X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fcode%2Fclass.lisp;h=51d4911232ef6bf2153691c08b3cf9ac35b75bde;hb=9a241987c408980164f71237f7d840265302bbc1;hp=4b87df7b57f64af035b313097192d7fabd8acc12;hpb=3c65762b927af861c9c8bc416e4cbac9a14ec0c3;p=sbcl.git

diff --git a/src/code/class.lisp b/src/code/class.lisp
index 4b87df7..51d4911 100644
--- a/src/code/class.lisp
+++ b/src/code/class.lisp
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@
   (clos-hash-6 (random-layout-clos-hash) :type index)
   (clos-hash-7 (random-layout-clos-hash) :type index)
   ;; the class that this is a layout for
-  (class (required-argument)
+  (class (missing-arg)
 	 ;; FIXME: Do we really know this is a CL:CLASS? Mightn't it
 	 ;; be a SB-PCL:CLASS under some circumstances? What goes here
 	 ;; when the LAYOUT is in fact a PCL::WRAPPER?
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@
   ;;      renamed because some of us find it confusing to call something
   ;;      a depth when it isn't quite.
   (depthoid -1 :type layout-depthoid)
-  ;; The number of top-level descriptor cells in each instance.
+  ;; the number of top level descriptor cells in each instance
   (length 0 :type index)
   ;; If this layout has some kind of compiler meta-info, then this is
   ;; it. If a structure, then we store the DEFSTRUCT-DESCRIPTION here.
@@ -394,8 +394,8 @@
 	(let ((old-length (layout-length old-layout)))
 	  (unless (= old-length length)
 	    (warn "change in instance length of class ~S:~%  ~
-		   ~A length: ~D~%  ~
-		   ~A length: ~D"
+		   ~A length: ~W~%  ~
+		   ~A length: ~W"
 		  name
 		  old-context old-length
 		  context length)
@@ -441,7 +441,6 @@
 (declaim (ftype (function (symbol index simple-vector layout-depthoid) layout)
 		find-and-init-or-check-layout))
 (defun find-and-init-or-check-layout (name length inherits depthoid)
-  (/show0 "entering FIND-AND-INIT-OR-CHECK-LAYOUT")
   (let ((layout (find-layout name)))
     (init-or-check-layout layout
 			  (or (sb!xc:find-class name nil)
@@ -1336,7 +1335,7 @@
 ;;; FIXME: It would be good to arrange for this to be called when the
 ;;; cross-compiler is being built, not just when the target Lisp is
 ;;; being cold loaded. Perhaps this could be moved to its own file
-;;; late in the stems-and-flags.lisp-expr sequence, and be put in
+;;; late in the build-order.lisp-expr sequence, and be put in
 ;;; !COLD-INIT-FORMS there?
 (defun !class-finalize ()
   (dohash (name layout *forward-referenced-layouts*)