE-RETURN to
-;;; recompute the tail set type.
+;;; RETURN-RESULT lvar to cause IR1-OPTIMIZE-RETURN to recompute the
+;;; tail set type.
(defun merge-tail-sets (call &optional (new-fun (combination-lambda call)))
(declare (type basic-combination call) (type clambda new-fun))
- (let ((return (continuation-dest (node-cont call))))
+ (let ((return (node-dest call)))
(when (return-p return)
(let ((call-set (lambda-tail-set (node-home-lambda call)))
(fun-set (lambda-tail-set new-fun)))
(setf (lambda-tail-set fun) call-set))
(setf (tail-set-funs call-set)
(nconc (tail-set-funs call-set) funs)))
- (reoptimize-continuation (return-result return))
+ (reoptimize-lvar (return-result return))
t)))))
;;; Convert a combination into a local call. We PROPAGATE-TO-ARGS, set
(declare (type ref ref) (type combination call) (type clambda fun))
(propagate-to-args call fun)
(setf (basic-combination-kind call) :local)
+ (unless (call-full-like-p call)
+ (dolist (arg (basic-combination-args call))
+ (when arg
+ (flush-lvar-externally-checkable-type arg))))
(pushnew fun (lambda-calls-or-closes (node-home-lambda call)))
+ (recognize-dynamic-extent-lvars call fun)
(merge-tail-sets call fun)
(change-ref-leaf ref fun)
(values))
;;;
;;; If there is a &MORE arg, then there are a couple of optimizations
;;; that we make (more for space than anything else):
-;;; -- If MIN-ARGS is 0, then we make the more entry a T clause, since
+;;; -- If MIN-ARGS is 0, then we make the more entry a T clause, since
;;; no argument count error is possible.
-;;; -- We can omit the = clause for the last entry-point, allowing the
+;;; -- We can omit the = clause for the last entry-point, allowing the
;;; case of 0 more args to fall through to the more entry.
;;;
;;; We don't bother to policy conditionalize wrong arg errors in
(n-supplied (gensym))
(temps (make-gensym-list max)))
(collect ((entries))
- (do ((eps (optional-dispatch-entry-points fun) (rest eps))
- (n min (1+ n)))
- ((null eps))
- (entries `((= ,n-supplied ,n)
- (%funcall ,(first eps) ,@(subseq temps 0 n)))))
+ ;; Force convertion of all entries
+ (optional-dispatch-entry-point-fun fun 0)
+ (loop for ep in (optional-dispatch-entry-points fun)
+ and n from min
+ do (entries `((= ,n-supplied ,n)
+ (%funcall ,(force ep) ,@(subseq temps 0 n)))))
`(lambda (,n-supplied ,@temps)
;; FIXME: Make sure that INDEX type distinguishes between
;; target and host. (Probably just make the SB!XC:DEFTYPE
;;; then associate this lambda with FUN as its XEP. After the
;;; conversion, we iterate over the function's associated lambdas,
;;; redoing local call analysis so that the XEP calls will get
-;;; converted.
+;;; converted.
;;;
;;; We set REANALYZE and REOPTIMIZE in the component, just in case we
;;; discover an XEP after the initial local call analyze pass.
(aver (null (functional-entry-fun fun)))
(with-ir1-environment-from-node (lambda-bind (main-entry fun))
(let ((res (ir1-convert-lambda (make-xep-lambda-expression fun)
- :debug-name (debug-namify
- "XEP for ~A"
- (leaf-debug-name fun)))))
+ :debug-name (debug-name
+ 'xep (leaf-debug-name fun)))))
(setf (functional-kind res) :external
(leaf-ever-used res) t
(functional-entry-fun res) fun
(functional-entry-fun fun) res
- (component-reanalyze *current-component*) t
- (component-reoptimize *current-component*) t)
+ (component-reanalyze *current-component*) t)
+ (reoptimize-component *current-component* :maybe)
(etypecase fun
(clambda
(locall-analyze-fun-1 fun))
(optional-dispatch
(dolist (ep (optional-dispatch-entry-points fun))
- (locall-analyze-fun-1 ep))
+ (locall-analyze-fun-1 (force ep)))
(when (optional-dispatch-more-entry fun)
(locall-analyze-fun-1 (optional-dispatch-more-entry fun)))))
res)))
(make-xep fun))))))
\f
;;; Attempt to convert all references to FUN to local calls. The
-;;; reference must be the function for a call, and the function
-;;; continuation must be used only once, since otherwise we cannot be
-;;; sure what function is to be called. The call continuation would be
-;;; multiply used if there is hairy stuff such as conditionals in the
-;;; expression that computes the function.
