X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fcompiler%2Flocall.lisp;h=ae4ad080dba81e34272ceb09d17fe891dd6178ad;hb=f294da03824843f07d781e655d5a5e70c2c4851e;hp=620d28540e42361de6b3b7f79f28b3811fb5dc97;hpb=e049902f5e7c30501d2dbb7a41d058a0c717fc1f;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/src/compiler/locall.lisp b/src/compiler/locall.lisp index 620d285..ae4ad08 100644 --- a/src/compiler/locall.lisp +++ b/src/compiler/locall.lisp @@ -134,21 +134,11 @@ (temps (make-gensym-list (length (lambda-vars fun))))) `(lambda (,n-supplied ,@temps) (declare (type index ,n-supplied)) - ,(if (policy *lexenv* (zerop safety)) + ,(if (policy *lexenv* (zerop verify-arg-count)) `(declare (ignore ,n-supplied)) `(%verify-arg-count ,n-supplied ,nargs)) (locally - ;; KLUDGE: The intent here is to enable tail recursion - ;; optimization, since leaving frames for wrapper - ;; functions like this on the stack is actually more - ;; annoying than helpful for debugging. Unfortunately - ;; trying to express this by messing with the - ;; ANSI-standard declarations is a little awkward, since - ;; no matter how we do it we'll tend to have side-effects - ;; on things like SPEED-vs.-SAFETY comparisons. Perhaps - ;; it'd be better to define a new SB-EXT:TAIL-RECURSIVELY - ;; declaration and use that? -- WHN 2002-07-08 - (declare (optimize (speed 2) (debug 1))) + (declare (optimize (merge-tail-calls 3))) (%funcall ,fun ,@temps))))) (optional-dispatch (let* ((min (optional-dispatch-min-args fun)) @@ -176,11 +166,7 @@ `(multiple-value-bind (,n-context ,n-count) (%more-arg-context ,n-supplied ,max) (locally - ;; KLUDGE: As above, we're trying to - ;; enable tail recursion optimization and - ;; any other effects of this declaration - ;; are accidental. -- WHN 2002-07-08 - (declare (optimize (speed 2) (debug 1))) + (declare (optimize (merge-tail-calls 3))) (%funcall ,more ,@temps ,n-context ,n-count))))))) (t (%arg-count-error ,n-supplied))))))))) @@ -547,8 +533,8 @@ (with-ir1-environment-from-node call (ir1-convert-lambda `(lambda ,vars - (declare (ignorable . ,ignores)) - (%funcall ,entry . ,args)) + (declare (ignorable ,@ignores)) + (%funcall ,entry ,@args)) :debug-name (debug-namify "hairy function entry ~S" (continuation-fun-name (basic-combination-fun call))))))) @@ -958,12 +944,21 @@ (cond ((not return)) ((or next-block call-return) (unless (block-delete-p (node-block return)) + (when (and (node-tail-p call) + call-return + (not (eq (node-cont call) + (return-result call-return)))) + ;; We do not care to give a meaningful continuation to + ;; a tail combination, but here we need it. + (delete-continuation-use call) + (add-continuation-use call (return-result call-return))) (move-return-uses fun call (or next-block (node-block call-return))))) (t (aver (node-tail-p call)) (setf (lambda-return call-fun) return) - (setf (return-lambda return) call-fun)))) + (setf (return-lambda return) call-fun) + (setf (lambda-return fun) nil)))) (move-let-call-cont fun) (values)) @@ -1001,10 +996,11 @@ (when (leaf-has-source-name-p clambda) ;; ANSI requires that explicit NOTINLINE be respected. (or (eq (lambda-inlinep clambda) :notinline) - ;; If (> DEBUG SPEED) we can guess that inlining generally - ;; won't be appreciated, but if the user specifically requests - ;; inlining, that takes precedence over our general guess. - (and (policy clambda (> debug speed)) + ;; If (= LET-CONVERTION 0) we can guess that inlining + ;; generally won't be appreciated, but if the user + ;; specifically requests inlining, that takes precedence over + ;; our general guess. + (and (policy clambda (= let-convertion 0)) (not (eq (lambda-inlinep clambda) :inline)))))) ;;; We also don't convert calls to named functions which appear in the