X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fcompiler%2Fmain.lisp;h=137f74dcbe3e583725f316bec927833a9340197e;hb=f73c1f391342c797b8daebe4e8c27e5923341b6d;hp=77567ccbe706c4674d163bfda46eb96b3b171c29;hpb=16f848f33e91035457132f704448d2d23c34724e;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/src/compiler/main.lisp b/src/compiler/main.lisp index 77567cc..137f74d 100644 --- a/src/compiler/main.lisp +++ b/src/compiler/main.lisp @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ #!+sb-show *compiler-trace-output* *last-source-context* *last-original-source* *last-source-form* *last-format-string* *last-format-args* - *last-message-count* *lexenv*)) + *last-message-count* *lexenv* *fun-names-in-this-file*)) ;;; Whether call of a function which cannot be defined causes a full ;;; warning. @@ -139,9 +139,6 @@ (multiple-value-prog1 (funcall fn) (setf succeeded-p t)) (unless succeeded-p (incf *aborted-compilation-unit-count*))) - ;; FIXME: Now *COMPILER-FOO-COUNT* stuff is bound in more than - ;; one place. If we can get rid of the IR1 interpreter, this - ;; should be easier to clean up. (let ((*aborted-compilation-unit-count* 0) (*compiler-error-count* 0) (*compiler-warning-count* 0) @@ -161,6 +158,12 @@ (incf *aborted-compilation-unit-count*)) (summarize-compilation-unit (not succeeded-p))))))))) +;;; Is FUN-NAME something that no conforming program can rely on +;;; defining as a function? +(defun fun-name-reserved-by-ansi-p (fun-name) + (eq (symbol-package (fun-name-block-name fun-name)) + *cl-package*)) + ;;; This is to be called at the end of a compilation unit. It signals ;;; any residual warnings about unknown stuff, then prints the total ;;; error counts. ABORT-P should be true when the compilation unit was @@ -184,11 +187,24 @@ (undefined-warning-count (undefined-warning-count undef))) (dolist (*compiler-error-context* warnings) (if #-sb-xc-host (and (eq kind :function) - (symbolp name) ; FIXME: (SETF CL:fo) - (eq (symbol-package name) *cl-package*) + (fun-name-reserved-by-ansi-p name) *flame-on-necessarily-undefined-function*) #+sb-xc-host nil - (compiler-warn "undefined ~(~A~): ~S" kind name) + (case name + ((declare) + (compiler-warn + "~@" + name name)) + (t + (compiler-warn + "~@" + kind name))) (compiler-style-warn "undefined ~(~A~): ~S" kind name))) (let ((warn-count (length warnings))) (when (and warnings (> undefined-warning-count warn-count)) @@ -426,9 +442,10 @@ (describe-ir2-component component *compiler-trace-output*)) (maybe-mumble "code ") - (multiple-value-bind (code-length trace-table fixups) + (multiple-value-bind (code-length trace-table fixup-notes) (generate-code component) + #-sb-xc-host (when *compiler-trace-output* (format *compiler-trace-output* "~|~%disassembly of code for ~S~2%" component) @@ -442,7 +459,7 @@ *code-segment* code-length trace-table - fixups + fixup-notes *compile-object*)) (core-object (maybe-mumble "core") @@ -450,7 +467,7 @@ *code-segment* code-length trace-table - fixups + fixup-notes *compile-object*)) (null)))))) @@ -614,7 +631,7 @@ (defun describe-component (component *standard-output*) (declare (type component component)) (format t "~|~%;;;; component: ~S~2%" (component-name component)) - (print-blocks component) + (print-all-blocks component) (values)) (defun describe-ir2-component (component *standard-output*) @@ -818,9 +835,11 @@ ;;; We parse declarations and then recursively process the body. (defun process-toplevel-locally (body path compile-time-too &key vars funs) (declare (list path)) - (multiple-value-bind (forms decls) (parse-body body nil) - (let* ((*lexenv* - (process-decls decls vars funs (make-continuation))) + (multiple-value-bind (forms decls) + (parse-body body :doc-string-allowed nil :toplevel t) + (let* ((*lexenv* (process-decls decls vars funs)) + ;; FIXME: VALUES declaration + ;; ;; Binding *POLICY* is pretty much of a hack, since it ;; causes LOCALLY to "capture" enclosed proclamations. It ;; is necessary because CONVERT-AND-MAYBE-COMPILE uses the @@ -1156,7 +1175,8 @@ (declare (ignore funs)) (process-toplevel-locally body path - compile-time-too)))) + compile-time-too)) + :compile)) ((symbol-macrolet) (funcall-in-symbol-macrolet-lexenv magic @@ -1164,7 +1184,8 @@ (process-toplevel-locally body path compile-time-too - :vars vars))))))) + :vars vars)) + :compile))))) ((locally) (process-toplevel-locally (rest form) path compile-time-too)) ((progn) @@ -1321,32 +1342,35 @@ ;;; Return (VALUES NIL WARNINGS-P FAILURE-P). (defun sub-compile-file (info) (declare (type source-info info)) - (let* ((*block-compile* *block-compile-arg*) - (*package* (sane-package)) - (*policy* *policy*) - (*lexenv* (make-null-lexenv)) - (*source-info* info) - (sb!xc:*compile-file-pathname* nil) - (sb!xc:*compile-file-truename* nil) - (*toplevel-lambdas* ()) - (*compiler-error-bailout* - (lambda () - (compiler-mumble "~2&; fatal error, aborting compilation~%") - (return-from sub-compile-file (values nil t t)))) - (*current-path* nil) - (*last-source-context* nil) - (*last-original-source* nil) - (*last-source-form* nil) - (*last-format-string* nil) - (*last-format-args* nil) - (*last-message-count* 0) - ;; FIXME: Do we need this rebinding here? It's a literal - ;; translation of the old CMU CL rebinding to - ;; (OR *BACKEND-INFO-ENVIRONMENT* *INFO-ENVIRONMENT*), - ;; and it's not obvious whether the rebinding to itself is - ;; needed that SBCL doesn't need *BACKEND-INFO-ENVIRONMENT*. - (*info-environment* *info-environment*) - (*gensym-counter* 0)) + (let ((*package* (sane-package)) + (*readtable* *readtable*) + (sb!xc:*compile-file-pathname* nil) ; really bound in + (sb!xc:*compile-file-truename* nil) ; SUB-SUB-COMPILE-FILE + + (*policy* *policy*) + (*lexenv* (make-null-lexenv)) + (*block-compile* *block-compile-arg*) + (*source-info* info) + (*toplevel-lambdas* ()) + (*fun-names-in-this-file* ()) + (*compiler-error-bailout* + (lambda () + (compiler-mumble "~2&; fatal error, aborting compilation~%") + (return-from sub-compile-file (values nil t t)))) + (*current-path* nil) + (*last-source-context* nil) + (*last-original-source* nil) + (*last-source-form* nil) + (*last-format-string* nil) + (*last-format-args* nil) + (*last-message-count* 0) + ;; FIXME: Do we need this rebinding here? It's a literal + ;; translation of the old CMU CL rebinding to + ;; (OR *BACKEND-INFO-ENVIRONMENT* *INFO-ENVIRONMENT*), + ;; and it's not obvious whether the rebinding to itself is + ;; needed that SBCL doesn't need *BACKEND-INFO-ENVIRONMENT*. + (*info-environment* *info-environment*) + (*gensym-counter* 0)) (handler-case (with-compilation-values (sb!xc:with-compilation-unit ()