X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fcode%2Frun-program.lisp;h=1539001d7ae7345a42d0021c936988731bfe7ebf;hb=bee53328c93be3433477821131ab805557476c8b;hp=a4d7b7bfe4d8e16a32d376f2fa9cf2894234fa9a;hpb=72408d179d7396904e25e9a3dc423d2634e65072;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/src/code/run-program.lisp b/src/code/run-program.lisp index a4d7b7b..1539001 100644 --- a/src/code/run-program.lisp +++ b/src/code/run-program.lisp @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ ;;;; provided with absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS ;;;; files for more information. -(in-package "SB-IMPL") +(in-package "SB-IMPL") ;(SB-IMPL, not SB!IMPL, since we're built in warm load.) ;;;; hacking the Unix environment ;;;; @@ -46,6 +46,21 @@ ;;;; visible at GENESIS time. (def-alien-variable "environ" (* c-string)) +(push (lambda () + ;; We redo this here to protect ourselves from this scenario: + ;; * Build under one version of shared lib, save a core. + ;; * Load core under another version of shared lib. ("Now + ;; where was environ again?" SIGSEGV, etc.) + ;; Obviously it's a KLUDGE to do this hack for every alien + ;; variable, but as it happens, as of sbcl-0.7.0 this is the + ;; only alien variable used to implement SBCL, so it's not + ;; worth coming up with a general solution. (A general + ;; solution would be nice for users who want to have their + ;; alien code be preserved across a save/load cycle, but this + ;; problem with alien variables is only one of several + ;; problems which'd need to be solved before that can happen.) + (def-alien-variable "environ" (* c-string))) + *after-save-initializations*) (defun posix-environ () "Return the Unix environment (\"man environ\") as a list of SIMPLE-STRINGs." @@ -429,6 +444,12 @@ (stdout sb-c-call:int) (stderr sb-c-call:int)) +;;; Is UNIX-FILENAME the name of a file that we can execute? +(defun unix-filename-is-executable-p (unix-filename) + (declare (type simple-string unix-filename)) + (values (and (eq (sb-unix:unix-file-kind unix-filename) :file) + (sb-unix:unix-access unix-filename sb-unix:x_ok)))) + ;;; FIXME: There shouldn't be two semiredundant versions of the ;;; documentation. Since this is a public extension function, the ;;; documentation should be in the doc string. So all information from @@ -580,13 +601,15 @@ ;; "path:" defined in sbcl-0.6.10. It would probably be ;; reasonable to restore Unix PATH searching in SBCL, e.g. ;; with a function FIND-EXECUTABLE-FILE-IN-POSIX-PATH. - ;; (I don't want to do it with search lists the way - ;; that CMU CL did, because those are a non-ANSI - ;; extension which I'd like to get rid of. -- WHN) - (pfile (unix-namestring program t t)) + ;; CMU CL did it with a "PATH:" search list, but CMU CL + ;; search lists are a non-ANSI extension that SBCL + ;; doesn't support. -- WHN) + (pfile (unix-namestring program t)) (cookie (list 0))) (unless pfile (error "no such program: ~S" program)) + (unless (unix-filename-is-executable-p pfile) + (error "not executable: ~S" program)) (multiple-value-bind (stdin input-stream) (get-descriptor-for input cookie :direction :input