X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Fdebug.impure.lisp;h=33b38613417058308b8c429d1f0d60b1d64f8657;hb=cf49f2d086069a9c1b57f501df9a6a0bd3a34c3c;hp=4d8ae6bc565eb4cb230e2e7af6ebddab3dad9a34;hpb=2050b7c3644ab235aaf1959795bb33e89bd571a3;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/tests/debug.impure.lisp b/tests/debug.impure.lisp index 4d8ae6b..33b3861 100644 --- a/tests/debug.impure.lisp +++ b/tests/debug.impure.lisp @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ ;;; The debugger doesn't have any native knowledge of the interpreter (when (eq sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :interpret) - (sb-ext:quit :unix-status 104)) + (sb-ext:exit :code 104)) ;;;; Check that we get debug arglists right. @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ ;;; and that it contains the frames we expect, doesn't contain any ;;; "bogus stack frame"s, and contains the appropriate toplevel call ;;; and hasn't been cut off anywhere. -(defun verify-backtrace (test-function frame-specs &key (allow-stunted nil)) +(defun verify-backtrace (test-function frame-specs &key (allow-stunted nil) details) (labels ((args-equal (want real) (cond ((eq '&rest (car want)) t) @@ -96,46 +96,72 @@ (handler-bind ((error (lambda (condition) ;; find the part of the backtrace we're interested in - (let* ((full-backtrace (sb-debug:backtrace-as-list)) - (backtrace (member (caar frame-specs) full-backtrace - :key #'car - :test #'equal))) - - (setf result condition) - - (unless backtrace - (format t "~&//~S not in backtrace:~% ~S~%" - (caar frame-specs) - full-backtrace) - (setf result nil)) - ;; check that we have all the frames we wanted - (mapcar - (lambda (spec frame) - (unless (or (not spec) - (and (equal (car spec) (car frame)) - (args-equal (cdr spec) - (cdr frame)))) - (print (list :wanted spec :got frame)) - (setf result nil))) - frame-specs - backtrace) - - ;; Make sure the backtrace isn't stunted in - ;; any way. (Depends on running in the main - ;; thread.) FIXME: On Windows we get two - ;; extra foreign frames below regular frames. - (unless (find '(sb-impl::toplevel-init) backtrace - :test #'equal) - (print (list :backtrace-stunted backtrace)) - (setf result nil)) - (return-from outer-handler))))) + (let (full-backtrace) + (sb-debug::map-backtrace + (lambda (frame) + (multiple-value-bind (name args info) + (sb-debug::frame-call frame #+nil #+nil + :replace-dynamic-extent-objects t) + (if details + (push (list (cons name args) info) full-backtrace) + (push (cons name args) full-backtrace))))) + + (setf full-backtrace (nreverse full-backtrace)) + (let ((backtrace (if details + (member (caaar frame-specs) + full-backtrace + :key #'caar + :test #'equal) + (member (caar frame-specs) + full-backtrace + :key #'car + :test #'equal)))) + + (setf result condition) + + (unless backtrace + (format t "~&//~S not in backtrace:~% ~S~%" + (caar frame-specs) + full-backtrace) + (setf result nil)) + ;; check that we have all the frames we wanted + (mapcar + (lambda (spec frame) + (unless (or (not spec) + (if details + (handler-case + (and (args-equal (car spec) + (car frame)) + (equal (cdr spec) (cdr frame))) + (error (e) + (print (list :spec spec :frame frame)) + (error e))) + (and (equal (car spec) (car frame)) + (args-equal (cdr spec) + (cdr frame))))) + (print (list :wanted spec :got frame)) + (setf result nil))) + frame-specs + backtrace) + + ;; Make sure the backtrace isn't stunted in + ;; any way. (Depends on running in the main + ;; thread.) FIXME: On Windows we get two + ;; extra foreign frames below regular frames. + (unless (find (if details + '((sb-impl::toplevel-init) ()) + '(sb-impl::toplevel-init)) + backtrace + :test #'equal) + (print (list :backtrace-stunted backtrace)) + (setf result nil)) + (return-from outer-handler)))))) (funcall test-function))) result))) (defvar *undefined-function-frame* ;; bug 353 - '(#+(or x86 x86-64) "bogus stack frame" - #-(or x86 x86-64) "undefined function")) + '("undefined function")) ;;; Test for "undefined function" (undefined_tramp) working properly. ;;; Try it with and without tail call elimination, since they can have @@ -152,7 +178,11 @@ (funcall fun))) (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-346) - :fails-on '(or :alpha :ppc :sparc :mips + ;; Failures on ALPHA, SPARC, MIPS, and probably + ;; HPPA are due to not having a full and valid + ;; stack frame for the undefined function frame. + ;; See PPC undefined_tramp for details. + :fails-on '(or :alpha :sparc :mips (and :x86-64 :freebsd))) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'optimized)) @@ -161,13 +191,7 @@ ;; bug 353: This test fails at least most of the time for