X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fcode%2Funix.lisp;h=c3c97a3492231e1da30c8f6ac3bdd41e7effa91a;hb=a160917364f85b38dc0826a5e3dcef87e3c4c62c;hp=a26a951d983b6ff85e4a16538705b4c60c620924;hpb=77d46c398278c0bbe221722c21c01d47713cd878;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/src/code/unix.lisp b/src/code/unix.lisp index a26a951..c3c97a3 100644 --- a/src/code/unix.lisp +++ b/src/code/unix.lisp @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ SYSCALL-FORM. Repeat evaluation of SYSCALL-FORM if it is interrupted." #!-win32 (define-alien-routine ("getenv" posix-getenv) c-string "Return the \"value\" part of the environment string \"name=value\" which - corresponds to NAME, or NIL if there is none." +corresponds to NAME, or NIL if there is none." (name c-string)) ;;; from stdio.h @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ SYSCALL-FORM. Repeat evaluation of SYSCALL-FORM if it is interrupted." (defun sb-mkstemp (template-string mode) (declare (type string template-string) (type unix-file-mode mode)) - (let ((template-buffer (string-to-octets template-string))) + (let ((template-buffer (string-to-octets template-string :null-terminate t))) (with-pinned-objects (template-buffer) (let ((fd (alien-funcall (extern-alien "sb_mkstemp" (function int (* char) int)) @@ -206,12 +206,21 @@ SYSCALL-FORM. Repeat evaluation of SYSCALL-FORM if it is interrupted." ;; microsecond but also has a range of years. ;; CLH: Note that tv-usec used to be a time-t, but that this seems ;; problematic on Darwin x86-64 (and wrong). Trying suseconds-t. -#!-win32 +#!-(or win32 openbsd) (define-alien-type nil (struct timeval (tv-sec time-t) ; seconds (tv-usec suseconds-t))) ; and microseconds +;; The above definition doesn't work on 64-bit OpenBSD platforms. +;; Both tv_sec and tv_usec are declared as long instead of time_t, and +;; time_t is a typedef for int. +#!+openbsd +(define-alien-type nil + (struct timeval + (tv-sec long) ; seconds + (tv-usec long))) ; and microseconds + #!+win32 (define-alien-type nil (struct timeval @@ -395,15 +404,15 @@ SYSCALL-FORM. Repeat evaluation of SYSCALL-FORM if it is interrupted." ;; comma not inside a backquote. This error has absolutely nothing ;; to do with the actual meaning of the error (and little to do with ;; its location, either). - #!-(or linux openbsd freebsd netbsd sunos osf1 darwin win32) (,stub,) - #!+(or linux openbsd freebsd netbsd sunos osf1 darwin win32) + #!-(or linux openbsd freebsd netbsd sunos osf1 darwin hpux win32) (,stub,) + #!+(or linux openbsd freebsd netbsd sunos osf1 darwin hpux win32) (or (newcharstar-string (alien-funcall (extern-alien "getcwd" (function (* char) (* char) size-t)) nil #!+(or linux openbsd freebsd netbsd darwin win32) 0 - #!+(or sunos osf1) 1025)) + #!+(or sunos osf1 hpux) 1025)) (simple-perror "getcwd"))) ;;; Return the Unix current directory as a SIMPLE-STRING terminated @@ -772,11 +781,21 @@ SYSCALL-FORM. Repeat evaluation of SYSCALL-FORM if it is interrupted." ;; the POSIX.4 structure for a time value. This is like a "struct ;; timeval" but has nanoseconds instead of microseconds. +#!-openbsd (define-alien-type nil (struct timespec (tv-sec long) ; seconds (tv-nsec long))) ; nanoseconds +;; Just as with struct timeval, 64-bit OpenBSD has problems with the +;; above definition. tv_sec is declared as time_t instead of long, +;; and time_t is a typedef for int. +#!+openbsd +(define-alien-type nil + (struct timespec + (tv-sec time-t) ; seconds + (tv-nsec long))) ; nanoseconds + ;; used by other time functions (define-alien-type nil (struct tm @@ -996,9 +1015,21 @@ SYSCALL-FORM. Repeat evaluation of SYSCALL-FORM if it is interrupted." (setf (values e-sec e-msec) (system-real-time-values) c-sec 0 c-msec 0)) - ;; If two threads call this at the same time, we're still safe, I believe, - ;; as long as NOW is updated before either of C-MSEC or C-SEC. Same applies - ;; to interrupts. --NS + ;; If two threads call this at the same time, we're still safe, I + ;; believe, as long as NOW is updated before either of C-MSEC or + ;; C-SEC. Same applies to interrupts. --NS + ;; + ;; I believe this is almost correct with x86/x86-64 cache + ;; coherency, but if the new value of C-SEC, C-MSEC can become + ;; visible to another CPU without NOW doing the same then it's + ;; unsafe. It's `almost' correct on x86 because writes by other + ;; processors may become visible in any order provided transitity + ;; holds. With at least three cpus, C-MSEC and C-SEC may be from + ;; different threads and an incorrect value may be returned. + ;; Considering that this failure is not detectable by the caller - + ;; it looks like time passes a bit slowly - and that it should be + ;; an extremely rare occurance I'm inclinded to leave it as it is. + ;; --MG (defun get-internal-real-time () (multiple-value-bind (sec msec) (system-real-time-values) (unless (and (= msec c-msec) (= sec c-sec))