X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;f=src%2Fcode%2Flate-type.lisp;h=870601748c2d33a85d67e7a6c74c425edfa5af9f;hb=4fc9d21ae1d8a6a2f8ff70f589d5da103203de13;hp=656bb635b5cb36831ba73327a69a17a71f9e97b8;hpb=cea4896b2482b7b2b429c1631d774b4cfbc0efba;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/src/code/late-type.lisp b/src/code/late-type.lisp index 656bb63..8706017 100644 --- a/src/code/late-type.lisp +++ b/src/code/late-type.lisp @@ -61,14 +61,12 @@ (funcall method type2 type1) (vanilla-intersection type1 type2)))) -;;; This is used by DEFINE-SUPERCLASSES to define the SUBTYPE-ARG1 -;;; method. INFO is a list of conses (SUPERCLASS-CLASS . -;;; {GUARD-TYPE-SPECIFIER | NIL}). This will never be called with a -;;; hairy type as TYPE2, since the hairy type TYPE2 method gets first -;;; crack. -;;; -;;; FIXME: Declare this as INLINE, since it's only used in one place. -(defun has-superclasses-complex-subtypep-arg1 (type1 type2 info) +;;; This is used by !DEFINE-SUPERCLASSES to define the SUBTYPE-ARG1 +;;; method. INFO is a list of conses +;;; (SUPERCLASS-CLASS . {GUARD-TYPE-SPECIFIER | NIL}). +;;; This will never be called with a hairy type as TYPE2, since the +;;; hairy type TYPE2 method gets first crack. +(defun !has-superclasses-complex-subtypep-arg1 (type1 type2 info) (values (and (sb!xc:typep type2 'sb!xc:class) (dolist (x info nil) @@ -94,7 +92,7 @@ ;;; G0,(and G1 (not G0)), (and G2 (not (or G0 G1))). ;;; ;;; WHEN controls when the forms are executed. -(defmacro define-superclasses (type-class-name specs when) +(defmacro !define-superclasses (type-class-name specs when) (let ((type-class (gensym "TYPE-CLASS-")) (info (gensym "INFO"))) `(,when @@ -107,7 +105,7 @@ ',specs))) (setf (type-class-complex-subtypep-arg1 ,type-class) (lambda (type1 type2) - (has-superclasses-complex-subtypep-arg1 type1 type2 ,info))) + (!has-superclasses-complex-subtypep-arg1 type1 type2 ,info))) (setf (type-class-complex-subtypep-arg2 ,type-class) #'delegate-complex-subtypep-arg2) (setf (type-class-complex-intersection ,type-class) @@ -136,17 +134,17 @@ ;; the type of the argument value (type (required-argument) :type ctype)) -(define-type-method (values :simple-subtypep :complex-subtypep-arg1) +(!define-type-method (values :simple-subtypep :complex-subtypep-arg1) (type1 type2) (declare (ignore type2)) (error "Subtypep is illegal on this type:~% ~S" (type-specifier type1))) -(define-type-method (values :complex-subtypep-arg2) +(!define-type-method (values :complex-subtypep-arg2) (type1 type2) (declare (ignore type1)) (error "Subtypep is illegal on this type:~% ~S" (type-specifier type2))) -(define-type-method (values :unparse) (type) +(!define-type-method (values :unparse) (type) (cons 'values (unparse-args-types type))) ;;; Return true if LIST1 and LIST2 have the same elements in the same @@ -167,7 +165,7 @@ (unless val (return (values nil t)))))) -(define-type-method (values :simple-=) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (values :simple-=) (type1 type2) (let ((rest1 (args-type-rest type1)) (rest2 (args-type-rest type2))) (cond ((or (args-type-keyp type1) (args-type-keyp type2) @@ -186,7 +184,7 @@ (values-type-optional type2)) (values (and req-val opt-val) (and req-win opt-win)))))))) -(define-type-class function) +(!define-type-class function) ;;; a flag that we can bind to cause complex function types to be ;;; unparsed as FUNCTION. This is useful when we want a type that we @@ -194,7 +192,7 @@ (defvar *unparse-function-type-simplify*) (!cold-init-forms (setq *unparse-function-type-simplify* nil)) -(define-type-method (function :unparse) (type) +(!define-type-method (function :unparse) (type) (if *unparse-function-type-simplify* 'function (list 'function @@ -206,34 +204,34 @@ ;;; Since all function types are equivalent to FUNCTION, they are all ;;; subtypes of each other. -(define-type-method (function :simple-subtypep) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (function :simple-subtypep) (type1 type2) (declare (ignore type1 type2)) (values t t)) -(define-superclasses function ((function)) !cold-init-forms) +(!define-superclasses function ((function)) !cold-init-forms) ;;; The union or intersection of two FUNCTION types is FUNCTION. -(define-type-method (function :simple-union) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (function :simple-union) (type1 type2) (declare (ignore type1 type2)) (specifier-type 'function)) -(define-type-method (function :simple-intersection) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (function :simple-intersection) (type1 type2) (declare (ignore type1 type2)) (values (specifier-type 'function) t)) ;;; ### Not very real, but good enough for redefining transforms ;;; according to type: -(define-type-method (function :simple-=) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (function :simple-=) (type1 type2) (values (equalp type1 type2) t)) -(define-type-class constant :inherits values) +(!define-type-class constant :inherits values) -(define-type-method (constant :unparse) (type) +(!define-type-method (constant :unparse) (type) `(constant-argument ,(type-specifier (constant-type-type type)))) -(define-type-method (constant :simple-=) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (constant :simple-=) (type1 type2) (type= (constant-type-type type1) (constant-type-type type2))) -(def-type-translator constant-argument (type) +(!def-type-translator constant-argument (type) (make-constant-type :type (specifier-type type))) ;;; Given a LAMBDA-LIST-like values type specification and an ARGS-TYPE @@ -244,7 +242,7 @@ (multiple-value-bind (required optional restp rest keyp keys allowp aux) (parse-lambda-list lambda-list) (when aux - (error "&Aux in a FUNCTION or VALUES type: ~S." lambda-list)) + (error "&AUX in a FUNCTION or VALUES type: ~S." lambda-list)) (setf (args-type-required result) (mapcar #'specifier-type required)) (setf (args-type-optional result) (mapcar #'specifier-type optional)) (setf (args-type-rest result) (if restp (specifier-type rest) nil)) @@ -255,7 +253,8 @@ (error "Keyword type description is not a two-list: ~S." key)) (let ((kwd (first key))) (when (find kwd (key-info) :key #'key-info-name) - (error "Repeated keyword ~S in lambda list: ~S." kwd lambda-list)) + (error "~@" + kwd lambda-list)) (key-info (make-key-info :name kwd :type (specifier-type (second key)))))) (setf (args-type-keywords result) (key-info))) @@ -291,7 +290,7 @@ (result))) -(def-type-translator function (&optional (args '*) (result '*)) +(!def-type-translator function (&optional (args '*) (result '*)) (let ((res (make-function-type :returns (values-specifier-type result)))) (if (eq args '*) @@ -299,7 +298,7 @@ (parse-args-types args res)) res)) -(def-type-translator values (&rest values) +(!def-type-translator values (&rest values) (let ((res (make-values-type))) (parse-args-types values res) res)) @@ -309,16 +308,19 @@ ;;;; We provide a few special operations that can be meaningfully used ;;;; on VALUES types (as well as on any other type). -;;; Return the type of the first value indicated by Type. This is used -;;; by people who don't want to have to deal with values types. -#!-sb-fluid (declaim (freeze-type values-type) (inline single-value-type)) +;;; Return the type of the first value indicated by TYPE. This is used +;;; by people who don't want to have to deal with VALUES types. +#!-sb-fluid (declaim (freeze-type values-type)) +; (inline single-value-type)) (defun single-value-type (type) (declare (type ctype type)) (cond ((values-type-p type) (or (car (args-type-required type)) - (car (args-type-optional type)) + (if (args-type-optional type) + (type-union (car (args-type-optional type)) + (specifier-type 'null))) (args-type-rest type) - *universal-type*)) + (specifier-type 'null))) ((eq type *wild-type*) *universal-type*) (t @@ -338,10 +340,10 @@ (values fixed (+ fixed (length (args-type-optional type)))))) (values nil nil))) -;;; Determine if Type corresponds to a definite number of values. The -;;; first value is a list of the types for each value, and the second -;;; value is the number of values. If the number of values is not -;;; fixed, then return NIL and :Unknown. +;;; Determine whether TYPE corresponds to a definite number of values. +;;; The first value is a list of the types for each value, and the +;;; second value is the number of values. If the number of values is +;;; not fixed, then return NIL and :UNKNOWN. (defun values-types (type) (declare (type ctype type)) (cond ((eq type *wild-type*) @@ -360,15 +362,15 @@ ;;; Return two values: ;;; 1. A list of all the positional (fixed and optional) types. ;;; 2. The &REST type (if any). If keywords allowed, *UNIVERSAL-TYPE*. -;;; If no keywords or rest, *EMPTY-TYPE*. -(defun values-type-types (type) +;;; If no keywords or &REST, then the DEFAULT-TYPE. +(defun values-type-types (type &optional (default-type *empty-type*)) (declare (type values-type type)) (values (append (args-type-required type) (args-type-optional type)) (cond ((args-type-keyp type) *universal-type*) ((args-type-rest type)) (t - *empty-type*)))) + default-type)))) ;;; Return a list of OPERATION applied to the types in TYPES1 and ;;; TYPES2, padding with REST2 as needed. TYPES1 must not be shorter @@ -420,13 +422,16 @@ ;;; OPERATION returned true as its second value each time we called ;;; it. Since we approximate the intersection of VALUES types, the ;;; second value being true doesn't mean the result is exact. -(defun args-type-op (type1 type2 operation nreq) - (declare (type ctype type1 type2) (type function operation nreq)) +(defun args-type-op (type1 type2 operation nreq default-type) + (declare (type ctype type1 type2 default-type) + (type function operation nreq)) (if (or (values-type-p type1) (values-type-p type2)) (let ((type1 (coerce-to-values type1)) (type2 (coerce-to-values type2))) - (multiple-value-bind (types1 rest1) (values-type-types type1) - (multiple-value-bind (types2 rest2) (values-type-types type2) + (multiple-value-bind (types1 rest1) + (values-type-types type1 default-type) + (multiple-value-bind (types2 rest2) + (values-type-types type2 