x86/linux ;; ca. 0.8.20.16. -- WHN - (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-353) - ;; This used to have fewer :fails-on features pre-0.9.16.38, - ;; but it turns out that the bug was just being masked by - ;; the presence of the IR1 stepper instrumentation (and - ;; is thus again failing now that the instrumentation is - ;; no more). - :fails-on '(or :alpha :mips :ppc)) + (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-353)) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'not-optimized)) (list *undefined-function-frame* @@ -177,15 +201,15 @@ (with-test (:name :backtrace-interrupted-condition-wait :skipped-on '(not :sb-thread) ;; For some unfathomable reason the backtrace becomes - ;; stunted on Darwin, ending at _sigtramp, when we add - ;; :TIMEOUT NIL to the frame we expect. If we leave it out, - ;; the backtrace is fine -- but the test fails. I can only - ;; boggle right now. - :fails-on :darwin) + ;; stunted, ending at _sigtramp, when we add :TIMEOUT NIL to + ;; the frame we expect. If we leave it out, the backtrace is + ;; fine -- but the test fails. I can only boggle right now. + :fails-on `(or (and :x86 :linux) + :win32)) (let ((m (sb-thread:make-mutex)) (q (sb-thread:make-waitqueue))) (assert (verify-backtrace - (lambda () + (lambda () (sb-thread:with-mutex (m) (handler-bind ((timeout (lambda (c) (error "foo")))) @@ -236,24 +260,86 @@ (throw 'no-such-tag t)) (assert (verify-backtrace #'throw-test '((throw-test)))))) +(defun bug-308926 (x) + (let ((v "foo")) + (flet ((bar (z) + (oops v z) + (oops z v))) + (bar x) + (bar v)))) + +(with-test (:name :bug-308926) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-308926 13)) + '(((flet bar :in bug-308926) 13) + (bug-308926 &rest t))))) + +;;; Test backtrace through assembly routines +;;; :bug-800343 +(macrolet ((test (predicate fun + &optional (two-arg + (find-symbol (format nil "TWO-ARG-~A" fun) + "SB-KERNEL"))) + (let ((test-name (make-symbol (format nil "TEST-~A" fun)))) + `(flet ((,test-name (x y) + ;; make sure it's not in tail position + (list (,fun x y)))) + (with-test (:name (:bug-800343 ,fun)) + (assert (verify-backtrace + (lambda () + (eval `(funcall ,#',test-name 42 t))) + '((,two-arg 42 t) + #+(or x86 x86-64) + ,@(and predicate + '(("no debug information for frame"))) + ((flet ,test-name :in ,*p*) 42 t)))))))) + (test-predicates (&rest functions) + `(progn ,@(mapcar (lambda (function) + (if (consp function) + `(test t ,@function) + `(test t ,function))) + functions))) + (test-functions (&rest functions) + `(progn ,@(mapcar (lambda (function) + (if (consp function) + `(test nil ,@function) + `(test nil ,function))) + functions)))) + (test-predicates = < >) + (test-functions + - * / + gcd lcm + (logand sb-kernel:two-arg-and) + (logior sb-kernel:two-arg-ior) + (logxor sb-kernel:two-arg-xor))) + ;;; test entry point handling in backtraces (defun oops () (error "oops")) +(with-test (:name :xep-too-many-arguments) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (oops 1 2 3 4 5 6)) + '((oops ? ? ? ? ? ?))))) + (defmacro defbt (n ll &body body) - `(progn - ;; normal debug info - (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.1" n)) ,ll - ,@body) - ;; no arguments saved - (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.2" n)) ,ll - (declare (optimize (debug 1) (speed 3))) - ,@body) - ;; no lambda-list saved - (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.3" n)) ,ll - (declare (optimize (debug 0))) - ,@body))) + ;; WTF is this? This is a way to make these tests not depend so much on the + ;; details of LOAD/EVAL. Around 1.0.57 we changed %SIMPLE-EVAL to be + ;; slightly smarter, which meant that things which used to have xeps + ;; suddently had tl-xeps, etc. This takes care of that. + `(funcall + (compile nil + '(lambda () + (progn + ;; normal debug info + (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.1" n)) ,ll + ,@body) + ;; no arguments saved + (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.2" n)) ,ll + (declare (optimize (debug 1) (speed 3))) + ,@body) + ;; no lambda-list saved + (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.3" n)) ,ll + (declare (optimize (debug 0))) + ,@body)))))) (defbt 1 (&key key) (list key)) @@ -271,109 +357,108 @@ (defbt 5 (&optional (opt (oops))) (list opt)) -(defmacro with-details (bool &body body) - `(let ((sb-debug:*show-entry-point-details* ,bool)) - ,@body)) - (defun bug-354 (x) (error "XEPs in backtraces: ~S" x)) (with-test (:name :bug-354) - (with-details t - (assert (not (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-354 354)) - '((bug-354 &rest) - ((sb-c::tl-xep bug-354) &rest)))))) + (assert (not (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-354 354)) + '((bug-354 354) + (((bug-354 &rest) (:tl :external)) 354))))) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-354 354)) '((bug-354 354))))) ;;; FIXME: This test really should be broken into smaller pieces (with-test (:name (:backtrace :tl-xep)) - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring - '(((sb-c::tl-xep namestring) 0 ?))