X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fpcl%2Fboot.lisp;h=562ff1d6c9b11facb18cdcc2e3a51ca1ac20d909;hb=8160f3ac81fff66563276cfbc7546d43891dae5c;hp=747a55512b77a93643864ca2a1b88b220d1aac2f;hpb=80304981972c91c1b3f3fca75f36dacf1fecf307;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/src/pcl/boot.lisp b/src/pcl/boot.lisp index 747a555..562ff1d 100644 --- a/src/pcl/boot.lisp +++ b/src/pcl/boot.lisp @@ -78,19 +78,9 @@ bootstrapping. ;;; then things break.) (declaim (declaration class)) -;;; FIXME: SB-KERNEL::PCL-CHECK-WRAPPER-VALIDITY-HOOK shouldn't be a -;;; separate function. Instead, we should define a simple placeholder -;;; version of SB-PCL:CHECK-WRAPPER-VALIDITY where -;;; SB-KERNEL::PCL-CHECK-WRAPPER-VALIDITY is defined now, then just -;;; let the later real PCL DEFUN of SB-PCL:CHECK-WRAPPER-VALIDITY -;;; overwrite it. -(setf (symbol-function 'sb-kernel::pcl-check-wrapper-validity-hook) - #'check-wrapper-validity) - (declaim (notinline make-a-method add-named-method ensure-generic-function-using-class - add-method remove-method)) @@ -157,6 +147,12 @@ bootstrapping. standard-compute-effective-method)))) (defmacro defgeneric (fun-name lambda-list &body options) + (declare (type list lambda-list)) + (unless (legal-fun-name-p fun-name) + (error 'simple-program-error + :format-control "illegal generic function name ~S" + :format-arguments (list fun-name))) + (check-gf-lambda-list lambda-list) (let ((initargs ()) (methods ())) (flet ((duplicate-option (name) @@ -168,13 +164,32 @@ bootstrapping. (arglist (elt qab arglist-pos)) (qualifiers (subseq qab 0 arglist-pos)) (body (nthcdr (1+ arglist-pos) qab))) - `(defmethod ,fun-name ,@qualifiers ,arglist ,@body)))) + `(push (defmethod ,fun-name ,@qualifiers ,arglist ,@body) + (generic-function-initial-methods #',fun-name))))) (macrolet ((initarg (key) `(getf initargs ,key))) (dolist (option options) (let ((car-option (car option))) (case car-option (declare - (push (cdr option) (initarg :declarations))) + (when (and + (consp (cadr option)) + (member (first (cadr option)) + ;; FIXME: this list is slightly weird. + ;; ANSI (on the DEFGENERIC page) in one + ;; place allows only OPTIMIZE; in + ;; another place gives this list of + ;; disallowed declaration specifiers. + ;; This seems to be the only place where + ;; the FUNCTION declaration is + ;; mentioned; TYPE seems to be missing. + ;; Very strange. -- CSR, 2002-10-21 + '(declaration ftype function + inline notinline special))) + (error 'simple-program-error + :format-control "The declaration specifier ~S ~ + is not allowed inside DEFGENERIC." + :format-arguments (list (cadr option)))) + (push (cadr option) (initarg :declarations))) ((:argument-precedence-order :method-combination) (if (initarg car-option) (duplicate-option car-option) @@ -202,25 +217,74 @@ bootstrapping. (eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute) (compile-or-load-defgeneric ',fun-name)) (load-defgeneric ',fun-name ',lambda-list ,@initargs) - ,@(mapcar #'expand-method-definition methods) - `,(function ,fun-name))))) + ,@(mapcar #'expand-method-definition methods) + #',fun-name)))) (defun compile-or-load-defgeneric (fun-name) - (sb-kernel:proclaim-as-fun-name fun-name) - (sb-kernel:note-name-defined fun-name :function) + (proclaim-as-fun-name fun-name) + (note-name-defined fun-name :function) (unless (eq (info :function :where-from fun-name) :declared) (setf (info :function :where-from fun-name) :defined) (setf (info :function :type fun-name) - (sb-kernel:specifier-type 'function)))) + (specifier-type 'function)))) (defun load-defgeneric (fun-name lambda-list &rest initargs) (when (fboundp fun-name) - (sb-kernel::style-warn "redefining ~S in DEFGENERIC" fun-name)) + (style-warn "redefining ~S in DEFGENERIC" fun-name) + (let ((fun (fdefinition fun-name))) + (when (generic-function-p fun) + (loop for method in (generic-function-initial-methods fun) + do (remove-method fun method)) + (setf (generic-function-initial-methods fun) '())))) (apply #'ensure-generic-function - fun-name - :lambda-list lambda-list - :definition-source `((defgeneric ,fun-name) ,*load-truename*) - initargs)) + fun-name + :lambda-list lambda-list + :definition-source `((defgeneric ,fun-name) ,*load-pathname*) + initargs)) + +;;; As per section 3.4.2 of the ANSI spec, generic function lambda +;;; lists have some special limitations, which we check here. +(defun check-gf-lambda-list (lambda-list) + (flet ((ensure (arg ok) + (unless ok + (error + ;; (s/invalid/non-ANSI-conforming/ because the old PCL + ;; implementation allowed this, so people got used to + ;; it, and maybe this phrasing will help them to guess + ;; why their program which worked under PCL no longer works.) + "~@" + arg lambda-list)))) + (multiple-value-bind (required optional restp rest keyp keys allowp + auxp aux morep more-context more-count) + (parse-lambda-list lambda-list) + (declare (ignore required)) ; since they're no different in a gf ll + (declare (ignore restp rest)) ; since they're no different in a gf ll + (declare (ignore allowp)) ; since &ALLOW-OTHER-KEYS is fine either way + (declare (ignore aux)) ; since we require AUXP=NIL + (declare (ignore more-context more-count)) ; safely ignored unless MOREP + ;; no defaults allowed for &OPTIONAL arguments + (dolist (i optional) + (ensure i (or (symbolp i) + (and (consp i) (symbolp (car i)) (null (cdr i)))))) + ;; no defaults allowed for &KEY arguments + (when keyp + (dolist (i keys) + (ensure i (or (symbolp i) + (and (consp i) + (or (symbolp (car i)) + (and (consp (car i)) + (symbolp (caar i)) + (symbolp (cadar i)) + (null (cddar i)))) + (null (cdr i))))))) + ;; no &AUX allowed + (when auxp + (error "&AUX is not allowed in a generic function lambda list: ~S" + lambda-list)) + ;; Oh, *puhlease*... not specifically as per section 3.4.2 of + ;; the ANSI spec, but the CMU CL &MORE extension does not + ;; belong here! + (aver (not morep))))) (defmacro defmethod (&rest args &environment env) (multiple-value-bind (name qualifiers lambda-list body) @@ -271,11 +335,6 @@ bootstrapping. (class-prototype (or (generic-function-method-class gf?) (find-class 'standard-method))))))) -(defvar *optimize-asv-funcall-p* nil) -(defvar *asv-readers*) -(defvar *asv-writers*) -(defvar *asv-boundps*) - (defun expand-defmethod (name proto-gf proto-method @@ -283,53 +342,43 @@ bootstrapping. lambda-list body env) - (let ((*make-instance-function-keys* nil) - (*optimize-asv-funcall-p* t) - (*asv-readers* nil) (*asv-writers* nil) (*asv-boundps* nil)) - (declare (special *make-instance-function-keys*)) - (multiple-value-bind (method-lambda unspecialized-lambda-list specializers) - (add-method-declarations name qualifiers lambda-list body env) - (multiple-value-bind (method-function-lambda initargs) - (make-method-lambda proto-gf proto-method method-lambda env) - (let ((initargs-form (make-method-initargs-form proto-gf - proto-method - method-function-lambda - initargs - env))) - `(progn - ;; Note: We could DECLAIM the ftype of the generic - ;; function here, since ANSI specifies that we create it - ;; if it does not exist. However, I chose not to, because - ;; I think it's more useful to support a style of - ;; programming where every generic function has an - ;; explicit DEFGENERIC and any typos in DEFMETHODs are - ;; warned about. Otherwise - ;; (DEFGENERIC FOO-BAR-BLETCH ((X T))) - ;; (DEFMETHOD FOO-BAR-BLETCH ((X HASH-TABLE)) ..) - ;; (DEFMETHOD FOO-BRA-BLETCH ((X SIMPLE-VECTOR)) ..) - ;; (DEFMETHOD FOO-BAR-BLETCH ((X VECTOR)) ..) - ;; (DEFMETHOD FOO-BAR-BLETCH ((X ARRAY)) ..) - ;; (DEFMETHOD FOO-BAR-BLETCH ((X LIST)) ..) - ;; compiles without raising an error and runs without - ;; raising an error (since SIMPLE-VECTOR cases fall - ;; through to VECTOR) but still doesn't do what was - ;; intended. I hate that kind of bug (code which silently - ;; gives the wrong answer), so we don't do a DECLAIM - ;; here. -- WHN 20000229 - ,@(when *make-instance-function-keys* - `((get-make-instance-functions - ',*make-instance-function-keys*))) - ,@(when (or *asv-readers* *asv-writers* *asv-boundps*) - `((initialize-internal-slot-gfs* - ',*asv-readers* ',*asv-writers* ',*asv-boundps*))) - ,(make-defmethod-form name qualifiers specializers - unspecialized-lambda-list - (if proto-method - (class-name (class-of proto-method)) - 'standard-method) - initargs-form - (getf (getf initargs :plist) - :pv-table-symbol)))))))) + (multiple-value-bind (method-lambda unspecialized-lambda-list specializers) + (add-method-declarations name qualifiers lambda-list body env) + (multiple-value-bind (method-function-lambda initargs) + (make-method-lambda proto-gf proto-method method-lambda env) + (let ((initargs-form (make-method-initargs-form proto-gf + proto-method + method-function-lambda + initargs + env))) + `(progn + ;; Note: We could DECLAIM the ftype of the generic function + ;; here, since ANSI specifies that we create it if it does + ;; not exist. However, I chose not to, because I think it's + ;; more useful to support a style of programming where every + ;; generic function has an explicit DEFGENERIC and any typos + ;; in DEFMETHODs are warned about. Otherwise + ;; + ;; (DEFGENERIC FOO-BAR-BLETCH ((X T))) + ;; (DEFMETHOD FOO-BAR-BLETCH ((X HASH-TABLE)) ..) + ;; (DEFMETHOD FOO-BRA-BLETCH ((X SIMPLE-VECTOR)) ..) + ;; (DEFMETHOD FOO-BAR-BLETCH ((X VECTOR)) ..) + ;; (DEFMETHOD FOO-BAR-BLETCH ((X ARRAY)) ..) + ;; (DEFMETHOD FOO-BAR-BLETCH ((X LIST)) ..) + ;; + ;; compiles without raising an error and runs without + ;; raising an error (since SIMPLE-VECTOR cases fall through + ;; to VECTOR) but still doesn't do what was intended. I hate + ;; that kind of bug (code which silently gives the wrong + ;; answer), so we don't do a DECLAIM here. -- WHN 20000229 + ,(make-defmethod-form name qualifiers specializers + unspecialized-lambda-list + (if proto-method + (class-name (class-of proto-method)) + 'standard-method) + initargs-form + (getf (getf initargs :plist) + :pv-table-symbol))))))) (defun interned-symbol-p (x) (and (symbolp x) (symbol-package x))) @@ -393,7 +442,8 @@ bootstrapping. ,,(cadr specializer)) `',specializer)) specializers)) - unspecialized-lambda-list method-class-name + unspecialized-lambda-list + method-class-name initargs-form pv-table-symbol)))) @@ -431,11 +481,35 @@ bootstrapping. (multiple-value-bind (parameters unspecialized-lambda-list specializers) (parse-specialized-lambda-list lambda-list) (declare (ignore parameters)) - (multiple-value-bind (documentation declarations real-body) - (extract-declarations body env) + (multiple-value-bind (real-body declarations documentation) + (parse-body body env) (values `(lambda ,unspecialized-lambda-list ,@(when documentation `(,documentation)) - (declare (%method-name ,(list name qualifiers specializers))) + ;; (Old PCL code used a somewhat different style of + ;; list for %METHOD-NAME values. Our names use + ;; ,@QUALIFIERS instead of ,QUALIFIERS so that the + ;; method names look more like what you see in a + ;; DEFMETHOD form.) + ;; + ;; FIXME: As of sbcl-0.7.0.6, code elsewhere, at + ;; least the code to set up named BLOCKs around the + ;; bodies of methods, depends on the function's base + ;; name being the first element of the %METHOD-NAME + ;; list. It would be good to remove this dependency, + ;; perhaps by building the BLOCK here, or by using + ;; another declaration (e.g. %BLOCK-NAME), so that + ;; our method debug names are free to have any format, + ;; e.g. (:METHOD PRINT-OBJECT :AROUND (CLOWN T)). + ;; + ;; Further, as of sbcl-0.7.9.10, the code to + ;; implement NO-NEXT-METHOD is coupled to the form of + ;; this declaration; see the definition of + ;; CALL-NO-NEXT-METHOD (and the passing of + ;; METHOD-NAME-DECLARATION arguments around the + ;; various CALL-NEXT-METHOD logic). + (declare (%method-name (,name + ,@qualifiers + ,specializers))) (declare (%method-lambda-list ,@lambda-list)) ,@declarations ,@real-body) @@ -444,7 +518,8 @@ bootstrapping. (defun real-make-method-initargs-form (proto-gf proto-method method-lambda initargs env) (declare (ignore proto-gf