X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fcode%2Fearly-fasl.lisp;h=d72d5f4ae36101471dc31d1d808baf0245e315d7;hb=ad3beba970fab6e451a461c9f9b14faf4ef17718;hp=8719750e7c2b47de6305e7a183e1fab8eaeb5080;hpb=759b5cefaa7a16a13d58cd8fd67bbea77819ab8f;p=sbcl.git

diff --git a/src/code/early-fasl.lisp b/src/code/early-fasl.lisp
index 8719750..d72d5f4 100644
--- a/src/code/early-fasl.lisp
+++ b/src/code/early-fasl.lisp
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
 
 (macrolet ((define-fasl-format-features ()
              (let (;; master value for *F-P-A-F-F*
-		   (fpaff '(:sb-thread)))
+		   (fpaff '(:sb-thread :sb-package-locks :sb-unicode)))
 	       `(progn
 		  ;; a list of *(SHEBANG-)FEATURES* flags which affect
 		  ;; binary compatibility, i.e. which must be the same
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
 ;;; versions which break binary compatibility. But it certainly should
 ;;; be incremented for release versions which break binary
 ;;; compatibility.
-(def!constant +fasl-file-version+ 46)
+(def!constant +fasl-file-version+ 57)
 ;;; (record of versions before 2003 deleted in 2003-04-26/0.pre8.107 or so)
 ;;; 38: (2003-01-05) changed names of internal SORT machinery
 ;;; 39: (2003-02-20) in 0.7.12.1 a slot was added to
@@ -102,6 +102,26 @@
 ;;;     incompatibly in 0.8.3.62.
 ;;; 46: (2003-11-11) Tim Daly, Jr. (and Christophe Rhodes) reported
 ;;;     .fasl incompatibility on sbcl-devel 2003-11-09.
+;;; 47: (2003-11-30) Static variables were rearranged in 0.8.6.11.
+;;; 48: (2004-03-01) Renumbered all the widetags to allow for more
+;;;     microefficiency in sbcl-0.8.8.10
+;;; 49: (2004-05-04) Changed implementation of DEFFOO macros and the
+;;;     functions they expand to.
+;;; 50: (2004-05-20) Changed %COMPILER-DEFUN signature again.
+;;; 51: (2004-07-24) Package locks (SBCL 0.8.12.7) changed signature of
+;;;     %DEFPACKAGE.
+;;; 52: (2004-11-02) Merge of SB-UNICODE.
+;;; 53: (2005-02-22) Something introduced in SBCL 0.8.19.26 (give or take
+;;;     a couple of patches) invalidated some FFI-related fasls. Probably
+;;;     caused by "lazy alien resolution improvements".
+;;; 54: (2005-03-22) At least "0.8.20.6: Make FILE-STREAM and STRING-STREAM
+;;;     potential mixins in CLOS" and "0.8.20.21: Add immediate single-floats
+;;;     on x86-64."
+;;; 55: (2005-04-06) EXTERN-ALIEN-NAME logic moved from fixups to
+;;;     FIND-FOREIGN-SYMBOL-IN-TABLE &co.
+;;; 56: (2005-05-22) Something between 0.9.0.1 and 0.9.0.14. My money is
+;;;     on 0.9.0.6 (MORE CASE CONSISTENCY).
+;;; 57: (2005-06-12) Raw slot rearrangement in 0.9.1.38
 
 ;;; the conventional file extension for our fasl files
 (declaim (type simple-string *fasl-file-type*))
@@ -113,16 +133,9 @@
 ;;;   Assembler routines are named by full Lisp symbols: they
 ;;;     have packages and that sort of native Lisp stuff associated
 ;;;     with them. We can compare them with EQ.
-;;;   Foreign symbols are named by Lisp STRINGs: the Lisp package
-;;;     system doesn't extend out to symbols in languages like C.
-;;;     We want to use EQUAL to compare them.
-;;;   *STATIC-FOREIGN-SYMBOLS* are static as opposed to "dynamic" (not
-;;;     as opposed to C's "extern"). The table contains symbols known at 
-;;;     the time that the program was built, but not symbols defined
-;;;     in object files which have been loaded dynamically since then.
-(declaim (type hash-table *assembler-routines* *static-foreign-symbols*))
+(declaim (type hash-table *assembler-routines*))
 (defvar *assembler-routines* (make-hash-table :test 'eq))
-(defvar *static-foreign-symbols* (make-hash-table :test 'equal))
+
 
 ;;;; the FOP database
 
@@ -138,9 +151,6 @@
 	      :initial-element (lambda ()
 				 (error "corrupt fasl file: losing FOP"))))
 
-;;;; other miscellaneous loading-related stuff
-
-
 ;;;; variables
 
 (defvar *load-depth* 0
@@ -152,15 +162,4 @@
 (defvar *fasl-input-stream*)
 (declaim (type ansi-stream *fasl-input-stream*))
 
-(defvar *load-print* nil
-  #!+sb-doc
-  "the default for the :PRINT argument to LOAD")
-(defvar *load-verbose* nil
-  ;; Note that CMU CL's default for this was T, and ANSI says it's
-  ;; implementation-dependent. We choose NIL on the theory that it's
-  ;; a nicer default behavior for Unix programs.
-  #!+sb-doc
-  "the default for the :VERBOSE argument to LOAD")
-
 (defvar *load-code-verbose* nil)
-