X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=BUGS;h=b849dad7e12ff677fd5f22193c7d2c586c277439;hb=e8b69b1dd5564a4237b1bdc1060820c3b820cde2;hp=cce7d24a239d3e7a74bddae5c0eb2a6e958ca18f;hpb=5277a0cbf1a72243cad6808883a4847acefc8e6b;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/BUGS b/BUGS index cce7d24..b849dad 100644 --- a/BUGS +++ b/BUGS @@ -1335,7 +1335,54 @@ Error in function C::GET-LAMBDA-TO-COMPILE: forever, even when it is uninterned and all other references to it are lost. +136: + (reported by Arnaud Rouanet on cmucl-imp 2001-12-18) + (defmethod foo ((x integer)) + x) + (defmethod foo :around ((x integer)) + (let ((x (1+ x))) + (call-next-method))) + Now (FOO 3) should return 3, but instead it returns 4. +137: + (SB-DEBUG:BACKTRACE) output should start with something + including the name BACKTRACE, not (as in 0.pre7.88) + just "0: (\"hairy arg processor\" ...)". In general + the names in BACKTRACE are all screwed up compared to + the nice useful names in 0.6.13. + + Note for those who observe that this is an annoying + bug and doesn't belong in a release: See the "note for the + ambitious", below. + + Note for the ambitious: This is an important bug and I'd + really like to fix it and spent many hours on it. The + obvious ways to fix it are hard, because the underlying + infrastructure seems to be rather broken. + * There are two mostly-separate systems for storing names, + the in-the-function-object system used by e.g. + CL:FUNCTION-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION and the + in-the-DEBUG-FUN-object system used by e.g. BACKTRACE. + The code as of sbcl-0.pre7.94 is smart enough to set + up the first value, but not the second (because I naively + assumed that one mechanism is enough, and didn't proof + read the entire system to see whether there might be + another mechanism?! argh...) + * The systems are not quite separate, but instead weirdly and + fragilely coupled by the FUN-DEBUG-FUN algorithm. + * If you try to refactor this dain bramage away, reducing + things to a single system -- I tried to add a + %SIMPLE-FUN-DEBUG-FUN slot, planning eventually to get + rid of the old %SIMPLE-FUN-NAME slot in favor of indirection + through the new slot -- you get torpedoed by the fragility + of the SIMPLE-FUN primitive object. Just adding the + new slot, without making any other changes in the system, + is enough to make the system fail with what look like + memory corruption problems in warm init. + But please do fix some or all of the problem, I'm tired + of messing with it. -- WHN 2001-12-22 + + KNOWN BUGS RELATED TO THE IR1 INTERPRETER (Now that the IR1 interpreter has gone away, these should be