X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=doc%2Fintro.sgml;h=8cb110d3ed9d954c8b1c8275679a2ba280c6c06b;hb=ba02429b75951fc407be01c44fdcb01ff2908707;hp=67d3d5467233c87026727ab5743b3460091ad6c2;hpb=f6a2be77637d025bfded9430f02863c28f74f77a;p=sbcl.git

diff --git a/doc/intro.sgml b/doc/intro.sgml
index 67d3d54..8cb110d 100644
--- a/doc/intro.sgml
+++ b/doc/intro.sgml
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ specific to &SBCL;, not on behavior which is common to all
 implementations of &ANSI; &CommonLisp;.</para>
 
 <sect1 id="more-cl-info">
-<title>Where To Go For More Information on &CommonLisp; in General</title>
+<title>Where To Go For More Information about &CommonLisp; in General</title>
 
 <para>Regardless of your ability level, two very useful resources
 for working with any implementation of
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ but need to learn about Lisp, three books stand out.
 </sect1>
 
 <sect1>
-<title>Where To Go For More Information On &SBCL;</title>
+<title>Where To Go For More Information About &SBCL;</title>
 
 <para>Before you read this user manual, you should probably read
 two other things.
@@ -107,9 +107,9 @@ known bugs, known performance problems, and missing extensions are
 likely to be fixed, tuned, or added. </para>
 
 <para>&SBCL; is descended from &CMUCL;, which is itself descended from
-Spice Lisp. Early implementations for the Mach operating system on the
-IBM RT, back in the 1980s. Design decisions from that time are still
-reflected in the current implementation:
+Spice Lisp, including early implementations for the Mach operating
+system on the IBM RT, back in the 1980s. Design decisions from that
+time are still reflected in the current implementation:
 <itemizedlist>
   <listitem><para>The system expects to be loaded into a 
     fixed-at-compile-time location in virtual memory, and also expects
@@ -122,7 +122,8 @@ reflected in the current implementation:
   <listitem><para>A word is a 32-bit quantity. The system has been 
     ported to many processor architectures without altering this
     basic principle. Some hacks allow the system to run on the Alpha
-    chip (a 64-bit architecture) but the assumption that a word is
+    chip (a 64-bit architecture) but even there 32-bit words are
+    used. The assumption that a word is
     32 bits wide is implicit in hundreds of places in the
     system.</para></listitem>
   <listitem><para>The system is implemented as a C program which is 
@@ -150,7 +151,7 @@ special classes of forms, such as symbols which are
 <function>boundp</>. More complicated forms are evaluated by calling
 <function>compile</> and then calling <function>funcall</> on the
 returned result.
-<para>
+</para>
 
 <para>The direct ancestor of &SBCL; is the X86 port of &CMUCL;. This
 port was in some ways the most cobbled-together of all the &CMUCL;
@@ -160,8 +161,8 @@ debugging) do not work particularly well there. &SBCL; should be able
 to improve in these areas (and has already improved in some other
 areas), but it takes a while.</para>
 
-<para>The &SBCL; GC, like the GC on the X86 port of &CMUCL;, is
-<emphasis>conservative</>. This means that it doesn't maintain a
+<para>On the x86, &SBCL; like the X86 port of &CMUCL;, uses a 
+<emphasis>conservative</> GC. This means that it doesn't maintain a
 strict separation between tagged and untagged data, instead treating
 some untagged data (e.g. raw floating point numbers) as
 possibly-tagged data and so not collecting any Lisp objects that they
@@ -182,15 +183,16 @@ running system with new versions. This quasi-build procedure can cause
 various bizarre bootstrapping hangups, especially when a major change
 is made to the system. It also makes the connection between the
 current source code and the current executable more tenuous than in
-any other software system I'm aware of -- it's easy to accidentally
+other software systems -- it's easy to accidentally
 <quote>build</> a &CMUCL; system containing characteristics not
 reflected in the current version of the source code.</para>
 
 <para>Other major changes since the fork from &CMUCL; include
 <itemizedlist>
   <listitem><para>&SBCL; has dropped support for many &CMUCL; extensions,
-    (e.g. remote procedure call, Unix system interface, and X11
-    interface).</para></listitem>
+    (e.g. IP networking, remote procedure call, Unix system interface, and X11
+    interface).  Some of these are now available as contributed or
+    third-party modules.</para></listitem>
   <listitem><para>&SBCL; has deleted or deprecated
     some nonstandard features and code complexity which helped
     efficiency at the price of maintainability. For example, the