X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fcompiler%2Fearly-c.lisp;h=1e3f6162329ff0939b4e5ebb551183deb2edb3a1;hb=82653abf5573c22c691e2243b70647ecdaa6aea8;hp=022268910b49ab499569f4cc51d1be5589eed2ab;hpb=b33fd6859bbe71667bf9d8a6dbcaf62464bfbee5;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/src/compiler/early-c.lisp b/src/compiler/early-c.lisp index 0222689..1e3f616 100644 --- a/src/compiler/early-c.lisp +++ b/src/compiler/early-c.lisp @@ -15,11 +15,33 @@ (in-package "SB!C") -;;; FIXME: Shouldn't SB!C::&MORE be in this list? -(defconstant-eqx sb!xc:lambda-list-keywords - '(&optional &rest &key &aux &body &whole &allow-other-keys &environment) +;;; ANSI limits on compilation +(defconstant sb!xc:call-arguments-limit most-positive-fixnum + #!+sb-doc + "The exclusive upper bound on the number of arguments which may be passed + to a function, including &REST args.") +(defconstant sb!xc:lambda-parameters-limit most-positive-fixnum #!+sb-doc + "The exclusive upper bound on the number of parameters which may be specifed + in a given lambda list. This is actually the limit on required and &OPTIONAL + parameters. With &KEY and &AUX you can get more.") +(defconstant sb!xc:multiple-values-limit most-positive-fixnum + #!+sb-doc + "The exclusive upper bound on the number of multiple VALUES that you can + return.") + +(defconstant-eqx sb!xc:lambda-list-keywords + '(&allow-other-keys + &aux + &body + &environment + &key + &more + &optional + &rest + &whole) #'equal + #!+sb-doc "symbols which are magical in a lambda list") ;;;; cross-compiler-only versions of CL special variables, so that we @@ -51,12 +73,12 @@ (defvar *lexenv*) (declaim (type lexenv *lexenv*)) -;;; *FREE-VARIABLES* translates from the names of variables referenced -;;; globally to the LEAF structures for them. *FREE-FUNCTIONS* is like -;;; *FREE-VARIABLES*, only it deals with function names. -(defvar *free-variables*) -(defvar *free-functions*) -(declaim (type hash-table *free-variables* *free-functions*)) +;;; *FREE-VARS* translates from the names of variables referenced +;;; globally to the LEAF structures for them. *FREE-FUNS* is like +;;; *FREE-VARS*, only it deals with function names. +(defvar *free-vars*) +(defvar *free-funs*) +(declaim (type hash-table *free-vars* *free-funs*)) ;;; We use the same CONSTANT structure to represent all equal anonymous ;;; constants. This hashtable translates from constants to the LEAFs that @@ -75,7 +97,6 @@ (defvar *compiler-note-count*) (defvar *compiler-trace-output*) (defvar *constraint-number*) -(defvar *converting-for-interpreter*) (defvar *count-vop-usages*) (defvar *current-path*) (defvar *current-component*) @@ -94,6 +115,18 @@ (defvar *trace-table*) (defvar *undefined-warnings*) (defvar *warnings-p*) + +;;; unique ID for the next object created (to let us track object +;;; identity even across GC, useful for understanding weird compiler +;;; bugs where something is supposed to be unique but is instead +;;; exists as duplicate objects) +#!+sb-show +(progn + (defvar *object-id-counter* 0) + (defun new-object-id () + (prog1 + *object-id-counter* + (incf *object-id-counter*)))) ;;;; miscellaneous utilities @@ -104,7 +137,7 @@ note-name-defined)) (defun note-name-defined (name kind) ;; We do this BOUNDP check because this function can be called when - ;; not in a compilation unit (as when loading top-level forms). + ;; not in a compilation unit (as when loading top level forms). (when (boundp '*undefined-warnings*) (setq *undefined-warnings* (delete-if (lambda (x) @@ -116,7 +149,6 @@ ;;; to be called when a variable is lexically bound (declaim (ftype (function (symbol) (values)) note-lexical-binding)) (defun note-lexical-binding (symbol) - (let ((name (symbol-name symbol))) ;; This check is intended to protect us from getting silently ;; burned when we define ;; foo.lisp: @@ -127,10 +159,9 @@ ;; (LET ((*FOO* X)) ;; (FOO 14))) ;; and then we happen to compile bar.lisp before foo.lisp. - (when (and (char= #\* (aref name 0)) - (char= #\* (aref name (1- (length name))))) + (when (looks-like-name-of-special-var-p symbol) ;; FIXME: should be COMPILER-STYLE-WARNING? (style-warn "using the lexical binding of the symbol ~S, not the~@ dynamic binding, even though the symbol name follows the usual naming~@ -convention (names like *FOO*) for special variables" symbol))) +convention (names like *FOO*) for special variables" symbol)) (values))