X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fcode%2Fmacros.lisp;h=baf6694938b7804074e2a337d65b891b63871cdd;hb=771b864c8f32af7734bc0550aeaf1539fc4df194;hp=d94900ca494a0ff3d12d28fba57c6fe673ba7424;hpb=3bd7a97d1b11a2b0aee086ef211cae807f3dfc35;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/src/code/macros.lisp b/src/code/macros.lisp index d94900c..baf6694 100644 --- a/src/code/macros.lisp +++ b/src/code/macros.lisp @@ -31,13 +31,13 @@ some locations known to SETF, starting over with test-form. Returns NIL." `(do () (,test-form) (assert-error ',test-form ',places ,datum ,@arguments) - ,@(mapcar #'(lambda (place) - `(setf ,place (assert-prompt ',place ,place))) + ,@(mapcar (lambda (place) + `(setf ,place (assert-prompt ',place ,place))) places))) (defun assert-prompt (name value) (cond ((y-or-n-p "The old value of ~S is ~S.~ - ~%Do you want to supply a new value? " + ~%Do you want to supply a new value? " name value) (format *query-io* "~&Type a form to be evaluated:~%") (flet ((read-it () (eval (read *query-io*)))) @@ -54,14 +54,6 @@ ;;; and some things (e.g., READ-CHAR) can't afford this excessive ;;; consing, we bend backwards a little. ;;; -;;; FIXME: In reality, this restart cruft is needed hardly anywhere in -;;; the system. Write NEED and NEED-TYPE to replace ASSERT and -;;; CHECK-TYPE inside the system. (CL:CHECK-TYPE must still be -;;; defined, since it's specified by ANSI and it is sometimes nice for -;;; whipping up little things. But as far as I can tell it's not -;;; usually very helpful deep inside the guts of a complex system like -;;; SBCL.) -;;; ;;; CHECK-TYPE-ERROR isn't defined until a later file because it uses ;;; the macro RESTART-CASE, which isn't defined until a later file. (defmacro-mundanely check-type (place type &optional type-string) @@ -76,153 +68,111 @@ (setf ,place (check-type-error ',place ,place-value ',type ,type-string))))) -;;;; DEFCONSTANT +;;;; DEFINE-SYMBOL-MACRO -(defmacro-mundanely defconstant (name value &optional documentation) - #!+sb-doc - "For defining global constants. DEFCONSTANT says that the value is - constant and may be compiled into code. If the variable already has - a value, and this is not EQL to the init, the code is not portable - (undefined behavior). The third argument is an optional documentation - string for the variable." +(defmacro-mundanely define-symbol-macro (name expansion) `(eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute) - (sb!c::%defconstant ',name ,value ',documentation))) + (sb!c::%define-symbol-macro ',name ',expansion))) -;;; the guts of DEFCONSTANT -(defun sb!c::%defconstant (name value doc) +(defun sb!c::%define-symbol-macro (name expansion) (unless (symbolp name) - (error "The constant name is not a symbol: ~S" name)) - (about-to-modify name) - (when (looks-like-name-of-special-var-p name) - (style-warn "defining ~S as a constant, even though the name follows~@ -the usual naming convention (names like *FOO*) for special variables" - name)) - (let ((kind (info :variable :kind name))) - (case kind - (:constant - ;; Note: This behavior (discouraging any non-EQL modification) - ;; is unpopular, but it is specified by ANSI (i.e. ANSI says a - ;; non-EQL change has undefined consequences). If people really - ;; want bindings which are constant in some sense other than - ;; EQL, I suggest either just using DEFVAR (which is usually - ;; appropriate, despite the un-mnemonic name), or defining - ;; something like SB-INT:DEFCONSTANT-EQX (which is occasionally - ;; more appropriate). -- WHN 2000-11-03 - (unless (eql value - (info :variable :constant-value name)) - (cerror "Go ahead and change the value." - "The constant ~S is being redefined." - name))) - (:global - ;; (This is OK -- undefined variables are of this kind. So we - ;; don't warn or error or anything, just fall through.) - ) - (t (warn "redefining ~(~A~) ~S to be a constant" kind name)))) - (when doc - (setf (fdocumentation name 'variable) doc)) - - ;; We want to set the cross-compilation host's symbol value, not just - ;; the cross-compiler's (INFO :VARIABLE :CONSTANT-VALUE NAME), so - ;; that code like - ;; (defconstant max-entries 61) - ;; (deftype entry-index () `(mod ,max-entries)) - ;; will be cross-compiled correctly. - #-sb-xc-host (setf (symbol-value name) value) - #+sb-xc-host (progn - (/show (symbol-package name)) - ;; Redefining our cross-compilation host's CL symbols - ;; would be poor form. - ;; - ;; FIXME: Having to check this and then not treat it - ;; as a fatal error seems like a symptom of things - ;; being pretty broken. It's also a problem in and of - ;; itself, since it makes it too easy for cases of - ;; using the cross-compilation host Lisp's CL - ;; constant values in the target Lisp to slip by. I - ;; got backed into this because the cross-compiler - ;; translates DEFCONSTANT SB!XC:FOO into DEFCONSTANT - ;; CL:FOO. It would be good to unscrew the - ;; cross-compilation package hacks so that that - ;; translation doesn't happen. Perhaps: - ;; * Replace SB-XC with SB-CL. SB-CL exports all the - ;; symbols which ANSI requires to be exported from CL. - ;; * Make a nickname SB!CL which behaves like SB!XC. - ;; * Go through the loaded-on-the-host code making - ;; every target definition be in SB-CL. E.g. - ;; DEFMACRO-MUNDANELY DEFCONSTANT becomes - ;; DEFMACRO-MUNDANELY SB!CL:DEFCONSTANT. - ;; * Make IN-TARGET-COMPILATION-MODE do - ;; UNUSE-PACKAGE CL and USE-PACKAGE SB-CL in each - ;; of the target packages (then undo it on exit). - ;; * Make the cross-compiler's implementation of - ;; EVAL-WHEN (:COMPILE-TOPLEVEL) do UNCROSS. - ;; (This may not require any change.) - ;; * Hack GENESIS as necessary so that it outputs - ;; SB-CL stuff as COMMON-LISP stuff. - ;; * Now the code here can assert that the symbol - ;; being defined isn't in the cross-compilation - ;; host's CL package. - (unless (eql (find-symbol (symbol-name name) :cl) name) - ;; KLUDGE: In the cross-compiler, we use the - ;; cross-compilation host's DEFCONSTANT macro - ;; instead of just (SETF SYMBOL-VALUE), in order to - ;; get whatever blessing the cross-compilation host - ;; may expect for a global (SETF SYMBOL-VALUE). - ;; (CMU CL, at least around 2.4.19, generated full - ;; WARNINGs for code -- e.g. DEFTYPE expanders -- - ;; which referred to symbols which had been set by - ;; (SETF SYMBOL-VALUE). I doubt such warnings are - ;; ANSI-compliant, but I'm not sure, so I've - ;; written this in a way that CMU CL will tolerate - ;; and which ought to work elsewhere too.) -- WHN - ;; 2001-03-24 - (eval `(defconstant ,name ',value)))) - - (setf (info :variable :kind name) :constant) - (setf (info :variable :constant-value name) value) + (error 'simple-type-error :datum name :expected-type 'symbol + :format-control "Symbol macro name is not a symbol: ~S." + :format-arguments (list name))) + (with-single-package-locked-error + (:symbol name "defining ~A as a symbol-macro")) + (ecase (info :variable :kind name) + ((:macro :global nil) + (setf (info :variable :kind name) :macro) + (setf (info :variable :macro-expansion name) expansion)) + (:special + (error 'simple-program-error + :format-control "Symbol macro name already declared special: ~S." + :format-arguments (list name))) + (:constant + (error 'simple-program-error + :format-control "Symbol macro name already declared constant: ~S." + :format-arguments (list name)))) name) ;;;; DEFINE-COMPILER-MACRO -;;; FIXME: The logic here for handling compiler macros named (SETF -;;; FOO) was added after the fork from SBCL, is not well tested, and -;;; may conflict with subtleties of the ANSI standard. E.g. section -;;; "3.2.2.1 Compiler Macros" says that creating a lexical binding for -;;; a function name shadows a compiler macro, and it's not clear that -;;; that works with this version. It should be tested. (defmacro-mundanely define-compiler-macro (name lambda-list &body body) #!+sb-doc "Define a compiler-macro for NAME." - (let ((whole (gensym "WHOLE-")) - (environment (gensym "ENV-"))) + (legal-fun-name-or-type-error name) + (when (consp name) + ;; It's fairly clear that the user intends the compiler macro to + ;; expand when he does (SETF (FOO ...) X). And that's even a + ;; useful and reasonable thing to want. Unfortunately, + ;; (SETF (FOO ...) X) macroexpands into (FUNCALL (SETF FOO) X ...), + ;; and it's not at all clear that it's valid to expand a FUNCALL form, + ;; and the ANSI standard doesn't seem to say anything else which + ;; would justify us expanding the compiler macro the way the user + ;; wants. So instead we rely on 3.2.2.1.3 "When Compiler Macros Are + ;; Used" which says they never have to be used, so by