X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=BUGS;h=8fd2a83a643565274d856f02eb6ac077d8e727bd;hb=6b8baeece6cf870e3f979a9f09c32985c64c04de;hp=f286819451e7e8c6f30487d17a86242dabea39cf;hpb=f8535c1984748199fef344f9ba64f1ccab86bd53;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/BUGS b/BUGS index f286819..8fd2a83 100644 --- a/BUGS +++ b/BUGS @@ -249,20 +249,17 @@ WORKAROUND: comfortable merging the patches in the CVS version of SBCL. 108: - (TIME (ROOM T)) reports more than 200 Mbytes consed even for - a clean, just-started SBCL system. And it seems to be right: - (ROOM T) can bring a small computer to its knees for a *long* - time trying to GC afterwards. Surely there's some more economical - way to implement (ROOM T). + ROOM issues: - Daniel Barlow doesn't know what fixed this, but observes that it - doesn't seem to be the case in 0.8.7.3 any more. Instead, (ROOM T) - in a fresh SBCL causes + a) ROOM works by walking over the heap linearly, instead of + following the object graph. Hence, it report garbage objects that + are unreachable. (Maybe this is a feature and not a bug?) - debugger invoked on a SB-INT:BUG in thread 5911: - failed AVER: "(SAP= CURRENT END)" - - unless a GC has happened beforehand. + b) ROOM uses MAP-ALLOCATED-OBJECTS to walk the heap, which doesn't + check all pointers as well as it should, and can hence become + confused, leading to aver failures. As of 1.0.13.21 these (the + SAP= aver in particular) should be mostly under control, but push + ROOM hard enough and it still might croak. 117: When the compiler inline expands functions, it may be that different @@ -482,6 +479,11 @@ WORKAROUND: (print (incf start 22)) (print (incf start 26)))))) + [ Update: 1.0.14.36 improved this quite a bit (20-25%) by + eliminating useless work from PROPAGATE-FROM-SETS -- but as alluded + below, maybe we should be smarter about when to decide a derived + type is "good enough". ] + This example could be solved with clever enough constraint propagation or with SSA, but consider @@ -554,11 +556,6 @@ WORKAROUND: c. The cross-compiler cannot inline functions defined in a non-null lexical environment. -206: ":SB-FLUID feature broken" - (reported by Antonio Martinez-Shotton sbcl-devel 2002-10-07) - Enabling :SB-FLUID in the target-features list in sbcl-0.7.8 breaks - the build. - 207: "poorly distributed SXHASH results for compound data" SBCL's SXHASH could probably try a little harder. ANSI: "the intent is that an implementation should make a good-faith @@ -1615,22 +1612,6 @@ WORKAROUND: For some more details see comments for (define-alien-type-method (c-string :deport-gen) ...) in host-c-call.lisp. -402: "DECLAIM DECLARATION does not inform the PCL code-walker" - reported by Vincent Arkesteijn: - - (declaim (declaration foo)) - (defgeneric bar (x)) - (defmethod bar (x) - (declare (foo x)) - x) - - ==> WARNING: The declaration FOO is not understood by - SB-PCL::SPLIT-DECLARATIONS. - Please put FOO on one of the lists SB-PCL::*NON-VAR-DECLARATIONS*, - SB-PCL::*VAR-DECLARATIONS-WITH-ARG*, or - SB-PCL::*VAR-DECLARATIONS-WITHOUT-ARG*. - (Assuming it is a variable declaration without argument). - 403: FORMAT/PPRINT-LOGICAL-BLOCK of CONDITIONs ignoring *PRINT-CIRCLE* In sbcl-0.9.13.34, (defparameter *c* @@ -1732,6 +1713,10 @@ WORKAROUND: 3: (SB-C::BOUND-FUNC ...) 4: (SB-C::%SINGLE-FLOAT-DERIVE-TYPE-AUX ...) + These are now fixed, but (COERCE HUGE 'SINGLE-FLOAT) still signals a + type-error at runtime. The question is, should it instead signal a + floating-point overflow, or return an infinity? + 408: SUBTYPEP confusion re. OR of SATISFIES of not-yet-defined predicate As reported by Levente M\'{e}sz\'{a}ros sbcl-devel 2006-02-20, (aver (equal (multiple-value-list @@ -1788,34 +1773,6 @@ WORKAROUND: implementation of read circularity, using a symbol as a marker for the previously-referenced object. -413: type-errors in ROOM - - (defvar *a* (make-array (expt 2 27))) - (room) - - Causes a type-error on 32bit SBCL, as various byte-counts in ROOM - implementation overrun fixnums. - - This was fixed in 1.0.4.89, but the patch was reverted as it caused - ROOM to cons sufficiently to make running it in a loop deadly on - GENCGC: newly allocated objects survived to generation 1, where next - call to ROOM would see them, and allocate even more... - - Reported by Faré Rideau on sbcl-devel. - -414: strange DISASSEMBLE warning - - Compiling and disassembling - - (defun disassemble-source-form-bug (x y z) - (declare (optimize debug)) - (list x y z)) - - Gives - - WARNING: bogus form-number in form! The source file has probably - been changed too much to cope with. - 415: Issues creating large arrays on x86-64/Linux and x86/Darwin (make-array (1- array-dimension-limit)) @@ -1848,67 +1805,26 @@ WORKAROUND: 419: stack-allocated indirect closure variables are not popped - (locally (declare (optimize speed (safety 0))) (defun