+;;; reference must be the function for a call, and the function lvar
+;;; must be used only once, since otherwise we cannot be sure what
+;;; function is to be called. The call lvar would be multiply used if
+;;; there is hairy stuff such as conditionals in the expression that
+;;; computes the function.
;;;
;;; If we cannot convert a reference, then we mark the referenced
;;; function as an entry-point, creating a new XEP if necessary. We
;;; do LET conversion here.
(defun locall-analyze-fun-1 (fun)
(declare (type functional fun))
- (let ((refs (leaf-refs fun))
- (first-time t))
+ (let ((refs (leaf-refs fun)))
(dolist (ref refs)
- (let* ((cont (node-cont ref))
- (dest (continuation-dest cont)))
- (cond ((and (basic-combination-p dest)
- (eq (basic-combination-fun dest) cont)
- (eq (continuation-use cont) ref))
+ (let* ((lvar (node-lvar ref))
+ (dest (when lvar (lvar-dest lvar))))
+ (unless (node-to-be-deleted-p ref)
+ (cond ((and (basic-combination-p dest)
+ (eq (basic-combination-fun dest) lvar)
+ (eq (lvar-uses lvar) ref))
- (convert-call-if-possible ref dest)
+ (convert-call-if-possible ref dest)
- (unless (eq (basic-combination-kind dest) :local)
- (reference-entry-point ref)))
- (t
- (reference-entry-point ref))))
- (setq first-time nil)))
+ (unless (eq (basic-combination-kind dest) :local)
+ (reference-entry-point ref)))
+ (t
+ (reference-entry-point ref)))))))
(values))
(return))
(let ((kind (functional-kind functional)))
(cond ((or (functional-somewhat-letlike-p functional)
- (eql kind :deleted))
+ (memq kind '(:deleted :zombie)))
(values)) ; nothing to do
((and (null (leaf-refs functional)) (eq kind nil)
(not (functional-entry-fun functional)))
;; COMPONENT is the only one here. Let's make that explicit.
(aver (= 1 (length (functional-components clambda))))
(aver (eql component (first (functional-components clambda))))
- (when (component-new-functionals component)
+ (when (or (component-new-functionals component)
+ (component-reanalyze-functionals component))
(setf did-something t)
(locall-analyze-component component))))
(unless did-something
(>= speed compilation-speed)))
(not (eq (functional-kind (node-home-lambda call)) :external))
(inline-expansion-ok call))
- (multiple-value-bind (losing-local-functional converted-lambda)
- (catch 'locall-already-let-converted
- (with-ir1-environment-from-node call
- (let ((*lexenv* (functional-lexenv original-functional)))
- (values nil
- (ir1-convert-lambda
- (functional-inline-expansion original-functional)
- :debug-name (debug-namify
- "local inline ~A"
- (leaf-debug-name
- original-functional)))))))
- (cond (losing-local-functional
- (let ((*compiler-error-context* call))
- (compiler-note "couldn't inline expand because expansion ~
- calls this LET-converted local function:~
- ~% ~S"
- (leaf-debug-name losing-local-functional)))
- original-functional)
- (t
- (change-ref-leaf ref converted-lambda)
- converted-lambda)))
+ (let* ((end (component-last-block (node-component call)))
+ (pred (block-prev end)))
+ (multiple-value-bind (losing-local-object converted-lambda)
+ (catch 'locall-already-let-converted
+ (with-ir1-environment-from-node call
+ (let ((*lexenv* (functional-lexenv original-functional)))
+ (values nil
+ (ir1-convert-lambda
+ (functional-inline-expansion original-functional)
+ :debug-name (debug-name 'local-inline
+ (leaf-debug-name
+ original-functional)))))))
+ (cond (losing-local-object
+ (if (functional-p losing-local-object)
+ (let ((*compiler-error-context* call))
+ (compiler-notify "couldn't inline expand because expansion ~
+ calls this LET-converted local function:~
+ ~% ~S"
+ (leaf-debug-name losing-local-object)))
+ (let ((*compiler-error-context* call))
+ (compiler-notify "implementation limitation: couldn't inline ~
+ expand because expansion refers to ~
+ the optimized away object ~S."