default-type) (multiple-value-bind (rest rest-exact) (funcall operation rest1 rest2) (multiple-value-bind (res res-exact) @@ -447,7 +452,7 @@ :optional (if opt-last (subseq opt 0 (1+ opt-last)) ()) - :rest (if (eq rest *empty-type*) nil rest)) + :rest (if (eq rest default-type) nil rest)) (and rest-exact res-exact))))))))) (funcall operation type1 type2))) @@ -468,7 +473,7 @@ ((eq type1 *empty-type*) type2) ((eq type2 *empty-type*) type1) (t - (values (args-type-op type1 type2 #'type-union #'min))))) + (values (args-type-op type1 type2 #'type-union #'min *empty-type*))))) (defun-cached (values-type-intersection :hash-function type-cache-hash :hash-bits 8 :values 2 @@ -479,7 +484,10 @@ (cond ((eq type1 *wild-type*) (values type2 t)) ((eq type2 *wild-type*) (values type1 t)) (t - (args-type-op type1 type2 #'type-intersection #'max)))) + (args-type-op type1 type2 + #'type-intersection + #'max + (specifier-type 'null))))) ;;; This is like TYPES-INTERSECT, except that it sort of works on ;;; VALUES types. Note that due to the semantics of @@ -557,9 +565,9 @@ (eq type2 *empty-type*)) (values nil t)) (t - (invoke-type-method :simple-subtypep :complex-subtypep-arg2 - type1 type2 - :complex-arg1 :complex-subtypep-arg1)))) + (!invoke-type-method :simple-subtypep :complex-subtypep-arg2 + type1 type2 + :complex-arg1 :complex-subtypep-arg1)))) ;;; Just parse the type specifiers and call CSUBTYPE. (defun sb!xc:subtypep (type1 type2) @@ -582,7 +590,7 @@ (declare (type ctype type1 type2)) (if (eq type1 type2) (values t t) - (invoke-type-method :simple-= :complex-= type1 type2))) + (!invoke-type-method :simple-= :complex-= type1 type2))) ;;; Not exactly the negation of TYPE=, since when the relationship is ;;; uncertain, we still return NIL, NIL. This is useful in cases where @@ -606,9 +614,9 @@ (declare (type ctype type1 type2)) (if (eq type1 type2) type1 - (let ((res (invoke-type-method :simple-union :complex-union - type1 type2 - :default :vanilla))) + (let ((res (!invoke-type-method :simple-union :complex-union + type1 type2 + :default :vanilla))) (cond ((eq res :vanilla) (or (vanilla-union type1 type2) (make-union-type (list type1 type2)))) @@ -630,9 +638,9 @@ (declare (type ctype type1 type2)) (if (eq type1 type2) (values type1 t) - (invoke-type-method :simple-intersection :complex-intersection - type1 type2 - :default (values *empty-type* t)))) + (!invoke-type-method :simple-intersection :complex-intersection + type1 type2 + :default (values *empty-type* t)))) ;;; The first value is true unless the types don't intersect. The ;;; second value is true if the first value is definitely correct. NIL @@ -661,8 +669,8 @@ ;;; (VALUES-SPECIFIER-TYPE and SPECIFIER-TYPE moved from here to ;;; early-type.lisp by WHN ca. 19990201.) -;;; Take a list of type specifiers, compute the translation and define -;;; it as a builtin type. +;;; Take a list of type specifiers, computing the translation of each +;;; specifier and defining it as a builtin type. (declaim (ftype (function (list) (values)) precompute-types)) (defun precompute-types (specs) (dolist (spec specs) @@ -674,7 +682,7 @@ ;;;; built-in types -(define-type-class named) +(!define-type-class named) (defvar *wild-type*) (defvar *empty-type*) @@ -696,32 +704,32 @@ (frob nil *empty-type*) (frob t *universal-type*))) -(define-type-method (named :simple-=) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (named :simple-=) (type1 type2) (values (eq type1 type2) t)) -(define-type-method (named :simple-subtypep) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (named :simple-subtypep) (type1 type2) (values (or (eq type1 *empty-type*) (eq type2 *wild-type*)) t)) -(define-type-method (named :complex-subtypep-arg1) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (named :complex-subtypep-arg1) (type1 type2) (assert (not (hairy-type-p type2))) (values (eq type1 *empty-type*) t)) -(define-type-method (named :complex-subtypep-arg2) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (named :complex-subtypep-arg2) (type1 type2) (if (hairy-type-p type1) (values nil nil) (values (not (eq type2 *empty-type*)) t))) -(define-type-method (named :complex-intersection) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (named :complex-intersection) (type1 type2) (vanilla-intersection type1 type2)) -(define-type-method (named :unparse) (x) +(!define-type-method (named :unparse) (x) (named-type-name x)) ;;;; hairy and unknown types -(define-type-method (hairy :unparse) (x) (hairy-type-specifier x)) +(!define-type-method (hairy :unparse) (x) (hairy-type-specifier x)) -(define-type-method (hairy :simple-subtypep) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (hairy :simple-subtypep) (type1 type2) (let ((hairy-spec1 (hairy-type-specifier type1)) (hairy-spec2 (hairy-type-specifier type2))) (cond ((and (consp hairy-spec1) (eq (car hairy-spec1) 'not) @@ -733,7 +741,7 @@ (t (values nil nil))))) -(define-type-method (hairy :complex-subtypep-arg2) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (hairy :complex-subtypep-arg2) (type1 type2) (let ((hairy-spec (hairy-type-specifier type2))) (cond ((and (consp hairy-spec) (eq (car hairy-spec) 'not)) (multiple-value-bind (val win) @@ -744,29 +752,29 @@ (t (values nil nil))))) -(define-type-method (hairy :complex-subtypep-arg1 :complex-=) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (hairy :complex-subtypep-arg1 :complex-=) (type1 type2) (declare (ignore type1 type2)) (values nil nil)) -(define-type-method (hairy :simple-intersection :complex-intersection) +(!define-type-method (hairy :simple-intersection :complex-intersection) (type1 type2) (declare (ignore type2)) (values type1 nil)) -(define-type-method (hairy :complex-union) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (hairy :complex-union) (type1 type2) (make-union-type (list type1 type2))) -(define-type-method (hairy :simple-=) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (hairy :simple-=) (type1 type2) (if (equal (hairy-type-specifier type1) (hairy-type-specifier type2)) (values t t) (values nil nil))) -(def-type-translator not (&whole whole type) +(!def-type-translator not (&whole whole type) (declare (ignore type)) (make-hairy-type :specifier whole)) -(def-type-translator satisfies (&whole whole fun) +(!def-type-translator satisfies (&whole whole fun) (declare (ignore fun)) (make-hairy-type :specifier whole)) @@ -774,11 +782,11 @@ ;;; A list of all the float formats, in order of decreasing precision. (eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute) - (defconstant float-formats + (defparameter *float-formats* '(long-float double-float single-float short-float))) ;;; The type of a float format. -(deftype float-format () `(member ,@float-formats)) +(deftype float-format () `(member ,@*float-formats*)) #!+negative-zero-is-not-zero (defun make-numeric-type (&key class format (complexp :real) low high @@ -802,9 +810,9 @@ :high (canonicalise-high-bound high) :enumerable enumerable))) -(define-type-class number) +(!define-type-class number) -(define-type-method (number :simple-=) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (number :simple-=) (type1 type2) (values (and (eq (numeric-type-class type1) (numeric-type-class type2)) (eq (numeric-type-format type1) (numeric-type-format type2)) @@ -813,7 +821,7 @@ (equal (numeric-type-high type1) (numeric-type-high type2))) t)) -(define-type-method (number :unparse) (type) +(!define-type-method (number :unparse) (type) (let* ((complexp (numeric-type-complexp type)) (low (numeric-type-low type)) (high (numeric-type-high type)) @@ -953,7 +961,7 @@ (if (,open (car ,n-y) ,n-x) ,n-y ,n-x) (if (,closed ,n-y ,n-x) ,n-y ,n-x)))))) -(define-type-method (number :simple-subtypep) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (number :simple-subtypep) (type1 type2) (let ((class1 (numeric-type-class type1)) (class2 (numeric-type-class type2)) (complexp2 (numeric-type-complexp type2)) @@ -985,7 +993,7 @@ (t (values nil t))))) -(define-superclasses number ((generic-number)) !cold-init-forms) +(!define-superclasses number ((generic-number)) !cold-init-forms) ;;; If the high bound of LOW is adjacent to the low bound of HIGH, ;;; then return true, otherwise NIL. @@ -1025,9 +1033,9 @@ ;;; Return a numeric type that is a supertype for both TYPE1 and TYPE2. ;;; -;;; ### Note: we give up early, so keep from dropping lots of information on +;;; ### Note: we give up early to keep from dropping lots of information on ;;; the floor by returning overly general types. -(define-type-method (number :simple-union) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (number :simple-union) (type1 type2) (declare (type numeric-type type1 type2)) (cond ((csubtypep type1 type2) type2) ((csubtypep type2 type1) type1) @@ -1060,7 +1068,7 @@ (setf (info :type :builtin 'number) (make-numeric-type :complexp nil))) -(def-type-translator complex (&optional (spec '*)) +(!def-type-translator complex (&optional (spec '*)) (if (eq spec '*) (make-numeric-type :complexp :complex) (let ((type (specifier-type spec))) @@ -1089,7 +1097,7 @@ type bound)))) -(def-type-translator integer (&optional (low '*) (high '*)) +(!def-type-translator integer (&optional (low '*) (high '*)) (let* ((l (canonicalized-bound low 'integer)) (lb (if (consp l) (1+ (car l)) l)) (h (canonicalized-bound high 'integer)) @@ -1103,7 +1111,7 @@ :high hb))) (defmacro def-bounded-type (type class format) - `(def-type-translator ,type (&optional (low '*) (high '*)) + `(!def-type-translator ,type (&optional (low '*) (high '*)) (let ((lb (canonicalized-bound low ',type)) (hb (canonicalized-bound high ',type))) (unless (numeric-bound-test* lb hb <= <) @@ -1213,7 +1221,7 @@ ;;; appropriate numeric type before maximizing. This avoids possible ;;; confusion due to mixed-type comparisons (but I think the result is ;;; the same). -(define-type-method (number :simple-intersection) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (number :simple-intersection) (type1 type2) (declare (type numeric-type type1 type2)) (if (numeric-types-intersect type1 type2) (let* ((class1 (numeric-type-class type1)) @@ -1251,19 +1259,19 @@ ;;; either one is