X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;f=tests%2Fdebug.impure.lisp;h=9c6473dba99ef64fe0d92eff5aca5d5e34115bff;hb=1dc3a468ba32755c51747d6e85ed32d989f2dd49;hp=ea5d8b7160933bee458796bce84972d1a8d35a3a;hpb=b66385e2031fc2cac17dd129df0af400beb48a22;p=sbcl.git

diff --git a/tests/debug.impure.lisp b/tests/debug.impure.lisp
index ea5d8b7..9c6473d 100644
--- a/tests/debug.impure.lisp
+++ b/tests/debug.impure.lisp
@@ -172,10 +172,10 @@
                    (list '(flet not-optimized))
                    (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized))))))
 
-;;; Division by zero was a common error on PPC.  It depended on the
+;;; Division by zero was a common error on PPC. It depended on the
 ;;; return function either being before INTEGER-/-INTEGER in memory,
-;;; or more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM bytes ahead.  It also depends on
-;;; INTEGER-/-INTEGER calling SIGNED-TRUNCATE.  I believe Raymond Toy
+;;; or more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM bytes ahead. It also depends on
+;;; INTEGER-/-INTEGER calling SIGNED-TRUNCATE. I believe Raymond Toy
 ;;; says that the Sparc backend (at least for CMUCL) inlines this, so
 ;;; if SBCL does the same this test is probably not good for the
 ;;; Sparc.