X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=BUGS;h=a6fca6dd552920fc3c92e8ca592b0a02e0b2005e;hb=2253ebaef8a0a1527d2282a1c10f48c62e0d4a83;hp=a04ad720ba26c36642d1f1a97eb73415242e744b;hpb=a2ff6543c79752bfe42578f794bda1c28167fd10;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/BUGS b/BUGS index a04ad72..a6fca6d 100644 --- a/BUGS +++ b/BUGS @@ -585,18 +585,6 @@ WORKAROUND: 211: "keywords processing" a. :ALLOW-OTHER-KEYS T should allow a function to receive an odd number of keyword arguments. - e. Compiling - - (flet ((foo (&key y) (list y))) - (list (foo :y 1 :y 2))) - - issues confusing message - - ; in: LAMBDA NIL - ; (FOO :Y 1 :Y 2) - ; - ; caught STYLE-WARNING: - ; The variable #:G15 is defined but never used. 212: "Sequence functions and circular arguments" COERCE, MERGE and CONCATENATE go into an infinite loop when given @@ -742,6 +730,11 @@ WORKAROUND: (UNSIGNED-BYTE 8) will write to the stream one byte at a time, rather than writing the sequence in one go, leading to severe performance degradation. + As of sbcl-0.9.0.36, this is solved for fd-streams, so is less of a + problem in practice. (Fully fixing this would require adding a + ansi-stream-n-bout slot and associated methods to write a byte + sequence to ansi-stream, similar to the existing ansi-stream-sout + slot/functions.) 243: "STYLE-WARNING overenthusiasm for unused variables" (observed from clx compilation) @@ -931,24 +924,6 @@ WORKAROUND: (see also bug 117) -281: COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD error signalling. - (slightly obscured by a non-0 default value for - SB-PCL::*MAX-EMF-PRECOMPUTE-METHODS*) - It would be natural for COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD to signal errors - when it finds a method with invalid qualifiers. However, it - shouldn't signal errors when any such methods are not applicable to - the particular call being evaluated, and certainly it shouldn't when - simply precomputing effective methods that may never be called. - (setf sb-pcl::*max-emf-precompute-methods* 0) - (defgeneric foo (x) - (:method-combination +) - (:method ((x symbol)) 1) - (:method + ((x number)) x)) - (foo 1) -> ERROR, but should simply return 1 - - The issue seems to be that construction of a discriminating function - calls COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD with methods that are not all applicable. - 283: Thread safety: libc functions There are places that we call unsafe-for-threading libc functions that we should find alternatives for, or put locks around. Known or @@ -1073,17 +1048,6 @@ WORKAROUND: The problem is that both EVALs sequentially write to the same LVAR. -305: - (Reported by Dave Roberts.) - Local INLINE/NOTINLINE declaration removes local FTYPE declaration: - - (defun quux (x) - (declare (ftype (function () (integer 0 10)) fee) - (inline fee)) - (1+ (fee))) - - uses generic arithmetic with INLINE and fixnum without. - 306: "Imprecise unions of array types" a.(defun foo (x) (declare (optimize speed) @@ -2081,7 +2045,41 @@ WORKAROUND: arrange_return_to_lisp_function(), but this looked hard to do in general without suffering from memory leaks. -378: floating-point exceptions not signalled on x86-64 - Floating point traps are currently not enabled on the x86-64 port. - This is true for at least overflow detection (as tested in - float.pure.lisp) and divide-by-zero. +379: TRACE :ENCAPSULATE NIL broken on ppc/darwin + See commented-out test-case in debug.impure.lisp. + +380: Accessor redefinition fails because of old accessor name + When redefining an accessor, SB-PCL::FIX-SLOT-ACCESSORS may try to + find the generic function named by the old accessor name using + ENSURE-GENERIC-FUNCTION and then remove the old accessor's method in + the GF. If the old name does not name a function, or if the old name + does not name a generic function, no attempt to find the GF or remove + any methods is made. + + However, if an unrelated GF with an incompatible lambda list exists, + the class redefinition will fail when SB-PCL::REMOVE-READER-METHOD + tries to find and remove a method with an incompatible lambda list + from the unrelated generic function. + +381: incautious calls to EQUAL in fasl dumping + Compiling + (frob #(#1=(a #1#))) + (frob #(#1=(b #1#))) + (frob #(#1=(a #1#))) + in sbcl-0.9.0 causes CONTROL-STACK-EXHAUSTED. My (WHN) impression + is that this follows from the use of (MAKE-HASH-TABLE :TEST 'EQUAL) + to detect sharing, in which case fixing it might require either + getting less ambitious about detecting shared list structure, or + implementing the moral equivalent of EQUAL hash tables in a + cycle-tolerant way. + +382: externalization unexpectedly changes array simplicity + COMPILE-FILE and LOAD + (defun foo () + (let ((x #.(make-array 4 :fill-pointer 0))) + (values (eval `(typep ',x 'simple-array)) + (typep x 'simple-array)))) + then (FOO) => T, NIL. + + Similar problems exist with SIMPLE-ARRAY-P, ARRAY-HEADER accessors + and all array dimension functions.