null, return NIL. (defun float-format-max (f1 f2) (when (and f1 f2) - (dolist (f float-formats (error "Bad float format: ~S." f1)) + (dolist (f *float-formats* (error "bad float format: ~S" f1)) (when (or (eq f f1) (eq f f2)) (return f))))) -;;; Return the result of an operation on Type1 and Type2 according to +;;; Return the result of an operation on TYPE1 and TYPE2 according to ;;; the rules of numeric contagion. This is always NUMBER, some float ;;; format (possibly complex) or RATIONAL. Due to rational ;;; canonicalization, there isn't much we can do here with integers or ;;; rational complex numbers. ;;; -;;; If either argument is not a Numeric-Type, then return NUMBER. This +;;; If either argument is not a NUMERIC-TYPE, then return NUMBER. This ;;; is useful mainly for allowing types that are technically numbers, -;;; but not a Numeric-Type. +;;; but not a NUMERIC-TYPE. (defun numeric-contagion (type1 type2) (if (and (numeric-type-p type1) (numeric-type-p type2)) (let ((class1 (numeric-type-class type1)) @@ -1309,7 +1317,7 @@ ;;;; array types -(define-type-class array) +(!define-type-class array) ;;; What this does depends on the setting of the ;;; *USE-IMPLEMENTATION-TYPES* switch. If true, return the specialized @@ -1320,7 +1328,7 @@ (array-type-specialized-element-type type) (array-type-element-type type))) -(define-type-method (array :simple-=) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (array :simple-=) (type1 type2) (values (and (equal (array-type-dimensions type1) (array-type-dimensions type2)) (eq (array-type-complexp type1) @@ -1329,7 +1337,7 @@ (specialized-element-type-maybe type2))) t)) -(define-type-method (array :unparse) (type) +(!define-type-method (array :unparse) (type) (let ((dims (array-type-dimensions type)) (eltype (type-specifier (array-type-element-type type))) (complexp (array-type-complexp type))) @@ -1369,7 +1377,7 @@ `(array ,eltype ,dims) `(simple-array ,eltype ,dims)))))) -(define-type-method (array :simple-subtypep) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (array :simple-subtypep) (type1 type2) (let ((dims1 (array-type-dimensions type1)) (dims2 (array-type-dimensions type2)) (complexp2 (array-type-complexp type2))) @@ -1400,7 +1408,7 @@ (t (values nil t))))) -(define-superclasses array +(!define-superclasses array ((string string) (vector vector) (array)) @@ -1435,7 +1443,7 @@ (t (values nil t))))) -(define-type-method (array :simple-intersection) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (array :simple-intersection) (type1 type2) (declare (type array-type type1 type2)) (if (array-types-intersect type1 type2) (let ((dims1 (array-type-dimensions type1)) @@ -1483,34 +1491,35 @@ ;;;; MEMBER types -(define-type-class member) +(!define-type-class member) -(define-type-method (member :unparse) (type) +(!define-type-method (member :unparse) (type) (let ((members (member-type-members type))) (if (equal members '(nil)) 'null `(member ,@members)))) -(define-type-method (member :simple-subtypep) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (member :simple-subtypep) (type1 type2) (values (subsetp (member-type-members type1) (member-type-members type2)) t)) -(define-type-method (member :complex-subtypep-arg1) (type1 type2) - (block PUNT - (values (every-type-op ctypep type2 (member-type-members type1) - :list-first t) - t))) +(!define-type-method (member :complex-subtypep-arg1) (type1 type2) + (values (every-type-op ctypep + type2 + (member-type-members type1) + :list-first t) + t)) ;;; We punt if the odd type is enumerable and intersects with the ;;; MEMBER type. If not enumerable, then it is definitely not a ;;; subtype of the MEMBER type. -(define-type-method (member :complex-subtypep-arg2) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (member :complex-subtypep-arg2) (type1 type2) (cond ((not (type-enumerable type1)) (values nil t)) ((types-intersect type1 type2) (values nil nil)) (t (values nil t)))) -(define-type-method (member :simple-intersection) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (member :simple-intersection) (type1 type2) (let ((mem1 (member-type-members type1)) (mem2 (member-type-members type2))) (values (cond ((subsetp mem1 mem2) type1) @@ -1522,26 +1531,25 @@ *empty-type*)))) t))) -(define-type-method (member :complex-intersection) (type1 type2) - (block PUNT - (collect ((members)) - (let ((mem2 (member-type-members type2))) - (dolist (member mem2) - (multiple-value-bind (val win) (ctypep member type1) - (unless win - (return-from PUNT (values type2 nil))) - (when val (members member)))) - - (values (cond ((subsetp mem2 (members)) type2) - ((null (members)) *empty-type*) - (t - (make-member-type :members (members)))) - t))))) - -;;; We don't need a :COMPLEX-UNION, since the only interesting case is a union -;;; type, and the member/union interaction is handled by the union type -;;; method. -(define-type-method (member :simple-union) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (member :complex-intersection) (type1 type2) + (collect ((members)) + (let ((mem2 (member-type-members