X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fcompiler%2Fearly-c.lisp;h=0ff78207e27d3e47477a1ae758fcff51ff8b4047;hb=31361af9eb64344f521abbb245ea784c76c746e5;hp=913bde5d8ef26ae7ec191a3bcefdf598559dbea2;hpb=4823297c200e5b1fcab240f06ce82c308b8ee7d7;p=sbcl.git

diff --git a/src/compiler/early-c.lisp b/src/compiler/early-c.lisp
index 913bde5..0ff7820 100644
--- a/src/compiler/early-c.lisp
+++ b/src/compiler/early-c.lisp
@@ -15,6 +15,21 @@
 
 (in-package "SB!C")
 
+;;; ANSI limits on compilation
+(defconstant sb!xc:call-arguments-limit most-positive-fixnum
+  #!+sb-doc
+  "The exclusive upper bound on the number of arguments which may be passed
+  to a function, including &REST args.")
+(defconstant sb!xc:lambda-parameters-limit most-positive-fixnum
+  #!+sb-doc
+  "The exclusive upper bound on the number of parameters which may be specifed
+  in a given lambda list. This is actually the limit on required and &OPTIONAL
+  parameters. With &KEY and &AUX you can get more.")
+(defconstant sb!xc:multiple-values-limit most-positive-fixnum
+  #!+sb-doc
+  "The exclusive upper bound on the number of multiple VALUES that you can
+  return.")
+
 ;;; FIXME: Shouldn't SB!C::&MORE be in this list?
 (defconstant-eqx sb!xc:lambda-list-keywords
   '(&optional &rest &key &aux &body &whole &allow-other-keys &environment)
@@ -56,13 +71,13 @@
 ;;; *FREE-VARIABLES*, only it deals with function names.
 (defvar *free-variables*)
 (defvar *free-functions*)
-(declaim (hash-table *free-variables* *free-functions*))
+(declaim (type hash-table *free-variables* *free-functions*))
 
-;;; We use the same Constant structure to represent all equal anonymous
-;;; constants. This hashtable translates from constants to the Leafs that
+;;; We use the same CONSTANT structure to represent all equal anonymous
+;;; constants. This hashtable translates from constants to the LEAFs that
 ;;; represent them.
 (defvar *constants*)
-(declaim (hash-table *constants*))
+(declaim (type hash-table *constants*))
 
 ;;; miscellaneous forward declarations
 (defvar *code-segment*)
@@ -116,7 +131,6 @@
 ;;; to be called when a variable is lexically bound
 (declaim (ftype (function (symbol) (values)) note-lexical-binding))
 (defun note-lexical-binding (symbol)
-  (let ((name (symbol-name symbol)))
     ;; This check is intended to protect us from getting silently
     ;; burned when we define
     ;;   foo.lisp:
@@ -127,10 +141,9 @@
     ;;       (LET ((*FOO* X))
     ;;         (FOO 14)))
     ;; and then we happen to compile bar.lisp before foo.lisp.
-    (when (and (char= #\* (aref name 0))
-	       (char= #\* (aref name (1- (length name)))))
+  (when (looks-like-name-of-special-var-p symbol)
       ;; FIXME: should be COMPILER-STYLE-WARNING?
       (style-warn "using the lexical binding of the symbol ~S, not the~@
 dynamic binding, even though the symbol name follows the usual naming~@
-convention (names like *FOO*) for special variables" symbol)))
+convention (names like *FOO*) for special variables" symbol))
   (values))