+ losing-local-object)))
+ (loop for block = (block-next pred) then (block-next block)
+ until (eq block end)
+ do (setf (block-delete-p block) t))
+ (loop for block = (block-next pred) then (block-next block)
+ until (eq block end)
+ do (delete-block block t))
+ original-functional)
+ (t
+ (change-ref-leaf ref converted-lambda)
+ converted-lambda))))
original-functional))
;;; Dispatch to the appropriate function to attempt to convert a call.
(original-fun (ref-leaf ref)))
(aver (functional-p original-fun))
(unless (or (member (basic-combination-kind call) '(:local :error))
- (block-delete-p block)
- (eq (functional-kind (block-home-lambda block)) :deleted)
+ (node-to-be-deleted-p call)
(member (functional-kind original-fun)
'(:toplevel-xep :deleted))
(not (or (eq (component-kind component) :initial)
;;; Attempt to convert a multiple-value call. The only interesting
;;; case is a call to a function that LOOKS-LIKE-AN-MV-BIND, has
;;; exactly one reference and no XEP, and is called with one values
-;;; continuation.
+;;; lvar.
;;;
;;; We change the call to be to the last optional entry point and
;;; change the call to be local. Due to our preconditions, the call
;;; optional defaulting code.
;;;
;;; We also use variable types for the called function to construct an
-;;; assertion for the values continuation.
+;;; assertion for the values lvar.
;;;
;;; See CONVERT-CALL for additional notes on MERGE-TAIL-SETS, etc.
(defun convert-mv-call (ref call fun)
(declare (type ref ref) (type mv-combination call) (type functional fun))
(when (and (looks-like-an-mv-bind fun)
- (not (functional-entry-fun fun))
- (= (length (leaf-refs fun)) 1)
- (= (length (basic-combination-args call)) 1))
- (let ((ep (car (last (optional-dispatch-entry-points fun)))))
- (setf (basic-combination-kind call) :local)
- (pushnew ep (lambda-calls-or-closes (node-home-lambda call)))
- (merge-tail-sets call ep)
- (change-ref-leaf ref ep)
+ (singleton-p (leaf-refs fun))
+ (singleton-p (basic-combination-args call)))
+ (let* ((*current-component* (node-component ref))
+ (ep (optional-dispatch-entry-point-fun
+ fun (optional-dispatch-max-args fun))))
+ (when (null (leaf-refs ep))
+ (aver (= (optional-dispatch-min-args fun) 0))
+ (aver (not (functional-entry-fun fun)))
+ (setf (basic-combination-kind call) :local)
+ (pushnew ep (lambda-calls-or-closes (node-home-lambda call)))
+ (merge-tail-sets call ep)
+ (change-ref-leaf ref ep)
- (assert-continuation-type
- (first (basic-combination-args call))
- (make-values-type :optional (mapcar #'leaf-type (lambda-vars ep))
- :rest *universal-type*)
- (lexenv-policy (node-lexenv call)))))
+ (assert-lvar-type
+ (first (basic-combination-args call))
+ (make-short-values-type (mapcar #'leaf-type (lambda-vars ep)))
+ (lexenv-policy (node-lexenv call))))))
(values))
;;; Attempt to convert a call to a lambda. If the number of args is
(defun convert-lambda-call (ref call fun)
(declare (type ref ref) (type combination call) (type clambda fun))
(let ((nargs (length (lambda-vars fun)))
- (call-args (length (combination-args call))))
- (cond ((= call-args nargs)
+ (n-call-args (length (combination-args call))))
+ (cond ((= n-call-args nargs)
(convert-call ref call fun))
(t
- ;; FIXME: ANSI requires in "3.2.5 Exceptional Situations in the
- ;; Compiler" that calling a function with "the wrong number of
- ;; arguments" be only a STYLE-ERROR. I think, though, that this
- ;; should only apply when the number of arguments is inferred
- ;; from a previous definition. If the number of arguments
- ;; is DECLAIMed, surely calling with the wrong number is a
- ;; real WARNING. As long as SBCL continues to use CMU CL's
- ;; non-ANSI DEFUN-is-a-DECLAIM policy, we're in violation here,
- ;; but as long as we continue to use that policy, that's the
- ;; not our biggest problem.:-| When we fix that policy, this
- ;; should come back into compliance. (So fix that policy!)
