X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Fcompiler.pure.lisp;h=9eac7fb3ecaf5e8fac388f688b942cb5f4d9d671;hb=19b57ee6640261133a179417c814ca38039e1ab1;hp=38aebc8bc703885549d7cd9cffd3db2181027075;hpb=5eb97830eca716fef626c6e12429c99c9b97e3c8;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/tests/compiler.pure.lisp b/tests/compiler.pure.lisp index 38aebc8..9eac7fb 100644 --- a/tests/compiler.pure.lisp +++ b/tests/compiler.pure.lisp @@ -1,3 +1,16 @@ +;;;; various compiler tests without side effects + +;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for +;;;; more information. +;;;; +;;;; While most of SBCL is derived from the CMU CL system, the test +;;;; files (like this one) were written from scratch after the fork +;;;; from CMU CL. +;;;; +;;;; This software is in the public domain and is provided with +;;;; absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS files for +;;;; more information. + (cl:in-package :cl-user) ;;; Exercise a compiler bug (by crashing the compiler). @@ -43,3 +56,87 @@ (frob (mrstk x))) nil)))) 13) + +;;; bug 112, reported by Martin Atzmueller 2001-06-25 (originally +;;; from Bruno Haible in CMU CL bugs collection), fixed by +;;; Alexey Dejneka 2002-01-27 +(assert (= 1 ; (used to give 0 under bug 112) + (let ((x 0)) + (declare (special x)) + (let ((x 1)) + (let ((y x)) + (declare (special x)) y))))) +(assert (= 1 ; (used to give 1 even under bug 112, still works after fix) + (let ((x 0)) + (declare (special x)) + (let ((x 1)) + (let ((y x) (x 5)) + (declare (special x)) y))))) + +;;; another LET-related bug fixed by Alexey Dejneka at the same +;;; time as bug 112 +(multiple-value-bind (value error) + (ignore-errors + ;; should complain about duplicate variable names in LET binding + (compile nil + '(lambda () + (let (x + (x 1)) + (list x))))) + (assert (null value)) + (assert (typep error 'error))) + +;;; bug 169 (reported by Alexey Dejneka 2002-05-12, fixed by David +;;; Lichteblau 2002-05-21) +(progn + (multiple-value-bind (fun warnings-p failure-p) + (compile nil + ;; Compiling this code should cause a STYLE-WARNING + ;; about *X* looking like a special variable but not + ;; being one. + '(lambda (n) + (let ((*x* n)) + (funcall (symbol-function 'x-getter)) + (print *x*)))) + (assert (functionp fun)) + (assert warnings-p) + (assert (not failure-p))) + (multiple-value-bind (fun warnings-p failure-p) + (compile nil + ;; Compiling this code should not cause a warning + ;; (because the DECLARE turns *X* into a special + ;; variable as its name suggests it should be). + '(lambda (n) + (let ((*x* n)) + (declare (special *x*)) + (funcall (symbol-function 'x-getter)) + (print *x*)))) + (assert (functionp fun)) + (assert (not warnings-p)) + (assert (not failure-p)))) + +;;; a bug in 0.7.4.11 +(dolist (i '(a b 1 2 "x" "y")) + ;; In sbcl-0.7.4.11, the compiler tried to source-transform the + ;; TYPEP here but got confused and died, doing + ;; (ASSOC '(AND INTEGERP (SATISFIES PLUSP))) + ;; *BACKEND-TYPE-PREDICATES* + ;; :TEST #'TYPE=) + ;; and blowing up because TYPE= tried to call PLUSP on the + ;; characters of the MEMBER-TYPE representing STANDARD-CHAR. + (when (typep i '(and integer (satisfies oddp))) + (print i))) +(dotimes (i 14) + (when (typep i '(and integer (satisfies oddp))) + (print i))) + +;;; bug 156 (reported by APD sbcl-devel 2002-04-12, fixed by CSR patch +;;; sbcl-devel 2002-07-02): FUNCTION-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION of +;;; interactively-compiled functions was broken by sleaziness and +;;; confusion in the assault on 0.7.0, so this expression used to +;;; signal TYPE-ERROR when it found NIL instead of a DEBUG-SOURCE. +(eval '(function-lambda-expression #'(lambda (x) x))) + +;;; bug caught and fixed by Raymond Toy cmucl-imp 2002-07-10: &REST +;;; variable is not optional. +(assert (null (ignore-errors (eval '(funcall (lambda (&rest) 12))))))