X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=BUGS;h=2917c5c0de079278900137b8f69c0303b698b00b;hb=c43e3ee7e99bf8116402c2e6a90320b2e92b391b;hp=f7c265b8dde74bc930c2634b4ec36f2e6bd43714;hpb=b6fb1a4ad3fb9783148f1373e93edaf1f7e2d780;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/BUGS b/BUGS index f7c265b..2917c5c 100644 --- a/BUGS +++ b/BUGS @@ -883,11 +883,9 @@ WORKAROUND: 283: Thread safety: libc functions There are places that we call unsafe-for-threading libc functions that we should find alternatives for, or put locks around. Known or - strongly suspected problems, as of 0.8.3.10: please update this + strongly suspected problems, as of 1.0.3.13: please update this bug instead of creating new ones - gethostbyname, gethostbyaddr in sb-bsd-sockets - 284: Thread safety: special variables There are lots of special variables in SBCL, and I feel sure that at least some of them are indicative of potentially thread-unsafe @@ -1789,3 +1787,27 @@ WORKAROUND: TYPE/= do, and writing an explanation which is so clear that one can see immediately what it's supposed to mean in odd cases like (TYPE= '(SATISFIES X) 'INTEGER) when X isn't defined yet. + +409: MORE TYPE SYSTEM PROBLEMS + Found while investigating an optimization failure for extended + sequences. The extended sequence type implementation was altered to + work around the problem, but the fundamental problem remains, to wit: + (sb-kernel:type= (sb-kernel:specifier-type '(or float ratio)) + (sb-kernel:specifier-type 'single-float)) + returns NIL, NIL on sbcl-1.0.3. + (probably related to bug #408) + +410: read circularities and type declarations + Consider the definition + (defstruct foo (a 0 :type (not symbol))) + followed by + (setf *print-circle* t) ; just in case + (read-from-string "#1=#s(foo :a #1#)") + This gives a type error (#:G1 is not a (NOT SYMBOL)) because of the + implementation of read circularity, using a symbol as a marker for + the previously-referenced object. + +411: NAN issues on x86-64 + Test :NAN-COMPARISONS in float.pure.lisp fails on x86-64, and has been + disabled on those platforms. Since x86 does not exhibit any problems + the problem is probably with the new FP implementation.