- ;; ..but..
- ;; FIXME, continued: Except that section "3.2.2.3 Semantic
- ;; Constraints" says that if it's within the same file, it's
- ;; wrong. And we're in locall.lisp here, so it's probably
- ;; (haven't checked this..) a call to something in the same
- ;; file. So maybe it deserves a full warning anyway.
- (compiler-warn
+ (warn
+ 'local-argument-mismatch
+ :format-control
"function called with ~R argument~:P, but wants exactly ~R"
- call-args nargs)
+ :format-arguments (list n-call-args nargs))
(setf (basic-combination-kind call) :error)))))
\f
;;;; &OPTIONAL, &MORE and &KEYWORD calls
(max-args (optional-dispatch-max-args fun))
(call-args (length (combination-args call))))
(cond ((< call-args min-args)
- ;; FIXME: See FIXME note at the previous
- ;; wrong-number-of-arguments warnings in this file.
- (compiler-warn
+ (warn
+ 'local-argument-mismatch
+ :format-control
"function called with ~R argument~:P, but wants at least ~R"
- call-args min-args)
+ :format-arguments (list call-args min-args))
(setf (basic-combination-kind call) :error))
((<= call-args max-args)
(convert-call ref call
- (elt (optional-dispatch-entry-points fun)
- (- call-args min-args))))
+ (let ((*current-component* (node-component ref)))
+ (optional-dispatch-entry-point-fun
+ fun (- call-args min-args)))))
((optional-dispatch-more-entry fun)
(convert-more-call ref call fun))
(t
- ;; FIXME: See FIXME note at the previous
- ;; wrong-number-of-arguments warnings in this file.
- (compiler-warn
+ (warn
+ 'local-argument-mismatch
+ :format-control
"function called with ~R argument~:P, but wants at most ~R"
- call-args max-args)
+ :format-arguments
+ (list call-args max-args))
(setf (basic-combination-kind call) :error))))
(values))
`(lambda ,vars
(declare (ignorable ,@ignores))
(%funcall ,entry ,@args))
- :debug-name (debug-namify "hairy function entry ~S"
- (continuation-fun-name
- (basic-combination-fun call)))))))
+ :debug-name (debug-name 'hairy-function-entry
+ (lvar-fun-name
+ (basic-combination-fun call)))))))
(convert-call ref call new-fun)
(dolist (ref (leaf-refs entry))
- (convert-call-if-possible ref (continuation-dest (node-cont ref))))))
+ (convert-call-if-possible ref (lvar-dest (node-lvar ref))))))
;;; Use CONVERT-HAIRY-FUN-ENTRY to convert a &MORE-arg call to a known
;;; function into a local call to the MAIN-ENTRY.
