X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Fcompiler.pure.lisp;h=130a5af0f735075fa892447cb1ebb698853bc702;hb=3a8bfcb01abe4d8eeb9ef1343d623dbbf57c19d9;hp=704a693d34b6ebba66c7a9a5ed48d99069038086;hpb=a260738d7a71680079d972b102b4e4db4e8dc3ae;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/tests/compiler.pure.lisp b/tests/compiler.pure.lisp index 704a693..130a5af 100644 --- a/tests/compiler.pure.lisp +++ b/tests/compiler.pure.lisp @@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ (assert (null result)) (assert (typep error 'program-error))) +;;; ECASE should treat a bare T as a literal key (multiple-value-bind (result error) (ignore-errors (ecase 1 (t 0))) (assert (null result)) @@ -234,3 +235,89 @@ ;;; FTYPE should accept any functional type specifier (compile nil '(lambda (x) (declare (ftype function f)) (f x))) + +;;; FUNCALL of special operators and macros should signal an +;;; UNDEFINED-FUNCTION error +(multiple-value-bind (result error) + (ignore-errors (funcall 'quote 1)) + (assert (null result)) + (assert (typep error 'undefined-function)) + (assert (eq (cell-error-name error) 'quote))) +(multiple-value-bind (result error) + (ignore-errors (funcall 'and 1)) + (assert (null result)) + (assert (typep error 'undefined-function)) + (assert (eq (cell-error-name error) 'and))) + +;;; PSETQ should behave when given complex symbol-macro arguments +(multiple-value-bind (sequence index) + (symbol-macrolet ((x (aref a (incf i))) + (y (aref a (incf i)))) + (let ((a (copy-seq #(0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9))) + (i 0)) + (psetq x (aref a (incf i)) + y (aref a (incf i))) + (values a i))) + (assert (equalp sequence #(0 2 2 4 4 5 6 7 8 9))) + (assert (= index 4))) + +(multiple-value-bind (result error) + (ignore-errors + (let ((x (list 1 2))) + (psetq (car x) 3) + x)) + (assert (null result)) + (assert (typep error 'program-error))) + +;;; COPY-SEQ should work on known-complex vectors: +(assert (equalp #(1) + (let ((v (make-array 0 :fill-pointer 0))) + (vector-push-extend 1 v) + (copy-seq v)))) + +;;; to support INLINE functions inside MACROLET, it is necessary for +;;; FUNCTION-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION to return a proper lambda expression in +;;; certain circumstances, one of which is when compile is called from +;;; top-level. +(assert (equal + (function-lambda-expression + (compile nil '(lambda (x) (block nil (print x))))) + '(lambda (x) (block nil (print x))))) + +;;; bug 62: too cautious type inference in a loop +(assert (nth-value + 2 + (compile nil + '(lambda (a) + (declare (optimize speed (safety 0))) + (typecase a + (array (loop (print (car a))))))))) + +;;; Bug reported by Robert E. Brown sbcl-devel 2003-02-02: compiler +;;; failure +(compile nil + '(lambda (key tree collect-path-p) + (let ((lessp (key-lessp tree)) + (equalp (key-equalp tree))) + (declare (type (function (t t) boolean) lessp equalp)) + (let ((path '(nil))) + (loop for node = (root-node tree) + then (if (funcall lessp key (node-key node)) + (left-child node) + (right-child node)) + when (null node) + do (return (values nil nil nil)) + do (when collect-path-p + (push node path)) + (when (funcall equalp key (node-key node)) + (return (values node path t)))))))) + +;;; CONSTANTLY should return a side-effect-free function (bug caught +;;; by Paul Dietz' test suite) +(let ((i 0)) + (let ((fn (constantly (progn (incf i) 1)))) + (assert (= i 1)) + (assert (= (funcall fn) 1)) + (assert (= i 1)) + (assert (= (funcall fn) 1)) + (assert (= i 1))))