X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Fcompiler.impure.lisp;h=f36f860bcffcee1aeb6f7791ca9b10e3d2148372;hb=3a10f894e7867fa2c27a3af05380abc3247f728d;hp=9a8458c203d1867f9fa25356b6312db331005300;hpb=09d7974601df2aaaa820ca576026b9b4f03e6ab1;p=sbcl.git

diff --git a/tests/compiler.impure.lisp b/tests/compiler.impure.lisp
index 9a8458c..f36f860 100644
--- a/tests/compiler.impure.lisp
+++ b/tests/compiler.impure.lisp
@@ -15,9 +15,8 @@
 ;;;; absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS files for
 ;;;; more information.
 
-(cl:in-package :cl-user)
-
 (load "assertoid.lisp")
+(use-package "ASSERTOID")
 
 ;;; Old CMU CL code assumed that the names of "keyword" arguments are
 ;;; necessarily self-evaluating symbols, but ANSI Common Lisp allows
@@ -405,21 +404,22 @@ BUG 48c, not yet fixed:
   (declare (ignore result))
   (assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
 
-;;; bug 110: the compiler flushed the argument type test and the default
-;;; case in the cond.
-
-(defun bug110 (x)
-  (declare (optimize (safety 2) (speed 3)))
-  (declare (type (or string stream) x))
-  (cond ((typep x 'string) 'string)
-        ((typep x 'stream) 'stream)
-        (t
-         'none)))
-
-(multiple-value-bind (result condition)
-    (ignore-errors (bug110 0))
-  (declare (ignore result))
-  (assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
+;;;; bug 110: the compiler flushed the argument type test and the default
+;;;; case in the cond.
+;
+;(locally (declare (optimize (safety 3) (speed 2)))
+;  (defun bug110 (x)
+;    (declare (optimize (safety 2) (speed 3)))
+;    (declare (type (or string stream) x))
+;    (cond ((typep x 'string) 'string)
+;          ((typep x 'stream) 'stream)
+;          (t
+;           'none))))
+;
+;(multiple-value-bind (result condition)
+;    (ignore-errors (bug110 0))
+;  (declare (ignore result))
+;  (assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
 
 ;;; bug 202: the compiler failed to compile a function, which derived
 ;;; type contradicted declared.
@@ -636,6 +636,161 @@ BUG 48c, not yet fixed:
   (+ y 5))
 (assert (= (call-inlined 3) 6))
 