(when (optional-dispatch-keyp fun)
(when (oddp (length more))
(compiler-warn "function called with odd number of ~
- arguments in keyword portion")
-
+ arguments in keyword portion")
(setf (basic-combination-kind call) :error)
(return-from convert-more-call))
(do ((key more (cddr key))
(temp more-temps (cddr temp)))
((null key))
- (let ((cont (first key)))
- (unless (constant-continuation-p cont)
+ (let ((lvar (first key)))
+ (unless (constant-lvar-p lvar)
(when flame
- (compiler-note "non-constant keyword in keyword call"))
+ (compiler-notify "non-constant keyword in keyword call"))
(setf (basic-combination-kind call) :error)
(return-from convert-more-call))
- (let ((name (continuation-value cont))
+ (let ((name (lvar-value lvar))
(dummy (first temp))
(val (second temp)))
- ;; FIXME: check whether KEY was supplied earlier
(when (and (eq name :allow-other-keys) (not allow-found))
(let ((val (second key)))
- (cond ((constant-continuation-p val)
+ (cond ((constant-lvar-p val)
(setq allow-found t
- allowp (continuation-value val)))
+ allowp (lvar-value val)))
(t (when flame
- (compiler-note "non-constant :ALLOW-OTHER-KEYS value"))
+ (compiler-notify "non-constant :ALLOW-OTHER-KEYS value"))
(setf (basic-combination-kind call) :error)
(return-from convert-more-call)))))
(dolist (var (key-vars)
(progn
(ignores dummy val)
(unless (eq name :allow-other-keys)
- (setq loser name))))
+ (setq loser (list name)))))
(let ((info (lambda-var-arg-info var)))
(when (eq (arg-info-key info) name)
- (ignores dummy)
- (supplied (cons var val))
- (return)))))))
+ (ignores dummy)
+ (if (member var (supplied) :key #'car)
+ (ignores val)
+ (supplied (cons var val)))
+ (return)))))))
(when (and loser (not (optional-dispatch-allowp fun)) (not allowp))
(compiler-warn "function called with unknown argument keyword ~S"
- loser)
+ (car loser))
(setf (basic-combination-kind call) :error)
(return-from convert-more-call)))
(collect ((call-args))
(do ((var arglist (cdr var))
(temp temps (cdr temp)))
- (())
+ ((null var))
(let ((info (lambda-var-arg-info (car var))))
(if info
(ecase (arg-info-kind info)
;;;; corresponding combination node, making the control transfer
;;;; explicit and allowing LETs to be mashed together into a single
;;;; block. The value of the LET is delivered directly to the
-;;;; original continuation for the call, eliminating the need to
-;;;; propagate information from the dummy result continuation.
+;;;; original lvar for the call, eliminating the need to
+;;;; propagate information from the dummy result lvar.
;;;; -- As far as IR1 optimization is concerned, it is interesting in
;;;; that there is only one expression that the variable can be bound
;;;; to, and this is easily substituted for.
(join-components component clambda-component)))
(let ((*current-component* component))
(node-ends-block call))
- ;; FIXME: Use DESTRUCTURING-BIND here, and grep for other
- ;; uses of '=.*length' which could also be converted to use
- ;; DESTRUCTURING-BIND or PROPER-LIST-OF-LENGTH-P.
- (aver (= (length (block-succ call-block)) 1))
- (let ((next-block (first (block-succ call-block))))
+ (destructuring-bind (next-block)
+ (block-succ call-block)
(unlink-blocks call-block next-block)
(link-blocks call-block bind-block)
next-block)))
;;; Handle the value semantics of LET conversion. Delete FUN's return
;;; node, and change the control flow to transfer to NEXT-BLOCK
-;;; instead. Move all the uses of the result continuation to CALL's
-;;; CONT.
-;;;
-;;; If the actual continuation is only used by the LET call, then we
-;;; intersect the type assertion on the dummy continuation with the
-;;; assertion for the actual continuation; in all other cases
-;;; assertions on the dummy continuation are lost.
-;;;
-;;; We also intersect the derived type of the CALL with the derived
-;;; type of all the dummy continuation's uses. This serves mainly to
-;;; propagate TRULY-THE through LETs.
+;;; instead. Move all the uses of the result lvar to CALL's lvar.
(defun move-return-uses (fun call next-block)
(declare (type clambda fun) (type basic-combination call)
(type cblock next-block))
(let* ((return (lambda-return fun))
- (return-block (node-block return)))
+ (return-block (progn
+ (ensure-block-start (node-prev return))
+ (node-block return))))
(unlink-blocks return-block
(component-tail (block-component return-block)))
(link-blocks return-block next-block)
(unlink-node return)
(delete-return return)
(let ((result (return-result return))
- (cont (node-cont call))
- (call-type (node-derived-type call)))
- (when (eq (continuation-use cont) call)
- (set-continuation-type-assertion
- cont
- (continuation-asserted-type result)
- (continuation-type-to-check result)))
+ (lvar (if (node-tail-p call)
+ (return-result (lambda-return (node-home-lambda call)))
+ (node-lvar call)))
+ (call-type (node-derived-type call)))
(unless (eq call-type *wild-type*)
- (do-uses (use result)
- (derive-node-type use call-type)))
- (substitute-continuation-uses cont result)))
- (values))
-
-;;; Change all CONT for all the calls to FUN to be the start
-;;; continuation for the bind node. This allows the blocks to be
-;;; joined if the caller count ever goes to one.
