X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Fcompiler.pure.lisp;h=cadd0b07358dc2978b012fe9005b08af59903c66;hb=75b52379bdc2269961af6a1308eca63610f38ac3;hp=28b32428f587b001b3fb4a8baeb9f98a381aeec5;hpb=c8cc0137e55e6179f6af344f42e54f514660f68b;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/tests/compiler.pure.lisp b/tests/compiler.pure.lisp index 28b3242..cadd0b0 100644 --- a/tests/compiler.pure.lisp +++ b/tests/compiler.pure.lisp @@ -1372,3 +1372,71 @@ (progn (if (ldb-test (byte 0 0) (rational (throw 'ct7 0))) 0 0) 0)))) 0 0)))) 391833530 -32785211))) + +;;; efficiency notes for ordinary code +(macrolet ((frob (arglist &body body) + `(progn + (handler-case + (compile nil '(lambda ,arglist ,@body)) + (sb-ext:compiler-note (e) + (error "bad compiler note for ~S:~% ~A" ',body e))) + (catch :got-note + (handler-case + (compile nil '(lambda ,arglist (declare (optimize speed)) + ,@body)) + (sb-ext:compiler-note (e) (throw :got-note nil))) + (error "missing compiler note for ~S" ',body))))) + (frob (x) (funcall x)) + (frob (x y) (find x y)) + (frob (x y) (find-if x y)) + (frob (x y) (find-if-not x y)) + (frob (x y) (position x y)) + (frob (x y) (position-if x y)) + (frob (x y) (position-if-not x y)) + (frob (x) (aref x 0))) + +(macrolet ((frob (style-warn-p form) + (if style-warn-p + `(catch :got-style-warning + (handler-case + (eval ',form) + (style-warning (e) (throw :got-style-warning nil))) + (error "missing style-warning for ~S" ',form)) + `(handler-case + (eval ',form) + (style-warning (e) + (error "bad style-warning for ~S: ~A" ',form e)))))) + (frob t (lambda (x &optional y &key z) (list x y z))) + (frob nil (lambda (x &optional y z) (list x y z))) + (frob nil (lambda (x &key y z) (list x y z))) + (frob t (defgeneric #:foo (x &optional y &key z))) + (frob nil (defgeneric #:foo (x &optional y z))) + (frob nil (defgeneric #:foo (x &key y z))) + (frob t (defun #:foo (x) (flet ((foo (x &optional y &key z) (list x y z))) (foo x x :z x))))) + +;;; this was a bug in the LOGXOR type deriver. The top form gave a +;;; note, because the system failed to derive the fact that the return +;;; from LOGXOR was small and negative, though the bottom one worked. +(handler-bind ((sb-ext:compiler-note #'error)) + (compile nil '(lambda () + (declare (optimize speed (safety 0))) + (lambda (x y) + (declare (type (integer 3 6) x) + (type (integer -6 -3) y)) + (+ (logxor x y) most-positive-fixnum))))) +(handler-bind ((sb-ext:compiler-note #'error)) + (compile nil '(lambda () + (declare (optimize speed (safety 0))) + (lambda (x y) + (declare (type (integer 3 6) y) + (type (integer -6 -3) x)) + (+ (logxor x y) most-positive-fixnum))))) + +;;; check that modular ash gives the right answer, to protect against +;;; possible misunderstandings about the hardware shift instruction. +(assert (zerop (funcall + (compile nil '(lambda (x y) + (declare (optimize speed) + (type (unsigned-byte 32) x y)) + (logand #xffffffff (ash x y)))) + 1 257)))