;;;; absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS files for
;;;; more information.
-;;;; Note that the MOP is not in a supported state. Package issues
-;;;; (both MOP/SB-PCL and CL/SB-PCL) have yet to be resolved, and
-;;;; there is likely to be missing functionality. However, this seems
-;;;; a good a way as any of ensuring that we have no regressions.
+;;;; Note that the MOP is not in an entirely supported state.
+;;;; However, this seems a good a way as any of ensuring that we have
+;;;; no regressions.
(defpackage "MOP-TEST"
- ;; eventually, we might want "MOP" as well here.
- (:use "CL"))
+ (:use "CL" "SB-MOP"))
(in-package "MOP-TEST")
\f
;;; Readers for Class Metaobjects (pp. 212--214 of AMOP)
(defclass red-herring (forward-ref) ())
-(assert (null (sb-pcl:class-direct-slots (sb-pcl:find-class 'forward-ref))))
-(assert (null (sb-pcl:class-direct-default-initargs
- (sb-pcl:find-class 'forward-ref))))
+(assert (null (class-direct-slots (find-class 'forward-ref))))
+(assert (null (class-direct-default-initargs
+ (find-class 'forward-ref))))
\f
;;; Readers for Generic Function Metaobjects (pp. 216--218 of AMOP)
(defgeneric fn-with-odd-arg-precedence (a b c)
(:argument-precedence-order b c a))
(assert (equal
- (sb-pcl:generic-function-lambda-list #'fn-with-odd-arg-precedence)
+ (generic-function-lambda-list #'fn-with-odd-arg-precedence)
'(a b c)))
(assert (equal
- (sb-pcl:generic-function-argument-precedence-order #'fn-with-odd-arg-precedence)
+ (generic-function-argument-precedence-order #'fn-with-odd-arg-precedence)
'(b c a)))
;;; Test for DOCUMENTATION's order, which was wrong until sbcl-0.7.8.39
(assert (equal
- (sb-pcl:generic-function-argument-precedence-order #'documentation)
- (let ((ll (sb-pcl:generic-function-lambda-list #'documentation)))
+ (generic-function-argument-precedence-order #'documentation)
+ (let ((ll (generic-function-lambda-list #'documentation)))
(list (nth 1 ll) (nth 0 ll)))))
(assert (null
- (sb-pcl:generic-function-declarations #'fn-with-odd-arg-precedence)))
+ (generic-function-declarations #'fn-with-odd-arg-precedence)))
(defgeneric gf-with-declarations (x)
(declare (optimize (speed 3)))
(declare (optimize (safety 0))))
-(let ((decls (sb-pcl:generic-function-declarations #'gf-with-declarations)))
+(let ((decls (generic-function-declarations #'gf-with-declarations)))
(assert (= (length decls) 2))
(assert (member '(optimize (speed 3)) decls :test #'equal))
(assert (member '(optimize (safety 0)) decls :test #'equal)))
(a-class-slot :allocation :class :accessor a-class-slot)))
(dolist (m (list (list #'an-instance-slot :instance)
(list #'a-class-slot :class)))
- (let ((methods (sb-pcl:generic-function-methods (car m))))
+ (let ((methods (generic-function-methods (car m))))
(assert (= (length methods) 1))
- (assert (eq (sb-pcl:slot-definition-allocation
- (sb-pcl:accessor-method-slot-definition
+ (assert (eq (slot-definition-allocation
+ (accessor-method-slot-definition
(car methods)))
(cadr m)))))
\f
;;; Class Finalization Protocol (see section 5.5.2 of AMOP)
(let ((finalized-count 0))
- (defmethod sb-pcl:finalize-inheritance :after ((x sb-pcl::standard-class))
+ (defmethod finalize-inheritance :after ((x standard-class))
(incf finalized-count))
(defun get-count () finalized-count))
(defclass finalization-test-1 () ())
;;; that it is at least possible to define classes with that as a
;;; metaclass.