+;;; DEFINE-COMPILER-MACRO to work as expected, not via weird magical
+;;; IR1 pseudo-:COMPILE-TOPLEVEL handling
+(defvar *bug219-a-expanded-p* nil)
+(defun bug219-a (x)
+  (+ x 1))
+(define-compiler-macro bug219-a (&whole form y)
+  (setf *bug219-a-expanded-p* t)
+  (if (constantp y)
+      (+ (eval y) 2)
+      form))
+(defun bug219-a-aux ()
+  (bug219-a 2))
+(assert (= (bug219-a-aux)
+	   (if *bug219-a-expanded-p* 4 3)))
+(defvar *bug219-a-temp* 3)
+(assert (= (bug219-a *bug219-a-temp*) 4))
+
+(defvar *bug219-b-expanded-p* nil)
+(defun bug219-b-aux1 (x)
+  (when x
+    (define-compiler-macro bug219-b (y)
+      (setf *bug219-b-expanded-p* t)
+      `(+ ,y 2))))
+(defun bug219-b-aux2 (z)
+  (bug219-b z))
+(assert (not *bug219-b-expanded-p*))
+(assert (raises-error? (bug219-b-aux2 1) undefined-function))
+(bug219-b-aux1 t)
+(defun bug219-b-aux2 (z)
+  (bug219-b z))
+(defun bug219-b (x)
+  x)
+(assert (= (bug219-b-aux2 1)
+	   (if *bug219-b-expanded-p* 3 1)))
+
+;;; bug 224: failure in unreachable code deletion
+(defmacro do-optimizations (&body body)
+  `(dotimes (.speed. 4)
+     (dotimes (.space. 4)
+       (dotimes (.debug. 4)
+         (dotimes (.compilation-speed. 4)
+           (proclaim `(optimize (speed , .speed.) (space , .space.)
+                                (debug , .debug.)
+                                (compilation-speed , .compilation-speed.)))
+           ,@body)))))
+
+(do-optimizations
+    (compile nil
+             (read-from-string
+              "(lambda () (#:localy (declare (optimize (safety 3)))
+                                    (ignore-errors (progn (values-list (car (list '(1 . 2)))) t))))")))
+
+(do-optimizations
+    (compile nil '(lambda ()
+                   (labels ((ext ()
+                              (tagbody
+                                 (labels ((i1 () (list (i2) (i2)))
+                                          (i2 () (list (int) (i1)))
+                                          (int () (go :exit)))
+                                   (list (i1) (i1) (i1)))
+                               :exit (return-from ext)
+                                 )))
+                     (list (error "nih") (ext) (ext))))))
+
+(do-optimizations
+  (compile nil '(lambda (x) (let ((y (error ""))) (list x y)))))
+
+;;; bug 223: invalid moving of global function name referencing
+(defun bug223-int (n)
+  `(int ,n))
+
+(defun bug223-wrap ()
+  (let ((old #'bug223-int))
+    (setf (fdefinition 'bug223-int)
+          (lambda (n)
+            (assert (> n 0))
+            `(ext ,@(funcall old (1- n)))))))
+(compile 'bug223-wrap)
+
+(assert (equal (bug223-int 4) '(int 4)))
+(bug223-wrap)
+(assert (equal (bug223-int 4) '(ext int 3)))
+(bug223-wrap)
+(assert (equal (bug223-int 4) '(ext ext int 2)))
+
+;;; COERCE got its own DEFOPTIMIZER which has to reimplement most of
+;;; SPECIFIER-TYPE-NTH-ARG.  For a while, an illegal type would throw
+;;; you into the debugger on compilation.
+(defun coerce-defopt (x)
+  ;; illegal, but should be compilable.
+  (coerce x '(values t)))
+(assert (null (ignore-errors (coerce-defopt 3))))
+
+;;; Oops.  In part of the (CATCH ..) implementation of DEBUG-RETURN,
+;;; it was possible to confuse the type deriver of the compiler
+;;; sufficiently that compiler invariants were broken (explained by
+;;; APD sbcl-devel 2003-01-11).
+
+;;; WHN's original report
+(defun debug-return-catch-break1 ()
+  (with-open-file (s "/tmp/foo"
+		     :direction :output
+		     :element-type (list
+				    'signed-byte
+				    (1+
+				     (integer-length most-positive-fixnum))))
+    (read-byte s)
+    (read-byte s)
+    (read-byte s)
+    (read-byte s)))
+
+;;; APD's simplified test case
+(defun debug-return-catch-break2 (x)
+  (declare (type (vector (unsigned-byte 8)) x))
+  (setq *y* (the (unsigned-byte 8) (aref x 4))))
+
+;;; FUNCTION-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION should return something that's COMPILE
+;;; can understand.  Here's a simple test for that on a function
+;;; that's likely to return a hairier list than just a lambda:
+(macrolet ((def (fn) `(progn
+		       (declaim (inline ,fn))
+		       (defun ,fn (x) (1+ x)))))
+  (def bug228))
+(let ((x (function-lambda-expression #'bug228)))
+  (when x
+    (assert (= (funcall (compile nil x) 1) 2))))
+
+;;; Bug reported by reported by rif on c.l.l 2003-03-05
+(defun test-type-of-special-1 (x)
+  (declare (special x)
+           (fixnum x)
+           (optimize (safety 3)))
+  (list x))
+(defun test-type-of-special-2 (x)
+  (declare (special x)
+           (fixnum x)
+           (optimize (safety 3)))
+  (list x (setq x (/ x 2)) x))
+(assert (raises-error? (test-type-of-special-1 3/2) type-error))
+(assert (raises-error? (test-type-of-special-2 3) type-error))
+(assert (equal (test-type-of-special-2 8) '(8 4 4)))
+
+;;; bug which existed in 0.8alpha.0.4 for several milliseconds before
+;;; APD fixed it in 0.8alpha.0.5
+(defun frob8alpha04 (x y)
+  (+ x y))
+(defun baz8alpha04 (this kids)
+  (flet ((n-i (&rest rest)
+	   ;; Removing the #+NIL here makes the bug go away.
+	   #+nil (format t "~&in N-I REST=~S~%" rest)
+	   (apply #'frob8alpha04 this rest)))
+    (n-i kids)))
+;;; failed in 0.8alpha.0.4 with "The value 13 is not of type LIST."
+(assert (= (baz8alpha04 12 13) 25))
+
 ;;;; tests not in the problem domain, but of the consistency of the
 ;;;; compiler machinery itself