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring - '((namestring)))))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring + '(((namestring) (:tl :external))) + :details t)) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring + '((namestring))))) (with-test (:name (:backtrace :more-processor)) - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key)) - '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.1) &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key)) - '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.2) &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key)) - '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.3) &rest))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key)) - '((bt.1.1 :key)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key)) - '((bt.1.2 &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key)) - '((bt.1.3 &rest)))))) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key)) + '(((bt.1.1 :key) (:more :optional))) + :details t)) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key)) + '(((bt.1.2 ?) (:more :optional))) + :details t)) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key)) + '(((bt.1.3 &rest) (:more :optional))) + :details t)) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key)) + '((bt.1.1 :key)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key)) + '((bt.1.2 &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key)) + '((bt.1.3 &rest))))) (with-test (:name (:backtrace :xep)) - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1 - '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.1) 0 ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2 - '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.2) &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3 - '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.3) &rest))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1 - '((bt.2.1)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2 - '((bt.2.2 &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3 - '((bt.2.3 &rest)))))) - + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1 + '(((bt.2.1) (:external))) + :details t)) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2 + '(((bt.2.2 &rest) (:external))) + :details t)) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3 + '(((bt.2.3 &rest) (:external))) + :details t)) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1 + '((bt.2.1)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2 + '((bt.2.2 &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3 + '((bt.2.3 &rest))))) + +;;; This test is somewhat deceptively named. Due to confusion in debug naming +;;; these functions used to have sb-c::varargs-entry debug names for their +;;; main lambda. (with-test (:name (:backtrace :varargs-entry)) - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1 - '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.1) :key nil)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2 - '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.2) :key ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3 - '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.3) &rest))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1 - '((bt.3.1 :key nil)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2 - '((bt.3.2 :key ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3 - '((bt.3.3 &rest)))))) - + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1 + '((bt.3.1 :key nil)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2 + '((bt.3.2 :key ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3 + '((bt.3.3 &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1 + '((bt.3.1 :key nil)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2 + '((bt.3.2 :key ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3 + '((bt.3.3 &rest))))) + +;;; This test is somewhat deceptively named. Due to confusion in debug naming +;;; these functions used to have sb-c::hairy-args-processor debug names for +;;; their main lambda. (with-test (:name (:backtrace :hairy-args-processor)) - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1 - '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.1) ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2 - '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.2) ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3 - '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.3) &rest))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1 - '((bt.4.1 ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2 - '((bt.4.2 ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3 - '((bt.4.3 &rest)))))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1 + '((bt.4.1 ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2 + '((bt.4.2 ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3 + '((bt.4.3 &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1 + '((bt.4.1 ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2 + '((bt.4.2 ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3 + '((bt.4.3 &rest))))) (with-test (:name (:backtrace :optional-processor)) - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1 - '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.1))))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2 - '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.2) &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3 - '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.3) &rest))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1 - '((bt.5.1)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2 - '((bt.5.2 &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3 - '((bt.5.3 &rest)))))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1 + '(((bt.5.1) (:optional))) + :details t)) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2 + '(((bt.5.2 &rest) (:optional))) + :details t)) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3 + '(((bt.5.3 &rest) (:optional))) + :details t)) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1 + '((bt.5.1)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2 + '((bt.5.2 &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3 + '((bt.5.3 &rest))))) (write-line "//compile nil") (defvar *compile-nil-error* (compile nil '(lambda (x) (cons (when x (error "oops")) nil)))) @@ -462,7 +547,7 @@ (assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out)) (assert (search "returned OK" out)))) -(with-test (:name (trace-recursive :encapsulate nil) +(with-test (:name (:trace-recursive :encapsulate nil) :fails-on '(or (and :ppc (not :linux)) :sparc :mips :sunos) :broken-on '(or :darwin (and :x86 :sunos))) (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*) @@ -496,7 +581,7 @@ (declare (dynamic-extent dx-arg)) (flet ((dx-arg-backtrace (x) (declare (optimize (debug 2))) - (prog1 (sb-debug:backtrace-as-list 10) + (prog1 (sb-debug:list-backtrace :count 10) (assert (sb-debug::stack-allocated-p x))))) (declare (notinline dx-arg-backtrace)) (assert (member-if (lambda (frame) @@ -514,7 +599,8 @@ ((error (lambda (e) (declare (ignore e)) (handler-case - (sb-debug:backtrace 100 (make-broadcast-stream)) + (sb-debug:print-backtrace :count 100 + :stream (make-broadcast-stream)) (error () (throw 'done :error)) (:no-error () @@ -536,7 +622,7 @@ (format t "recursive condition: ~A~%" condition) (force-output) (error "recursive condition: ~A" condition))) -(defun test-inifinite-error-protection () +(defun test-infinite-error-protection () ;; after 50 successful throws to SB-IMPL::TOPLEVEL-CATCHER sbcl used ;; to halt, it produces so much garbage that's hard to suppress that ;; it is tested only once @@ -554,14 +640,14 @@ :normal-exit))))))) (write-line "--END OF H-B-A-B--")) -(with-test (:name infinite-error-protection) +(with-test (:name :infinite-error-protection) (enable-debugger) - (test-inifinite-error-protection)) + (test-infinite-error-protection)) -(with-test (:name (infinite-error-protection :thread) +(with-test (:name (:infinite-error-protection :thread) :skipped-on '(not :sb-thread)) (enable-debugger) - (let ((thread (sb-thread:make-thread #'test-inifinite-error-protection))) + (let ((thread (sb-thread:make-thread #'test-infinite-error-protection))) (loop while (sb-thread:thread-alive-p thread)))) ;; unconditional, in case either previous left it enabled @@ -572,7 +658,7 @@ ;;; Older GENCGC systems had a bug in the pointer validation used by ;;; MAKE-LISP-OBJ that made SIMPLE-FUN objects always fail to ;;; validate. -(with-test (:name (make-lisp-obj :simple-funs)) +(with-test (:name (:make-lisp-obj :simple-funs)) (sb-sys:without-gcing (assert (eq #'identity (sb-kernel:make-lisp-obj @@ -581,7 +667,7 @@ ;;; Older CHENEYGC systems didn't perform any real pointer validity ;;; checks beyond "is this pointer to somewhere in heap space". -(with-test (:name (make-lisp-obj :pointer-validation)) +(with-test (:name (:make-lisp-obj :pointer-validation)) ;; Fun and games: We need to