X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=BUGS;h=bdf4781ee70d76b8f73cf99a6b0df28b9a1b9717;hb=08671cc8f003e0b1f9879635fa950c78f7bf40fe;hp=ed532b3086f610c9cad30d14a6a6a56278b7548a;hpb=d2c3be7fa4cd6e09db6377ba45afab1af621dbfe;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/BUGS b/BUGS index ed532b3..bdf4781 100644 --- a/BUGS +++ b/BUGS @@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ WORKAROUND: (defclass ccc () ()) (setf (find-class 'ccc1) (find-class 'ccc)) (defmethod zut ((c ccc1)) 123) + In sbcl-0.7.1.13, this gives an error, + There is no class named CCC1. DTC's recommended workaround from the mailing list 3 Mar 2000: (setf (pcl::find-class 'ccc1) (pcl::find-class 'ccc)) @@ -255,21 +257,24 @@ WORKAROUND: 45: a slew of floating-point-related errors reported by Peter Van Eynde on July 25, 2000: - a: (fixed in sbcl-0.6.11.25) b: SBCL's value for LEAST-POSITIVE-SHORT-FLOAT is bogus, and should probably be 1.4012985e-45. In SBCL, (/ LEAST-POSITIVE-SHORT-FLOAT 2) returns a number smaller than LEAST-POSITIVE-SHORT-FLOAT. Similar problems exist for LEAST-NEGATIVE-SHORT-FLOAT, LEAST-POSITIVE-LONG-FLOAT, and LEAST-NEGATIVE-LONG-FLOAT. - c: Many expressions generate floating infinity: + c: Many expressions generate floating infinity on x86/Linux: (/ 1 0.0) (/ 1 0.0d0) (EXPT 10.0 1000) (EXPT 10.0d0 1000) - PVE's regression tests want them to raise errors. SBCL - generates the infinities instead, which may or may not be - conforming behavior. + PVE's regression tests want them to raise errors. sbcl-0.7.0.5 + on x86/Linux generates the infinities instead. That might or + might not be conforming behavior, but it's also inconsistent, + which is almost certainly wrong. (Inconsistency: (/ 1 0.0) + should give the same result as (/ 1.0 0.0), but instead (/ 1 0.0) + generates SINGLE-FLOAT-POSITIVE-INFINITY and (/ 1.0 0.0) + signals an error. d: (in section12.erg) various forms a la (FLOAT 1 DOUBLE-FLOAT-EPSILON) don't give the right behavior. @@ -331,11 +336,7 @@ WORKAROUND: d: In general, the system doesn't like '(INTEGER (0) (0)) -- it blows up at the level of SPECIFIER-TYPE with "Lower bound (0) is greater than upper bound (0)." Probably - SPECIFIER-TYPE should return NIL instead. - e: (TYPEP 0 '(COMPLEX (EQL 0)) fails with - "Component type for Complex is not numeric: (EQL 0)." - This might be easy to fix; the type system already knows - that (SUBTYPEP '(EQL 0) 'NUMBER) is true. + SPECIFIER-TYPE should return the NIL type instead. g: The type system isn't all that smart about relationships between hairy types, as shown in the type.erg test results, e.g. (SUBTYPEP 'CONS '(NOT ATOM)) => NIL, NIL. @@ -366,13 +367,6 @@ WORKAROUND: The implementation of #'+ returns its single argument without type checking, e.g. (+ "illegal") => "illegal". -56: - Attempting to use COMPILE on something defined by DEFMACRO fails: - (DEFMACRO FOO (X) (CONS X X)) - (COMPILE 'FOO) -Error in function C::GET-LAMBDA-TO-COMPILE: - # was defined in a non-null environment. - 58: (SUBTYPEP '(AND ZILCH INTEGER) 'ZILCH) => NIL, NIL Note: I looked into fixing this in 0.6.11.15, but gave up. The @@ -633,8 +627,8 @@ Error in function C::GET-LAMBDA-TO-COMPILE: (assert (not (eq type1 *wild-type*))) in the NAMED :SIMPLE-= type method.) '* isn't really a type, and in a type context should probably be translated to T, and so it's - probably to ask whether it's equal to the T type and then (using the - EQ type comparison in the NAMED :SIMPLE-= type