ignoring such + ;; macros we're erring on the safe side. But any user who does + ;; (DEFINE-COMPILER-MACRO (SETF FOO) ...) could easily be surprised + ;; by this way of complying with a rather screwy aspect of the ANSI + ;; spec, so at least we can warn him... + (sb!c::compiler-style-warn + "defining compiler macro of (SETF ...), which will not be expanded")) + (when (and (symbolp name) (special-operator-p name)) + (error 'simple-program-error + :format-control "cannot define a compiler-macro for a special operator: ~S" + :format-arguments (list name))) + (with-unique-names (whole environment) (multiple-value-bind (body local-decs doc) (parse-defmacro lambda-list whole body name 'define-compiler-macro :environment environment) (let ((def `(lambda (,whole ,environment) ,@local-decs - (block ,(function-name-block-name name) - ,body)))) - `(sb!c::%define-compiler-macro ',name #',def ',lambda-list ,doc))))) -(defun sb!c::%define-compiler-macro (name definition lambda-list doc) - ;; FIXME: Why does this have to be an interpreted function? Shouldn't - ;; it get compiled? - (aver (sb!eval:interpreted-function-p definition)) - (setf (sb!eval:interpreted-function-name definition) - (format nil "DEFINE-COMPILER-MACRO ~S" name)) - (setf (sb!eval:interpreted-function-arglist definition) lambda-list) - (sb!c::%%define-compiler-macro name definition doc)) -(defun sb!c::%%define-compiler-macro (name definition doc) - (setf (sb!xc:compiler-macro-function name) definition) - ;; FIXME: Add support for (SETF FDOCUMENTATION) when object is a list - ;; and type is COMPILER-MACRO. (Until then, we have to discard any - ;; compiler macro documentation for (SETF FOO).) - (unless (listp name) - (setf (fdocumentation name 'compiler-macro) doc)) - name) + ,body)) + (debug-name (sb!c::debug-namify "DEFINE-COMPILER-MACRO " name))) + `(eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute) + (sb!c::%define-compiler-macro ',name + #',def + ',lambda-list + ,doc + ,debug-name)))))) + +;;; FIXME: This will look remarkably similar to those who have already +;;; seen the code for %DEFMACRO in src/code/defmacro.lisp. Various +;;; bits of logic should be shared (notably arglist setting). +(macrolet + ((def (times set-p) + `(eval-when (,@times) + (defun sb!c::%define-compiler-macro + (name definition lambda-list doc debug-name) + ,@(unless set-p + '((declare (ignore lambda-list debug-name)))) + ;; FIXME: warn about incompatible lambda list with + ;; respect to parent function? + (setf (sb!xc:compiler-macro-function name) definition) + ;; FIXME: Add support for (SETF FDOCUMENTATION) when + ;; object is a list and type is COMPILER-MACRO. (Until + ;; then, we have to discard any compiler macro + ;; documentation for (SETF FOO).) + (unless (listp name) + (setf (fdocumentation name 'compiler-macro) doc)) + ,(when set-p + `(case (widetag-of definition) + (#.sb!vm:closure-header-widetag + (setf (%simple-fun-arglist (%closure-fun definition)) + lambda-list + (%simple-fun-name (%closure-fun definition)) + debug-name)) + (#.sb!vm:simple-fun-header-widetag + (setf (%simple-fun-arglist definition) lambda-list + (%simple-fun-name definition) debug-name)))) + name)))) + (progn + (def (:load-toplevel :execute) #-sb-xc-host t #+sb-xc-host nil) + #-sb-xc (def (:compile-toplevel) nil))) ;;;; CASE, TYPECASE, and friends -(eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute) +(eval-when (#-sb-xc :compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute) ;;; CASE-BODY returns code for all the standard "case" macros. NAME is ;;; the macro name, and KEYFORM is the thing to case on. MULTI-P @@ -241,16 +191,22 @@ the usual naming convention (names like *FOO*) for special variables" (let ((keyform-value (gensym)) (clauses ()) (keys ())) - (dolist (case cases) + (do* ((cases cases (cdr cases)) + (case (car cases) (car cases))) + ((null cases) nil) (unless (list-of-length-at-least-p case 1) (error "~S -- bad clause in ~S" case name)) (destructuring-bind (keyoid &rest forms) case - (cond ((memq keyoid '(t otherwise)) + (cond ((and (memq keyoid '(t otherwise)) + (null (cdr cases))) (if errorp - (error 'simple-program-error - :format-control - "No default clause is allowed in ~S: ~S" - :format-arguments (list name case)) + (progn + (style-warn "~@" + keyoid name) + (push keyoid keys) + (push `((,test ,keyform-value ',keyoid) nil ,@forms) + clauses)) (push `(t nil ,@forms) clauses))) ((and multi-p (listp keyoid)) (setf keys (append keyoid keys)) @@ -356,7 +312,8 @@ the usual naming convention (names like *FOO*) for special variables" ;;;; WITH-FOO i/o-related macros (defmacro-mundanely with-open-stream ((var stream) &body forms-decls) - (multiple-value-bind (forms decls) (parse-body forms-decls nil) + (multiple-value-bind (forms decls) + (parse-body forms-decls :doc-string-allowed nil) (let ((abortp (gensym))) `(let ((,var ,stream) (,abortp t)) @@ -375,7 +332,8 @@ the usual naming convention (names like *FOO*) for special variables" (defmacro-mundanely with-input-from-string ((var string &key index start end) &body forms-decls) - (multiple-value-bind (forms decls) (parse-body forms-decls nil) + (multiple-value-bind (forms decls) + (parse-body forms-decls :doc-string-allowed nil) ;; The ONCE-ONLY inhibits compiler note for unreachable code when ;; END is true. (once-only ((string string)) @@ -400,16 +358,18 @@ the usual naming convention (names like *FOO*) for special variables" ,@(when index `((setf ,index (string-input-stream-current ,var))))))))) -(defmacro-mundanely with-output-to-string ((var &optional string) - &body forms-decls) - (multiple-value-bind (forms decls) (parse-body forms-decls nil) +(defmacro-mundanely with-output-to-string + ((var &optional string &key (element-type ''character)) + &body forms-decls) + (multiple-value-bind (forms decls) + (parse-body forms-decls :doc-string-allowed nil) (if string `(let ((,var (make-fill-pointer-output-stream ,string))) ,@decls (unwind-protect (progn ,@forms) (close ,var))) - `(let ((,var (make-string-output-stream))) + `(let ((,var (make-string-output-stream :element-type ,element-type))) ,@decls (unwind-protect (progn ,@forms) @@ -420,8 +380,15 @@ the usual naming convention (names like *FOO*) for special variables" (defmacro-mundanely nth-value (n form) #!+sb-doc - "Evaluates FORM and returns the Nth value (zero based). This involves no + "Evaluate FORM and return the Nth value (zero based). This involves no consing when N is a trivial constant integer." + ;; FIXME: The above is true, if slightly misleading. The + ;; MULTIPLE-VALUE-BIND idiom [ as opposed to MULTIPLE-VALUE-CALL + ;; (LAMBDA (&REST VALUES) (NTH N VALUES)) ] does indeed not cons at + ;; runtime. However, for large N (say N = 200), COMPILE on such a + ;; form will take longer than can be described as adequate, as the + ;; optional dispatch mechanism for the M-V-B gets increasingly + ;; hairy. (if (integerp n) (let ((dummy-list nil) (keeper (gensym "KEEPER-"))) @@ -444,29 +411,23 @@ the usual naming convention (names like *FOO*) for special variables" #!+sb-doc "DECLAIM Declaration* Do a declaration or declarations for the global environment." - #-sb-xc-host `(eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute) - ,@(mapcar #'(lambda (x) - `(sb!xc:proclaim ',x)) - specs)) - ;; KLUDGE: The definition above doesn't work in the cross-compiler, - ;; because UNCROSS translates SB!XC:PROCLAIM into CL:PROCLAIM before - ;; the form gets executed. Instead, we have to explicitly do the - ;; proclamation at macroexpansion time. -- WHN ca. 19990810 - ;; - ;; FIXME: Maybe we don't need this special treatment any more now - ;; that we're using DEFMACRO-MUNDANELY instead of DEFMACRO? - #+sb-xc-host (progn - (mapcar #'sb!xc:proclaim specs) - `(progn - ,@(mapcar #'(lambda (x) - `(sb!xc:proclaim ',x)) - specs)))) + ,@(mapcar (lambda (spec) `(sb!xc:proclaim ',spec)) + specs))) -(defmacro-mundanely print-unreadable-object ((object stream - &key type identity) +(defmacro-mundanely print-unreadable-object ((object stream &key type identity) &body body) + "Output OBJECT to STREAM with \"#<\" prefix, \">\" suffix, optionally + with object-type prefix and object-identity suffix, and executing the + code in BODY to provide possible further output." `(%print-unreadable-object ,object ,stream ,type ,identity ,(if body - `#'(lambda () ,@body) + `(lambda () ,@body) nil))) + +(defmacro-mundanely ignore-errors (&rest forms) + #!+sb-doc + "Execute FORMS handling ERROR conditions, returning the result of the last + form, or (VALUES NIL the-ERROR-that-was-caught) if an ERROR was handled." + `(handler-case (progn ,@forms) + (error (condition) (values nil condition))))