(defclass gf-class (standard-generic-function) ()
- (:metaclass sb-pcl::funcallable-standard-class))
+ (:metaclass funcallable-standard-class))
(defgeneric g (a b c)
(:generic-function-class gf-class))
\f
;;; relationships. These aren't necessarily true, but are probably
;;; not going to change often.
(dolist (x '(number array sequence character symbol))
- (assert (eq (car (sb-pcl:class-direct-superclasses (sb-pcl:find-class x)))
- (sb-pcl:find-class t)))
- (assert (member (sb-pcl:find-class x)
- (sb-pcl:class-direct-subclasses (sb-pcl:find-class t)))))
+ (assert (eq (car (class-direct-superclasses (find-class x)))
+ (find-class t)))
+ (assert (member (find-class x)
+ (class-direct-subclasses (find-class t)))))
+\f
+;;; the class-prototype of the NULL class used to be some weird
+;;; standard-instance-like thing. Make sure it's actually NIL.
+;;;
+;;; (and FIXME: eventually turn this into asserting that the prototype
+;;; of all built-in-classes is of the relevant type)
+(assert (null (class-prototype (find-class 'null))))
+\f
+;;; simple consistency checks for the SB-MOP package: all of the
+;;; functionality specified in AMOP is in functions and classes:
+(assert (null (loop for x being each external-symbol in "SB-MOP"
+ unless (or (fboundp x) (find-class x)) collect x)))
+;;; and all generic functions in SB-MOP have at least one specified
+;;; method, except for UPDATE-DEPENDENT
+(assert (null (loop for x being each external-symbol in "SB-MOP"
+ unless (or (not (fboundp x))
+ (eq x 'update-dependent)
+ (not (typep (fdefinition x) 'generic-function))
+ (> (length (generic-function-methods
+ (fdefinition x)))
+ 0))
+ collect x)))
+\f
+;;; make sure that ENSURE-CLASS-USING-CLASS's arguments are the right
+;;; way round (!)
+(defvar *e-c-u-c-arg-order* nil)
+(defmethod ensure-class-using-class :after
+ (class (name (eql 'e-c-u-c-arg-order)) &key &allow-other-keys)
+ (setf *e-c-u-c-arg-order* t))
+(defclass e-c-u-c-arg-orderoid () ())
+(assert (null *e-c-u-c-arg-order*))
+(defclass e-c-u-c-arg-order () ())
+(assert (eq *e-c-u-c-arg-order* t))
+\f
+;;; verify that FIND-CLASS works after FINALIZE-INHERITANCE
+(defclass automethod-class (standard-class) ())
+(defmethod validate-superclass ((c1 automethod-class) (c2 standard-class))
+ t)
+(defmethod finalize-inheritance :after ((x automethod-class))
+ (format t "~&~S ~S~%" x (find-class (class-name x))))
+(defclass automethod-object () ()
+ (:metaclass automethod-class))
+(defvar *automethod-object* (make-instance 'automethod-object))
+(assert (typep *automethod-object* 'automethod-object))
+\f
+;;; COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-SLOT-DEFINITION should take three arguments, one
+;;; of which is the name of the slot.
+(defvar *compute-effective-slot-definition-count* 0)
+(defmethod compute-effective-slot-definition :before
+ (class (name (eql 'foo)) dsds)
+ (incf *compute-effective-slot-definition-count*))
+(defclass cesd-test-class ()
+ ((foo :initarg :foo)))
+(make-instance 'cesd-test-class :foo 3)
+;;; FIXME: this assertion seems a little weak. I don't know why
+;;; COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-SLOT-DEFINITION gets called twice in this
+;;; sequence, nor whether that's compliant with AMOP. -- CSR,
+;;; 2003-04-17
+(assert (> *compute-effective-slot-definition-count* 0))
+\f
+;;; this used to cause a nasty uncaught metacircularity in PCL.