method) return NIL. + probably wrong to ask whether it's equal to the T type and then (using + the EQ type comparison in the NAMED :SIMPLE-= type method) return NIL. (I haven't tried to investigate this bug enough to guess whether there might be any user-level symptoms.) @@ -658,25 +652,6 @@ Error in function C::GET-LAMBDA-TO-COMPILE: clear what's the best fix. (See the "bug in type handling" discussion on cmucl-imp ca. 2001-03-22 and ca. 2001-02-12.) -93: - In sbcl-0.6.11.26, (COMPILE 'IN-HOST-COMPILATION-MODE) in - src/cold/shared.lisp doesn't correctly translate the - interpreted function - (defun in-host-compilation-mode (fn) - (let ((*features* (cons :sb-xc-host *features*)) - ;; the CROSS-FLOAT-INFINITY-KLUDGE, as documented in - ;; base-target-features.lisp-expr: - (*shebang-features* (set-difference *shebang-features* - '(:sb-propagate-float-type - :sb-propagate-fun-type)))) - (with-additional-nickname ("SB-XC" "SB!XC") - (funcall fn)))) - No error is reported by the compiler, but when the function is executed, - it causes an error - TYPE-ERROR in SB-KERNEL::OBJECT-NOT-TYPE-ERROR-HANDLER: - (:LINUX :X86 :IEEE-FLOATING-POINT :SB-CONSTRAIN-FLOAT-TYPE :SB-TEST - :SB-INTERPRETER :SB-DOC :UNIX ...) is not of type SYMBOL. - 94a: Inconsistencies between derived and declared VALUES return types for DEFUN aren't checked very well. E.g. the logic which successfully @@ -781,11 +756,6 @@ Error in function C::GET-LAMBDA-TO-COMPILE: /usr/stuff/sbcl/src/code/host-alieneval.lisp Created: Monday, March 12, 2001 07:47:43 AM CST -106: - (reported by Eric Marsden on cmucl-imp 2001-06-15) - (and APD pointed out on sbcl-devel 2001-12-29 that it's the same - as bug 50e) - 108: (TIME (ROOM T)) reports more than 200 Mbytes consed even for a clean, just-started SBCL system. And it seems to be right: @@ -830,44 +800,6 @@ Error in function C::GET-LAMBDA-TO-COMPILE: type declarations are supposed to be treated as assertions unless SAFETY 0, so we should be getting a TYPE-ERROR. -111: - reported by Martin Atzmueller 2001-06-25; originally from CMU CL bugs - collection: - (in-package :cl-user) - ;;; Produces an assertion failures when compiled. - (defun foo (z) - (declare (type (or (function (t) t) null) z)) - (let ((z (or z #'identity))) - (declare (type (function (t) t) z)) - (funcall z 1))) - The error in sbcl-0.6.12.42 is - internal error, failed AVER: - "(COMMON-LISP:NOT (COMMON-LISP:EQ SB!C::CHECK COMMON-LISP:T))" - -112: - reported by Martin Atzmueller 2001-06-25; taken from CMU CL bugs - collection; apparently originally reported by Bruno Haible - (in-package :cl-user) - ;;; From: Bruno Haible - ;;; Subject: scope of SPECIAL declarations - ;;; It seems CMUCL has a bug relating to the scope of SPECIAL - ;;; declarations. I observe this with "CMU Common Lisp 18a x86-linux - ;;; 1.4.0 cvs". - (let ((x 0)) - (declare (special x)) - (let ((x 1)) - (let ((y x)) - (declare (special x)) y))) - ;;; Gives: 0 (this should return 1 according to CLHS) - (let ((x 0)) - (declare (special x)) - (let ((x 1)) - (let ((y x) (x 5)) - (declare (special x)) y))) - ;;; Gives: 1 (correct). - The reported results match what we get from the interpreter - in sbcl-0.6.12.42. - 113: reported by Martin Atzmueller 2001-06-25; originally from CMU CL bugs collection: @@ -1129,35 +1061,6 @@ Error in function C::GET-LAMBDA-TO-COMPILE: arguments in FLET/LABELS: it might be an old Python bug which is only exercised by the new arrangement of the SBCL