X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Fcompiler.impure.lisp;h=d904439e95175b0765d6c5a65dbcb307d48aab4a;hb=50f728671defadb8f7b1e8691c984cb0e6aba17c;hp=37b12fc5763cda9d5fcda28f3d40de1e98298b71;hpb=12bd68a3ff68b4e06cfb8c441383b6e898d2ed78;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/tests/compiler.impure.lisp b/tests/compiler.impure.lisp index 37b12fc..d904439 100644 --- a/tests/compiler.impure.lisp +++ b/tests/compiler.impure.lisp @@ -404,21 +404,22 @@ BUG 48c, not yet fixed: (declare (ignore result)) (assert (typep condition 'type-error))) -;;; bug 110: the compiler flushed the argument type test and the default -;;; case in the cond. - -(defun bug110 (x) - (declare (optimize (safety 2) (speed 3))) - (declare (type (or string stream) x)) - (cond ((typep x 'string) 'string) - ((typep x 'stream) 'stream) - (t - 'none))) - -(multiple-value-bind (result condition) - (ignore-errors (bug110 0)) - (declare (ignore result)) - (assert (typep condition 'type-error))) +;;;; bug 110: the compiler flushed the argument type test and the default +;;;; case in the cond. +; +;(locally (declare (optimize (safety 3) (speed 2))) +; (defun bug110 (x) +; (declare (optimize (safety 2) (speed 3))) +; (declare (type (or string stream) x)) +; (cond ((typep x 'string) 'string) +; ((typep x 'stream) 'stream) +; (t +; 'none)))) +; +;(multiple-value-bind (result condition) +; (ignore-errors (bug110 0)) +; (declare (ignore result)) +; (assert (typep condition 'type-error))) ;;; bug 202: the compiler failed to compile a function, which derived ;;; type contradicted declared. @@ -702,7 +703,81 @@ BUG 48c, not yet fixed: (do-optimizations (compile nil '(lambda (x) (let ((y (error ""))) (list x y))))) +;;; bug 223: invalid moving of global function name referencing +(defun bug223-int (n) + `(int ,n)) + +(defun bug223-wrap () + (let ((old #'bug223-int)) + (setf (fdefinition 'bug223-int) + (lambda (n) + (assert (> n 0)) + `(ext ,@(funcall old (1- n))))))) +(compile 'bug223-wrap) + +(assert (equal (bug223-int 4) '(int 4))) +(bug223-wrap) +(assert (equal (bug223-int 4) '(ext int 3))) +(bug223-wrap) +(assert (equal (bug223-int 4) '(ext ext int 2))) +;;; COERCE got its own DEFOPTIMIZER which has to reimplement most of +;;; SPECIFIER-TYPE-NTH-ARG. For a while, an illegal type would throw +;;; you into the debugger on compilation. +(defun coerce-defopt (x) + ;; illegal, but should be compilable. + (coerce x '(values t))) +(assert (null (ignore-errors (coerce-defopt 3)))) + +;;; Oops. In part of the (CATCH ..) implementation of DEBUG-RETURN, +;;; it was possible to confuse the type deriver of the compiler +;;; sufficiently that compiler invariants were broken (explained by +;;; APD sbcl-devel 2003-01-11). + +;;; WHN's original report +(defun debug-return-catch-break1 () + (with-open-file (s "/tmp/foo" + :direction :output + :element-type (list + 'signed-byte + (1+ + (integer-length most-positive-fixnum)))) + (read-byte s) + (read-byte s) + (read-byte s) + (read-byte s))) + +;;; APD's simplified test case +(defun debug-return-catch-break2 (x) + (declare (type (vector (unsigned-byte 8)) x)) + (setq *y* (the (unsigned-byte 8) (aref x 4)))) + +;;; FUNCTION-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION should return something that's COMPILE +;;; can understand. Here's a simple test for that on a function +;;; that's likely to return a hairier list than just a lambda: +(macrolet ((def (fn) `(progn + (declaim (inline ,fn)) + (defun ,fn (x) (1+ x))))) + (def bug228)) +(let ((x (function-lambda-expression #'bug228))) + (when x + (assert (= (funcall (compile nil x) 1) 2)))) + +;;; Bug reported by reported by rif on c.l.l 2003-03-05 +(defun test-type-of-special-1 (x) + (declare (special x) + (fixnum x) + (optimize (safety 3))) + (list x)) +(defun test-type-of-special-2 (x) + (declare (special x) + (fixnum x) + (optimize (safety 3))) + (list x (setq x (/ x 2)) x)) +(assert (raises-error? (test-type-of-special-1 3/2) type-error)) +(assert (raises-error? (test-type-of-special-2 3) type-error)) +(assert (equal (test-type-of-special-2 8) '(8 4 4))) + ;;;; tests not in the problem domain, but of the consistency of the ;;;; compiler machinery itself