proto-method)) - (unless (and (consp method-lambda) (eq (car method-lambda) 'lambda)) + (unless (and (consp method-lambda) + (eq (car method-lambda) 'lambda)) (error "The METHOD-LAMBDA argument to MAKE-METHOD-FUNCTION, ~S, ~ is not a lambda form." method-lambda)) @@ -520,8 +595,8 @@ bootstrapping. (error "The METHOD-LAMBDA argument to MAKE-METHOD-LAMBDA, ~S, ~ is not a lambda form." method-lambda)) - (multiple-value-bind (documentation declarations real-body) - (extract-declarations (cddr method-lambda) env) + (multiple-value-bind (real-body declarations documentation) + (parse-body (cddr method-lambda) env) (let* ((name-decl (get-declaration '%method-name declarations)) (sll-decl (get-declaration '%method-lambda-list declarations)) (method-name (when (consp name-decl) (car name-decl))) @@ -608,10 +683,11 @@ bootstrapping. env slots calls) - (multiple-value-bind - (ignore walked-declarations walked-lambda-body) - (extract-declarations (cddr walked-lambda)) - (declare (ignore ignore)) + (multiple-value-bind (walked-lambda-body + walked-declarations + walked-documentation) + (parse-body (cddr walked-lambda) env) + (declare (ignore walked-documentation)) (when (or next-method-p-p call-next-method-p) (setq plist (list* :needs-next-methods-p t plist))) (when (some #'cdr slots) @@ -642,6 +718,14 @@ bootstrapping. :call-next-method-p ,call-next-method-p :next-method-p-p ,next-method-p-p + ;; we need to pass this along + ;; so that NO-NEXT-METHOD can + ;; be given a suitable METHOD + ;; argument; we need the + ;; QUALIFIERS and SPECIALIZERS + ;; inside the declaration to + ;; give to FIND-METHOD. + :method-name-declaration ,name-decl :closurep ,closurep :applyp ,applyp) ,@walked-declarations @@ -673,10 +757,10 @@ bootstrapping. rest-arg &rest lmf-options) &body body) - `(bind-fast-lexical-method-macros (,args ,rest-arg ,next-method-call) - (bind-lexical-method-functions (,@lmf-options) - (bind-args (,(nthcdr (length args) lambda-list) ,rest-arg) - ,@body)))) + `(bind-fast-lexical-method-macros (,args ,rest-arg ,next-method-call) + (bind-lexical-method-functions (,@lmf-options) + (bind-args (,(nthcdr (length args) lambda-list) ,rest-arg) + ,@body)))) (defmacro bind-simple-lexical-method-macros ((method-args next-methods) &body body) @@ -685,18 +769,32 @@ bootstrapping. (,',next-methods (cdr ,',next-methods))) .next-method. ,',next-methods ,@body)) - (call-next-method-body (cnm-args) + (call-next-method-body (method-name-declaration cnm-args) `(if .next-method. (funcall (if (std-instance-p .next-method.) (method-function .next-method.) .next-method.) ; for early methods (or ,cnm-args ,',method-args) ,',next-methods) - (error "no next method"))) + (apply #'call-no-next-method ',method-name-declaration + (or ,cnm-args ,',method-args)))) (next-method-p-body () `(not (null .next-method.)))) ,@body)) +(defun call-no-next-method (method-name-declaration &rest args) + (destructuring-bind (name) method-name-declaration + (destructuring-bind (name &rest qualifiers-and-specializers) name + ;; KLUDGE: inefficient traversal, but hey. This should only + ;; happen on the slow error path anyway. + (let* ((qualifiers (butlast qualifiers-and-specializers)) + (specializers (car (last qualifiers-and-specializers))) + (method (find-method (gdefinition name) qualifiers specializers))) + (apply #'no-next-method + (method-generic-function method) + method + args))))) + (defstruct (method-call (:copier nil)) (function #'identity :type function) call-method-args) @@ -741,11 +839,8 @@ bootstrapping. #-sb-fluid (declaim (sb-ext:freeze-type fast-instance-boundp)) (eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute) - -(defvar *allow-emf-call-tracing-p* nil) -(defvar *enable-emf-call-tracing-p* #-testing nil #+testing t) - -) ; EVAL-WHEN + (defvar *allow-emf-call-tracing-p* nil) + (defvar *enable-emf-call-tracing-p* #-sb-show nil #+sb-show t)) ;;;; effective method functions @@ -795,26 +890,25 @@ bootstrapping. &rest required-args+rest-arg) (unless (constantp restp) (error "The RESTP argument