X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Fclos.impure.lisp;h=1e705908039c34a6aad313334b7e4b3d2e9e3b64;hb=b624a686af5426145841a597bdb96b27d5bd042e;hp=9d43e31eb19ab3ddfc035ff3b6d6d4829170f587;hpb=ec6d4bd97d9adc6f4003747d8ca92fad7766ccfd;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/tests/clos.impure.lisp b/tests/clos.impure.lisp index 9d43e31..1e70590 100644 --- a/tests/clos.impure.lisp +++ b/tests/clos.impure.lisp @@ -115,6 +115,103 @@ (defgeneric born-to-be-redefined (x)) (assert (eq (born-to-be-redefined 1) 'int)) +;;; In the removal of ITERATE from SB-PCL, a bug was introduced +;;; preventing forward-references and also change-class (which +;;; forward-references used interally) from working properly. One +;;; symptom was reported by Brian Spilsbury (sbcl-devel 2002-04-08), +;;; and another on IRC by Dan Barlow simultaneously. Better check +;;; that it doesn't happen again. +;;; +;;; First, the forward references: +(defclass a (b) ()) +(defclass b () ()) +;;; Then change-class +(defclass class-with-slots () + ((a-slot :initarg :a-slot :accessor a-slot) + (b-slot :initarg :b-slot :accessor b-slot) + (c-slot :initarg :c-slot :accessor c-slot))) +(let ((foo (make-instance 'class-with-slots + :a-slot 1 + :b-slot 2 + :c-slot 3))) + (let ((bar (change-class foo 'class-with-slots))) + (assert (= (a-slot bar) 1)) + (assert (= (b-slot bar) 2)) + (assert (= (c-slot bar) 3)))) + +;;; some more CHANGE-CLASS testing, now that we have an ANSI-compliant +;;; version (thanks to Espen Johnsen) +(defclass from-class () + ((foo :initarg :foo :accessor foo))) +(defclass to-class () + ((foo :initarg :foo :accessor foo) + (bar :initarg :bar :accessor bar))) +(let* ((from (make-instance 'from-class :foo 1)) + (to (change-class from 'to-class :bar 2))) + (assert (= (foo to) 1)) + (assert (= (bar to) 2))) + +;;; Until Pierre Mai's patch (sbcl-devel 2002-06-18, merged in +;;; sbcl-0.7.4.39) the :MOST-SPECIFIC-LAST option had no effect. +(defgeneric bug180 ((x t)) + (:method-combination list :most-specific-last)) +(defmethod bug180 list ((x number)) + 'number) +(defmethod bug180 list ((x fixnum)) + 'fixnum) +(assert (equal (bug180 14) '(number fixnum))) + +;;; printing a structure class should not loop indefinitely (or cause +;;; a stack overflow): +(defclass test-printing-structure-class () + ((slot :initarg :slot)) + (:metaclass structure-class)) +(print (make-instance 'test-printing-structure-class :slot 2)) + +;;; structure-classes should behave nicely when subclassed +(defclass super-structure () + ((a :initarg :a :accessor a-accessor) + (b :initform 2 :reader b-reader)) + (:metaclass structure-class)) +(defclass sub-structure (super-structure) + ((c :initarg :c :writer c-writer :accessor c-accessor)) + (:metaclass structure-class)) +(let ((foo (make-instance 'sub-structure :a 1 :c 3))) + (assert (= (a-accessor foo) 1)) + (assert (= (b-reader foo) 2)) + (assert (= (c-accessor foo) 3)) + (setf (a-accessor foo) 4) + (c-writer 5 foo) + (assert (= (a-accessor foo) 4)) + (assert (= (c-accessor foo) 5))) + +;;; At least as of sbcl-0.7.4, PCL has code to support a special +;;; encoding of effective method functions for slot accessors as +;;; FIXNUMs. Given this special casing, it'd be easy for slot accessor +;;; functions to get broken in special ways even though ordinary +;;; generic functions work. As of sbcl-0.7.4 we didn't have any tests +;;; for that possibility. Now we have a few tests: +(defclass fish () + ((fin :reader ffin :writer ffin!) + (tail :reader ftail :writer ftail!))) +(defvar *fish* (make-instance 'fish)) +(ffin! 'triangular-fin *fish*) +(defclass cod (fish) ()) +(defvar *cod* (make-instance 'cod)) +(defparameter *clos-dispatch-side-fx* (make-array 0 :fill-pointer 0)) +(defmethod ffin! (new-fin (cod cod)) + (format t "~&about to set ~S fin to ~S~%" cod new-fin) + (vector-push-extend '(cod) *clos-dispatch-side-fx*) + (prog1 + (call-next-method) + (format t "~&done setting ~S fin to ~S~%" cod new-fin))) +(defmethod ffin! :before (new-fin (cod cod)) + (vector-push-extend '(:before cod) *clos-dispatch-side-fx*) + (format t "~&exploring the CLOS dispatch zoo with COD fins~%")) +(ffin! 'almost-triang-fin *cod*) +(assert (eq (ffin *cod*) 'almost-triang-fin)) +(assert (equalp #((:before cod) (cod)) *clos-dispatch-side-fx*)) + ;;;; success (sb-ext:quit :unix-status 104)