+(defclass substandard-method (standard-method) ())
+(defgeneric substandard-defgeneric (x y)
+ (:method-class substandard-method)
+ (:method ((x number) (y number)) (+ x y))
+ (:method ((x string) (y string)) (concatenate 'string x y)))
+(assert (= (substandard-defgeneric 1 2) 3))
+(assert (string= (substandard-defgeneric "1" "2") "12"))
+\f
+(let* ((x (find-class 'pathname))
+ (xs (class-direct-subclasses x)))
+ (assert (>= (length xs) 1))
+ (assert (member (find-class 'logical-pathname) xs)))
+
+;;; BUG 338: "MOP specializers as type specifiers"
+;;; (reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel 2004-06-11)
+(let* ((m (defmethod eql-specialized-method ((x (eql 4.0))) 3.0))
+ (spec (first (sb-mop:method-specializers m))))
+ (assert (not (typep 1 spec)))
+ (assert (typep 4.0 spec)))
+\f
+;;; BUG #334, relating to programmatic addition of slots to a class
+;;; with COMPUTE-SLOTS.
+;;;
+;;; FIXME: the DUMMY classes here are to prevent class finalization
+;;; before the compute-slots method is around. This should probably
+;;; be done by defining the COMPUTE-SLOTS methods on a metaclass,
+;;; which can be defined before.
+;;;
+;;; a. adding an :allocation :instance slot
+(defclass class-to-add-instance-slot (dummy-ctais) ())
+(defmethod compute-slots ((c (eql (find-class 'class-to-add-instance-slot))))
+ (append (call-next-method)
+ (list (make-instance 'standard-effective-slot-definition
+ :name 'y
+ :allocation :instance))))
+(defclass dummy-ctais () ((x :allocation :class)))
+(assert (equal (mapcar #'slot-definition-allocation
+ (class-slots (find-class 'class-to-add-instance-slot)))
+ ;; FIXME: is the order really guaranteed?
+ '(:class :instance)))
+(assert (typep (slot-definition-location
+ (cadr (class-slots (find-class 'class-to-add-instance-slot))))
+ 'unsigned-byte))
+#| (assert (typep (slot-definition-location (car ...)) '???)) |#
+(let ((x (make-instance 'class-to-add-instance-slot)))
+ (assert (not (slot-boundp x 'x)))
+ (setf (slot-value x 'x) t)
+ (assert (not (slot-boundp x 'y)))
+ (setf (slot-value x 'y) 1)
+ (assert (= 1 (slot-value x 'y))))
+(let ((x (make-instance 'class-to-add-instance-slot)))
+ (assert (slot-boundp x 'x))
+ (assert (eq t (slot-value x 'x)))
+ (assert (not (slot-boundp x 'y))))
+
+;;; b. adding an :allocation :class slot
+(defclass class-to-add-class-slot (dummy-ctacs) ())
+(defmethod compute-slots ((c (eql (find-class 'class-to-add-class-slot))))
+ (append (call-next-method)
+ (list (make-instance 'standard-effective-slot-definition
+ :name 'y
+ :allocation :class))))
+(defclass dummy-ctacs () ((x :allocation :class)))
+(assert (equal (mapcar #'slot-definition-allocation
+ (class-slots (find-class 'class-to-add-class-slot)))
+ '(:class :class)))
+(let ((x (make-instance 'class-to-add-class-slot)))
+ (assert (not (slot-boundp x 'x)))
+ (setf (slot-value x 'x) nil)
+ (assert (not (slot-boundp x 'y)))
+ (setf (slot-value x 'y) 1)
+ (assert (= 1 (slot-value x 'y))))
+(let ((x (make-instance 'class-to-add-class-slot)))
+ (assert (slot-boundp x 'x))
+ (assert (eq nil (slot-value x 'x)))
+ (assert (slot-boundp x 'y))
+ (assert (= 1 (slot-value x 'y))))
+;; extra paranoia: check that we haven't broken the instance-slot class
+(let ((x (make-instance 'class-to-add-instance-slot)))
+ (assert (slot-boundp x 'x))
+ (assert (eq t (slot-value x 'x)))
+ (assert (not (slot-boundp x 'y))))
\f
;;;; success
(sb-ext:quit :unix-status 104)