;;;; While most of SBCL is derived from the CMU CL system, the test
;;;; files (like this one) were written from scratch after the fork
;;;; from CMU CL.
-;;;;
+;;;;
;;;; This software is in the public domain and is provided with
;;;; absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS files for
;;;; more information.
(in-package :cl-user)
+
+(load "test-util.lisp")
+(load "compiler-test-util.lisp")
+(use-package :test-util)
\f
;;;; properties of symbols, e.g. presence of doc strings for public symbols
;;; furthermore do the right thing when it gets a package designator.
;;; (bug reported and fixed by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2001-10-17)
(assert (< 0
- (length (apropos-list "PRINT" :cl))
- (length (apropos-list "PRINT"))))
+ (length (apropos-list "PRINT" :cl))
+ (length (apropos-list "PRINT"))))
+;;; Further, it should correctly deal with the external-only flag (bug
+;;; reported by cliini on #lisp IRC 2003-05-30, fixed in sbcl-0.8.0.1x
+;;; by CSR)
+(assert (= (length (apropos-list "" "CL"))
+ (length (apropos-list "" "CL" t))))
+(assert (< 0
+ (length (apropos-list "" "SB-VM" t))
+ (length (apropos-list "" "SB-VM"))))
\f
;;; DESCRIBE shouldn't fail on rank-0 arrays (bug reported and fixed
;;; by Lutz Euler sbcl-devel 2002-12-03)
;;; We should have documentation for our extension package:
(assert (documentation (find-package "SB-EXT") t))
+
+;;; DECLARE should not be a special operator
+(assert (not (special-operator-p 'declare)))
+
+;;; WITH-TIMEOUT should accept more than one form in its body.
+(with-test (:name :with-timeout-forms)
+ (handler-bind ((sb-ext:timeout #'continue))
+ (sb-ext:with-timeout 3
+ (sleep 2)
+ (sleep 2))))
+
+;;; SLEEP should not cons except on 32-bit platforms when
+;;; (> (mod seconds 1) (* most-positive-fixnum 1e-9))
+(with-test (:name (sleep :non-consing) :fails-on :win32)
+ (handler-case (sb-ext:with-timeout 5
+ (ctu:assert-no-consing (sleep 0.00001s0))
+ (locally (declare (notinline sleep))
+ (ctu:assert-no-consing (sleep 0.00001s0))
+ (ctu:assert-no-consing (sleep 0.00001d0))
+ (ctu:assert-no-consing (sleep 1/100000003))))
+ (timeout ())))
+
+;;; Changes to make SLEEP cons less led to SLEEP
+;;; not sleeping at all on 32-bit platforms when
+;;; (> (mod seconds 1) (* most-positive-fixnum 1e-9)).
+(with-test (:name :bug-1194673)
+ (assert (eq :timeout
+ (handler-case
+ (with-timeout 0.01
+ (sleep 0.6))
+ (timeout ()
+ :timeout)))))
+
+;;; SLEEP should work with large integers as well
+(with-test (:name (sleep :pretty-much-forever))
+ (assert (eq :timeout
+ (handler-case
+ (sb-ext:with-timeout 1
+ (sleep (ash 1 (* 2 sb-vm:n-word-bits))))
+ (sb-ext:timeout ()
+ :timeout)))))
+
+;;; DOCUMENTATION should return nil, not signal slot-unbound
+(documentation 'fixnum 'type)
+(documentation 'class 'type)
+(documentation (find-class 'class) 'type)
+(documentation 'foo 'structure)
+
+;;; DECODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME should accept second-resolution time-zones.
+(macrolet ((test (ut time-zone list)
+ (destructuring-bind (sec min hr date mon yr day tz)
+ list
+ `(multiple-value-bind (sec min hr date mon yr day dst tz)
+ (decode-universal-time ,ut ,time-zone)
+ (declare (ignore dst))
+ (assert (= sec ,sec))
+ (assert (= min ,min))
+ (assert (= hr ,hr))
+ (assert (= date ,date))
+ (assert (= mon ,mon))
+ (assert (= yr ,yr))
+ (assert (= day ,day))
+ (assert (= tz ,tz))))))
+ (test (* 86400 365) -1/3600 (1 0 0 1 1 1901 1 -1/3600))
+ (test (* 86400 365) 0 (0 0 0 1 1 1901 1 0))
+ (test (* 86400 365) 1/3600 (59 59 23 31 12 1900 0 1/3600)))
+
+;;; DECODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME shouldn't fail when the time is outside UNIX
+;;; 32-bit time_t and a timezone wasn't passed
+(decode-universal-time 0 nil)
+
+;;; ENCODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME should be able to encode the universal time
+;;; 0 when passed a representation in a timezone where the
+;;; representation of 0 as a decoded time is in 1899.
+(encode-universal-time 0 0 23 31 12 1899 1)
+
+;;; DISASSEMBLE shouldn't fail on purified functions
+(disassemble 'cl:+)
+(disassemble 'sb-ext:run-program)
+
+;;; minimal test of GC: see stress-gc.{sh,lisp} for a more
+;;; comprehensive test.
+(loop repeat 2
+ do (compile nil '(lambda (x) x))
+ do (sb-ext:gc :full t))
+
+;;; On x86-64, the instruction definitions for CMP*[PS][SD] were broken
+;;; so that the disassembler threw an error when they were used with
+;;; one operand in memory.
+(with-test (:name :bug-814702)
+ (disassemble (lambda (x)
+ (= #C(2.0f0 3.0f0)
+ (the (complex single-float) x))))
+ (disassemble (lambda (x y)
+ (= (the (complex single-float) x)
+ (the (complex single-float) y)))))
+
+;;; Check that SLEEP called with ratios (with no common factors with
+;;; 1000000000, and smaller than 1/1000000000) works more or less as
+;;; expected.
+(with-test (:name :sleep-ratios)
+ (let ((fun0a (compile nil '(lambda () (sleep 1/7))))
+ (fun0b (compile nil '(lambda () (sleep 1/100000000000000000000000000))))
+ (fun1 (compile nil '(lambda (x) (sleep x))))
+ (start-time (get-universal-time)))
+ (sleep 1/7)
+ (sleep 1/100000000000000000000000000)
+ (funcall fun0a)
+ (funcall fun0b)
+ (funcall fun1 1/7)
+ (funcall fun1 1/100000000000000000000000000)
+ (assert (< (- (get-universal-time) start-time) 2))))