X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Fcompiler.pure.lisp;h=948d419bbc8d7b2d882a2efda56e893b4d0da6e4;hb=2b596efa9a6b08a22bbdcdf88198c5d2af1d0335;hp=30cc9dcf851d272b94bba2722b8d909ee0ca8c43;hpb=3cf5c8351289d390112a3842b6c03e17cee20211;p=sbcl.git

diff --git a/tests/compiler.pure.lisp b/tests/compiler.pure.lisp
index 30cc9dc..948d419 100644
--- a/tests/compiler.pure.lisp
+++ b/tests/compiler.pure.lisp
@@ -446,8 +446,8 @@
                                 (declare (notinline mapcar))
                                 (1+ (mapcar #'print '(1 2 3)))))))
 
-;; bug found by Paul Dietz: (SETF AREF) for bit vectors with constant
-;; index was effectless
+;;; bug found by Paul Dietz: (SETF AREF) for bit vectors with constant
+;;; index was effectless
 (let ((f (compile nil '(lambda (a v)
                         (declare (type simple-bit-vector a) (type bit v))
                         (declare (optimize (speed 3) (safety 0)))
@@ -457,3 +457,66 @@
     (assert (equal y #*00))
     (funcall f y 1)
     (assert (equal y #*10))))
+
+(handler-bind ((sb-ext:compiler-note #'error))
+  (compile nil '(lambda (x)
+		 (declare (type (simple-array (simple-string 3) (5)) x))
+		 (aref (aref x 0) 0))))
+
+;;; compiler failure
+(let ((f (compile nil '(lambda (x) (typep x '(not (member 0d0)))))))
+  (assert (funcall f 1d0)))
+
+(compile nil '(lambda (x)
+	       (declare (double-float x))
+	       (let ((y (* x pi)))
+		 (atan y y))))
+
+;;; bogus optimization of BIT-NOT
+(multiple-value-bind (result x)
+    (eval '(let ((x (eval #*1001)))
+            (declare (optimize (speed 2) (space 3))
+                     (type (bit-vector) x))
+            (values (bit-not x nil) x)))
+  (assert (equal x #*1001))
+  (assert (equal result #*0110)))
+
+;;; the VECTOR type in CONCATENATE/MERGE/MAKE-SEQUENCE means (VECTOR T).
+(handler-bind ((sb-ext:compiler-note #'error))
+  (assert (equalp (funcall
+		   (compile
+		    nil
+		    '(lambda ()
+		      (let ((x (make-sequence 'vector 10 :initial-element 'a)))
+			(setf (aref x 4) 'b)
+			x))))
+		  #(a a a a b a a a a a))))
+
+;;; this is not a check for a bug, but rather a test of compiler
+;;; quality
+(dolist (type '((integer 0 *)           ; upper bound
+                (real (-1) *)
+                float                   ; class
+                (real * (-10))          ; lower bound
+                ))
+  (assert (nth-value
+           1 (compile nil
+                      `(lambda (n)
+                         (declare (optimize (speed 3) (compilation-speed 0)))
+                         (loop for i from 1 to (the (integer -17 10) n) by 2
+                               collect (when (> (random 10) 5)
+                                         (the ,type (- i 11)))))))))
+
+;;; bug 278b
+;;;
+;;; We suppose that INTEGER arithmetic cannot be efficient, and the
+;;; compiler has an optimized VOP for +; so this code should cause an
+;;; efficiency note.
+(assert (eq (block nil
+              (handler-case
+                  (compile nil '(lambda (i)
+                                 (declare (optimize speed))
+                                 (declare (type integer i))
+                                 (+ i 2)))
+                (sb-ext:compiler-note (c) (return :good))))
+            :good))