X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Fcompiler.test.sh;h=45acaba67c84ac61625497debc2426bede414204;hb=04d819bb1a2e64de4e997203b9516229bb73c686;hp=4c731b23dc1e1721e02bf35b695b9990e6697692;hpb=5b43e28a5a9f0fcdefc2132840492e2e382876c6;p=sbcl.git

diff --git a/tests/compiler.test.sh b/tests/compiler.test.sh
index 4c731b2..45acaba 100644
--- a/tests/compiler.test.sh
+++ b/tests/compiler.test.sh
@@ -6,12 +6,12 @@
 # While most of SBCL is derived from the CMU CL system, the test
 # files (like this one) were written from scratch after the fork
 # from CMU CL.
-# 
+#
 # This software is in the public domain and is provided with
 # absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS files for
 # more information.
 
-. expect.sh
+. ./expect.sh
 
 base_tmpfilename="compiler-test-$$-tmp"
 tmpfilename="$base_tmpfilename.lisp"
@@ -39,17 +39,34 @@ expect_failed_compile $tmpfilename
 # having the same name.
 cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
     (in-package :cl-user)
-    (defun foo (x) 
+    (defun foo (x)
       (flet ((baz (y) (load y)))
         (declare (notinline baz))
         (baz x)))
-    (defun bar (x) 
+    (defun bar (x)
       (flet ((baz (y) (load y)))
         (declare (notinline baz))
         (baz x)))
 EOF
 expect_clean_compile $tmpfilename
 
+# This shouldn't fail because it's not really a multiple definition
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+    (in-package :cl-user)
+    (eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
+      (defun foo (x) x))
+EOF
+expect_clean_compile $tmpfilename
+
+# Likewise
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+    (in-package :cl-user)
+    (eval-when (:compile-toplevel)
+      (defun foo (x) x))
+    (defun foo (x) x)
+EOF
+expect_clean_compile $tmpfilename
+
 # This shouldn't fail despite the apparent type mismatch, because of
 # the NOTINLINE declamation.
 cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
@@ -60,12 +77,23 @@ cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
 EOF
 expect_clean_compile $tmpfilename
 
+# This shouldn't fail, but did until sbcl-0.8.10.4x
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+    (in-package :cl-user)
+    (declaim (inline foo))
+    (defun foo (x)
+      (1+ x))
+    (defun bar (y)
+      (list (foo y) (if (> y 1) (funcall (if (> y 0) #'foo #'identity) y))))
+EOF
+expect_clean_compile $tmpfilename
+
 # This shouldn't fail despite the apparent type mismatch, because of
 # the NOTINLINE declaration.
 cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
     (in-package :cl-user)
     (defun foo (x) (list x))
-    (defun bar (x) 
+    (defun bar (x)
       (declare (notinline foo))
       (1+ (foo x)))
 EOF
@@ -130,8 +158,202 @@ cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
 EOF
 fail_on_compiler_note $tmpfilename
 