compiler.) -132: - Trying to compile - (DEFUN FOO () (CATCH 0 (PRINT 1331))) - gives an error - # is not valid as the second argument to VOP: - SB-C:MAKE-CATCH-BLOCK, - since the TN's primitive type SB-VM::POSITIVE-FIXNUM doesn't allow - any of the SCs allowed by the operand restriction: - (SB-VM::DESCRIPTOR-REG) - The (CATCH 0 ...) construct is bad style (because of unportability - of EQ testing of numbers) but it is legal, and shouldn't cause an - internal compiler error. (This error occurs in sbcl-0.6.13 and in - 0.pre7.86.flaky7.14.) - -133: - Trying to compile something like - (sb!alien:def-alien-routine "breakpoint_remove" sb!c-call:void - (code-obj sb!c-call:unsigned-long) - (pc-offset sb!c-call:int) - (old-inst sb!c-call:unsigned-long)) - in SBCL-0.pre7.86.flaky7.22 after warm init fails with an error - cannot use values types here - probably because the SB-C-CALL:VOID type gets translated to (VALUES). - It should be valid to use VOID for a function return type, so perhaps - instead of calling SPECIFIER-TYPE (which excludes all VALUES types - automatically) we should call VALUES-SPECIFIER-TYPE and handle VALUES - types manually, allowing the special case (VALUES) but still excluding - all more-complex VALUES types. - 135: Ideally, uninterning a symbol would allow it, and its associated FDEFINITION and PROCLAIM data, to be reclaimed by the GC. However, @@ -1266,8 +1169,157 @@ Error in function C::GET-LAMBDA-TO-COMPILE: interpreter is gone, the system's notion of what's a top-level form and what's not will remain too confused to fix this problem.] +145: + ANSI allows types `(COMPLEX ,FOO) to use very hairy values for + FOO, e.g. (COMPLEX (AND REAL (SATISFIES ODDP))). The old CMU CL + COMPLEX implementation didn't deal with this, and hasn't been + upgraded to do so. (This doesn't seem to be a high priority + conformance problem, since seems hard to construct useful code + where it matters.) + +146: + Floating point errors are reported poorly. E.g. on x86 OpenBSD + with sbcl-0.7.1, + * (expt 2.0 12777) + debugger invoked on condition of type SB-KERNEL:FLOATING-POINT-EXCEPTION: + An arithmetic error SB-KERNEL:FLOATING-POINT-EXCEPTION was signalled. + No traps are enabled? How can this be? + It should be possible to be much more specific (overflow, division + by zero, etc.) and of course the "How can this be?" should be fixable. + +147: + (reported by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2002-01-28) + Compiling a file containing + (deftype digit () '(member #\1)) + (defun parse-num (string ind) + (flet ((digs () + (let (old-index) + (if (and (< ind ind) + (typep (char string ind) 'digit)) + nil)))))) + in sbcl-0.7.1 causes the compiler to fail with + internal error, failed AVER: "(= (LENGTH (BLOCK-SUCC CALL-BLOCK)) 1)" + This problem seems to have been introduced by the sbcl-0.pre7.* compiler + changes, since 0.pre7.73 and 0.6.13 don't suffer from it. A related + test case is + (defun parse-num (index) + (let (num x) + (flet ((digs () + (setq num index)) + (z () + (let () + (setq x nil)))) + (when (and (digs) (digs)) x)))) + In sbcl-0.7.1, this second test case failed with the same + internal error, failed AVER: "(= (LENGTH (BLOCK-SUCC CALL-BLOCK)) 1)" + After the APD patches in sbcl-0.7.1.2 (new consistency check in + TARGET-IF-DESIRABLE, plus a fix in meta-vmdef.lisp to keep the + new consistency check from failing routinely) this second test case + failed in FIND-IN-PHYSENV instead. Fixes in sbcl-0.7.1.3 (not + closing over unreferenced variables) made this second test case + compile without error, but the original test case still fails. + + Another way to get rid of the DEFTYPE without changing the symptom + of the bug is + (defvar *ch*) + (defun parse-num (string ind) + (flet ((digs () + (let () + (if (and (< ind ind) + (sb-int:memq *ch* '(#\1))) + nil)))))) + In sbcl-0.7.1.3, this fails with + internal error, failed AVER: "(= (LENGTH (BLOCK-SUCC CALL-BLOCK)) 1)" + The problem occurs while the inline expansion of MEMQ, + # + is being LET-converted after having its second REF deleted, leaving + it with only one entry in LEAF-REFS. + +148: + In sbcl-0.7.1.3 on x86, COMPILE-FILE on the file + (in-package :cl-user) + (defvar *thing*) + (defvar *zoom*) + (defstruct foo bar bletch) + (defun %zeep () + (labels ((kidify1 (kid) + ) + (kid-frob (kid) + (if *thing* + (setf sweptm + (m+ (frobnicate kid) + sweptm)) + (kidify1 kid)))) + (declare (inline kid-frob)) + (map nil + #'kid-frob + (the simple-vector (foo-bar perd))))) + fails with + debugger invoked on condition of type TYPE-ERROR: + The value NIL is not of type SB-C::NODE. + The location of this failure has moved around as various related + issues were cleaned up. As of sbcl-0.7.1.9, it occurs in + NODE-BLOCK called by LAMBDA-COMPONENT called by IR2-CONVERT-CLOSURE. + +150: + In sbcl-0.7.1.15, compiling this code + (let* () + (flet ((wufn () (glorp table1 4.9))) + (gleep *uustk* #'wufn "#1" (list))) + (if (eql (lo foomax 3.2)) + (values) + (error "not ~S" '(eql (lo foomax 3.2)))) + (values)) + causes a failure in SB-C::ADD-TEST-CONSTRAINTS: + The value NIL is not of type SB-C::CONTINUATION. + other notes: + * The problem appears to be tied to the way that EQL is given only + one argument, and goes away when we give EQL a second argument. + * CMU CL 18c has this problem too, exercised by + (compile nil + '(lambda () + (let* () + (flet ((wufn () (glorp table1 4.9))) + (gleep *uustk* #'wufn "#1" (list))) + (if (eql (lo foomax 3.2)) + (values) + (error "not ~S" '(eql (lo foomax 3.2)))) + (values)))) + +151: + From the ANSI description of GET-DISPATCH-MACRO-CHARACTER, it + should return NIL when there is no definition, e.g. + (GET-DISPATCH-MACRO-CHARACTER #\# #\{) => NIL + Instead, in sbcl-0.7.1.17 it returns + # + +152: + Undefined functions are supposed to be reported as UNDEFINED-FUNCTION + conditions, inheriting from CELL-ERROR. Instead sbcl-0.7.1.19 reports + them as TYPE-ERRORs (reporting the problem as something not being + coerceable to a function). + +153: + (essentially the same problem as a CMU CL bug reported by Martin + Cracauer on cmucl-imp 2002-02-19) + There is a hole in structure slot type checking. Compiling and LOADing + (declaim (optimize safety)) + (defstruct foo + (bla 0 :type fixnum)) + (defun f () + (let ((foo (make-foo))) + (setf (foo-bla foo) '(1 . 1)) + (format t "Is ~a of type ~a a cons? => ~a~%" + (foo-bla foo) + (type-of (foo-bla foo)) + (consp (foo-bla foo))))) + (f) + should signal an error, but in sbcl-0.7.1.21 instead gives the output + Is (1 . 1) of type CONS a cons? => NIL + without signalling an error. + + DEFUNCT CATEGORIES OF BUGS IR1-#: - These numbers were used for bugs related to the old IR1 - interpreter. The # values reached 6 before the category - was closed down. \ No newline at end of file + These labels were used for bugs related to the old IR1 interpreter. + The # values reached 6 before the category was closed down.