is not constant.")) + ;; FIXME: The RESTP handling here is confusing and maybe slightly + ;; broken if RESTP evaluates to a non-self-evaluating form. E.g. if + ;; (INVOKE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD-FUNCTION EMF '(ERROR "gotcha") ...) + ;; then TRACE-EMF-CALL-CALL-INTERNAL might die on a gotcha error. (setq restp (eval restp)) - `(locally - - ;; In sbcl-0.6.11.43, the compiler would issue bogus warnings - ;; about type mismatches in unreachable code when we - ;; macroexpanded the GET-SLOTS-OR-NIL expressions here and - ;; byte-compiled the code. GET-SLOTS-OR-NIL is now an inline - ;; function instead of a macro, which seems sufficient to solve - ;; the problem all by itself (probably because of some quirk in - ;; the relative order of expansion and type inference) but we - ;; also use overkill by NOTINLINEing GET-SLOTS-OR-NIL, because it - ;; looks as though (1) inlining isn't that much of a win anyway, - ;; and (2a) once you miss the FAST-METHOD-CALL clause you're - ;; going to be slow anyway, but (2b) code bloat still hurts even - ;; when it's off the critical path. - (declare (notinline get-slots-or-nil)) - + `(progn (trace-emf-call ,emf ,restp (list ,@required-args+rest-arg)) (cond ((typep ,emf 'fast-method-call) - (invoke-fast-method-call ,emf ,@required-args+rest-arg)) + (invoke-fast-method-call ,emf ,@required-args+rest-arg)) + ;; "What," you may wonder, "do these next two clauses do?" + ;; In that case, you are not a PCL implementor, for they + ;; considered this to be self-documenting.:-| Or CSR, for + ;; that matter, since he can also figure it out by looking + ;; at it without breaking stride. For the rest of us, + ;; though: From what the code is doing with .SLOTS. and + ;; whatnot, evidently it's implementing SLOT-VALUEish and + ;; GET-SLOT-VALUEish things. Then we can reason backwards + ;; and conclude that setting EMF to a FIXNUM is an + ;; optimized way to represent these slot access operations. ,@(when (and (null restp) (= 1 (length required-args+rest-arg))) `(((typep ,emf 'fixnum) (let* ((.slots. (get-slots-or-nil @@ -828,19 +922,13 @@ bootstrapping. `(((typep ,emf 'fixnum) (let ((.new-value. ,(car required-args+rest-arg)) (.slots. (get-slots-or-nil - ,(car required-args+rest-arg)))) - (when .slots. - (setf (clos-slots-ref .slots. ,emf) .new-value.)))))) - #|| - ,@(when (and (null restp) (= 1 (length required-args+rest-arg))) - `(((typep ,emf 'fast-instance-boundp) - (let ((.slots. (get-slots-or-nil - ,(car required-args+rest-arg)))) - (and .slots. - (not (eq (clos-slots-ref - .slots. (fast-instance-boundp-index ,emf)) - +slot-unbound+))))))) - ||# + ,(cadr required-args+rest-arg)))) + (when .slots. + (setf (clos-slots-ref .slots. ,emf) .new-value.)))))) + ;; (In cmucl-2.4.8 there was a commented-out third ,@(WHEN + ;; ...) clause here to handle SLOT-BOUNDish stuff. Since + ;; there was no explanation and presumably the code is 10+ + ;; years stale, I simply deleted it. -- WHN) (t (etypecase ,emf (method-call @@ -907,83 +995,96 @@ bootstrapping. +slot-unbound+))))) (function (apply emf args)))) - -;; KLUDGE: A comment from the original PCL said "This can be improved alot." -(defun gf-make-function-from-emf (gf emf) - (etypecase emf - (fast-method-call (let* ((arg-info (gf-arg-info gf)) - (nreq (arg-info-number-required arg-info)) - (restp (arg-info-applyp arg-info))) - (lambda (&rest args) - (trace-emf-call emf t args) - (apply (fast-method-call-function emf) - (fast-method-call-pv-cell emf) - (fast-method-call-next-method-call emf) - (if restp - (let* ((rest-args (nthcdr nreq args)) - (req-args (ldiff args - rest-args))) - (nconc req-args rest-args)) - args))))) - (method-call (lambda (&rest args) - (trace-emf-call emf t args) - (apply (method-call-function emf) - args - (method-call-call-method-args emf)))) - (function emf))) (defmacro bind-fast-lexical-method-macros ((args rest-arg next-method-call) &body body) - `(macrolet ((call-next-method-bind (&body body) - `(let () ,@body)) - (call-next-method-body (cnm-args) - `(if ,',next-method-call - ,(if (and (null ',rest-arg) - (consp cnm-args) - (eq (car cnm-args) 'list)) - `(invoke-effective-method-function - ,',next-method-call nil - ,@(cdr cnm-args)) - (let ((call `(invoke-effective-method-function - ,',next-method-call - ,',(not (null rest-arg)) - ,@',args - ,@',(when rest-arg `(,rest-arg))))) - `(if ,cnm-args - (bind-args ((,@',args - ,@',(when rest-arg - `(&rest ,rest-arg))) - ,cnm-args) - ,call) - ,call))) - (error "no next method"))) + `(macrolet ((narrowed-emf (emf) + ;; INVOKE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD-FUNCTION has code in it to + ;; dispatch on the possibility that EMF might be of + ;; type FIXNUM (as an optimized representation of a + ;; slot accessor). But as far as I (WHN 2002-06-11) + ;; can tell, it's impossible for such a representation + ;; to end up as .NEXT-METHOD-CALL. By reassuring + ;; INVOKE-E-M-F that when called from this context + ;; it needn't worry about the FIXNUM case, we can + ;; keep those cases from being compiled, which is + ;; good both because it saves bytes and because it + ;; avoids annoying type mismatch compiler warnings. + ;; + ;; KLUDGE: In sbcl-0.7.4.29, the compiler's type + ;; system isn't smart enough about NOT and intersection + ;; types to benefit from a (NOT FIXNUM) declaration + ;; here. -- WHN 2002-06-12 + ;; + ;; FIXME: Might the FUNCTION type be omittable here, + ;; leaving only METHOD-CALLs? Failing that, could this + ;; be documented somehow? (It'd be nice if the types + ;; involved could be understood without solving the + ;; halting problem.) + `(the (or function method-call fast-method-call) + ,emf)) + (call-next-method-bind (&body body) + `(let () ,@body)) + (call-next-method-body (method-name-declaration cnm-args) + `(if ,',next-method-call + ,(locally + ;; This declaration suppresses a "deleting + ;; unreachable code" note for the following IF when + ;; REST-ARG is NIL. It is not nice for debugging + ;; SBCL itself, but at least it keeps us from + ;; annoying users. + (declare (optimize (inhibit-warnings 3))) + (if (and (null ',rest-arg) + (consp cnm-args) + (eq (car cnm-args) 'list)) + `(invoke-effective-method-function + (narrowed-emf ,',next-method-call) + nil + ,@(cdr cnm-args)) + (let ((call `(invoke-effective-method-function + (narrowed-emf ,',next-method-call) + ,',(not (null rest-arg)) + ,@',args + ,@',(when rest-arg `(,rest-arg))))) + `(if ,cnm-args + (bind-args ((,@',args + ,@',(when rest-arg + `(&rest ,rest-arg))) + ,cnm-args) + ,call) + ,call)))) + ,(locally + ;; As above, this declaration suppresses code + ;; deletion notes. + (declare (optimize (inhibit-warnings 3))) + (if (and (null ',rest-arg) + (consp cnm-args) + (eq (car cnm-args) 'list)) + `(call-no-next-method ',method-name-declaration + ,@(cdr cnm-args)) + `(call-no-next-method ',method-name-declaration + ,@',args + ,@',(when rest-arg + `(,rest-arg))))))) (next-method-p-body () - `(not (null ,',next-method-call)))) - ,@body)) + `(not (null ,',next-method-call)))) + ,@body)) (defmacro bind-lexical-method-functions - ((&key call-next-method-p next-method-p-p closurep applyp) + ((&key call-next-method-p next-method-p-p + closurep applyp method-name-declaration) &body body) (cond ((and (null call-next-method-p) (null next-method-p-p) (null closurep) (null applyp)) `(let () ,@body)) - ((and (null closurep) - (null applyp)) - ;; OK to use MACROLET, and all args are mandatory - ;; (else APPLYP would be true). - `(call-next-method-bind - (macrolet ((call-next-method (&rest cnm-args) - `(call-next-method-body ,(when cnm-args - `(list ,@cnm-args)))) - (next-method-p () - `(next-method-p-body))) - ,@body))) (t `(call-next-method-bind (flet (,@(and call-next-method-p - '((call-next-method (&rest cnm-args) - (call-next-method-body cnm-args)))) + `((call-next-method (&rest cnm-args) + (call-next-method-body + ,method-name-declaration + cnm-args)))) ,@(and next-method-p-p '((next-method-p () (next-method-p-body))))) @@ -1023,8 +1124,9 @@ bootstrapping. ,(cadr var))))))) (rest `((,var ,args-tail))) (key (cond ((not (consp var)) - `((,var (get-key-arg ,(keywordicate var) - ,args-tail)))) + `((,var (car + (get-key-arg-tail ,(keywordicate var) + ,args-tail))))) ((null (cddr var)) (multiple-value-bind (keyword variable) (if (consp (car var)) @@ -1032,8 +1134,9 @@ bootstrapping. (cadar var)) (values (keywordicate (car var)) (car var))) - `((,key (get-key-arg1 ',keyword ,args-tail)) - (,variable (if (consp ,key) + `((,key (get-key-arg-tail ',keyword + ,args-tail)) + (,variable (if ,key (car ,key) ,(cadr var)))))) (t @@ -1043,9 +1146,10 @@ bootstrapping. (cadar var)) (values (keywordicate (car var)) (car var))) - `((,key (get-key-arg1 ',keyword ,args-tail)) + `((,key (get-key-arg-tail ',keyword + ,args-tail)) (,(caddr var) ,key) - (,variable (if (consp ,key) + (,variable (if ,key (car ,key) ,(cadr var)))))))) (aux `(,var)))))) @@ -1055,15 +1159,14 @@ bootstrapping. (declare (ignorable ,args-tail)) ,@body))))) -(defun get-key-arg (keyword list) - (loop (when (atom list) (return nil)) - (when (eq (car list) keyword) (return (cadr list))) - (setq list (cddr list)))) - -(defun get-key-arg1 (keyword list) - (loop (when (atom list) (return nil)) - (when (eq (car list) keyword) (return (cdr list))) - (setq list (cddr list)))) +(defun get-key-arg-tail (keyword list) + (loop for (key . tail) on list by #'cddr + when (null tail) do + ;; FIXME: Do we want to export this symbol? Or maybe use an + ;; (ERROR 'SIMPLE-PROGRAM-ERROR) form? + (sb-c::%odd-key-args-error) + when (eq key keyword) + return tail)) (defun walk-method-lambda (method-lambda required-parameters env slots calls) (let ((call-next-method-p nil) ; flag indicating that CALL-NEXT-METHOD @@ -1116,13 +1219,6 @@ bootstrapping. ((generic-function-name-p (car form)) (optimize-generic-function-call form required-parameters env slots calls)) - ((and (eq (car form) 'asv-funcall) - *optimize-asv-funcall-p*) - (case (fourth form) - (reader (push (third form) *asv-readers*)) - (writer (push (third form) *asv-writers*)) - (boundp (push (third form) *asv-boundps*))) - `(,(second form) ,@(cddddr form))) (t form)))) (let ((walked-lambda (walk-form method-lambda env #'walk-function))) @@ -1214,14 +1310,14 @@ bootstrapping. (parse-specializers specializers) nil)))) (when method - (sb-kernel::style-warn "redefining ~S~{ ~S~} ~S in DEFMETHOD" - gf-spec qualifiers specializers)))) + (style-warn "redefining ~S~{ ~S~} ~S in DEFMETHOD" + gf-spec qualifiers specializers)))) (let ((method (apply #'add-named-method gf-spec qualifiers specializers lambda-list :definition-source `((defmethod ,gf-spec ,@qualifiers ,specializers) - ,*load-truename*) + ,*load-pathname*) initargs))) (unless (or (eq method-class 'standard-method) (eq (find-class method-class nil) (class-of method))) @@ -1343,15 +1439,15 @@ bootstrapping. (analyze-lambda-list lambda-list) (declare (ignore keyword-parameters)) (let* ((old (info :function :type name)) ;FIXME:FDOCUMENTATION instead? - (old-ftype (if (sb-kernel:fun-type-p old) old nil)) - (old-restp (and old-ftype (sb-kernel:fun-type-rest old-ftype))) + (old-ftype (if (fun-type-p old) old nil)) + (old-restp (and old-ftype (fun-type-rest old-ftype))) (old-keys (and old-ftype - (mapcar #'sb-kernel:key-info-name - (sb-kernel:fun-type-keywords + (mapcar #'key-info-name + (fun-type-keywords old-ftype)))) - (old-keysp (and old-ftype (sb-kernel:fun-type-keyp old-ftype))) + (old-keysp (and old-ftype (fun-type-keyp old-ftype))) (old-allowp (and old-ftype - (sb-kernel:fun-type-allowp old-ftype))) + (fun-type-allowp old-ftype))) (keywords (union old-keys (mapcar #'keyword-spec-name keywords)))) `(function ,(append (make-list nrequired :initial-element t) (when (plusp noptional) @@ -1527,12 +1623,11 @@ bootstrapping. (early-method-lambda-list method) (method-lambda-list method))) (flet ((lose (string &rest args) - (error - "attempt to add the method ~S to the generic function ~S.