0.7.9.41:

[sbcl.git] / src / compiler / node.lisp

diff --git a/src/compiler/node.lisp b/src/compiler/node.lisp
index 44f0bfe..5641114 100644 (file)
--- a/src/compiler/node.lisp
+++ b/src/compiler/node.lisp
@@ -124,14 +124,14 @@
   ;;    will be used. In the latter case, LTN must ensure that a safe
   ;;    implementation *is* used.
   ;;
-  ;; :ERROR
-  ;;    There is a compile-time type error in some use of this
-  ;;    continuation. A type check should still be generated, but be
-  ;;    careful.
-  ;;
   ;; This is computed lazily by CONTINUATION-DERIVED-TYPE, so use
   ;; CONTINUATION-TYPE-CHECK instead of the %'ed slot accessor.
-  (%type-check t :type (member t nil :deleted :no-check :error))
+  (%type-check t :type (member t nil :deleted :no-check))
+  ;; Asserted type, weakend according to policies
+  (type-to-check *wild-type* :type ctype)
+  ;; Cached type which is checked by DEST. If NIL, then this must be
+  ;; recomputed: see CONTINUATION-EXTERNALLY-CHECKABLE-TYPE.
+  (%externally-checkable-type nil :type (or null ctype))
   ;; something or other that the back end annotates this continuation with
   (info nil)
   ;; uses of this continuation in the lexical environment. They are