X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fcompiler%2Finfo-functions.lisp;h=81d35254e91995977ad559a0f15dab0d62dd54a8;hb=4dbc52ee4f9a4f566701f1d33e7916e8491b918b;hp=2319a8304e2064224c3a743fc531a998f2bd34b2;hpb=cd176690400f8b6fa23faa4dc6fa8494bcbce480;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/src/compiler/info-functions.lisp b/src/compiler/info-functions.lisp index 2319a83..81d3525 100644 --- a/src/compiler/info-functions.lisp +++ b/src/compiler/info-functions.lisp @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ (:function) ; happy case ((nil)) ; another happy case (:macro ; maybe-not-so-good case - (compiler-style-warning "~S was previously defined as a macro." name) + (compiler-style-warn "~S was previously defined as a macro." name) (setf (info :function :where-from name) :assumed) (clear-info :function :macro-function name)))) @@ -60,12 +60,12 @@ ;; in EVAL-WHEN (:COMPILE) inside something like DEFSTRUCT, in which ;; case it's reasonable style. Either way, NAME is no longer a free ;; function.) - (when (boundp '*free-functions*) ; when compiling - (remhash name *free-functions*)) + (when (boundp '*free-funs*) ; when compiling + (remhash name *free-funs*)) ;; recording the ordinary case (setf (info :function :kind name) :function) - (note-if-setf-function-and-macro name) + (note-if-setf-fun-and-macro name) (values)) @@ -75,11 +75,11 @@ ;;; warning. Due to the weak semantics of the (SETF FUNCTION) name, we ;;; can't assume that they aren't just naming a function (SETF FOO) ;;; for the heck of it. NAME is already known to be well-formed. -(defun note-if-setf-function-and-macro (name) +(defun note-if-setf-fun-and-macro (name) (when (consp name) (when (or (info :setf :inverse name) (info :setf :expander name)) - (compiler-style-warning + (compiler-style-warn "defining as a SETF function a name that already has a SETF macro:~ ~% ~S" name))) @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ else returns NIL. If ENV is unspecified or NIL, use the global environment only." (declare (symbol symbol)) - (let* ((fenv (when env (sb!c::lexenv-functions env))) + (let* ((fenv (when env (sb!c::lexenv-funs env))) (local-def (cdr (assoc symbol fenv)))) (cond (local-def (if (and (consp local-def) (eq (car local-def) 'MACRO)) @@ -189,23 +189,23 @@ (defun sb!xc:compiler-macro-function (name &optional env) #!+sb-doc - "If NAME names a compiler-macro, returns the expansion function, - else returns NIL. Note: if the name is shadowed in ENV by a local - definition, or declared NOTINLINE, NIL is returned. Can be - set with SETF." - (let ((found (and env - (cdr (assoc name (sb!c::lexenv-functions env) - :test #'equal))))) - (unless (eq (cond ((sb!c::defined-fun-p found) - (sb!c::defined-fun-inlinep found)) - (found :notinline) - (t - (info :function :inlinep name))) - :notinline) - (values (info :function :compiler-macro-function name))))) -(defun (setf sb!xc:compiler-macro-function) (function name) + "If NAME names a compiler-macro in ENV, return the expansion function, else + return NIL. Can be set with SETF when ENV is NIL." + (legal-fun-name-or-type-error name) + ;; Note: CMU CL used to return NIL here when a NOTINLINE declaration + ;; was in force. That's fairly logical, given the specified effect + ;; of NOTINLINE declarations on compiler-macro expansion. However, + ;; (1) it doesn't seem to be consistent with the ANSI spec for + ;; COMPILER-MACRO-FUNCTION, and (2) it would give surprising + ;; behavior for (SETF (COMPILER-MACRO-FUNCTION FOO) ...) in the + ;; presence of a (PROCLAIM '(NOTINLINE FOO)). So we don't do it. + (values (info :function :compiler-macro-function name))) +(defun (setf sb!xc:compiler-macro-function) (function name &optional env) (declare (type (or symbol list) name) (type (or function null) function)) + (when env + ;; ANSI says this operation is undefined. + (error "can't SETF COMPILER-MACRO-FUNCTION when ENV is non-NIL")) (when (eq (info :function :kind name) :special-form) (error "~S names a special form." name)) (setf (info :function :compiler-macro-function name) function)