~%~ - But ~A" - method - gf - (apply #'format nil string args))) + (error 'simple-program-error + :format-control "~@" + :format-arguments (list method gf string args))) (comparison-description (x y) (if (> x y) "more" "fewer"))) (let ((gf-nreq (arg-info-number-required arg-info)) @@ -1548,14 +1643,14 @@ bootstrapping. "the method has ~A optional arguments than the generic function." (comparison-description nopt gf-nopt))) (unless (eq (or keysp restp) gf-key/rest-p) - (error - "The method and generic function differ in whether they accept~%~ + (lose + "the method and generic function differ in whether they accept~_~ &REST or &KEY arguments.")) (when (consp gf-keywords) (unless (or (and restp (not keysp)) allow-other-keys-p (every (lambda (k) (memq k keywords)) gf-keywords)) - (lose "the method does not accept each of the &KEY arguments~%~ + (lose "the method does not accept each of the &KEY arguments~2I~_~ ~S." gf-keywords))))))) @@ -1610,6 +1705,21 @@ bootstrapping. (let* ((sym (if (atom name) name (cadr name))) (pkg-list (cons *pcl-package* (package-use-list *pcl-package*)))) + ;; FIXME: given the presence of generalized function + ;; names, this test is broken. A little + ;; reverse-engineering suggests that this was intended + ;; to prevent precompilation of things on some + ;; PCL-internal automatically-constructed functions + ;; like the old "~A~A standard class ~A reader" + ;; functions. When the CADR of SB-PCL::SLOT-ACCESSOR + ;; generalized functions was *, this test returned T, + ;; not NIL, and an error was signalled in + ;; MAKE-ACCESSOR-TABLE for (DEFUN FOO (X) (SLOT-VALUE X + ;; 'ASLDKJ)). Whether the right thing to do is to fix + ;; MAKE-ACCESSOR-TABLE so that it can work in the + ;; presence of slot names that have no classes, or to + ;; restore this test to something more obvious, I don't + ;; know. -- CSR, 2003-02-14 (and sym (symbolp sym) (not (null (memq (symbol-package sym) pkg-list))) (not (find #\space (symbol-name sym)))))))) @@ -1641,13 +1751,15 @@ bootstrapping. (defun ensure-generic-function-using-class (existing spec &rest keys &key (lambda-list nil lambda-list-p) + argument-precedence-order &allow-other-keys) (declare (ignore keys)) (cond ((and existing (early-gf-p existing)) existing) ((assoc spec *!generic-function-fixups* :test #'equal) (if existing - (make-early-gf spec lambda-list lambda-list-p existing) + (make-early-gf spec lambda-list lambda-list-p existing + argument-precedence-order) (error "The function ~S is not already defined." spec))) (existing (error "~S should be on the list ~S." @@ -1655,18 +1767,20 @@ bootstrapping. '*!generic-function-fixups*)) (t (pushnew spec *!early-generic-functions* :test #'equal) - (make-early-gf spec lambda-list lambda-list-p)))) + (make-early-gf spec lambda-list lambda-list-p nil + argument-precedence-order)))) -(defun make-early-gf (spec &optional lambda-list lambda-list-p function) +(defun make-early-gf (spec &optional lambda-list lambda-list-p + function argument-precedence-order) (let ((fin (allocate-funcallable-instance *sgf-wrapper* *sgf-slots-init*))) - (set-funcallable-instance-fun + (set-funcallable-instance-function fin (or function (if (eq spec 'print-object) - #'(sb-kernel:instance-lambda (instance stream) + #'(instance-lambda (instance stream) (print-unreadable-object (instance stream :identity t) (format stream "std-instance"))) - #'(sb-kernel:instance-lambda (&rest args) + #'(instance-lambda (&rest args) (declare (ignore args)) (error "The function of the funcallable-instance ~S~ has not been set." fin))))) @@ -1675,13 +1789,17 @@ bootstrapping. (!bootstrap-set-slot 'standard-generic-function fin 'source - *load-truename*) + *load-pathname*) (set-fun-name fin spec) (let ((arg-info (make-arg-info))) (setf (early-gf-arg-info fin) arg-info) (when lambda-list-p (proclaim (defgeneric-declaration spec lambda-list)) - (set-arg-info fin :lambda-list lambda-list))) + (if argument-precedence-order + (set-arg-info fin + :lambda-list lambda-list + :argument-precedence-order argument-precedence-order) + (set-arg-info fin :lambda-list lambda-list)))) fin)) (defun set-dfun (gf &optional dfun cache info)