X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fcompiler%2Fmain.lisp;h=137f74dcbe3e583725f316bec927833a9340197e;hb=c0595e94aab165f59454a3a97f06a8bdc22f5bd3;hp=9c8597a350c5a941f12f671d247ce16cb906bfa4;hpb=c41cb4c87eae7b04f844dca5f7edb5086c5d2d68;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/src/compiler/main.lisp b/src/compiler/main.lisp index 9c8597a..137f74d 100644 --- a/src/compiler/main.lisp +++ b/src/compiler/main.lisp @@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ (describe-ir2-component component *compiler-trace-output*)) (maybe-mumble "code ") - (multiple-value-bind (code-length trace-table fixups) + (multiple-value-bind (code-length trace-table fixup-notes) (generate-code component) #-sb-xc-host @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ *code-segment* code-length trace-table - fixups + fixup-notes *compile-object*)) (core-object (maybe-mumble "core") @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ *code-segment* code-length trace-table - fixups + fixup-notes *compile-object*)) (null)))))) @@ -1342,33 +1342,35 @@ ;;; Return (VALUES NIL WARNINGS-P FAILURE-P). (defun sub-compile-file (info) (declare (type source-info info)) - (let* ((*block-compile* *block-compile-arg*) - (*package* (sane-package)) - (*policy* *policy*) - (*lexenv* (make-null-lexenv)) - (*source-info* info) - (sb!xc:*compile-file-pathname* nil) - (sb!xc:*compile-file-truename* nil) - (*toplevel-lambdas* ()) - (*fun-names-in-this-file* ()) - (*compiler-error-bailout* - (lambda () - (compiler-mumble "~2&; fatal error, aborting compilation~%") - (return-from sub-compile-file (values nil t t)))) - (*current-path* nil) - (*last-source-context* nil) - (*last-original-source* nil) - (*last-source-form* nil) - (*last-format-string* nil) - (*last-format-args* nil) - (*last-message-count* 0) - ;; FIXME: Do we need this rebinding here? It's a literal - ;; translation of the old CMU CL rebinding to - ;; (OR *BACKEND-INFO-ENVIRONMENT* *INFO-ENVIRONMENT*), - ;; and it's not obvious whether the rebinding to itself is - ;; needed that SBCL doesn't need *BACKEND-INFO-ENVIRONMENT*. - (*info-environment* *info-environment*) - (*gensym-counter* 0)) + (let ((*package* (sane-package)) + (*readtable* *readtable*) + (sb!xc:*compile-file-pathname* nil) ; really bound in + (sb!xc:*compile-file-truename* nil) ; SUB-SUB-COMPILE-FILE + + (*policy* *policy*) + (*lexenv* (make-null-lexenv)) + (*block-compile* *block-compile-arg*) + (*source-info* info) + (*toplevel-lambdas* ()) + (*fun-names-in-this-file* ()) + (*compiler-error-bailout* + (lambda () + (compiler-mumble "~2&; fatal error, aborting compilation~%") + (return-from sub-compile-file (values nil t t)))) + (*current-path* nil) + (*last-source-context* nil) + (*last-original-source* nil) + (*last-source-form* nil) + (*last-format-string* nil) + (*last-format-args* nil) + (*last-message-count* 0) + ;; FIXME: Do we need this rebinding here? It's a literal + ;; translation of the old CMU CL rebinding to + ;; (OR *BACKEND-INFO-ENVIRONMENT* *INFO-ENVIRONMENT*), + ;; and it's not obvious whether the rebinding to itself is + ;; needed that SBCL doesn't need *BACKEND-INFO-ENVIRONMENT*. + (*info-environment* *info-environment*) + (*gensym-counter* 0)) (handler-case (with-compilation-values (sb!xc:with-compilation-unit ()