-(defun move-let-call-cont (fun)
- (declare (type clambda fun))
- (let ((new-cont (node-prev (lambda-bind fun))))
- (dolist (ref (leaf-refs fun))
- (let ((dest (continuation-dest (node-cont ref))))
- (delete-continuation-use dest)
- (add-continuation-use dest new-cont))))
+ ;; FIXME: Replace the call with unsafe CAST. -- APD, 2003-01-26
+ (do-uses (use result)
+ (derive-node-type use call-type)))
+ (substitute-lvar-uses lvar result
+ (and lvar (eq (lvar-uses lvar) call)))))
(values))
;;; We are converting FUN to be a LET when the call is in a non-tail
(dolist (called (lambda-calls-or-closes fun))
(when (lambda-p called)
(dolist (ref (leaf-refs called))
- (let ((this-call (continuation-dest (node-cont ref))))
+ (let ((this-call (node-dest ref)))
(when (and this-call
(node-tail-p this-call)
(eq (node-home-lambda this-call) fun))
(ecase (functional-kind called)
((nil :cleanup :optional)
(let ((block (node-block this-call))
- (cont (node-cont call)))
- (ensure-block-start cont)
+ (lvar (node-lvar call)))
(unlink-blocks block (first (block-succ block)))
(link-blocks block next-block)
- (delete-continuation-use this-call)
- (add-continuation-use this-call cont)))
+ (aver (not (node-lvar this-call)))
+ (add-lvar-use this-call lvar)))
(:deleted)
;; The called function might be an assignment in the
;; case where we are currently converting that function.
;;; tail-recursive local calls.
;;; -- If CALL is a non-tail call, or if both have returns, then
;;; we delete the callee's return, move its uses to the call's
-;;; result continuation, and transfer control to the appropriate
+;;; result lvar, and transfer control to the appropriate
;;; return point.
;;; -- If the callee has a return, but the caller doesn't, then we
;;; move the return to the caller.
(let* ((return (lambda-return fun))
(call-fun (node-home-lambda call))
(call-return (lambda-return call-fun)))
+ (when (and call-return
+ (block-delete-p (node-block call-return)))
+ (delete-return call-return)
+ (unlink-node call-return)
+ (setq call-return nil))
(cond ((not return))
((or next-block call-return)
(unless (block-delete-p (node-block return))
- (when (and (node-tail-p call)
- call-return
- (not (eq (node-cont call)
- (return-result call-return))))
- ;; We do not care to give a meaningful continuation to
- ;; a tail combination, but here we need it.
- (delete-continuation-use call)
- (add-continuation-use call (return-result call-return)))
- (move-return-uses fun call
- (or next-block (node-block call-return)))))
+ (unless next-block
+ (ensure-block-start (node-prev call-return))
+ (setq next-block (node-block call-return)))
+ (move-return-uses fun call next-block)))
(t
(aver (node-tail-p call))
(setf (lambda-return call-fun) return)
(setf (return-lambda return) call-fun)
(setf (lambda-return fun) nil))))
- (move-let-call-cont fun)
+ (%delete-lvar-use call) ; LET call does not have value semantics
(values))
;;; Actually do LET conversion. We call subfunctions to do most of the
-;;; work. We change the CALL's CONT to be the continuation heading the
-;;; BIND block, and also do REOPTIMIZE-CONTINUATION on the args and
-;;; CONT so that LET-specific IR1 optimizations get a chance. We blow
-;;; away any entry for the function in *FREE-FUNS* so that nobody
-;;; will create new references to it.
+;;; work. We do REOPTIMIZE-LVAR on the args and CALL's lvar so that
+;;; LET-specific IR1 optimizations get a chance. We blow away any
+;;; entry for the function in *FREE-FUNS* so that nobody will create
+;;; new references to it.
(defun let-convert (fun call)
(declare (type clambda fun) (type basic-combination call))
- (let ((next-block (if (node-tail-p call)
- nil
- (insert-let-body fun call))))
+ (let* ((next-block (insert-let-body fun call))
+ (next-block (if (node-tail-p call)
+ nil
+ next-block)))
(move-return-stuff fun call next-block)
- (merge-lets fun call)))
+ (merge-lets fun call)
+ (setf (node-tail-p call) nil)
+ ;; If CALL has a derive type NIL, it means that "its return" is
+ ;; unreachable, but the next BIND is still reachable; in order to
+ ;; not confuse MAYBE-TERMINATE-BLOCK...
