X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fcompiler%2Farray-tran.lisp;h=2026bb2493df2185d1f89c054632ed4212b4a7b6;hb=26265f96389d737bf2e1e4c787ea8943ae499944;hp=357997579422bebda3019eba5f38fd0f15ec964c;hpb=47b7637b3e7c012c6dfa754e107c9bc7d74e73bd;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/src/compiler/array-tran.lisp b/src/compiler/array-tran.lisp index 3579975..2026bb2 100644 --- a/src/compiler/array-tran.lisp +++ b/src/compiler/array-tran.lisp @@ -136,13 +136,17 @@ ;;; Figure out the type of the data vector if we know the argument ;;; element type. -(defoptimizer (%with-array-data derive-type) ((array start end)) +(defun derive-%with-array-data/mumble-type (array) (let ((atype (lvar-type array))) (when (array-type-p atype) (specifier-type `(simple-array ,(type-specifier - (array-type-specialized-element-type atype)) - (*)))))) + (array-type-specialized-element-type atype)) + (*)))))) +(defoptimizer (%with-array-data derive-type) ((array start end)) + (derive-%with-array-data/mumble-type array)) +(defoptimizer (%with-array-data/fp derive-type) ((array start end)) + (derive-%with-array-data/mumble-type array)) (defoptimizer (array-row-major-index derive-type) ((array &rest indices)) (assert-array-rank array (length indices)) @@ -560,10 +564,27 @@ (give-up-ir1-transform)) (t (let ((dim (lvar-value dimension))) + ;; FIXME: Can SPEED > SAFETY weaken this check to INTEGER? `(the (integer 0 (,dim)) index))))) ;;;; WITH-ARRAY-DATA +(defun bounding-index-error (array start end) + (let ((size (array-total-size array))) + (error 'bounding-indices-bad-error + :datum (cons start end) + :expected-type `(cons (integer 0 ,size) + (integer ,start ,size)) + :object array))) + +(defun bounding-index-error/fp (array start end) + (let ((size (length array))) + (error 'bounding-indices-bad-error + :datum (cons start end) + :expected-type `(cons (integer 0 ,size) + (integer ,start ,size)) + :object array))) + ;;; This checks to see whether the array is simple and the start and ;;; end are in bounds. If so, it proceeds with those values. ;;; Otherwise, it calls %WITH-ARRAY-DATA. Note that %WITH-ARRAY-DATA @@ -589,29 +610,39 @@ (def!macro with-array-data (((data-var array &key offset-var) (start-var &optional (svalue 0)) (end-var &optional (evalue nil)) - &key force-inline) - &body forms) + &key force-inline check-fill-pointer) + &body forms + &environment env) (once-only ((n-array array) (n-svalue `(the index ,svalue)) (n-evalue `(the (or index null) ,evalue))) - `(multiple-value-bind (,data-var - ,start-var - ,end-var - ,@(when offset-var `(,offset-var))) - (if (not (array-header-p ,n-array)) - (let ((,n-array ,n-array)) - (declare (type (simple-array * (*)) ,n-array)) - ,(once-only ((n-len `(length ,n-array)) - (n-end `(or ,n-evalue ,n-len))) - `(if (<= ,n-svalue ,n-end ,n-len) - ;; success - (values ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-end 0) - (failed-%with-array-data ,n-array - ,n-svalue - ,n-evalue)))) - (,(if force-inline '%with-array-data-macro '%with-array-data) - ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-evalue)) - ,@forms))) + (let ((check-bounds (policy env (= 0 insert-array-bounds-checks)))) + `(multiple-value-bind (,data-var + ,start-var + ,end-var + ,@(when offset-var `(,offset-var))) + (if (not (array-header-p ,n-array)) + (let ((,n-array ,n-array)) + (declare (type (simple-array * (*)) ,n-array)) + ,(once-only ((n-len (if check-fill-pointer + `(length ,n-array) + `(array-total-size ,n-array))) + (n-end `(or ,n-evalue ,n-len))) + (if check-bounds + `(values ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-end 0) + `(if (<= ,n-svalue ,n-end ,n-len) + (values ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-end 0) + ,(if check-fill-pointer + `(bounding-index-error/fp ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-evalue) + `(bounding-index-error ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-evalue)))))) + ,(if force-inline + `(%with-array-data-macro ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-evalue + :check-bounds ,check-bounds + :check-fill-pointer ,check-fill-pointer) + (if check-fill-pointer + `(%with-array-data/fp ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-evalue) + `(%with-array-data ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-evalue)))) + ,@forms)))) ;;; This is the fundamental definition of %WITH-ARRAY-DATA, for use in ;;; DEFTRANSFORMs and DEFUNs. @@ -620,30 +651,18 @@ end &key (element-type '*) - unsafe? - fail-inline?) + check-bounds + check-fill-pointer) (with-unique-names (size defaulted-end data cumulative-offset) - `(let* ((,size (array-total-size ,array)) - (,defaulted-end - (cond (,end - (unless (or ,unsafe? (<= ,end ,size)) - ,(if fail-inline? - `(error 'bounding-indices-bad-error - :datum (cons ,start ,end) - :expected-type `(cons (integer 0 ,',size) - (integer ,',start ,',size)) - :object ,array) - `(failed-%with-array-data ,array ,start ,end))) - ,end) - (t ,size)))) - (unless (or ,unsafe? (<= ,start ,defaulted-end)) - ,(if fail-inline? - `(error 'bounding-indices-bad-error - :datum (cons ,start ,end) - :expected-type `(cons (integer 0 ,',size) - (integer ,',start ,',size)) - :object ,array) - `(failed-%with-array-data ,array ,start ,end))) + `(let* ((,size ,(if check-fill-pointer + `(length ,array) + `(array-total-size ,array))) + (,defaulted-end (or ,end ,size))) + ,@(when check-bounds + `((unless (<= ,start ,defaulted-end ,size) + ,(if check-fill-pointer + `(bounding-index-error/fp ,array ,start ,end) + `(bounding-index-error ,array ,start ,end))))) (do ((,data ,array (%array-data-vector ,data)) (,cumulative-offset 0 (+ ,cumulative-offset @@ -655,34 +674,47 @@ (the index ,cumulative-offset))) (declare (type index ,cumulative-offset)))))) -(deftransform %with-array-data ((array start end) - ;; It might very well be reasonable to - ;; allow general ARRAY here, I just - ;; haven't tried to understand the - ;; performance issues involved. -- - ;; WHN, and also CSR 2002-05-26 - ((or vector simple-array) index (or index null)) - * - :node node - :policy (> speed space)) - "inline non-SIMPLE-vector-handling logic" +(defun transform-%with-array-data/muble (array node check-fill-pointer) (let ((element-type (upgraded-element-type-specifier-or-give-up array)) (type (lvar-type array))) (if (and (array-type-p type) (listp (array-type-dimensions type)) (not (null (cdr (array-type-dimensions type))))) - ;; If it's a simple multidimensional array, then just return its - ;; data vector directly rather than going through - ;; %WITH-ARRAY-DATA-MACRO. SBCL doesn't generally generate code - ;; that would use this currently, but we have encouraged users - ;; to use WITH-ARRAY-DATA and we may use it ourselves at some - ;; point in the future for optimized libraries or similar. + ;; If it's a simple multidimensional array, then just return + ;; its data vector directly rather than going through + ;; %WITH-ARRAY-DATA-MACRO. SBCL doesn't generally generate + ;; code that would use this currently, but we have encouraged + ;; users to use WITH-ARRAY-DATA and we may use it ourselves at + ;; some point in the future for optimized libraries or + ;; similar. + ;; + ;; FIXME: The return values here don't seem sane, and + ;; bounds-checks are elided! `(let ((data (truly-the (simple-array ,element-type (*)) (%array-data-vector array)))) (values data 0 (length data) 0)) `(%with-array-data-macro array start end - :unsafe? ,(policy node (= safety 0)) + :check-fill-pointer ,check-fill-pointer + :check-bounds ,(policy node (< 0 insert-array-bounds-checks)) :element-type ,element-type)))) + +;; It might very well be reasonable to allow general ARRAY here, I +;; just haven't tried to understand the performance issues involved. +;; -- WHN, and also CSR 2002-05-26 +(deftransform %with-array-data ((array start end) + ((or vector simple-array) index (or index null) t) + * + :node node + :policy (> speed space)) + "inline non-SIMPLE-vector-handling logic" + (transform-%with-array-data/muble array node nil)) +(deftransform %with-array-data/fp ((array start end) + ((or vector simple-array) index (or index null) t) + * + :node node + :policy (> speed space)) + "inline non-SIMPLE-vector-handling logic" + (transform-%with-array-data/muble array node t)) ;;;; array accessors