X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=BUGS;h=39508d5f5e75f386e30c3543473a81bb11598de5;hb=4e3b57699314dbd3883470d9b196287b178f3e6d;hp=ad7b82a5f047672fe042ae50790cf60ef87e61c5;hpb=8fa3b333d2b37f45c3702f478f784b8c6f491080;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/BUGS b/BUGS index ad7b82a..39508d5 100644 --- a/BUGS +++ b/BUGS @@ -458,14 +458,6 @@ WORKAROUND: crashes SBCL. In general tracing anything which is used in the implementation of TRACE is likely to have the same problem. -68: - As reported by Daniel Solaz on cmucl-help@cons.org 2000-11-23, - SXHASH returns the same value for all non-STRUCTURE-OBJECT instances, - notably including all PCL instances. There's a limit to how much - SXHASH can do to return unique values for instances, but at least - it should probably look at the class name, the way that it does - for STRUCTURE-OBJECTs. - 70: (probably related to bug #65; maybe related to bug #109) The compiler doesn't like &OPTIONAL arguments in LABELS and FLET @@ -487,12 +479,6 @@ WORKAROUND: (SB-C::LAMBDA-TAIL-SET (SB-C::LAMBDA-HOME SB-C::CALLEE))) failed. -71: - (DECLAIM (OPTIMIZE ..)) doesn't work. E.g. even after - (DECLAIM (OPTIMIZE (SPEED 3))), things are still optimized with - the previous SPEED policy. This bug will probably get fixed in - 0.6.9.x in a general cleanup of optimization policy. - 72: (DECLAIM (OPTIMIZE ..)) doesn't work properly inside LOCALLY forms. @@ -1230,30 +1216,50 @@ WORKAROUND: Since this is a reasonable user error, it shouldn't be reported as an SBCL bug. -169: - (reported by Alexey Dejneka on sbcl-devel 2002-05-12) - * (defun test (n) - (let ((*x* n)) - (declare (special *x*)) - (getx))) - ; in: LAMBDA NIL - ; (LET ((*X* N)) - ; (DECLARE (SPECIAL *X*)) - ; (GETX)) - ; - ; caught STYLE-WARNING: - ; using the lexical binding of the symbol *X*, not the - ; dynamic binding, even though the symbol name follows the usual naming - ; convention (names like *FOO*) for special variables - ; compilation unit finished - ; caught 1 STYLE-WARNING condition - But the code works as it should. Checked in 0.6.12.43 and later. - 171: (reported by Pierre Mai while investigating bug 47): (DEFCLASS FOO () ((A :SILLY T))) signals a SIMPLE-ERROR, not a PROGRAM-ERROR. +172: + sbcl's treatment of at least macro lambda lists is too permissive; + e.g., in sbcl-0.7.3.7: + (defmacro foo (&rest rest bar) `(,bar ,rest)) + (macroexpand '(foo quux zot)) -> (QUUX (QUUX ZOT)) + whereas section 3.4.4 of the CLHS doesn't allow required parameters + to come after the rest argument. + +173: + The compiler sometimes tries to constant-fold expressions before + it checks to see whether they can be reached. This can lead to + bogus warnings about errors in the constant folding, e.g. in code + like + (WHEN X + (WRITE-STRING (> X 0) "+" "0")) + compiled in a context where the compiler can prove that X is NIL, + and the compiler complains that (> X 0) causes a type error because + NIL isn't a valid argument to #'>. Until sbcl-0.7.4.10 or so this + caused a full WARNING, which made the bug really annoying because then + COMPILE and COMPILE-FILE returned FAILURE-P=T for perfectly legal + code. Since then the warning has been downgraded to STYLE-WARNING, + so it's still a bug but at least it's a little less annoying. + +174: + The error message from attempting to use a #\Return format + directive: + (format nil "~^M") ; replace "^M" with a literal #\Return + debugger invoked on condition of type SB-FORMAT::FORMAT-ERROR: + error in format: unknown format directive + ~ + ^ + is not terribly helpful; this is more noticeable than parallel cases + with e.g. #\Backspace because of the differing newline conventions + on various operating systems. (reported by Harald Hanche-Olsen on + cmucl-help 2002-05-31) + +175: + (fixed in sbcl-0.7.4.14) + DEFUNCT CATEGORIES OF BUGS IR1-#: These labels were used for bugs related to the old IR1 interpreter.