X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=base-target-features.lisp-expr;h=519c5063333f38fc1ae92760bb6eaa1fc022b4ac;hb=a916a69266eb866d40da1a195a133258da35b668;hp=b264b00463a5ad68e387351cc7a26a2ed3602b26;hpb=b767eae48831153473226b985511c8f7a3ef98c5;p=sbcl.git

diff --git a/base-target-features.lisp-expr b/base-target-features.lisp-expr
index b264b00..519c506 100644
--- a/base-target-features.lisp-expr
+++ b/base-target-features.lisp-expr
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+;;;; -*- Lisp -*-
+
 ;;;; tags which are set during the build process and which end up in
 ;;;; CL:*FEATURES* in the target SBCL, plus some comments about other
 ;;;; CL:*FEATURES* tags which have special meaning to SBCL or which
@@ -246,6 +248,19 @@
  ;; documented in the CMU CL code that SBCL is derived from, and is
  ;; present but stale in SBCL as of 0.6.12.)
  ;;
+ ;; properties derived from the machine architecture
+ ;;   :control-stack-grows-downward-not-upward
+ ;;     On the X86, the Lisp control stack grows downward. On the
+ ;;     other supported CPU architectures as of sbcl-0.7.1.40, the
+ ;;     system stack grows upward. 
+ ;;   Note that there are other stack-related differences between the
+ ;;   X86 port and the other ports. E.g. on the X86, the Lisp control
+ ;;   stack coincides with the C stack, meaning that on the X86 there's
+ ;;   stuff on the control stack that the Lisp-level debugger doesn't
+ ;;   understand very well. As of sbcl-0.7.1.40 things like that are
+ ;;   just parameterized by #!+X86, but it'd probably be better to
+ ;;   use new flags like :CONTROL-STACK-CONTAINS-C-STACK.
+ ;;
  ;; operating system features:
  ;;   :linux   = We're intended to run under some version of Linux.
  ;;   :bsd     = We're intended to run under some version of BSD Unix. (This