X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fcompiler%2Farray-tran.lisp;h=9762e0cc350b52b05c3999023928fb4e29941dcc;hb=7024c08bf4d44b8eb0c555bc45783bdcefd9eb88;hp=fd4e9a99f2daf14bba1a271f1e3c3c87720e7387;hpb=d59fb3b0953c8d14427b60f949a0e567a8b79fe0;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/src/compiler/array-tran.lisp b/src/compiler/array-tran.lisp index fd4e9a9..9762e0c 100644 --- a/src/compiler/array-tran.lisp +++ b/src/compiler/array-tran.lisp @@ -112,25 +112,41 @@ (assert-array-rank array (1- (length stuff))) (assert-new-value-type (car (last stuff)) array)) -(defoptimizer (hairy-data-vector-ref derive-type) ((array index)) - (extract-upgraded-element-type array)) -(defoptimizer (data-vector-ref derive-type) ((array index)) +(macrolet ((define (name) + `(defoptimizer (,name derive-type) ((array index)) + (extract-upgraded-element-type array)))) + (define hairy-data-vector-ref) + (define hairy-data-vector-ref/check-bounds) + (define data-vector-ref)) + +#!+(or x86 x86-64) +(defoptimizer (data-vector-ref-with-offset derive-type) ((array index offset)) (extract-upgraded-element-type array)) -(defoptimizer (data-vector-set derive-type) ((array index new-value)) - (assert-new-value-type new-value array)) -(defoptimizer (hairy-data-vector-set derive-type) ((array index new-value)) +(macrolet ((define (name) + `(defoptimizer (,name derive-type) ((array index new-value)) + (assert-new-value-type new-value array)))) + (define hairy-data-vector-set) + (define hairy-data-vector-set/check-bounds) + (define data-vector-set)) + +#!+(or x86 x86-64) +(defoptimizer (data-vector-set-with-offset derive-type) ((array index offset new-value)) (assert-new-value-type new-value array)) ;;; Figure out the type of the data vector if we know the argument ;;; element type. -(defoptimizer (%with-array-data derive-type) ((array start end)) +(defun derive-%with-array-data/mumble-type (array) (let ((atype (lvar-type array))) (when (array-type-p atype) (specifier-type `(simple-array ,(type-specifier - (array-type-specialized-element-type atype)) - (*)))))) + (array-type-specialized-element-type atype)) + (*)))))) +(defoptimizer (%with-array-data derive-type) ((array start end)) + (derive-%with-array-data/mumble-type array)) +(defoptimizer (%with-array-data/fp derive-type) ((array start end)) + (derive-%with-array-data/mumble-type array)) (defoptimizer (array-row-major-index derive-type) ((array &rest indices)) (assert-array-rank array (length indices)) @@ -203,8 +219,7 @@ ,@(mapcar (lambda (el) (once-only ((n-val el)) `(locally (declare (optimize (safety 0))) - (setf (svref ,n-vec ,(incf n)) - ,n-val)))) + (setf (svref ,n-vec ,(incf n)) ,n-val)))) elements) ,n-vec)))) @@ -543,12 +558,13 @@ ;;; compile-time or we are generating unsafe code, don't bother with ;;; the VOP. (deftransform %check-bound ((array dimension index) * * :node node) - (cond ((policy node (and (> speed safety) (= safety 0))) + (cond ((policy node (= insert-array-bounds-checks 0)) 'index) ((not (constant-lvar-p dimension)) (give-up-ir1-transform)) (t (let ((dim (lvar-value dimension))) + ;; FIXME: Can SPEED > SAFETY weaken this check to INTEGER? `(the (integer 0 (,dim)) index))))) ;;;; WITH-ARRAY-DATA @@ -578,29 +594,39 @@ (def!macro with-array-data (((data-var array &key offset-var) (start-var &optional (svalue 0)) (end-var &optional (evalue nil)) - &key force-inline) - &body forms) + &key force-inline check-fill-pointer) + &body forms + &environment env) (once-only ((n-array array) (n-svalue `(the index ,svalue)) (n-evalue `(the (or index null) ,evalue))) - `(multiple-value-bind (,data-var - ,start-var - ,end-var - ,@(when offset-var `(,offset-var))) - (if (not (array-header-p ,n-array)) - (let ((,n-array ,n-array)) - (declare (type (simple-array * (*)) ,n-array)) - ,(once-only ((n-len `(length ,n-array)) - (n-end `(or ,n-evalue ,n-len))) - `(if (<= ,n-svalue ,n-end ,n-len) - ;; success - (values ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-end 0) - (failed-%with-array-data ,n-array - ,n-svalue - ,n-evalue)))) - (,(if force-inline '%with-array-data-macro '%with-array-data) - ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-evalue)) - ,@forms))) + (let ((check-bounds (policy env (plusp insert-array-bounds-checks)))) + `(multiple-value-bind (,data-var + ,start-var + ,end-var + ,@(when offset-var `(,offset-var))) + (if (not (array-header-p ,n-array)) + (let ((,n-array ,n-array)) + (declare (type (simple-array * (*)) ,n-array)) + ,(once-only ((n-len (if check-fill-pointer + `(length ,n-array) + `(array-total-size ,n-array))) + (n-end `(or ,n-evalue ,n-len))) + (if check-bounds + `(if (<= 0 ,n-svalue ,n-end ,n-len) + (values ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-end 0) + ,(if check-fill-pointer + `(sequence-bounding-indices-bad-error ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-evalue) + `(array-bounding-indices-bad-error ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-evalue))) + `(values ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-end 0)))) + ,(if force-inline + `(%with-array-data-macro ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-evalue + :check-bounds ,check-bounds + :check-fill-pointer ,check-fill-pointer) + (if check-fill-pointer + `(%with-array-data/fp ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-evalue) + `(%with-array-data ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-evalue)))) + ,@forms)))) ;;; This is the fundamental definition of %WITH-ARRAY-DATA, for use in ;;; DEFTRANSFORMs and DEFUNs. @@ -609,30 +635,18 @@ end &key (element-type '*) - unsafe? - fail-inline?) + check-bounds + check-fill-pointer) (with-unique-names (size defaulted-end data cumulative-offset) - `(let* ((,size (array-total-size ,array)) - (,defaulted-end - (cond (,end - (unless (or ,unsafe? (<= ,end ,size)) - ,(if fail-inline? - `(error 'bounding-indices-bad-error - :datum (cons ,start ,end) - :expected-type `(cons (integer 0 ,',size) - (integer ,',start ,',size)) - :object ,array) - `(failed-%with-array-data ,array ,start ,end))) - ,end) - (t ,size)))) - (unless (or ,unsafe? (<= ,start ,defaulted-end)) - ,(if fail-inline? - `(error 'bounding-indices-bad-error - :datum (cons ,start ,end) - :expected-type `(cons (integer 0 ,',size) - (integer ,',start ,',size)) - :object ,array) - `(failed-%with-array-data ,array ,start ,end))) + `(let* ((,size ,(if check-fill-pointer + `(length ,array) + `(array-total-size ,array))) + (,defaulted-end (or ,end ,size))) + ,@(when check-bounds + `((unless (<= ,start ,defaulted-end ,size) + ,(if check-fill-pointer + `(sequence-bounding-indices-bad-error ,array ,start ,end) + `(array-bounding-indices-bad-error ,array ,start ,end))))) (do ((,data ,array (%array-data-vector ,data)) (,cumulative-offset 0 (+ ,cumulative-offset @@ -644,21 +658,54 @@ (the index ,cumulative-offset))) (declare (type index ,cumulative-offset)))))) +(defun transform-%with-array-data/muble (array node check-fill-pointer) + (let ((element-type (upgraded-element-type-specifier-or-give-up array)) + (type (lvar-type array)) + (check-bounds (policy node (plusp insert-array-bounds-checks)))) + (if (and (array-type-p type) + (not (array-type-complexp type)) + (listp (array-type-dimensions type)) + (not (null (cdr (array-type-dimensions type))))) + ;; If it's a simple multidimensional array, then just return + ;; its data vector directly rather than going through + ;; %WITH-ARRAY-DATA-MACRO. SBCL doesn't generally generate + ;; code that would use this currently, but we have encouraged + ;; users to use WITH-ARRAY-DATA and we may use it ourselves at + ;; some point in the future for optimized libraries or + ;; similar. + (if check-bounds + `(let* ((data (truly-the (simple-array ,element-type (*)) + (%array-data-vector array))) + (len (length data)) + (real-end (or end len))) + (unless (<= 0 start data-end lend) + (sequence-bounding-indices-bad-error array start end)) + (values data 0 real-end 0)) + `(let ((data (truly-the (simple-array ,element-type (*)) + (%array-data-vector array)))) + (values data 0 (or end (length data)) 0))) + `(%with-array-data-macro array start end + :check-fill-pointer ,check-fill-pointer + :check-bounds ,check-bounds + :element-type ,element-type)))) + +;; It might