test MAKE-LISP-OBJ with a known-bogus ;; address, but we also need the GC to not pitch a fit if it sees an ;; object with said bogus address. Thus, construct our known-bogus @@ -596,9 +682,153 @@ (vector-data-address (sb-sys:sap-int (sb-kernel::vector-sap memory))) (object-base-address (logandc2 (+ vector-data-address sb-vm:lowtag-mask) sb-vm:lowtag-mask)) (object-tagged-address (+ object-base-address sb-vm:list-pointer-lowtag))) - (multiple-value-bind - (object valid-p) + (multiple-value-bind (object valid-p) (sb-kernel:make-lisp-obj object-tagged-address nil) + (declare (ignore object)) (assert (not valid-p))))) +(defun test-debugger (control form &rest targets) + (let ((out (make-string-output-stream)) + (oops t)) + (unwind-protect + (progn + (with-simple-restart (debugger-test-done! "Debugger Test Done!") + (let* ((*debug-io* (make-two-way-stream + (make-string-input-stream control) + (make-broadcast-stream out #+nil *standard-output*))) + ;; Initial announcement goes to *ERROR-OUTPUT* + (*error-output* *debug-io*) + (*invoke-debugger-hook* nil)) + (handler-bind ((error #'invoke-debugger)) + (eval form)))) + (setf oops nil)) + (when oops + (error "Uncontrolled unwind from debugger test."))) + ;; For sanity's sake this is outside the *debug-io* rebinding -- otherwise + ;; it could swallow our asserts! + (with-input-from-string (s (get-output-stream-string out)) + (loop for line = (read-line s nil) + while line + do (assert targets) + #+nil + (format *error-output* "Got: ~A~%" line) + (let ((match (pop targets))) + (if (eq '* match) + ;; Whatever, till the next line matches. + (let ((text (pop targets))) + #+nil + (format *error-output* "Looking for: ~A~%" text) + (unless (search text line) + (push text targets) + (push match targets))) + (unless (search match line) + (format *error-output* "~&Wanted: ~S~% Got: ~S~%" match line) + (setf oops t)))))) + ;; Check that we saw everything we wanted + (when targets + (error "Missed: ~S" targets)) + (assert (not oops)))) + +(with-test (:name (:debugger :source 1)) + (test-debugger + "d + source 0 + debugger-test-done!" + `(progn + (defun this-will-break (x) + (declare (optimize debug)) + (let* ((y (- x x)) + (z (/ x y))) + (+ x z))) + (this-will-break 1)) + '* + "debugger invoked" + '* + "DIVISION-BY-ZERO" + "operands (1 0)" + '* + "INTEGER-/-INTEGER" + "(THIS-WILL-BREAK 1)" + "1]" + "(/ X Y)" + "1]")) + +(with-test (:name (:debugger :source 2)) + (test-debugger + "d + source 0 + debugger-test-done!" + `(locally (declare (optimize (speed 0) (safety 3) (debug 3))) + (let ((f #'(lambda (x cont) + (print x (make-broadcast-stream)) + (if (zerop x) + (error "~%foo") + (funcall cont (1- x) cont))))) + (funcall f 10 f))) + '* + "debugger" + '* + "foo" + '* + "source: (ERROR \"~%foo\")" + '* + "(LAMBDA (X CONT)" + '* + "(FUNCALL CONT (1- X) CONT)" + "1]")) + +(with-test (:name (disassemble :high-debug-eval)) + (eval `(defun this-will-be-disassembled (x) + (declare (optimize debug)) + (+ x x))) + (let* ((oopses (make-string-output-stream)) + (disassembly + (let ((*error-output* oopses)) + (with-output-to-string (*standard-output*) + (disassemble 'this-will-be-disassembled))))) + (with-input-from-string (s disassembly) + (assert (search "; disassembly for THIS-WILL-BE-DISASSEMBLED" + (read-line s)))) + (let ((problems (get-output-stream-string oopses))) + (unless (zerop (length problems)) + (error problems))))) + +(defun this-too-will-be-disasssembled (x) + (declare (optimize debug)) + (+ x x)) + +(with-test (:name (disassemble :high-debug-load)) + (let* ((oopses (make-string-output-stream)) + (disassembly + (let ((*error-output* oopses)) + (with-output-to-string (*standard-output*) + (disassemble 'this-too-will-be-disasssembled))))) + (with-input-from-string (s disassembly) + (assert (equal "; disassembly for THIS-TOO-WILL-BE-DISASSSEMBLED" + (read-line s)))) + (let ((problems (get-output-stream-string oopses))) + (unless (zerop (length problems)) + (error problems))))) + +(defgeneric gf-dispatch-test/gf (x y) + (:method (x y) + (+ x y))) +(defun gf-dispatch-test/f (z) + (gf-dispatch-test/gf z)) + +(with-test (:name :gf-dispatch-backtrace) + ;; Fill the cache + (gf-dispatch-test/gf 1 1) + ;; Wrong argument count + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (gf-dispatch-test/f 42)) + '(((sb-pcl::gf-dispatch gf-dispatch-test/gf) 42))))) + +(with-test (:name (:xep-arglist-clean-up :bug-1192929)) + (assert + (block nil + (handler-bind ((error (lambda (e) + (declare (ignore e)) + (return (< (length (car (sb-debug:backtrace-as-list 1))) 10))))) + (funcall (compile nil `(lambda (i) (declare ((mod 65536) i)) i)) nil))))) + (write-line "/debug.impure.lisp done")