X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fcode%2Ftoplevel.lisp;h=5a40e8fd0383cb17b49fa5121cdf1c5c0ec62550;hb=5277a0cbf1a72243cad6808883a4847acefc8e6b;hp=41fd56869704b98aaf95f9dc30e8eeca39e72199;hpb=9ecb6b7686011c587bd0bf1b40a34c29338d89f3;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/src/code/toplevel.lisp b/src/code/toplevel.lisp index 41fd568..5a40e8f 100644 --- a/src/code/toplevel.lisp +++ b/src/code/toplevel.lisp @@ -386,10 +386,6 @@ ;; return its truename. (probe-init-files (&rest possible-init-file-names) (/show0 "entering PROBE-INIT-FILES") - - ;; REMOVEME: commented out while compiler has problems - #+nil - (prog1 (find-if (lambda (x) (and (stringp x) (probe-file x))) @@ -413,8 +409,6 @@ 'string user-home "/.sbclrc")))) - (/show0 "assigned SYSINIT-TRUENAME and USERINIT-TRUENAME") - ;; We wrap all the pre-REPL user/system customized startup code ;; in a restart. @@ -443,11 +437,14 @@ (eval eval) (flush-standard-output-streams))) (continue () - :report "Continue anyway (skipping to toplevel read/eval/print loop)." - (values)) ; (no-op, just fall through) + :report + "Continue anyway (skipping to toplevel read/eval/print loop)." + (/show0 "CONTINUEing from pre-REPL RESTART-CASE") + (values)) ; (no-op, just fall through) (quit () - :report "Quit SBCL (calling #'QUIT, killing the process)." - (quit)))) + :report "Quit SBCL (calling #'QUIT, killing the process)." + (/show0 "falling through to QUIT from pre-REPL RESTART-CASE") + (quit)))) ;; one more time for good measure, in case we fell out of the ;; RESTART-CASE above before one of the flushes in the ordinary @@ -455,7 +452,9 @@ (flush-standard-output-streams) (/show0 "falling into TOPLEVEL-REPL from TOPLEVEL-INIT") - (toplevel-repl noprint)))) + (toplevel-repl noprint) + ;; (classic CMU CL error message: "You're certainly a clever child.":-) + (critically-unreachable "after TOPLEVEL-REPL")))) ;;; read-eval-print loop for the default system toplevel (defun toplevel-repl (noprint) @@ -464,20 +463,30 @@ (- nil) (+ nil) (++ nil) (+++ nil) (/// nil) (// nil) (/ nil)) - (/show0 "about to set up restarts in TOPLEVEL-REPL") - ;; There should only be one TOPLEVEL restart, and it's here, so - ;; restarting at TOPLEVEL always bounces you all the way out here. - (with-simple-restart (toplevel - "Restart at toplevel READ/EVAL/PRINT loop.") - ;; We add a new ABORT restart for every debugger level, so - ;; restarting at ABORT in a nested debugger gets you out to the - ;; innermost enclosing debugger, and only when you're in the - ;; outermost, unnested debugger level does restarting at ABORT - ;; get you out to here. - (with-simple-restart (abort "Reduce debugger level (leaving debugger).") - (catch 'toplevel-catcher - (sb!unix:unix-sigsetmask 0) ; FIXME: What is this for? - (repl noprint)))))) + ;; WITH-SIMPLE-RESTART doesn't actually restart its body as some + ;; (like WHN for an embarrassingly long time ca. 2001-12-07) might + ;; think, but instead drops control back out at the end. So when a + ;; TOPLEVEL or outermost-ABORT restart happens, we need this outer + ;; LOOP wrapper to grab control and start over again. (And it also + ;; wraps CATCH 'TOPLEVEL-CATCHER for similar reasons.) + (loop + (/show0 "about to set up restarts in TOPLEVEL-REPL") + ;; There should only be one TOPLEVEL restart, and it's here, so + ;; restarting at TOPLEVEL always bounces you all the way out here. + (with-simple-restart (toplevel + "Restart at toplevel READ/EVAL/PRINT loop.") + ;; We add a new ABORT restart for every debugger level, so + ;; restarting at ABORT in a nested debugger gets you out to the + ;; innermost enclosing debugger, and only when you're in the + ;; outermost, unnested debugger level does restarting at ABORT + ;; get you out to here. + (with-simple-restart + (abort + "Reduce debugger level (leaving debugger, returning to toplevel).") + (catch 'toplevel-catcher + (sb!unix:unix-sigsetmask 0) ; FIXME: What is this for? + (repl noprint) + (critically-unreachable "after REPL"))))))) (defun repl (noprint) (/show0 "entering REPL") @@ -488,31 +497,28 @@ ;; way we can convince the GC to just ignore dead areas of the ;; control stack, so that we don't need to rely on this ;; half-measure? - (/show0 "at head of LOOP") (scrub-control-stack) - (/show0 "back from SCRUB-CONTROL-STACK") (unless noprint (fresh-line) - (/show0 "back from FRESH-LINE") (princ (if (functionp *prompt*) (funcall *prompt*) *prompt*)) - (/show0 "back from PRINC") - (flush-standard-output-streams) - (/show0 "back from FLUSH-STANDARD-OUTPUT-STREAMS")) + (flush-standard-output-streams)) (let ((form (read *standard-input* nil eof-marker))) - (/show0 "back from READ") - (if (eq form eof-marker) - (quit) - (let ((results (multiple-value-list (interactive-eval form)))) - (unless noprint - (dolist (result results) - (fresh-line) - (prin1 result))))))))) + (cond ((eq form eof-marker) + (/show0 "doing QUIT for EOF in REPL") + (quit)) + (t + (let ((results (multiple-value-list (interactive-eval form)))) + (unless noprint + (dolist (result results) + (fresh-line) + (prin1 result)))))))))) (defun noprogrammer-debugger-hook-fun (condition old-debugger-hook) (declare (ignore old-debugger-hook)) (flet ((failure-quit (&key recklessly-p) + (/show0 "in FAILURE-QUIT (in noprogrammer debugger hook)") (quit :unix-status 1 :recklessly-p recklessly-p))) ;; This HANDLER-CASE is here mostly to stop output immediately ;; (and fall through to QUIT) when there's an I/O error. Thus,