+# test case from Rudi for some CLOS WARNINGness that shouldn't have
+# been there
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+    (eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
+      (defstruct buffer-state
+        (output-index 0)))
+
+    (defclass buffered-stream-mixin ()
+      ((buffer-state :initform (make-buffer-state))))
+
+    (defgeneric frob (stream))
+    (defmethod frob ((stream t))
+      nil)
+    (defmethod frob ((stream buffered-stream-mixin))
+      (symbol-macrolet
+            ((index (buffer-state-output-index (slot-value stream 'buffer-state))))
+          (setf index 0))
+      (call-next-method))
+EOF
+expect_clean_compile $tmpfilename
+
+# undeclared unbound variables should cause a full warning, as they
+# invoke undefined behaviour
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+    (defun foo () x)
+EOF
+expect_failed_compile $tmpfilename
+
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+    (declaim (special *x*))
+    (defun foo () *x*)
+EOF
+expect_clean_compile $tmpfilename
+
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+    (defun foo () (declare (special x)) x)
+EOF
+expect_clean_compile $tmpfilename
+
+# MUFFLE-CONDITIONS tests
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+    (defun foo ()
+      (declare (muffle-conditions style-warning))
+      (bar))
+EOF
+expect_clean_compile $tmpfilename
+
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+    (defun foo ()
+      (declare (muffle-conditions code-deletion-note))
+      (if t (foo) (foo)))
+EOF
+fail_on_compiler_note $tmpfilename
+
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+    (defun foo (x y)
+      (declare (muffle-conditions compiler-note))
+      (declare (optimize speed))
+      (+ x y))
+EOF
+fail_on_compiler_note $tmpfilename
+
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+    (declaim (muffle-conditions compiler-note))
+    (defun foo (x y)
+      (declare (optimize speed))
+      (+ x y))
+EOF
+fail_on_compiler_note $tmpfilename
+
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+    (declaim (muffle-conditions compiler-note))
+    (defun foo (x y)
+      (declare (unmuffle-conditions compiler-note))
+      (declare (optimize speed))
+      (+ x y))
+EOF
+expect_compiler_note $tmpfilename
+
+# undefined variable causes a WARNING
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+    (declaim (muffle-conditions warning))
+    (declaim (unmuffle-conditions style-warning))
+    (defun foo () x)
+EOF
+expect_clean_compile $tmpfilename
+
+# top level LOCALLY behaves nicely
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+    (locally
+      (declare (muffle-conditions warning))
+      (defun foo () x))
+EOF
+expect_clean_compile $tmpfilename
+
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+    (locally
+      (declare (muffle-conditions warning))
+      (defun foo () x))
+    (defun bar () x)
+EOF
+expect_failed_compile $tmpfilename
+
+# This should fail, and fail nicely -- not eg. loop trying to dump
+# references to the unbound variable.
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+(defmacro macro-with-unbound-variables (foo)
+  \`(print ,bar))
+
+(macro-with-unbound-variables 'xxx)
+EOF
+expect_failed_compile $tmpfilename
+
+# This should fail, as the MAKE-LOAD-FORM must be used for
+# externalizing conditions, and the method for CONDITION must signal
+# an error.
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+(defvar *oops* #.(make-condition 'condition))
+EOF
+expect_failed_compile $tmpfilename
+
+# This should fail, as the MAKE-LOAD-FORM must be used for objects,
+# and the method for STANDARD.OBJECT is required to signal an error.
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+(defvar *oops* #.(make-instance 'standard-object))
+EOF
+expect_failed_compile $tmpfilename
+
+# This should be clean
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+(defvar *string* (make-string 10 :element-type 'base-char))
+EOF
+expect_clean_compile $tmpfilename
+
+# This should style-warn (but not warn or otherwise fail) as the call
+# to FORMAT has too many arguments, which is bad style but not
+# otherwise fatal.
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+(defun foo (a b)
+  (format nil "abc~~def" a b))
+EOF
+expect_warned_compile $tmpfilename
+
+# Tests that destructive-functions on known-constant data cause
+# compile-time warnings.
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+(let ((string "foo"))
+  (defun foo ()
+    (setf string "bar")))
+EOF
+expect_clean_compile $tmpfilename
+
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+(defun foo ()
+  (let (result)
+    (nreverse result)))
+EOF
+expect_clean_compile $tmpfilename
+
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+(defun bar ()
+  (let ((result ""))
+    (nreverse result)))
+EOF
+expect_clean_compile $tmpfilename
+
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+(let ((string "foo"))
+  (defun foo ()
+    (replace string "bar")))
+EOF
+expect_failed_compile $tmpfilename
+
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+(defun foo ()
+  (setf (char "bar" 0) #\1))
+EOF
+expect_failed_compile $tmpfilename
+
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+(let ((foo '(1 2 3)))
+  (defun foo ()
+    (nconc foo foo)))
+EOF
+expect_failed_compile $tmpfilename
+
+cat > $tmpfilename <<EOF
+(declaim (optimize (speed 3) (space 0) (safety 0)))
+
+(defun foo (bar)
+  (last bar))
+EOF
+expect_clean_compile $tmpfilename
+
 rm $tmpfilename
 rm $compiled_tmpfilename
 
-# success 
+# success
 exit 104