bug419 (x) (multiple-value-call #'list (eval '(values 1 2 3)) (let ((x x)) - (declare (dynamic-extent x)) + (declare (sb-int:truly-dynamic-extent x)) (flet ((mget (y) (+ x y)) (mset (z) (incf x z))) (declare (dynamic-extent #'mget #'mset)) - ((lambda (f g) (eval `(progn ,f ,g (values 4 5 6)))) #'mget #'mset)))))) - - (ASSERT (EQUAL (BUG419) '(1 2 3 4 5 6))) => failure - -420: The MISC.556 test from gcl/ansi-tests/misc.lsp fails hard. - -In sbcl-1.0.13 on Linux/x86, executing - (FUNCALL - (COMPILE NIL - '(LAMBDA (P1 P2) - (DECLARE - (OPTIMIZE (SPEED 1) (SAFETY 0) (DEBUG 0) (SPACE 0)) - (TYPE (MEMBER 8174.8604) P1) (TYPE (MEMBER -95195347) P2)) - (FLOOR P1 P2))) - 8174.8604 -95195347) -interactively causes - SB-SYS:MEMORY-FAULT-ERROR: Unhandled memory fault at #x8. -The gcl/ansi-tests/doit.lisp program terminates prematurely shortly after -MISC.556 by falling into gdb with - fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 2827: Unhandled SIGILL -unless the MISC.556 test is commented out. - -Analysis: + and a number of other arithmetic functions exhibit the -same behaviour. Here's the underlying problem: On x86 we perform -single-float + integer normally using double-precision, and then -coerce the result back to single-float. (The FILD instruction always -gives us a double-float, and unless we do MOVE-FROM-SINGLE it remains -one. Or so it seems to me, and that would also explain the observed -behaviour below.) - -During IR1 we derive the types for both - - (+ ) ; uses double-precision - (+ (FLOAT )) ; uses single-precision - -and get a mismatch for a number of unlucky arguments. This leads to -derived result type NIL, and ends up flushing the whole whole -operation -- and finally we generate code without a return sequence, -and fall through to whatever. - -The use of double-precision in the first case appears to be an -(un)happy accident -- interval arithmetic gives us the -double-precision result because that's what the backend does. - - (+ 8172.0 (coerce -95195347 'single-float)) ; => -9.518717e7 - (+ 8172.0 -95195347) ; => -9.5187176e7 - (coerce (+ 8172.0 (coerce -95195347 'double-float)) 'single-float) - ; => -9.5187176e7 - -Which should be fixed, the IR1, or the backend? + ((lambda (f g) (eval `(progn ,f ,g (values 4 5 6)))) #'mget #'mset))))) + + (ASSERT (EQUAL (BUG419 42) '(1 2 3 4 5 6))) => failure + + Note: as of SBCL 1.0.26.29 this bug no longer affects user code, as + SB-INT:TRULY-DYNAMIC-EXTENT needs to be used instead of + DYNAMIC-EXTENT for this to happen. Proper fix for this bug requires + (Nikodemus thinks) storing the relevant LAMBDA-VARs in a + :DYNAMIC-EXTENT cleanup, and teaching stack analysis how to deal + with them. 421: READ-CHAR-NO-HANG misbehaviour on Windows Console: @@ -1917,3 +1833,56 @@ Which should be fixed, the IR1, or the backend? seems to lie if the OS is buffering input for us on Console.) reported by Elliot Slaughter on sbcl-devel 2008/1/10. + +422: out-of-extent return not checked in safe code + + (declaim (optimize safety)) + (funcall (catch 't (block nil (throw 't (lambda () (return)))))) + +behaves ...erratically. Reported by Kevin Reid on sbcl-devel +2007-07-06. (We don't _have_ to check things like this, but we +generally try to check returns in safe code, so we should here too.) + +424: toplevel closures and *CHECK-CONSISTENCY* + + The following breaks under COMPILE-FILE if *CHECK-CONSISTENCY* is true. + + (let ((exported-symbols-alist + (loop for symbol being the external-symbols of :cl + collect (cons symbol + (concatenate 'string + "#" + (string-downcase symbol)))))) + (defun hyperdoc-lookup (symbol) + (cdr (assoc symbol exported-symbols-alist)))) + + (Test-case adapted from CL-PPCRE.) + +426: inlining failure involving multiple nested calls + + (declaim (inline foo)) + (defun foo (x y) + (cons x y)) + (defun bar (x) + (foo (foo x x) (foo x x))) + ;; shows a full call to FOO + (disassemble 'bar) + ;; simple way to test this programmatically + (let ((code (sb-c::fun-code-header #'bar)) + (foo (sb-impl::fdefinition-object 'foo nil))) + (loop for i from sb-vm:code-constants-offset below (sb-kernel:get-header-data code) + do (assert (not (eq foo (sb-kernel:code-header-ref code i)))))) + + This appears to be an ancient bug, inherited from CMUCL: reportedly + 18c does the same thing. RECOGNIZE-KNOWN-CALL correctly picks up only + one of the calls, but local call analysis fails to inline the call + for the second time. Nikodemus thinks (but is not 100% sure based on + very brief investigation) that the call that is not inlined is the + second nested one. A trivial fix is to call CHANGE-REF-LEAF in known + call for functions already inline converted there, but he is not sure + if this has adverse effects elsewhere. + +428: TIMER SCHEDULE-STRESS in timer.impure.lisp fails + + Failure modes vary. Core problem seems to be (?) recursive entry to + RUN-EXPIRED-TIMERS.