X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Fcompiler.pure.lisp;h=ad1853d8e07c75eec98e3756352d7e9e47c6362a;hb=d3c56c291d4d4eff8c3ec234d5ed904fe5b55df4;hp=c1cb8f6c1b3c76f56bad249c70b3a05bdf8c3ef2;hpb=b314841f7aa9e9236e8d5097a34f4f28349b408b;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/tests/compiler.pure.lisp b/tests/compiler.pure.lisp index c1cb8f6..ad1853d 100644 --- a/tests/compiler.pure.lisp +++ b/tests/compiler.pure.lisp @@ -587,7 +587,106 @@ ;;; Alpha floating point modes weren't being reset after an exception, ;;; leading to an exception on the second compile, below. (compile nil '(lambda (x y) (declare (type (double-float 0.0d0) x y)) (/ x y))) -(handler-bind ((arithmetic-error #'abort)) +(handler-case (/ 1.0 0.0) ;; provoke an exception - (/ 1.0 0.0)) + (arithmetic-error ())) (compile nil '(lambda (x y) (declare (type (double-float 0.0d0) x y)) (/ x y))) + +;;; bug reported by Paul Dietz: component last block does not have +;;; start ctran +(compile nil + '(lambda () + (declare (notinline + logand) + (optimize (speed 0))) + (LOGAND + (BLOCK B5 + (FLET ((%F1 () + (RETURN-FROM B5 -220))) + (LET ((V7 (%F1))) + (+ 359749 35728422)))) + -24076))) + +;;; bug 294 reported by Paul Dietz: miscompilation of REM and MOD +(assert (= (funcall (compile nil `(lambda (b) + (declare (optimize (speed 3)) + (type (integer 2 152044363) b)) + (rem b (min -16 0)))) + 108251912) + 8)) + +(assert (= (funcall (compile nil `(lambda (c) + (declare (optimize (speed 3)) + (type (integer 23062188 149459656) c)) + (mod c (min -2 0)))) + 95019853) + -1)) + +;;; bug reported by Paul Dietz: block splitting inside FLUSH-DEAD-CODE +(compile nil + '(LAMBDA (A B C) + (BLOCK B6 + (LOGEQV (REM C -6758) + (REM B (MAX 44 (RETURN-FROM B6 A))))))) + +(compile nil '(lambda () + (block nil + (flet ((foo (x y) (if (> x y) (print x) (print y)))) + (foo 1 2) + (bar) + (foo (return 14) 2))))) + +;;; bug in Alpha backend: not enough sanity checking of arguments to +;;; instructions +(assert (= (funcall (compile nil + '(lambda (x) + (declare (fixnum x)) + (ash x -257))) + 1024) + 0)) + +;;; bug found by WHN and pfdietz: compiler failure while referencing +;;; an entry point inside a deleted lambda +(compile nil '(lambda () + (let (r3533) + (flet ((bbfn () + (setf r3533 + (progn + (flet ((truly (fn bbd) + (let (r3534) + (let ((p3537 nil)) + (unwind-protect + (multiple-value-prog1 + (progn + (setf r3534 + (progn + (bubf bbd t) + (flet ((c-3536 () + (funcall fn))) + (cdec #'c-3536 + (vector bbd)))))) + (setf p3537 t)) + (unless p3537 + (error "j")))) + r3534)) + (c (pd) (pdc pd))) + (let ((a (smock a)) + (b (smock b)) + (b (smock c))))))))) + (wum #'bbfn "hc3" (list))) + r3533))) +(compile nil '(lambda () (flet ((%f () (unwind-protect nil))) nil))) + +;;; the strength reduction of constant multiplication used (before +;;; sbcl-0.8.4.x) to lie to the compiler. This meant that, under +;;; certain circumstances, the compiler would derive that a perfectly +;;; reasonable multiplication never returned, causing chaos. Fixed by +;;; explicitly doing modular arithmetic, and relying on the backends +;;; being smart. +(assert (= (funcall + (compile nil + '(lambda (x) + (declare (type (integer 178956970 178956970) x) + (optimize speed)) + (* x 24))) + 178956970) + 4294967280))