X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fcode%2Fmacros.lisp;h=10911149d8397271b3870600cb35f48385f8ad32;hb=c960f8bc221ef4db0058013b8aa992d9b5a73fb7;hp=b4453d12f3fac6b5e86206820fe9b8701ecfc7da;hpb=dc84ceb894fdbe315f82dd8336f3ba894435a669;p=sbcl.git

diff --git a/src/code/macros.lisp b/src/code/macros.lisp
index b4453d1..1091114 100644
--- a/src/code/macros.lisp
+++ b/src/code/macros.lisp
@@ -100,7 +100,6 @@
 	    :format-control "Symbol macro name already declared constant: ~S."
 	    :format-arguments (list name))))
   name)
-
 
 ;;;; DEFINE-COMPILER-MACRO
 
@@ -128,18 +127,20 @@
     (error 'simple-program-error
 	   :format-control "cannot define a compiler-macro for a special operator: ~S"
 	   :format-arguments (list name)))
-  (let ((whole (gensym "WHOLE-"))
-	(environment (gensym "ENV-")))
+  (with-unique-names (whole environment)
     (multiple-value-bind (body local-decs doc)
 	(parse-defmacro lambda-list whole body name 'define-compiler-macro
 			:environment environment)
       (let ((def `(lambda (,whole ,environment)
 		    ,@local-decs
-		    (block ,(fun-name-block-name name)
-		      ,body)))
+		    ,body))
 	    (debug-name (debug-namify "DEFINE-COMPILER-MACRO ~S" name)))
 	`(eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
-	  (sb!c::%define-compiler-macro ',name #',def ',lambda-list ,doc ,debug-name))))))
+	  (sb!c::%define-compiler-macro ',name
+					#',def
+					',lambda-list
+					,doc
+					,debug-name))))))
 
 ;;; FIXME: This will look remarkably similar to those who have already
 ;;; seen the code for %DEFMACRO in src/code/defmacro.lisp.  Various
@@ -174,11 +175,11 @@
 	     name))))
   (progn
     (def (:load-toplevel :execute) #-sb-xc-host t #+sb-xc-host nil)
-    (def (:compile-toplevel) nil)))
+    #-sb-xc (def (:compile-toplevel) nil)))
 
 ;;;; CASE, TYPECASE, and friends
 
-(eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
+(eval-when (#-sb-xc :compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
 
 ;;; CASE-BODY returns code for all the standard "case" macros. NAME is
 ;;; the macro name, and KEYFORM is the thing to case on. MULTI-P
@@ -197,16 +198,19 @@
   (let ((keyform-value (gensym))
 	(clauses ())
 	(keys ()))
-    (dolist (case cases)
+    (do* ((cases cases (cdr cases))
+	  (case (car cases) (car cases)))
+	 ((null cases) nil)
       (unless (list-of-length-at-least-p case 1)
 	(error "~S -- bad clause in ~S" case name))
       (destructuring-bind (keyoid &rest forms) case
-	(cond ((memq keyoid '(t otherwise))
+	(cond ((and (memq keyoid '(t otherwise))
+		    (null (cdr cases)))
 	       (if errorp
 		   (progn
-		     ;; FIXME: this message could probably do with
-		     ;; some loving pretty-printer format controls.
-		     (style-warn "Treating bare ~A in ~A as introducing a normal-clause, not an otherwise-clause" keyoid name)
+		     (style-warn "~@<Treating bare ~A in ~A as introducing a ~
+                                  normal-clause, not an otherwise-clause~@:>"
+				 keyoid name)
 		     (push keyoid keys)
 		     (push `((,test ,keyform-value ',keyoid) nil ,@forms)
 			   clauses))
@@ -359,8 +363,9 @@
 	   ,@(when index
 	       `((setf ,index (string-input-stream-current ,var)))))))))
 
-(defmacro-mundanely with-output-to-string ((var &optional string)
-					   &body forms-decls)
+(defmacro-mundanely with-output-to-string 
+    ((var &optional string &key (element-type ''character))
+     &body forms-decls)
   (multiple-value-bind (forms decls) (parse-body forms-decls nil)
     (if string
       `(let ((,var (make-fill-pointer-output-stream ,string)))
@@ -368,7 +373,7 @@
   	 (unwind-protect
 	     (progn ,@forms)
   	   (close ,var)))
-      `(let ((,var (make-string-output-stream)))
+      `(let ((,var (make-string-output-stream :element-type ,element-type)))
   	 ,@decls
   	 (unwind-protect
 	     (progn ,@forms)
@@ -381,6 +386,13 @@
   #!+sb-doc
   "Evaluate FORM and return the Nth value (zero based). This involves no
   consing when N is a trivial constant integer."
+  ;; FIXME: The above is true, if slightly misleading.  The
+  ;; MULTIPLE-VALUE-BIND idiom [ as opposed to MULTIPLE-VALUE-CALL
+  ;; (LAMBDA (&REST VALUES) (NTH N VALUES)) ] does indeed not cons at
+  ;; runtime.  However, for large N (say N = 200), COMPILE on such a
+  ;; form will take longer than can be described as adequate, as the
+  ;; optional dispatch mechanism for the M-V-B gets increasingly
+  ;; hairy.
   (if (integerp n)
       (let ((dummy-list nil)
 	    (keeper (gensym "KEEPER-")))