+ (setf (node-derived-type call) *wild-type*)))
;;; Reoptimize all of CALL's args and its result.
(defun reoptimize-call (call)
(declare (type basic-combination call))
(dolist (arg (basic-combination-args call))
(when arg
- (reoptimize-continuation arg)))
- (reoptimize-continuation (node-cont call))
+ (reoptimize-lvar arg)))
+ (reoptimize-lvar (node-lvar call))
(values))
;;; Are there any declarations in force to say CLAMBDA shouldn't be
(let ((refs (leaf-refs clambda)))
(when (and refs
(null (rest refs))
- (member (functional-kind clambda) '(nil :assignment))
+ (memq (functional-kind clambda) '(nil :assignment))
(not (functional-entry-fun clambda)))
- (let* ((ref (first refs))
- (ref-cont (node-cont ref))
- (dest (continuation-dest ref-cont)))
- (when (and dest
- (basic-combination-p dest)
- (eq (basic-combination-fun dest) ref-cont)
+ (binding* ((ref (first refs))
+ (ref-lvar (node-lvar ref) :exit-if-null)
+ (dest (lvar-dest ref-lvar)))
+ (when (and (basic-combination-p dest)
+ (eq (basic-combination-fun dest) ref-lvar)
(eq (basic-combination-kind dest) :local)
- (not (block-delete-p (node-block dest)))
+ (not (node-to-be-deleted-p dest))
+ (not (block-delete-p (lambda-block clambda)))
(cond ((ok-initial-convert-p clambda) t)
(t
- (reoptimize-continuation ref-cont)
+ (reoptimize-lvar ref-lvar)
nil)))
(when (eq clambda (node-home-lambda dest))
(delete-lambda clambda)
;;; If a potentially TR local call really is TR, then convert it to
;;; jump directly to the called function. We also call
;;; MAYBE-CONVERT-TO-ASSIGNMENT. The first value is true if we
-;;; tail-convert. The second is the value of M-C-T-A. We can switch
-;;; the succesor (potentially deleting the RETURN node) unless:
-;;; -- The call has already been converted.
-;;; -- The call isn't TR (some implicit MV PROG1.)
-;;; -- The call is in an XEP (thus we might decide to make it non-tail
-;;; so that we can use known return inside the component.)
-;;; -- There is a change in the cleanup between the call in the return,
-;;; so we might need to introduce cleanup code.
+;;; tail-convert. The second is the value of M-C-T-A.
(defun maybe-convert-tail-local-call (call)
(declare (type combination call))
- (let ((return (continuation-dest (node-cont call))))
+ (let ((return (lvar-dest (node-lvar call)))
+ (fun (combination-lambda call)))
(aver (return-p return))
- (when (and (not (node-tail-p call))
+ (when (and (not (node-tail-p call)) ; otherwise already converted
+ ;; this is a tail call
(immediately-used-p (return-result return) call)
+ (only-harmless-cleanups (node-block call)
+ (node-block return))
+ ;; If the call is in an XEP, we might decide to make it
+ ;; non-tail so that we can use known return inside the
+ ;; component.
(not (eq (functional-kind (node-home-lambda call))
:external))
- (only-harmless-cleanups (node-block call)
- (node-block return)))
+ (not (block-delete-p (lambda-block fun))))
(node-ends-block call)
- (let ((block (node-block call))
- (fun (combination-lambda call)))
+ (let ((block (node-block call)))
(setf (node-tail-p call) t)
(unlink-blocks block (first (block-succ block)))
(link-blocks block (lambda-block fun))
+ (delete-lvar-use call)
(values t (maybe-convert-to-assignment fun))))))
;;; This is called when we believe it might make sense to convert
(let ((outside-non-tail-call nil)
(outside-call nil))
(when (and (dolist (ref (leaf-refs clambda) t)
- (let ((dest (continuation-dest (node-cont ref))))
+ (let ((dest (node-dest ref)))
(when (or (not dest)
(block-delete-p (node-block dest)))
(return nil))