X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Fcompiler.impure.lisp;h=d371ea9f9c30a4d97ce7d6a8bc5a974379e16f0b;hb=079ef9dad558ca07cb8178ef428bf738112174fa;hp=aa5ee2e978a1d265871f498d38e26145cdf19b91;hpb=45e4225c7ceae7328b6951770f654932438ed266;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/tests/compiler.impure.lisp b/tests/compiler.impure.lisp index aa5ee2e..d371ea9 100644 --- a/tests/compiler.impure.lisp +++ b/tests/compiler.impure.lisp @@ -308,12 +308,17 @@ ;;; BUG 48a. and b. (symbol-macrolet handling), fixed by Eric Marsden ;;; and Raymond Toy for CMUCL, fix ported for sbcl-0.7.6.18. (multiple-value-bind (function warnings-p failure-p) - (compile nil '(lambda () (symbol-macrolet ((t nil)) t))) + (compile nil '(lambda () + ;; not interested in the package lock violation here + (declare (sb-ext:disable-package-locks t)) + (symbol-macrolet ((t nil)) t))) (assert failure-p) (assert (raises-error? (funcall function) program-error))) (multiple-value-bind (function warnings-p failure-p) (compile nil '(lambda () + ;; not interested in the package lock violation here + (declare (sb-ext:disable-package-locks *standard-input*)) (symbol-macrolet ((*standard-input* nil)) *standard-input*))) (assert failure-p) @@ -865,7 +870,59 @@ (load source) (full-check) (delete-file fasl))) - + +(defun expt-derive-type-bug (a b) + (unless (< a b) + (truncate (expt a b)))) +(assert (equal (multiple-value-list (expt-derive-type-bug 1 1)) + '(1 0))) + +;;; Problems with type checking in functions with EXPLICIT-CHECK +;;; attribute (reported by Peter Graves) +(loop for (fun . args) in '((= a) (/= a) + (< a) (<= a) (> a) (>= a)) + do (assert (raises-error? (apply fun args) type-error))) + +(defclass broken-input-stream (sb-gray:fundamental-input-stream) ()) +(defmethod sb-gray:stream-read-char ((stream broken-input-stream)) + (throw 'break :broken)) +(assert (eql (block return + (handler-case + (catch 'break + (funcall (eval ''peek-char) + 1 (make-instance 'broken-input-stream)) + :test-broken) + (type-error (c) + (return-from return :good)))) + :good)) + +;;;; MUFFLE-CONDITIONS test (corresponds to the test in the manual) +(defvar *compiler-note-count* 0) +#-(or alpha x86-64) ; FIXME: make a better test! +(handler-bind ((sb-ext:compiler-note (lambda (c) + (declare (ignore c)) + (incf *compiler-note-count*)))) + (let ((fun + (compile nil + '(lambda (x) + (declare (optimize speed) (fixnum x)) + (declare (sb-ext:muffle-conditions sb-ext:compiler-note)) + (values (* x 5) ; no compiler note from this + (locally + (declare (sb-ext:unmuffle-conditions sb-ext:compiler-note)) + ;; this one gives a compiler note + (* x -5))))))) + (assert (= *compiler-note-count* 1)) + (assert (equal (multiple-value-list (funcall fun 1)) '(5 -5))))) + +(handler-case + (eval '(flet ((%f (&key) nil)) (%f nil nil))) + (error (c) :good) + (:no-error (val) (error "no error: ~S" val))) +(handler-case + (eval '(labels ((%f (&key x) x)) (%f nil nil))) + (error (c) :good) + (:no-error (val) (error "no error: ~S" val))) ;;;; tests not in the problem domain, but of the consistency of the ;;;; compiler machinery itself