type2))) + (dolist (member mem2) + (multiple-value-bind (val win) (ctypep member type1) + (unless win + (return-from punt-type-method (values type2 nil))) + (when val (members member)))) + + (values (cond ((subsetp mem2 (members)) type2) + ((null (members)) *empty-type*) + (t + (make-member-type :members (members)))) + t)))) + +;;; We don't need a :COMPLEX-UNION, since the only interesting case is +;;; a union type, and the member/union interaction is handled by the +;;; union type method. +(!define-type-method (member :simple-union) (type1 type2) (let ((mem1 (member-type-members type1)) (mem2 (member-type-members type2))) (cond ((subsetp mem1 mem2) type2) @@ -1549,13 +1557,14 @@ (t (make-member-type :members (union mem1 mem2)))))) -(define-type-method (member :simple-=) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (member :simple-=) (type1 type2) (let ((mem1 (member-type-members type1)) (mem2 (member-type-members type2))) - (values (and (subsetp mem1 mem2) (subsetp mem2 mem1)) + (values (and (subsetp mem1 mem2) + (subsetp mem2 mem1)) t))) -(define-type-method (member :complex-=) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (member :complex-=) (type1 type2) (if (type-enumerable type1) (multiple-value-bind (val win) (csubtypep type2 type1) (if (or val (not win)) @@ -1563,11 +1572,169 @@ (values nil t))) (values nil t))) -(def-type-translator member (&rest members) +(!def-type-translator member (&rest members) (if members (make-member-type :members (remove-duplicates members)) *empty-type*)) +;;;; intersection types +;;;; +;;;; Until version 0.6.10.6, SBCL followed the original CMU CL approach +;;;; of punting on all AND types, not just the unreasonably complicated +;;;; ones. The change was motivated by trying to get the KEYWORD type +;;;; to behave sensibly: +;;;; ;; reasonable definition +;;;; (DEFTYPE KEYWORD () '(AND SYMBOL (SATISFIES KEYWORDP))) +;;;; ;; reasonable behavior +;;;; (ASSERT (SUBTYPEP 'KEYWORD 'SYMBOL)) +;;;; Without understanding a little about the semantics of AND, we'd +;;;; get (SUBTYPEP 'KEYWORD 'SYMBOL)=>NIL,NIL and, for entirely +;;;; parallel reasons, (SUBTYPEP 'RATIO 'NUMBER)=>NIL,NIL. That's +;;;; not so good..) +;;;; +;;;; We still follow the example of CMU CL to some extent, by punting +;;;; (to the opaque HAIRY-TYPE) on sufficiently complicated types +;;;; involving AND. + +;;; In general, make an INTERSECTION-TYPE object from the specifier +;;; types. But in various special cases, dodge instead, representing +;;; the intersection type in some other way. +(defun make-intersection-type-or-something (types) + (declare (list types)) + (/show0 "entering MAKE-INTERSECTION-TYPE-OR-SOMETHING") + (cond ((null types) + *universal-type*) + ((null (cdr types)) + (first types)) + (;; if potentially too hairy + (some (lambda (type) + (or (union-type-p type) + (hairy-type-p type))) + types) + ;; (CMU CL punted to HAIRY-TYPE like this for all AND-based + ;; types. We don't want to do that for simple intersection + ;; types like the definition of KEYWORD, hence the guard + ;; clause above. But we do want to punt for any really + ;; unreasonable cases which might have motivated them to punt + ;; in all cases, hence the punt-to-HAIRY-TYPE code below.) + (make-hairy-type :specifier `(and ,@(mapcar #'type-specifier types)))) + (t + (%make-intersection-type (some #'type-enumerable types) types)))) + +(!define-type-class intersection) + +;;; A few intersection types have special names. The others just get +;;; mechanically unparsed. +(!define-type-method (intersection :unparse) (type) + (declare (type ctype type)) + (/show0 "entering INTERSECTION :UNPARSE") + (or (find type '(ratio bignum keyword) :key #'specifier-type :test #'type=) + `(and ,@(mapcar #'type-specifier (intersection-type-types type))))) + +;;; shared machinery for type equality: true if every type in the set +;;; TYPES1 matches a type in the set TYPES2 and vice versa +(defun type=-set (types1 types2) + (/show0 "entering TYPE=-SET") + (flet (;; true if every type in the set X matches a type in the set Y + (type<=-set (x y) + (declare (type list x y)) + (every (lambda (xelement) + (position xelement y :test #'type=)) + x))) + (values (and (type<=-set types1 types2) + (type<=-set types2 types1)) + t))) + +;;; Two intersection types are equal if their subtypes are equal sets. +;;; +;;; FIXME: Might it be better to use +;;; (AND (SUBTYPEP X Y) (SUBTYPEP Y X)) +;;; instead, since SUBTYPEP is the usual relationship that we care +;;; most about, so it would be good to leverage any ingenuity there +;;; in this more obscure method? +(!define-type-method (intersection :simple-=) (type1 type2) + (/show0 "entering INTERSECTION :SIMPLE-=") + (type=-set (intersection-type-types type1) + (intersection-type-types type2))) + +(!define-type-method (intersection :simple-subtypep) (type1 type2) + (declare (type list type1 type2)) + (/show0 "entering INTERSECTION :SIMPLE-SUBTYPEP") + (some (lambda (t1) + (every (lambda (t2) + (csubtypep t1 t2)) + type2)) + type1)) + +(!define-type-method (intersection :complex-subtypep-arg1) (type1 type2) + (/show0 "entering INTERSECTION :COMPLEX-SUBTYPEP-ARG1") + (values (any-type-op csubtypep + type2 + (intersection-type-types type1) + :list-first t) + t)) + +(!define-type-method (intersection :complex-subtypep-arg2) (type1 type2) + (/show0 "entering INTERSECTION :COMPLEX-SUBTYPEP-ARG2") + (values (every-type-op csubtypep type1 (intersection-type-types type2)) + t)) + +;;; Return a new type list where pairs of types whose intersections +;;; can be represented simply have been replaced by the simple +;;; representation. +(defun simplify-intersection-type-types (%types) + (/show0 "entering SIMPLE-INTERSECTION-TYPE-TYPES") + (do* ((types (copy-list %types)) ; (to undestructivize the algorithm below) + (i-types types (cdr i-types)) + (i-type (car i-types) (car i-types))) + ((null i-types)) + (do* ((pre-j-types i-types (cdr pre-j-types)) + (j-types (cdr pre-j-types) (cdr pre-j-types)) + (j-type (car j-types) (car j-types))) + ((null j-types)) + (multiple-value-bind (isect win) (type-intersection i-type j-type) + (when win + ;; Overwrite I-TYPES with the intersection, and delete + ;; J-TYPES from the list. + (setf (car i-types) isect + (cdr pre-j-types) (cdr j-types))))) + (/show0 "leaving SIMPLE-INTERSECTION-TYPE-TYPES") + types)) + +(!define-type-method (intersection :simple-intersection :complex-intersection) + (type1 type2) + (/show0 "entering INTERSECTION :SIMPLE-INTERSECTION :COMPLEX-INTERSECTION") + (let ((type1types (intersection-type-types type1)) + (type2types (if (intersection-type-p type2) + (intersection-type-types type2) + (list type2)))) + (make-intersection-type-or-something + (simplify-intersection-type-types + (append type1types type2types))))) + +#| +(!def-type-translator and (&rest type-specifiers) + ;; Note: Between the behavior of SIMPLIFY-INTERSECTION-TYPE (which + ;; will reduce to a 1-element list any list of types which CMU CL + ;; could've represented) and MAKE-INTERSECTION-TYPE-OR-SOMETHING + ;; (which knows to treat a 1-element intersection as the element + ;; itself) we should recover CMU CL's behavior for anything which it + ;; could handle usefully (i.e. could without punting to HAIRY-TYPE). + (/show0 "entering type translator for AND") + (make-intersection-type-or-something + (simplify-intersection-type-types + (mapcar #'specifier-type type-specifiers)))) +|# +;;; (REMOVEME once INTERSECTION-TYPE works.) +(!def-type-translator and (&whole spec &rest types) + (let ((res *wild-type*)) + (dolist (type types res) + (let ((ctype (specifier-type type))) + (multiple-value-bind (int win) (type-intersection res ctype) + (unless win + (return (make-hairy-type :specifier spec))) + (setq res int)))))) + ;;;; union types ;;; Make a union type from the specifier types, setting ENUMERABLE in @@ -1576,50 +1743,51 @@ (declare (list types)) (%make-union-type (every #'type-enumerable types) types)) -(define-type-class union) +(!define-type-class union) -;;; If LIST, then return that, otherwise the OR of the component types. -(define-type-method (union :unparse) (type) +;;; The LIST type has a special name. Other union types +;;; just get mechanically unparsed. +(!define-type-method (union :unparse) (type) (declare (type ctype type)) (if (type= type (specifier-type 'list)) 'list `(or ,@(mapcar #'type-specifier (union-type-types type))))) -;;; Two union types are equal if every type in one is equal to some -;;; type in the other. -(define-type-method (union :simple-=) (type1 type2) - (block PUNT - (let ((types1 (union-type-types type1)) - (types2 (union-type-types type2))) - (values (and (dolist (type1 types1 t) - (unless (any-type-op type= type1 types2) - (return nil))) - (dolist (type2 types2 t) - (unless (any-type-op type= type2 types1) - (return nil)))) - t)))) +;;; Two union types are equal if their subtypes are equal sets. +(!define-type-method (union :simple-=) (type1 type2) + (type=-set (union-type-types type1) + (union-type-types type2))) ;;; Similarly, a union type is a subtype of another if every element ;;; of TYPE1 is a subtype of some element of TYPE2. -(define-type-method (union :simple-subtypep) (type1 type2) - (block PUNT - (let ((types2 (union-type-types type2))) - (values (dolist (type1 (union-type-types type1) t) - (unless (any-type-op csubtypep type1 types2) - (return nil))) - t)))) - -(define-type-method (union :complex-subtypep-arg1) (type1 type2) - (block PUNT - (values (every-type-op csubtypep type2 (union-type-types type1) - :list-first t) +;;; +;;; KLUDGE: This definition seems redundant, here in UNION-TYPE and +;;; similarly in INTERSECTION-TYPE, with the logic in the +;;; corresponding :COMPLEX-SUBTYPEP-ARG1 and :COMPLEX-SUBTYPEP-ARG2 +;;; methods. Ideally there's probably some way to make the +;;; :SIMPLE-SUBTYPEP method default to the :COMPLEX-SUBTYPEP-FOO +;;; methods in such a way that this definition could go away, but I +;;; don't grok the system well enough to tell whether it's simple to +;;; arrange this. -- WHN 2000-02-03 +(!define-type-method (union :simple-subtypep) (type1 type2) + (let ((types2 (union-type-types type2))) + (values (dolist (type1 (union-type-types type1) t) + (unless (any-type-op csubtypep type1 types2) + (return nil))) t))) -(define-type-method (union :complex-subtypep-arg2) (type1 type2) - (block PUNT - (values (any-type-op csubtypep type1 (union-type-types type2)) t))) +(!define-type-method (union :complex-subtypep-arg1) (type1 type2) + (values (every-type-op csubtypep + type2 + (union-type-types type1) + :list-first t) + t)) + +(!define-type-method (union :complex-subtypep-arg2) (type1 type2) + (values (any-type-op csubtypep type1 (union-type-types type2)) + t)) -(define-type-method (union :complex-union) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (union :complex-union) (type1 type2) (let* ((class1 (type-class-info type1))) (collect ((res)) (let ((this-type type1)) @@ -1640,13 +1808,13 @@ ;;; For the union of union types, we let the :COMPLEX-UNION method do ;;; the work. -(define-type-method (union :simple-union) (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (union :simple-union) (type1 type2) (let ((res type1)) (dolist (t2 (union-type-types type2) res) (setq res (type-union res t2))))) -(define-type-method (union :simple-intersection :complex-intersection) - (type1 type2) +(!define-type-method (union :simple-intersection :complex-intersection) + (type1 type2) (let ((res *empty-type*) (win t)) (dolist (type (union-type-types type2) (values res win)) @@ -1654,23 +1822,67 @@ (setq res (type-union res int)) (unless w (setq win nil)))))) -(def-type-translator or (&rest types) +(!def-type-translator or (&rest type-specifiers) (reduce #'type-union - (mapcar #'specifier-type types) + (mapcar #'specifier-type type-specifiers) :initial-value *empty-type*)) - -;;; We don't actually have intersection types, since the result of -;;; reasonable type intersections is always describable as a union of -;;; simple types. If something is too hairy to fit this mold, then we -;;; make a hairy type. -(def-type-translator and (&whole spec &rest types) - (let ((res *wild-type*)) - (dolist (type types res) - (let ((ctype (specifier-type type))) - (multiple-value-bind (int win) (type-intersection res ctype) - (unless win - (return (make-hairy-type :specifier spec))) - (setq res int)))))) + +;;;; CONS types + +(!define-type-class cons) + +(!def-type-translator cons (&optional (car-type-spec '*) (cdr-type-spec '*)) + (make-cons-type (specifier-type car-type-spec) + (specifier-type cdr-type-spec))) + +(!define-type-method (cons :unparse) (type) + (let ((car-eltype (type-specifier (cons-type-car-type type))) + (cdr-eltype (type-specifier (cons-type-cdr-type type)))) + (if (and (member car-eltype '(t *)) + (member cdr-eltype '(t *))) + 'cons + `(cons ,car-eltype ,cdr-eltype)))) + +(!define-type-method (cons :simple-=) (type1 type2) + (declare (type cons-type type1 type2)) + (and (type= (cons-type-car-type type1) (cons-type-car-type type2)) + (type= (cons-type-cdr-type type1) (cons-type-cdr-type type2)))) + +(!define-type-method (cons :simple-subtypep) (type1 type2) + (declare (type cons-type type1 type2)) + (multiple-value-bind (val-car win-car) + (csubtypep (cons-type-car-type type1) (cons-type-car-type type2)) + (multiple-value-bind (val-cdr win-cdr) + (csubtypep (cons-type-cdr-type type1) (cons-type-cdr-type type2)) + (if (and val-car val-cdr) + (values t (and win-car win-cdr)) + (values nil (or win-car win-cdr)))))) + +;;; Give up if a precise type is not possible, to avoid returning +;;; overly general types. +(!define-type-method (cons :simple-union) (type1 type2) + (declare (type cons-type type1 type2)) + (let ((car-type1 (cons-type-car-type type1)) + (car-type2 (cons-type-car-type type2)) + (cdr-type1 (cons-type-cdr-type type1)) + (cdr-type2 (cons-type-cdr-type type2))) + (cond ((type= car-type1 car-type2) + (make-cons-type car-type1 + (type-union cdr-type1 cdr-type2))) + ((type= cdr-type1 cdr-type2) + (make-cons-type (type-union cdr-type1 cdr-type2) + cdr-type1))))) + +(!define-type-method (cons :simple-intersection) (type1 type2) + (declare (type cons-type type1 type2)) + (multiple-value-bind (int-car win-car) + (type-intersection (cons-type-car-type type1) + (cons-type-car-type type2)) + (multiple-value-bind (int-cdr win-cdr) + (type-intersection (cons-type-cdr-type type1) + (cons-type-cdr-type type2)) + (values (make-cons-type int-car int-cdr) + (and win-car win-cdr))))) ;;; Return the type that describes all objects that are in X but not ;;; in Y. If we can't determine this type, then return NIL. @@ -1725,13 +1937,13 @@ (t (make-union-type (res))))))) -(def-type-translator array (&optional (element-type '*) +(!def-type-translator array (&optional (element-type '*) (dimensions '*)) (specialize-array-type (make-array-type :dimensions (canonical-array-dimensions dimensions) :element-type (specifier-type element-type)))) -(def-type-translator simple-array (&optional (element-type '*) +(!def-type-translator simple-array (&optional (element-type '*) (dimensions '*)) (specialize-array-type (make-array-type :dimensions (canonical-array-dimensions dimensions)