X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=BUGS;h=d7c3679300871abd7d9c554e4396bd0e0f082031;hb=baf5f781af1b88919b929c33e06f235f84e4cfb4;hp=ba4e1f1ad2f0f3f5c1fba83234def705ed340c45;hpb=dc4be57ff0baeee18d43fbee1bfc1af4af50e522;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/BUGS b/BUGS index ba4e1f1..d7c3679 100644 --- a/BUGS +++ b/BUGS @@ -585,18 +585,6 @@ WORKAROUND: 211: "keywords processing" a. :ALLOW-OTHER-KEYS T should allow a function to receive an odd number of keyword arguments. - e. Compiling - - (flet ((foo (&key y) (list y))) - (list (foo :y 1 :y 2))) - - issues confusing message - - ; in: LAMBDA NIL - ; (FOO :Y 1 :Y 2) - ; - ; caught STYLE-WARNING: - ; The variable #:G15 is defined but never used. 212: "Sequence functions and circular arguments" COERCE, MERGE and CONCATENATE go into an infinite loop when given @@ -931,24 +919,6 @@ WORKAROUND: (see also bug 117) -281: COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD error signalling. - (slightly obscured by a non-0 default value for - SB-PCL::*MAX-EMF-PRECOMPUTE-METHODS*) - It would be natural for COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD to signal errors - when it finds a method with invalid qualifiers. However, it - shouldn't signal errors when any such methods are not applicable to - the particular call being evaluated, and certainly it shouldn't when - simply precomputing effective methods that may never be called. - (setf sb-pcl::*max-emf-precompute-methods* 0) - (defgeneric foo (x) - (:method-combination +) - (:method ((x symbol)) 1) - (:method + ((x number)) x)) - (foo 1) -> ERROR, but should simply return 1 - - The issue seems to be that construction of a discriminating function - calls COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD with methods that are not all applicable. - 283: Thread safety: libc functions There are places that we call unsafe-for-threading libc functions that we should find alternatives for, or put locks around. Known or @@ -2077,3 +2047,28 @@ WORKAROUND: 379: TRACE :ENCAPSULATE NIL broken on ppc/darwin See commented-out test-case in debug.impure.lisp. + +380: Accessor redefinition fails because of old accessor name + When redefining an accessor, SB-PCL::FIX-SLOT-ACCESSORS may try to + find the generic function named by the old accessor name using + ENSURE-GENERIC-FUNCTION and then remove the old accessor's method in + the GF. If the old name does not name a function, or if the old name + does not name a generic function, no attempt to find the GF or remove + any methods is made. + + However, if an unrelated GF with an incompatible lambda list exists, + the class redefinition will fail when SB-PCL::REMOVE-READER-METHOD + tries to find and remove a method with an incompatible lambda list + from the unrelated generic function. + +381: incautious calls to EQUAL in fasl dumping + Compiling + (frob #(#1=(a #1#))) + (frob #(#1=(b #1#))) + (frob #(#1=(a #1#))) + in sbcl-0.9.0 causes CONTROL-STACK-EXHAUSTED. My (WHN) impression + is that this follows from the use of (MAKE-HASH-TABLE :TEST 'EQUAL) + to detect sharing, in which case fixing it might require either + getting less ambitious about detecting shared list structure, or + implementing the moral equivalent of EQUAL hash tables in a + cycle-tolerant way.