very well be reasonable to allow general ARRAY here, I +;; just haven't tried to understand the performance issues involved. +;; -- WHN, and also CSR 2002-05-26 (deftransform %with-array-data ((array start end) - ;; It might very well be reasonable to - ;; allow general ARRAY here, I just - ;; haven't tried to understand the - ;; performance issues involved. -- - ;; WHN, and also CSR 2002-05-26 - ((or vector simple-array) index (or index null)) + ((or vector simple-array) index (or index null) t) + * + :node node + :policy (> speed space)) + "inline non-SIMPLE-vector-handling logic" + (transform-%with-array-data/muble array node nil)) +(deftransform %with-array-data/fp ((array start end) + ((or vector simple-array) index (or index null) t) * :node node :policy (> speed space)) "inline non-SIMPLE-vector-handling logic" - (let ((element-type (upgraded-element-type-specifier-or-give-up array))) - `(%with-array-data-macro array start end - :unsafe? ,(policy node (= safety 0)) - :element-type ,element-type))) + (transform-%with-array-data/muble array node t)) ;;;; array accessors @@ -742,11 +789,72 @@ (deftransform aref ((array &rest indices)) (with-row-major-index (array indices index) (hairy-data-vector-ref array index))) + (deftransform %aset ((array &rest stuff)) (let ((indices (butlast stuff))) (with-row-major-index (array indices index new-value) (hairy-data-vector-set array index new-value))))) +;; For AREF of vectors we do the bounds checking in the callee. This +;; lets us do a significantly more efficient check for simple-arrays +;; without bloating the code. If we already know the type of the array +;; with sufficient precision, skip directly to DATA-VECTOR-REF. +(deftransform aref ((array index) (t t) * :node node) + (let* ((type (lvar-type array)) + (element-ctype (extract-upgraded-element-type array))) + (cond + ((and (array-type-p type) + (null (array-type-complexp type)) + (not (eql element-ctype *wild-type*)) + (eql (length (array-type-dimensions type)) 1)) + (let* ((declared-element-ctype (extract-declared-element-type array)) + (bare-form + `(data-vector-ref array + (%check-bound array (array-dimension array 0) index)))) + (if (type= declared-element-ctype element-ctype) + bare-form + `(the ,(type-specifier declared-element-ctype) ,bare-form)))) + ((policy node (zerop insert-array-bounds-checks)) + `(hairy-data-vector-ref array index)) + (t `(hairy-data-vector-ref/check-bounds array index))))) + +(deftransform %aset ((array index new-value) (t t t) * :node node) + (if (policy node (zerop insert-array-bounds-checks)) + `(hairy-data-vector-set array index new-value) + `(hairy-data-vector-set/check-bounds array index new-value))) + +;;; But if we find out later that there's some useful type information +;;; available, switch back to the normal one to give other transforms +;;; a stab at it. +(macrolet ((define (name transform-to extra extra-type) + `(deftransform ,name ((array index ,@extra)) + (let ((type (lvar-type array)) + (element-type (extract-upgraded-element-type array))) + ;; If an element type has been declared, we want to + ;; use that information it for type checking (even + ;; if the access can't be optimized due to the array + ;; not being simple). + (when (and (eql element-type *wild-type*) + ;; This type logic corresponds to the special + ;; case for strings in HAIRY-DATA-VECTOR-REF + ;; (generic/vm-tran.lisp) + (not (csubtypep type (specifier-type 'simple-string)))) + (when (or (not (array-type-p type)) + ;; If it's a simple array, we might be able + ;; to inline the access completely. + (not (null (array-type-complexp type)))) + (give-up-ir1-transform + "Upgraded element type of array is not known at compile time.")))) + `(,',transform-to array + (%check-bound array + (array-dimension array 0) + index) + ,@',extra)))) + (define hairy-data-vector-ref/check-bounds + hairy-data-vector-ref nil nil) + (define hairy-data-vector-set/check-bounds + hairy-data-vector-set (new-value) (*))) + ;;; Just convert into a HAIRY-DATA-VECTOR-REF (or ;;; HAIRY-DATA-VECTOR-SET) after checking that the index is inside the ;;; array total size.